INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS 1

Similar documents
Case 1:10-cv AT-HBP Document 375 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 37. May 8, 2017

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

Approved by Monitor, 11/20/15 INTERIOR PATROL

Approved by Monitor, 5/15/17 INTERIOR PATROL

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

Mock Examination - Working as a Security Officer

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS REFERENCE GUIDE

Know Your. Help End Discriminatory, Abusive & Illegal Policing!

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016 ANTONIO JOHNSON STATE OF MARYLAND

ESSAY QUESTION NO. 4. Answer this question in booklet No. 4

Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence

WHEN DOES AN ANONYMOUS TIP PROVIDE REASONABLE SUSPICION FOR A STOP AND FRISK? An Analysis of Recent Cases on Anonymous Tips

LAWS OF ARREST. Unit th Amendment

FINAL EXAMINATION DIRECTIONS: Write your answers on the ANSWER SHEET provided.

SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS FRISK OF DRINKING SUSPECT IN HIGH CRIME AREA

JUSTIFICATION FOR STOPS AND ARRESTS

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010

When used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meanings designated:

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF D.F. NO CA-0547 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

Introduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam

Case 1:10-cv SAS-HBP Document Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 19 REVISED EXHIBIT E

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Subject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

NYSBA NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. SECTION CHAIR HON. MARK DWYER Supreme Court Kings County, NY

DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

East Haven Police Department

No. 103,472 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BILLY WHITE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 TIMOTHY LEE MERCER STATE OF MARYLAND

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

People v. Ross, No st District, October 17, 2000

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2018

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.28

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,799 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr EAK-MAP-1.

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution

Arrest, Search, and Seizure

2016 PA Super 91. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: April 28, Anthony Stilo appeals from the July 23, 2014, judgment of sentence

OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MD

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

TYSON KENNETH CURLEY OPINION BY v. Record No ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN July 26, 2018 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

1 of 5 9/16/2014 2:02 PM

Virginia Beach Police Department General Order Chapter 8 - Criminal Investigations

Supreme Court of Florida

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811

identified in a commercial B & E

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES (Eyewitness Identification) MODEL POLICY GENERAL ORDER

Marquette University Police Department

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /3/2013 5/5/2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Leicestershire Constabulary Counter Allegations Procedure

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Chief of Police

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 14, 2001

SHOPLIFTING Detention and Use of Force

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.7 DOMESTIC MATTERS

Forensic Science. search

DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

5 Officer Schenk also testified that, after he brought Heaven to the office, the loss prevention officer immediately returned to Heaven s shopping

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

STATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Searches Without a Warrant

Maryland-National Capital Park Police Prince George s County Division DIVISION DIRECTIVE DISTRIBUTION EFFECTIVE DATE

This policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed by members when making an arrest.

DEFINITIONS. Accuse To bring a formal charge against a person, to the effect that he is guilty of a crime or punishable offense.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PA O P I N I O N. The Defendant is charged in a criminal Information with Possession of

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Identification Procedures

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

This is a guide to the way that stop and search will be done by the police in Haringey.

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016

5. Pursuit... 2:25 6. High Speed Chases... 2:26 III. IDENTIFICATIONS... 3:1 A. In-Person Identifications... 3:1 1. Right to Have Counsel Present...

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. Nos. 00-CF-65 & 00-CF-893 TYRONE TRICE, APPELLANT, UNITED STATES,

r f L Cuyahoga county, ohio CRIMINAL DIVISION ZOlb OCT 20 A 15

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : v. : No EDA 2016 : NAIM NEWSOME :

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Term 3 Types of Encounters between PO's and Citizens? Definition 1.) Voluntary 2.) Temporary Detention 3.) Arrest

Tanko v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 32418(U) September 24, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Alexander M.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant.

Transcription:

Case 1:08-cv-01034-AT Document 571-3 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 79 Attachment 3

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS 1

Learning Objectives: Understand the different levels of Investigative Encounters and the tools you have at each level Understand the documentation responsibilities, including how to prepare a good Stop Report Understand what is expected during the supervisory debriefs that follow stops Understand the proper procedures for interior patrols in TAP and NYCHA buildings Understand the appropriate and inappropriate use of race in conducting Investigative Encounters 2

3

4

5

Precision Policing: Stop Outcomes 6

7

D Protect Protect and Serve Decline to Prosecute and Serve 8

Patrol Guide Procedure 212-11 The Placeholder for page 1 of new PG 212-11 image of paperwork law is not new 9

The law in the PG 212-11 isn t new, but THIS is: Minor or inadvertent mistakes in documentation or isolated cases of erroneous but good-faith stops or frisks by members of the service should ordinarily be addressed through instruction and training. In most instances, instruction and training should be accomplished at the command level. The application of the law in this area can be complicated, and investigative encounters are fluid situations in which one event or observation can alter the level of suspicion or danger. A single erroneous judgment will not generally warrant referral to the Legal Bureau for retraining. However, members of the service who evince a lack of comprehension of the core concepts of the law governing this procedure should be referred to the Legal Bureau. 10

