ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. Florida Carry, Inc., and Alexandria Lainez ("Plaintiffs") have sued University of North Florida

Similar documents
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, FIRST DISTRICT. DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE No. : CA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT. Appellant, v. Case No. 4D L.T. No.: MM000530A STATE OF FLORIDA,

IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1D L.T. Case No CA FLORIDA CARRY, INC. Plaintiff/Appellant,

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT. DALE NORMAN Appellant/ Defendant, CASE NO.: 4D LT: MM v.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

COpy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COU T\ STATE OF GEORGIA ORDER DENYING INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING CASE BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

HOUSE BILL No {As Amended by House Committee of the Whole} As Amended by House Committee

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING SCHOOL BOARD S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING WEST PALM BEACH S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division. Case No CIV-KING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

Supreme Court of Florida

Filing # E-Filed 07/18/ :32:58 PM

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Charles W. Dodson, Judge. May 25, 2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2014-CA DIVISION: J MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PLAINTIFFS JOINT MOTION TO VACATE AUTOMATIC STAY. Plaintiffs Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc., Sierra Club, Inc., St. Johns

John F. Dickinson and Margaret A. Philips of Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT

No. 1D Petition for Writ of Certiorari Original Jurisdiction. May 10, 2018

CASE NO.: DIVISION: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF. Plaintiffs, JOSEPH ANDREWS, CONNIE BENHAM, Dr. JUAN P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER, EMILY HALE S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

FINAL ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Safety and Motor Vehicles ( Department ) final order sustaining the suspension of his driver

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

1 SB By Senator Williams. 4 RFD: Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 05/12/2016.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ( Roanoke Division)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Lower Tribunal Case No: 1D

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

v. CASE NO.: 2007-CA O STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY WRIT NO.: AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent. /

AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC On Appeal from the First District Court of Appeal LT Case No. 1D AMEC CIVIL, LLC,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D Loren E. Levy and Ana C. Torres of The Levy Law Firm, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, ORDER APPOINTING EXPERTS FOR COMPETENCY EVALUATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

v. CASE NO.: 2007-CA-5882-O Writ No.: STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2014-CA DIVISION: J

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0838 EUGENIE TOBIN ELLIS D BRENT JR CHARLES E TONEY JR KYE LEWIS DADRIUS LANUS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY FLORIDA

1 SB By Senator Allen. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 01/18/2017. Page 0

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ARIZONA, et al., UNITED STATES,

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC JAMES APTHORP. Petitioner, vs. KEN DETZNER, as Secretary of State of Florida. Respondent.

v. CASE NO.: 2007-CA O Writ No.: STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES,

v TR A-O 2012-TR A-O

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC Fifth DCA Case No. 5D th Judicial Circuit Case No. 06-CA-1003 and 06-CA-8702

v. DCA CASE N,O: 2Q STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

Case No.: 2008-CA O

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT WAUKESHA COUNTY. Case Classification Declaratory Judgment. Complaint

Supreme Court of Florida

CASE NO. 1D Geddes D. Anderson, Jr. and Jonathan A. Huth of Murphy & Anderson, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

---" ~ ~----

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.

Case No. 5D DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. GEORGE ROSARIO Appellant,

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JORGE LUIS DOMINGUEZ, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS. By information, the state charged Gloster under

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04- LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 3D IN THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No CIV-HURLEY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JEFFREY E. LEWIS, et al., Appellants, LEON COUNTY, et al., Appellees

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF

PETITIONER, CHARLOTTE TAYLOR S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. Lower Tribunal Case No. 09-CA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SCO5-938 Lower Case No. 3D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

Supreme Court of Florida

THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court Case No CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

This cause having come on to be heard upon the above-referenced Motions seeking

FINAL ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Sherri Hamadeh-Gossweiler ( Petitioner ) timely filed this petition seeking certiorari

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 91,943. Discretionary Review From The Fifth District Court of Appeal

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 16-2011-CA-8012 DIVISION: CV-G FLORIDA CARRY, INC., and ALEXANDRIA LAINEZ, v. Plaintiffs, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA, and JOHN DELANEY, Defendants. / ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Injunction. Florida Carry, Inc., and Alexandria Lainez ("Plaintiffs") have sued University of North Florida ("UNF") and its President, John Delaney ("President Delaney") (collectively, "Defendants"), alleging violations of Section 790.33, Florida Statutes, which declares the Legislature's occupation of the field of firearms regulation. Ms. Lainez is a student at UNF and a member of Florida Carry, Inc., a firearms owner advocacy group. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated Section 790.33 by publishing a Student Handbook and a Student Code of Conduct that prohibit students from possessing firearms on campus without any exception for firearms in private conveyances. Defendants assert that Florida law expressly permits universities to regulate firearms on university property. Plaintiffs request a temporary injunction: a. Prohibiting the Defendants from enforcing, for the duration of this case, any rules or regulations presently existing or subsequently enacted, regarding the

