IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CRAIGHEAD COUNTY, ARKANSAS WESTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY COMPLAINT

Similar documents
ThSTS. hereby state and allege. bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.

CV-272 PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL. Plaintiff intends that discovery be conducted under Discovery Level 2.

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS and VICKI THOMAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Michael Landers, by and through his attorneys, for his

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS COMMISSION ON POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY MOTION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

Courthouse News Service

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

WITNESSETH. For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DOTHAN DIVISION

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/13/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/13/2016. Exhibit 1

PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as

Case 3:11-cv BRW Document 1 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 12 FILED

Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case BGC11 Doc 1326 Filed 08/05/09 Entered 08/05/09 16:16:26 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Sample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION

WITNESSETH. For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply.

Case 1:17-cv KPF Document 1 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 5

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

Case 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CV-KING-BANDSTRA

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND MANDAMUS ADVISORY JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Monthly CDBG-DR Grant Financial Report

Case 4:15-cv DPM Document 25 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 12

A. JURISDICTION AND THE PARTIES

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA

AGREEMENT between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE for PARKING ACCESS IN THE COUNTY PARKING GARAGE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. DUSTIN McDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. v. Case No.

DATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA P

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DISCHARGE AND PERFORMANCE

Case 1:18-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

TAILGATE SITE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division Civil Action No.

CROSS-PRODUCT MASTER AGREEMENT February 2000

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAULKNER COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION ONE

Case 1:09-cv TWT Document 3 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F KEVIN MICHAEL MYERS, EMPLOYEE CRAIGHEAD FARMERS COOPERATIVE, EMPLOYER

Case: 1:18-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Recent Developments in the Application of anti-slapp Statutes in Sports and Entertainment Disputes

and Ethics: Slope Lisa Sommer Devlin

Petitioners, * COURT OF APPEALS. v. * OF MARYLAND. MARIROSE JOAN CAPOZZI, et al., * September Term, Respondents. * Petition Docket No.

rbk Doc#7 Filed 08/13/17 Entered 08/13/17 21:09:47 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING PROPOSED RULES AND REGULATIONS WITH THE ARKANSAS LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS EMERGENCY PETITION FOR VARIANCE FROM RULE 58A-5.036, F.A.C.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT. JIM KNIGHT, in his individual capacity and on behalf of CITIZENS FOR LOCAL CHOICE

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Case 2:17-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas (Jonesboro) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:06-cv JLH

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. similarly-situated employees or former employees of PESG of Alabama, LLC

U N I T E D S T A T E S A D U L T

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/27/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/27/2016

Case 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Defendants PCI Gaming d/b/a Creek Entertainment Center; Wind Creek Casino & Hotel;

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CRAIGHEAD COUNTY, ARKANSAS WESTERN DISTRICT ELECTRONICALLY FILED Craighead County Circuit Court in Jonesboro Candace Edwards, Craighead Circuit Clerk 2018-Feb-16 16:42:55 16JCV-18-199 C02D08 : 7 Pages ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY PLAINTIFF vs. Case No. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DEFENDANT COMPLAINT Now comes Plaintiff, Arkansas State University ( ASU ), and for its Complaint against Defendant, University of Miami ( UM ), states: Introduction 1. On May 9, 2013, ASU and UM entered into a football contract to play a twogame series. SeeExhibit A. 2. On September 13, 2014, ASU travelled to Miami and played the first game of the contract. 3. On September 6, 2017, UM informed ASU that it would not appear in Jonesboro to play the second game of the series due to Hurricane Irma. 4. On September 9, 2017, UM failed to appear in Jonesboro to play the scheduled football game. 5. Since UM s failure to play the September 9, 2017 game, UM has refused to timely and reasonably reschedule the football game in years in which it has openings. 6. UM also failed to pay ASU liquidated damages by February 15, 2018, as mandated under the contract. 7. This is a breach of contract action brought pursuant to Arkansas state law.

8. This action seeks a judgment finding that UM breached the contract by (1) failing to appear for the September 9, 2017 football game, (2) failing to reschedule the game when its schedule permitted, and (3) failing to pay ASU liquidated damages. 9. This action also seeks compensatory damages, liquidated damages for UM s breach of contract, and attorney s fees and costs. Parties 10. University of Miami is a private university located in located in Miami- Dade County, Florida. 11. Arkansas State University is a public institution of higher education located in Jonesboro, Arkansas. Jurisdiction and Venue 12. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof. 13. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 16-13- 201. 14. This Court has personal jurisdiction over UM pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 16-4- 101. 15. Venue properly lies in this Court pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 16-60-101. Factual Background 16. On May 9, 2013, ASU and UM entered into a mutually-agreed upon and signed contract. 17. The contract governs a home-and-home football game series. The first football game was to take place at UM in Miami Gardens, Florida, on August 28 or 30, 2014 or September 13, 2014. The second football game was to take place at ASU in Jonesboro, Arkansas, on September 9, 2017.

