ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

Similar documents
TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California. Law & Order Code TITLE 3 TORTS. [Last Amended 10/1/04. Current Through 2/3/09.]

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

THE POLITICS OF CIVIL LIBERTIES

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Particular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

Business Law Tort Law Unit Textbook

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

Chapter 6 Torts Byron Lilly De Anza College Byron Lilly De Anza College

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92

DEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

Contract and Tort Law for Engineers

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Negligent In Your Legal Knowledge?

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Answer A to Question Statements of Opinion May Be Actionable in a Defamation Action

DEFAMATION INSTRUCTIONS Introduction

TORTS SPECIFIC TORTS NEGLIGENCE

Legal Liability in Adventure Tourism

Chapter List. Real Estate Broker, Escrow Agent and Notary Liability

IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

)(

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

Professor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

POLICY HARASSMENT/ DISCRIMINATION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Legal and Ethical Considerations (Chapter 3- Mosby s Dental Hygiene)

Courthouse News Service

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

Fair Housing Sexual Harassment

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Assault and Battery Common Law

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

COMANCHE NATION TRIBAL COURT DISTRICT COURT

Ross: Civil Liability in Criminal Justice, 6th Edition

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Tort Liability. July 11, Call in number: Pass Code: #

LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY

Civil Liberties & the First Amendment CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/30/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Reality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Chapter 13

4. What is private law? 3. What are laws? 1. Review all terms in chapters: 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, What is the purpose of Law?

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

TORT LAW. Third Edition. Lewis N. Klar, Q.C. B.A., B.C.L., LL.M. Professor of Law University of Alberta THOMSON - ^ CARSWELL

Strict Liability Versus Negligence: An Economic Analysis of the Law of Libel

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name

Robert I, Duke of Normandy. 22 June July 1035

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. Plaintiff CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, by and through his attorneys, hereby states

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2009 December 12, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

Business Law Fundamentals Exam #1 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

July 2002 Bar Examination Sample Answers

KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II

LAWS1100 Final Exam Notes

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR ERWIN CHEMERINSKY. Copyright 2017 by BARBRI, Inc.

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

CAUSE NO. DEFENDANTS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION I. SUMMARY AND KEY FACTS

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

Checklist of Points to be Covered for Complete Answers FSM Bar Examination, August 5, 2004

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Transcription:

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT

II. Torts 1. A tort is a private or civil wrong or injury for which the law will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. 3. Differs from criminal actions. a. Civil actions are brought by individuals; criminal prosecutions by the state. b. The goal of civil actions is to compensate the injured; criminal prosecutions protect the public.

a. Common Law Torts: (1) Negligence. Conduct which falls below a standard the law establishes for the protection ti of others against unreasonable risk of harm. (2) Intentional Torts. Actor intends a particular consequence as a result of his actions.

B. Negligence (page 3) 1. Elements: A. Duty B. Breach C. Proximate Cause D. Damages

a. Duty Legal obligation to conform to an applicable standard of care established for the protection of others against unreasonable risks of harm. (1) The general duty of care requires every person to act as a reasonably careful person would under the same or similar circumstances.

b. Breach (page 4) (1) For children, the standard of care is what is reasonably expected of a child of like age, intelligence and experience. (2) For a teacher, officer or employee the standard of care is generally that which a reasonable person in that position would exercise under like circumstances.

c. Proximate Cause (1) An actor s negligence is the legal cause of harm to another if: (a) his/he conduct is a substantial ti factor in bringing i about the harm and (b) there is not a rule of law relieving the actor from liability because of the manner in which his/her negligence gg resulted in harm.

d. Injury (or damages) Property damage repair/replace loss of value lost use

d. Injury (or damages) Personal injury Past medical expenses Future medical expenses Loss of wages/earnings Loss of future earning capacity Loss of full mind and body past Loss of full mind and body future Physical and mental pain and suffering past Physical and mental pain and suffering - future

d. Injury (or damages) Death Present worth of value of estate Burial expenses Spousal support Children support

d. Injury (or damages) Consortium Spouse Children

2. Defenses (page 5) a. Comparative Fault Act (1) Generally, those parties in the suit are attributed a percentage of fault by the court, in accordance with the findings of the court or jury. (2) Plaintiff is not barred from recovery unless his/her fault is over 50 percent. If Plaintiff s fault is 50 percent or less, he recovers his/her damages proportionately reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to him/her.

b. Sovereign Immunity & Iowa s Municipal Tort Claims Act (Chapter 670) (page 6) (1) Sovereign immunity is the concept that the government can t be sued without its permission or The King Can Do No Wrong. (3) A school district is liable for the torts of its officers, agents and employees acting within the scope of their employment or duties. (4) Employees generally include persons providing services for the district even if not compensated.

(5) The School Board shall defend its officers and employees and hold them harmless and indemnify them against any tort claim or demand occurring within the scope of their employment or duties.

c. Release (2) In the tort context, releases are generally written contracts absolving a party of liability for injuries including injuries caused by that party s negligence.