possession of a weapon or firearm in a vehicle by any person otherwise lawfully entitled to possess a weapon or firearm in their private vehicle. b. Prohibiting the Defendants from punishing in any way, through prosecution or administrative or academic discipline, any student for otherwise lawful possession of a weapon or firearm in a private conveyance, if such conduct occurred while an injunction was in effect. "[A] preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which should be granted sparingly." Hadi v. Liberty Behavioral Health Corp., 927 So. 2d 34, 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). A petitioner seeking a temporary injunction must establish four elements: "a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; lack of an adequate remedy at law; irreparable harm absent the entry of an injunction; and that injunctive relief will serve the public interest." Liberty Counsel v. Fla. Bar Bd. of Governors, 12 So. 3d 183, 186 n.7 (Fla. 2009) (quoting Reform Party of Fla. v. Black, 885 So. 2d 303, 305 (Fla. 2004)). As set forth below, Plaintiffs have not established that they are substantially likely to succeed on the merits. Thus, the Court need not consider the other three elements required to obtain a temporary injunction. Section 790.33, upon which Plaintiffs rely, preempts local or administrative regulation of firearms "[e]xcept as expressly provided by the State Constitution or general law." Fla. Stat. 790.33(1) (2011). Section 790.251 generally forbids employers from prohibiting firearms storage in private conveyances, but expressly provides an exception for "any school property as defined and regulated under s. 790.115." Fla. Stat. 790.251(7)(a) (2011). Section 790.115 does not define "school property", but defines "school" as "any preschool, elementary school, middle school, junior high school, secondary school, career center, or postsecondary school, whether public or non-private." Fla. Stat. 790.115 (2011) (emphasis added). UNF is a postsecondary school. Thus, UNF's power to regulate the possession of firearms in private conveyances located on its property has been expressly provided by the Legislature. 2

Plaintiffs argue that Section 790.115 does not apply to UNF, because it refers to "school districts" and, according to Plaintiffs, UNF is not a "school district." Plaintiffs urge the Court to interpret school districts to mean public school districts, as defined in the Florida Constitution. See Fla. Const. Art IV, Section 9 (describing the role of school districts in Florida's public school system). Section 790.115 does not provide a definition of "school district", nor refer to the Florida Constitution. However, in the very next sentence after Section 790.115 mentions "school districts", the statute defines "school" to include schools from preschool through postsecondary "whether public or nonpublic." Fla. Stat. 790.115 (2011). Applying Plaintiffs' definition of "school district" to Section 790.115 would permit only public schools to regulate firearms on their property and frustrate the clearly expressed intent of the Legislature to cover all schools "whether public or private". See Blinn v. Fla. Dep't. of Transp., 781 So. 2d 1103, 1107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ("Where the literal language of the statute is in conflict with the stated legislative policy of the act, the court will not give the language its literal interpretation 'when to do so would lead to an unreasonable conclusion or defeat legislative intent or result in a manifest incongruity.'") To the extent that Section 790.251 is ambiguous, the legislative history bolsters the Court's conclusion that universities are covered by the "school property" exception. See Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So. 2d 360, 369 (Fla. 2005) ("[L]egislative history... is a basic and invaluable tool of statutory construction"). For example, when Senator Joyner had a question about the intent of this part of the bill, she understandably directed her specific question to the sponsor of the bill, and got the following answer: Senator Joyner: Thank you, Mr. President. Senator Peaden, the prohibitions list first school property and my question is, does school property include colleges, universities, law schools, community colleges and any other institutions of higher learning? 3

Mr. President: Senator Peaden. Senator Peaden: (Unintelligible). It is my understanding that the definition in the statute of schools all of these are covered for this particular bill. Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles: Second Reading and Debate on SB 1130, at 1:56:02-1:56:34 P.M. (Fla. Apr. 3, 2008) (emphasis added). Further: Senator Deutch: Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, just for purposes of clarification, and members of the Senate, school as it is defined in Section 790.115 means any preschool, elementary school, middle school, junior high school, secondary school, career center, or postsecondary school, whether public or non public. Under the bill as drafted, all of those schools are exempt from this statute. Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles: Second Reading and Debate on SB 1130, at 2:00:11-2:00:45 PM (Fla. Apr. 3, 2008) (emphasis added). And, finally: Senator Deutch: Thank you Mr. President. For the record the statute that Senator Peaden refers to clearly does not include preschools, child care centers are not included in the definition of schools so members if you vote against this amendment, you'll be making the decision to protect the kids in our K-12 and universities while choosing to put the safety of our kids in our preschools those are perhaps the most vulnerable kids that we drop off in the morning and pick up after work putting in jeopardy the safety of those kids. Please understand that as we vote on this amendment. Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles: Second Reading and Debate on SB 1130, at 1:44:22-1:44:50 P.M. (Fla. Apr. 3, 2008) (emphasis added). Section 790.251's legislative history clearly demonstrates that the Legislature's intended to permit universities such as UNF to regulate firearms storage in private conveyances located on their property. The Court must interpret Section 790.251 to accomplish, rather than defeat, the Legislature's purpose. See Dennis v. State, 51 So. 3d 456, 461 (Fla. 2010). 4

For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Injunction is Denied. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, FL, this day of March, 2012. Copies to: Eric J. Friday, Esq. Fletcher & Phillips 541 East Monroe Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, FL 32202 George E. Schulz, Jr., Esq. Holland & Knight 50 North Laura Street, Suite 3900 Jacksonville, FL 32202 _s/lawrence P. Haddock LAWRENCE P. HADDOCK Circuit Court Judge 5