Attorney for Defendant LAGUNA WHOLESALE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Date: Time: Dept: C53

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Information or instructions: Plea in abatement motion & Order to quash service Alternate Form

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DOCKET NO.: HEARING DATE : SIR: at nine o clock in the forenoon or as

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 3:11-cv County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

Information & Instructions: Seizure of debtor's property prior to judgment

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER]

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case Document 735 Filed in TXSB on 05/28/18 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MARIN. ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND ) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE NON DUI. Self Help Center Loca ons:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Chapter 6 MOTIONS. 6.1 Vocabulary Introduction Regular Motions 7

6 Mofty Shulman (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)

Case 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Information or instructions: Motion Order Affidavit for substituted service package PREVIEW

Superior Court of California

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONE

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

OPINION. the Court on Defendant Danette I. Greiner's preliminary objections to Plaintiff's Second

RULE 3. [Reserved] CHAPTER III. PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

ALMALEE HENDERSON, JUDITH WEHLAU, CHARLES TUGGLE, KATHERINE MILES, NANCY EPANCHIN, RAYMOND DIRODIS, RITA ZWERDLING, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,

1 of 1 DOCUMENT. *** This document is current through the 2016 Supplement *** (All 2015 legislation)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv AJN Document 176 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

$ Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and 9 PG&E CORPORATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

3 Chief, Tax Division

GREENUP v. RODMAN Supreme Court of California, Cal.3d 822, 231 Cal.Rptr. 220, 726 P.2d 1295.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:14-mc JD Document1 Filed10/30/14 Page1 of 13

AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER IN INSURANCE CASE

Dated: Louise Lawyer Attorney for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA EVICTION DEFENSE: PROTECTING LOW-INCOME TENANTS 2017

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE LAMOREAUX JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06-cv JGG

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

DEPARTMENT C26 GUIDELINES HONORABLE GREGORY H. LEWIS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

RateMyHorsePRO.com I',40V 17:14* P Clerk of the Superior Court NOV

Auto accident Motion for Summary Judgment complete package

Case 5:10-cv C Document 1 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

Case 8:14-cr JLS Document 222 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:3854

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER, EMILY HALE S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

Location (address): 1138 Howard Street, San Francisco CA (877)

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF MACOMB. In re CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, Case No AS Hon.

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

District Court, S. D. New York. April 28, 1880.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 David V. Jafari, SBN: 01 JAFARI LAW GROUP, INC. Vantis Drive, Suite 0 Aliso Viejo, California, Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -01 djafari@jafarilawgroup.com Attorney for Defendant LAGUNA WHOLESALE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 00 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 01 MARTELLATO USA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION vs. Plaintiff, LAGUNA WHOLESALE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 TO 0, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 0-01-00 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO: JUDICIAL OFFICER GEOFFREY T. GLASS DEPARTMENT C- DEFENDANT LAGUNA WHOLESALE S NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF MARTELLATO USA; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES Hearing Date: October, 01 Hearing Time: 1:0 p.m. Department: C- Judge: Geoffrey T. Glass Complaint Filed: April, 01 Trial Date: None set TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October, 01 at 1:0 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be hear in Department C- of the above-entitled court located at 00 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana, California 01, defendant, LAGUNA WHOLESALE (hereafter Laguna, will and hereby does move the court for an order striking the following portions of the Complaint of plaintiff 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 MATELLATO USA s (hereafter Martellato, filed on April, 01, pursuant to C.C.P. and C.C.P.. 1. The following language at page, paragraph c: attorney s fees according to proof.. The following language at page, paragraph BC-: Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees by an agreement or a statue according to proof.. The following language at page, paragraph CC-: Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees by an agreement or a statue according to proof.. Paragraph (b on page of the complaint and the document entitled ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT with page number and. This motion is based upon this notice, upon the attached Memorandum of Points and Authorities; upon the records and files in this action; and upon such further evidence and argument as may be presented prior to or at the time of hearing on the motion. 1 Dated: August 1, 01 JAFARI LAW GROUP, INC. DAVID JAFARI Attorney for defendant Laguna Wholesale