11

12

13

14

Level 1 Request for Information Objective Credible Reason 15

16

Level 1 Tools Non-accusatory Questions Protective Measures? 17

Protective Measures at Level 1? Example: a male passes by two other men and continues to stare at them with a menacing, angry expression. You approach and ask him if there is a problem with those men. The male glares at you and begins to reach for his back pants pocket. The use of the tool depends on a reasonable concern that your safety may be in jeopardy. 18

At Level 1, you CAN T: Ask pointed or accusatory questions Seek consent to search Detain the person, block his path or use or threaten to use force Direct the person to stop 19

At Level 1... Does the person have to stay and answer questions? 20

21

I m in pursuit on suspicion of.? 22

False or Inconsistent Answers can the Encounter 23

24

25

Back to our Quiz: If you have an objective credible reason to approach someone and request information, then you are permitted to ask the person pointed questions. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 26

Back to our Quiz: If you have an objective credible reason to approach someone and request information, then you are permitted to ask the person pointed questions. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 27

Level 2 Common Law Right Of Inquiry Founded Suspicion 28

29

30

31

Level 1 Questions v. Level 2 Questions Can I talk to you for a second? Name, address, destination, reason for being in the area? Did you see anything? Did you hear shots? What s going on? Do you have any weapons? Do you have anything you shouldn t have? What s in the bag? 32

CONSENT to SEARCH 33

Consent to Search - PG 212-11 Can I search your bag? I can only search your bag if you consent, do you understand? 34

35

36

37

38

Protective Measures 39

Protective Measures What you can say: Show me your hands Put that down Take your hands out of your pockets Raise your hands What you can do: You can forcibly remove the person s hands from their pockets, if they refuse to show them You can grab the person s hands, if they reach for their pocket or waistband 40

41

Corroborating an ANONYMOUS CALLER BEFORE YOU GET TO THE SCENE Call ANI ALI Get a NAME 42

If you can t get a name: Did caller JUST EYEWITNESS CRIMINALITY? Get caller s basis for knowing about the crime Does the ORIGINAL JOB convey sufficient details of observed criminality and a basis of knowledge? 43

Corroborating an ANONYMOUS CALLER WHEN YOU GET TO THE SCENE Observations that corroborate alleged criminality 44

At Level 2 Ask pointed or accusatory questions Seek consent to search Detain the person or use or threaten to use force Direct the person to stop 45

At Level 2, does the person have to: Answer your questions? Produce ID? Consent to a search? Can he walk away? Does his refusal to consent or answer questions elevate the encounter? 46

Back to our Quiz: Founded suspicion is not enough to seek consent to search. In order to seek consent to search, you need at least reasonable suspicion. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 47

Back to our Quiz: Founded suspicion is not enough to seek consent to search. In order to seek consent to search, you need at least reasonable suspicion. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 48

49

Level 3 The Terry Stop Reasonable Suspicion 50

51

Coming together? 52

Behavior Intelligence about the area high crime area Description Race, Age, Gender + Location Time Pattern Furtive movements Flight And more? 53

HE MATCHED THE DESCRIPTION Race should not play any part in a decision to approach or take action unless race is part of a sufficient suspect description. 54

How you talk to people One of your most powerful tools 55

56

and FRISK 57

Operator: What s your emergency? Store Manager Lisa Jenkins: We need the police - this couple was just in our store they were here last week and ran up about $2500 on stolen credit cards my security guard spotted them just now and was about to approach them they ran out of the store, we re on 14 th street they ran down University. It s a young man and woman in their 20 s. He is white, has brown hair, ponytail... 58

I frisked for my safety because I believed the suspect was armed and dangerous 59

Handcuffs during a Level 3 Stop? h If questioning continues: Mirandize 60

61

62

What s a FRISK? What s a SEARCH? 63

Remember There is no requirement that you be absolutely certain the suspect is armed. Reasonable suspicion deals with probabilities and not hard certainties just be able to explain your reason based on clear facts. 64

Back to our Quiz: If you have reasonable suspicion that a person just committed a Grand Larceny, you can frisk the person. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 65

Back to our Quiz: If you have reasonable suspicion that a person just committed a Grand Larceny, you can frisk the person. T R U E FAL S E IT DEP EN DS IHAVEN O IDEA 66

TAP and NYCHA Interior Patrols 67

There s no 4 th Amendment Exception The law applies to NYCHA and TAP Mere presence an Objective Credible Reason 68

FOR TAP VERTICALS, CONFIRM CURRENT OWNERS AFFIDAVIT (SIGNED WITHIN PAST 6 MONTHS) 75-I ARE NO TRESPASSING SIGNS PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED? 69

70

PG 212-60: Even if there is probable cause to arrest a person for trespassing, officers may exercise their discretion to refrain from arresting that person, and instead instruct that person to leave under appropriate circumstances. 71

72

What about Level 4? Probable Cause to Arrest 73

Asummons is a Level 4 encounter. Can you frisk someone you are going to summons? 74

75

Real Cases... 76

Contact Us Risk Management Bureau 1 Police Plaza, Room 1408 646-610-7900 Legal Bureau, Criminal Section 1 Police Plaza, Room 1406 646-610-5400 Compliance Division 253 Broadway, 6 th Floor 212-618-3100 77

SURVEY MONKEY 78