C. Intentional Torts (page 8) 1. b. Liability imposed when a person intends his/her act even if there was no intent to injury the person; the intended act even may have been a practical joke.

2. Examples of intentional a. Assault. torts (page 8): (1) An assault exists when one intentionally puts another in immediate apprehension of harmful or offensive physical contact. b. Battery. (1) A battery consist of contact with the person of the plaintiff, or something attached to him/ her, which is harmful or offensive measured by the standards of a person of ordinary sensibilities.

c. Infliction of mental or emotional distress (page 9) (1) (a) Outrageous conduct by the defendant; (b) Defendant s intent to cause or reckless disregard of the probability of mental distress; (page 10) (c) Severe emotional harm; and (d) A causal relationship between the defendant s conduct and the mental distress.

3. Defenses to intentional torts (page 11) a. Consent. b. Self-Defense. c. Defense of others. d. Defense of property.

E. Some specific torts (page 12) 1. Educational Malpractice. 3. Defamation. a. Types: (1) Libel written (2) Slander oral

b. Elements: (1) Declaratory statement (not an opinion); (2) Published or communicated to someone other than the defamed person; (3) False-Malice, knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth must be proven in some cases; and (4) A resulting injury in some cases must be specifically proven.

c. Defenses: (1) Truth. (2) Privilege. (3) May mitigate damages. (4) May limit damages to actual damages by retraction.

4. Negligent Supervision (page 14) a) Duty b) Breach c) Proximate Cause d) Damages

5. b. Peer sexual harassment (page 15) (1) Plaintiff is a member of a protected group; (2) Plaintiff was subject to unwelcome sexual harassment; (3) The harassment was based on sex. (4) The harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter the conditions of the Plaintiff s education and create an abusive educational environment; and (5) Some basis for institutional liability has been established. If the school knew or should have known of the harassment in question and failed to take prompt remedial action, the fifth element could be met.

6. Other Civil Rights Torts a. The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983, prohibits any state actor from causing the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the constitution i and laws. b. Relief may be by (1) injunction or (2) money damages. c. When execution of a government s policy or custom, whether made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy, inflicts the injury that the government as an entity is responsible under Section 1983.

f. Discipline and due process (page 16) (1) The premise of due process is to insure: (a) Fundamental fairness; and (b) Notice and opportunity to be heard.

(6) Substantive and procedural due process. (7) Rules must not be vague and must be publicized to give students/parents notice. (6) Rules must be fundamentally fair in their application.

Procedural Due Process (1) Notice (2) Opportunity to be heard The more that is at stake the more process is due.

f. (13) Student Searches Iowa Code Chapter 808A (a) i) Search rules must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which gave rise to the need for the search. ii) Search rules must be based upon consideration of relevant factors, including the following: a) Nature of the violations for which the search is being instituted; b) Age and gender of the student; c) Objectives to be accomplished by the search.

(d) A search may not be done if it is unreasonable in application as measured by the following, pursuant to Iowa Code 808A.3: (i) (ii) Age of the student; Non-seriousness of the violation; (iii) Sex of the student; and (iv) Nature of the suspected violation.

(e)prohibited searches include the following, pursuant to Iowa Code 808A.2(3): (i) Strip searches; (ii) () Body cavity searches; (iii) (iv) Searches of a student s body using a drug sniffing animal; and Search of a student by a school official not of the same sex as the student.

g. Violations of Freedom of Speech (page 23) (6) Iowa Code 280.2222 (2001) explicitly i l provides for students rights to exercise freedom of speech, including free expression in official school publications. However, it prohibits student expressions, publication, or distribution of: (a) Obscene material; (b) Defamatory materials; (c) Materials which encourage students to: (i) Commit unlawful acts. (ii) Violate lawful school regulations. (iii) Cause the material and substantial disruption of the orderly operation of the school.

h. Religious Freedoms: Free Exercise v. Establishment t (page 26) (1) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. (2) A natural tension exists between the two clauses. If you go too far in protecting against violating one clause, you risk violating the other clause or other First Amendment rights.

(3) Exercise Clause If a law/regulation l interferes with the ability of the student to follow a sincerely held belief, a court would balance the factors to determine whether the government should grant the person an exemption. The balance test evaluates: (a) The gravity of the student s s interests. (b) The strength of the state interest - i.e., whether it is a compelling interest. (c) Alternative means available.

(4) Establishment Clause -- the Lemon Test (page 27) (a) the law/rule must have a legitimate secular purpose (it need not be the only purpose); (b) its primary effect must neither promote nor inhibit religion; and (c) the statue/rule must not facilitate an excessive governmental entanglement with religion.

(page 31) i. Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 U.S.C. 794, prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap for programs or activities receiving federal funding assistance. j. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.

F. Miscellaneous (page 32) 4. Workers Compensation Act

III. Practical Suggestions (page 36) A. Identify Risks B. Board Policies C. Claims Management D. Records E. Risk Management Audit F. Insure