STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT AMENDMENTS TO THE MAINE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Effective: January 14, 2011

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials

STATE OF VERMONT VERMONT SUPREME COURT TERM, Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 16.2 and 26 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

Foreclosure Litigation Overview

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

Civil Litigation Forms Library

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

Foreclosure Actions Based on Breach of Contract

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing real property. (BDR 3-855)

2010 AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Abbott Marie Jones

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PROCEEDINGS TO REDUCE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE REDEMPTION PERIOD TO FIVE WEEKS. For Property in Hennepin County Foreclosed by Advertisement

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)

Discovery and Rules of Evidence in Eminent Domain

REVISED SCHEDULE OF CHARGES, COSTS AND FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS UNDER COURTS ARTICLE, Effective May 17, 2018

2010 FEDERAL RULE AMENDMENTS REGARDING EXPERT WITNESSES

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 26, 2016

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Pursuant to Arizona Supreme Court Rule 28, John D. Wintersteen respectfully

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

Beneficial Homeowner Serv. Corp. v Gastaldo 2013 NY Slip Op 33027(U) December 3, 2013 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /10 Judge:

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court:

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

CHAPTER House Bill No. 617

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, : Case No. 16 CV 137. v.

Be sure to look up definitions present at the beginning for both sections. RULES OF PROCEDURE IN TRAFFIC CASES AND BOATING CASES

Telephone: Facsimile: NOTICE OF RULE 120 MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING SALE RESPONSE DEADLINE November 16, 2018

FORECLOSURE FAQ WHERE IS A FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED?

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/13/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/13/2016

I. Mortgaging of Trust or Restricted Land

CASE NO. 1D Daniel W. Hartman of Hartman Law Firm, P.A.; Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law & Consulting, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IN A NUTSHELL

Credit Suisse Financial Corporation, Plaintiff, against

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961 (EXCERPT) Act 236 of 1961 CHAPTER 57 SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF PREMISES

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v Douglin 2013 NY Slip Op 31398(U) June 28, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 18002/2010 Judge: Sidney F.

The Rules Have Changed By Elliott Andalman, Esquire

Pennsylvania Code Rules Rule and

TITLE 25. RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE AND EVICTION LAW CHAPTER 1. SHORT TITLE, FINDINGS, AND PURPOSE

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26

VERMONT SUPREME COURT Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure 2009 Annual Report November 25, 2009

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

KEVIN WILK et al. [ 1] Kevin Wilk appeals from a judgment of foreclosure entered in the

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

PORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq.

ST.A T:: o r:- MArN. Cumber, 6 -~.., E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office. JUL 1,.a RE Cc. /VEO

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS.

Supreme Court of Florida

(129th General Assembly) (Amended Substitute House Bill Number 383) AN ACT

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v Jacob 2016 NY Slip Op 32095(U) September 6, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 20755/2013 Judge: Robert J.

Policies and Procedures for Circuit Civil Division 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

Transcription:

STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT AMENDMENTS TO THE MAINE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Effective: January 14, 2011 2011 Me. Rules 01 All of the Justices concurring therein, the following amendments to the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure are adopted to be effective on the date indicated above. The specific amendments are stated below. To aid in understanding of the amendments, an Advisory Note appears after the text of each amendment. The Advisory Note states the reason for recommending the amendment, but the Advisory Note is not part of the amendment adopted by the Court. 1. Rule 26(b)(4) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure is amended to read as follows: (4) Trial Preparation: Experts. Discovery of facts known and opinions held by experts, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of subdivision (b)(1) of this rule and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained only as follows: (A)(i) A party may through interrogatories require any other party to identify each person whom the other party expects to call as an expert witness at trial, to state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, to state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion, and to identify the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions, any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions, the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications authored by the witness within the preceding ten years, and the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony, provided however, that, unless otherwise ordered by the court, information relating to qualifications, publications and compensation need not be provided for experts who have been treating physicians of a party for any injury that is a subject of the litigation; (ii) Upon motion, the court may order further discovery by other means, subject to such restrictions as to scope and such provisions, pursuant to subdivision (b)(4)(c) of this rule, concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem

appropriate. A party may take the testimony of each person whom another party has designated as an expert witness for trial by deposition pursuant to Rule 30 or Rule 31. (B) A party may discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of litigation or preparation for trial and who is not expected to be called as a witness at trial, only as provided in Rule 35(b) or upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means. (C) Unless manifest injustice would result, (i) the court shall require that the party seeking discovery of the expert pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery under subdivisions (b)(4)(a)(ii) and (b)(4)(b) of this rule; and (ii) with respect to discovery obtained under subdivision (b)(4)(a)(ii) of this rule the court may require, and with respect to discovery obtained under subdivision (b)(4)(b) of this rule the court shall require, the party seeking discovery to pay the other party a fair portion of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert. at the deposition. Upon a showing of good cause, the court may award additional reasonable fees and expenses of the expert for expert discovery pursuant to this rule. Advisory Committee Notes December 2010 Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(ii) has been modified to allow the deposition of a party s retained expert as a matter of course, rather than on motion, consistent with common discovery practice in civil cases. This is also consistent with practice in Federal Court. Rule 26(b)(4)(C) is amended to state more clearly the responsibility of a party seeking discovery to pay the expert s reasonable fee for time spent in a deposition. The amendment clarifies that the time for which compensation is to be paid is the time at the deposition. The Rule continues to allow parties to move the court for additional expert fees or expenses, if appropriate, upon a showing of good cause. 2