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES I. INTRODUCTION This is a business collection case. On April, 01, plaintiff MARTELLATO USA (hereafter Martellato filed a civil action against defendant, LAGUNA WHOLESALE (hereafter Laguna, demanding $,.0 in damages plus interest, costs, and attorney fees. The complaint alleges two causes of action: 1 Breach of Contract, and Common Counts. Plaintiff s first cause of action alleges breach of a written contract. It states the contract was entered into between /1/1 and 1//1. It then alleges Defendant purchased from Plaintiff, products pursuant to purchase orders and invoices, and promised to pay for all products. Attached as exhibit (a is a true and correct copy of a statement of account reflecting all the amounts due. It fails to allege any provision regarding attorney fees to a party in the event of a dispute. Attached to the complaint as Exhibit A is a single sheet entitled Customer Open Balance which lists invoices with date, due date, open balance and amount. The top left corner of Exhibit A has a date and time stamp, which seems to be the date Exhibit A was created. Exhibit A does not provide any provision regarding attorney fees to a party in the event of a dispute. Plaintiff s second cause of action for common counts alleges a count for open book account for money due. Concurrently with this motion, defendant has filed a demurrer to the open book account count because it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Paragraph (b of the complaint alleges (b: See attachment to complaint - Alter Ego Allegations. Attached to the complaint as pages and is a document on pleading paper entitled ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT. Said document includes conclusory allegations of alter ego liability, such as (b Said alter ego defendants treated the defendant's assets as their own. As explained below, the court should strike paragraph (b and the document entitled ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT attached to the complaint because it contains conclusory allegations of fact and law that are irrelevant and improper matter in a complaint. Further, the Court should strike the other referenced paragraph regarding recovery of attorney fees because plaintiff has not

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 shown it is entitled to recover attorney fees, therefore such requests are irrelevant and improper matter that should also be struck from the complaint. ARGUMENT II. THE COURT IS AUTHORIZED TO STRIKE ALL OR PART OF A PLEADING "Any party, within the time allowed to respond to a pleading may serve and file a notice of motion to strike the whole or any part thereof, but this time limitation shall not apply to motions specified in subdivision (e [motions to strike after failure to amend following judgment on the pleadings]." C.C.P. (b(1. "The court may, upon a motion made pursuant to Section, or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: (a Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading. (b Strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." C.C.P.. Where pleadings are defective, "the defect may be raised by a demurrer or motion to strike or by motion for judgment on the pleadings." Coyne v. Krempels, Cal. d, P.d (0. III. GROUNDS EXIST FOR AN ORDER STRIKING PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT "A notice of motion to strike a portion of a pleading must quote in full the portions sought to be stricken except where the motion is to strike an entire paragraph, cause of action, count or defense. Specifications in a notice must be numbered consecutively." Cal. Rules of Court, rule.1(a. As set forth in the Notice herewith, Defendants seek an order striking the following matters from plaintiff's complaint: 1. The following language at page, paragraph c: attorney s fees according to proof.. The following language at page, paragraph BC-: Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees by an agreement or a statue according to proof,

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1. The following language at page, paragraph CC-: Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees by an agreement or a statue according to proof. Grounds: The matter is irrelevant because the damages sought by Plaintiff are not supported by the cause of actions pleaded and Plaintiff has otherwise failed to plead fact showing Plaintiff that it is entitled to attorney fees. Attorney fees are only recoverable when authorized by contract, statute or law. (CCP.(a((A,(B & (C. The First cause of action is for breach of written contract and Plaintiff has failed to allege that the written agreement between the parties provided for attorney fees. Nor does the statement that Plaintiff attaches as Exhibit A provides for recovery of attorney fees. The Second cause of action for account stated fails to provide that an agreement between the parties provides for attorney fees. Plaintiff s only basis for a limited recovery of attorney fees would be its claim for book account. However, concurrently with this motion and set for the hearing at the same date, defendant has filed a demurrer to the open book account count because it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. If defendant s demurrer is sustained without leave to amend as to the book account claim, plaintiff s prayer for attorney fees fails as well. For the foregoing reasons, the court should struck plaintiff allegations regarding attorney fees set forth above.. Paragraph (b on page of the complaint and the document entitled ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT as page number and. The allegations in ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT are conclusory allegations regarding alter ego liability without any specific facts. Such allegations are conclusions of the pleader and thus are irrelevant matter, subject to a motion to strike. Accordingly, the court should strike Paragraph (b on page of the complaint and the document entitled ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT as page number and. IV. CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing facts and authorities, Defendants respectfully request that the court issue an order striking those portions of the pleading as specified in this noticed motion. Dated: August 1, 01 JAFARI LAW GROUP, INC.

DAVID JAFARI Attorney for defendant Laguna Wholesale 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1