2. Rule 66 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, when it references appeals, is amended (i) at subdivisions (b)(5) and (c)(5) to strike the references to the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure and replace those references with references to the Maine Rules of Appellate Procedure; and (ii) at subdivision (d)(2)(g) to strike the reference to the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure and replace that reference with a reference to the Maine Rules of Appellate Procedure. Advisory Committee Note December 2010 The amendment of the provisions of Rule 66(b)(5), (c)(5), and (d)(2)(g), relating to appeals, substitutes references to the Maine Rules of Appellate Procedure for the previous references to the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure or the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 3. Rule 93, subdivisions (a) and (c), of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure are amended to read as follows: RULE 93. FORECLOSURE DIVERSION PROGRAM This Rule shall govern operation of the Foreclosure Diversion Program. (a) Definitions. As used in this Rule, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) Commercial loan means a loan made to a borrower in which the proceeds of the loan are not used, in whole or in part, for personal, family or household purposes, and/or are not used to refinance a loan made in whole or in part for personal, family or household purposes. (2) Foreclosure action means any civil action initiated pursuant to title 14, chapter 713 of the Maine Revised Statutes (14 M.R.S. 6101-6325) to foreclose on a property subject to a mortgage or other note or bond secured by that property, other than a State mortgage pursuant to 14 M.R.S. 6151-6153. (3) Owner-occupant means an individual who is the mortgagor of a residential property that is that individual s primary residence. The term may include: (A) two or more individuals who are joint mortgagors of that residential property., and (B) a mortgagor of a residential property who resided at that

property as that individual s primary residence within 180 days prior to commencement of the foreclosure action and has not established primary residence at another property subject to a mortgage with that individual as the mortgagor. (4) Primary residence means a residential property that is an individual s principal place of abode. (5) Residential property means a single residential real property including: (A) not more than four residential units owned by the mortgagor, or (B) a single condominium unit owned by the mortgagor within a larger residential condominium property. ************ 4 (c) Foreclosure Diversion Program Participation Requirements. (1) Answers: Request for Mediation. Within 20 days after being served with a summons and complaint each defendant shall (i) serve an answer to the complaint on the plaintiff, and (ii) file a copy of that answer with the court. To answer foreclosure complaints and request mediation, defendants may use the one-page form approved and developed by the Department of Professional and Financial Regulations, Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection, or may file an answer that complies with M.R. Civ. P. 12(a) and also requests mediation. However, if a defendant appears or otherwise requests mediation in the action within 20 days after service of the summons and complaint, but does not file an answer to the complaint, mediation shall be scheduled in accordance with this Rule, and the deadline for filing an answer shall be extended until 20 days after a final mediator s report is filed with the court or until 20 days after the court waives mediation or orders that mediation shall not occur. (2) Mediation. The court will schedule a mediation session for each foreclosure action filed against a defendant who is an owner-occupant and who appears, answers, or otherwise requests mediation in the action within 20 days after service of the summons and complaint and attends an informational session, if ordered to attend by the court. It is within the court s discretion whether to schedule mediation in actions in which the defendant fails to timely appear, answer, or otherwise request mediation, but has not been defaulted pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 55, or fails to attend an informational session.

(3) Informational Sessions. The Foreclosure Diversion Program is authorized to design and implement informational sessions, and the court may, in its discretion, schedule informational sessions and order parties, counsel, and others to attend. (4) Financial Forms to be Provided. In addition to the pleading requirements specified by statute and Court Rules, a plaintiff shall file and serve with the foreclosure complaint a set of financial forms requesting information from the defendant that would allow the plaintiff to consider or develop alternatives to foreclosure or otherwise facilitate mediation of the action. These forms may be forms designed by individual lenders or standardized forms developed by the federal government, a state agency, or some other group, provided that the forms sent by the plaintiff are the forms that it will use in considering or developing alternatives to foreclosure. With each set of financial forms served on a defendant, the plaintiff must include an envelope large enough to contain the forms. The envelope shall be addressed to the plaintiff s attorney, to whom this information will be sent. (5) Completion and Return of Forms. Defendants shall send one set of copies of all of the completed financial documents to plaintiff s attorney AND one set of copies of all of the completed financial documents to the court no later than 21 days after the informational session, if one is held, or no later than 42 days after service of the complaint and summons, if no informational session is held. If plaintiff s attorney has not received the forms by the 23rd day after the informational session, if one is held, or by the 44th day after service of the complaint and summons, if no informational session is held, plaintiff s attorney shall notify the court in writing that the defendant has failed to comply with this requirement for mediation, and shall send a copy of this notice to the defendant. If the defendant has failed to attend a scheduled informational session and has failed to send the required paperwork to plaintiff s counsel on time, the court may order that mediation not occur and return the case to the regular court docket. Advisory Committee Note December 2010 The first amendment eliminates the 180-day look back; the second would give judges the discretion to return cases to the regular docket if a defendant fails to attend an informational session. 5

With regard to the first amendment, M.R. Civ. P. 93(a)(3) as it currently reads, requires court staff to do extra work to find defendants who are not residing in the properties at issue. When this language was added, there was some concern that the mediation process be available to individuals who had moved out of their homes because they could no longer afford to pay the mortgage. With experience, it has become apparent that virtually the only unoccupied houses undergoing foreclosure in Maine are second homes, which do not qualify for the program. In Maine it appears that people who are not paying their mortgages on their primary residences, for whatever reason, are not moving out. The second proposed amendment would allow judges to use their discretion to determine how to address cases when a defendant fails to appear for an informational session the defendant was ordered to attend. This amendment would conform the Rule to present practice in some courts. 6 4. These amendments shall be effective January 14, 2011. Dated: January 3, 2011 FOR THE COURT 1 /s/ LEIGH I. SAUFLEY Chief Justice DONALD G. ALEXANDER JON D. LEVY WARREN M. SILVER ANDREW M. MEAD ELLEN A. GORMAN JOSEPH M. JABAR Associate Justices 1 This Rules Amendment Order is approved after conference of the Court, all Justices concurring therein.