18. The contract provides that failure of a party to participate in the Game will constitute a material breach of the Agreement that will cause the other party significant disruption and damages. Exhibit A, 6. 19. The contract further provides that the breaching party shall pay to the nonbreaching party $650,000 as liquidated damages. Exhibit A, 6. 20. The contract states that liquidated damages shall not be paid if it becomes impossible to play the game by reason of force majeure. Exhibit A, 6. 21. The force majeure provision of the contract provides that the contract shall be void with respect to any game in the event that an unforeseen catastrophe or disaster makes it impossible to play such game. Exhibit A, 14. 22. The force majeure clause also states that any game not played shall be rescheduled as such exigencies may dictate or permit. Exhibit A, 14. 23. On September 13, 2014, ASU played the first game of the series at UM in compliance with the contract. 24. On September 6, 2017, the Director of Athletics for UM, Blake James informed Terry Mohajir, the Director of Intercollegiate Athletics at ASU, that UM would not appear in Jonesboro to play the game. 25. Mr. James stated that the return trip home would be difficult due to Hurricane Irma. 26. Mr. James did not dispute that Miami s football team could travel to Jonesboro for the game on September 9, 2017. 27. Mr. Mohajir assured Mr. Blake thatum s football team and staff could remain in the Jonesboro area after the game, stay in local hotels, and make use of the University s indoor football practice facility.

28. ASU worked with conference officials as well as the ESPN television network to move the game to Friday, September 8, 2017. 29. Mr. Mohajir also offered to pay $86,000-$88,000 for the entire Miami team and staff to fly from Miami to Memphis on an air charter service to ensure that Miami could travel safely to Jonesboro and Miami s contractual obligations with other air carriers were not impacted. 30. Despite these proffered accommodations, UMstill refused to appear. 31. No football game took place at ASU on September 9, 2017. 32. This refusal caused Arkansas State University, the community of Jonesboro, and others significant disruption,harm, and damages. 33. After UM failed to play the September 9, 2017 game at ASU, Mr. Mohajir once again contacted Mr. James to reschedule the game. Due to Mr. James indication that he wished to finish Miami s football season before having further discussions about rescheduling, Mr. Mohajir agreed to wait until the end of the season to contact Mr. James again. 34. Once again, it was left up to ASU to initiate further discussions about the rescheduling of the game. In early 2018, Mr. Mohajir reached out to Mr. James. 35. Mr. James claimed that the earliest UM could play a return game would be during the seasons of 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, or 2028. 36. Industry standard for two-game agreements is not ten or more years between the games. 37. Mr. Mohajir explained that those dates were not workable for, and would be detrimental and harmful to ASU. 38. Additionally, at the time of these discussions, Mr. Mohajir consulted a scheduling service, which revealed that Miami had openings in both 2020 and 2021.

39. Mr. Mohajir raised these dates with Mr. James, and even offered that if UM would schedule the contracted game in 2020 or 2021, ASU would agree to play a buy game at UM. 40. Mr. James refused this offer and stated that playing during 2020 or 2021 was impossible given Miami s prior scheduling agreements. 41. Mr. James asserted that UM needed to play six home games. The scheduling service showed that UM already had six home games scheduled for 2020 and 2021, with availability for other games to be scheduled. 42. UM has claimed, and continues to claim, that they do not have to fulfill their obligations in the contract because Hurricane Irma was a force majeure event. 43. The game, however, was to take place in Jonesboro, Arkansas, not the Miami, Florida area. 44. Additionally, UM does not dispute that it was possible for them to attend the game in Jonesboro on September 9, 2017. 45. UM s Head Football Coach, Mark Richt,told the media that UM could have logistically appeared in Jonesboro and played the September 9, 2017 game. 46. Additionally, upon information and belief, seven other Florida and Georgia FBS schools had scheduled football games the weekend of Hurricane Irma. 47. Three teams in the Florida and Georgia area still played their football games scheduled for the weekend of Hurricane Irma. Florida International University played its scheduled home game against Alcorn State in Birmingham, Alabama. Georgia Southern University also played its scheduled home game against the University of New Hampshire in Birmingham, Alabama. Florida Atlantic University played its away game against the University of Wisconsin with a delayed return back to Florida.

48. Three additional teams cancelled their scheduled games, but rescheduled for the same season. Florida State played its rescheduled game against the University of Louisiana- Monroe on December 2, 2017. The University of South Florida played a rescheduled game against the University of Connecticut on November 4, 2017. And the University of Central Florida played its rescheduled game against the University of Memphis on September 30, 2017. 49. The seventh team, the University of Florida, cancelled its game against the University of Northern Colorado, and because the game could not be rescheduled due to conflicting schedules, Northern Colorado received a buyout for the game. 50. Upon belief, UM is the only FBS school to fail to play its scheduled game in accordance with its contract, timely reschedule its cancelled game, or pay the buyout or liquidated damages under the contract. 51. Additionally, UM and Florida State immediately rescheduled their September 16, 2017 football game for October 7, 2017. 52. It was not impossible for UM to appear for and attend the September 9, 2017 game against ASU in Jonesboro, Arkansas.But UM refused to participate in the September 9, 2017 game. 53. It is possible, however, for UM to schedule a game against ASU in 2020 or 2021. But UM refuses to reschedule for those years. 54. UM additionally refused to pay the liquidated damages under the contract. 55. ASU has made repeated good faith efforts to accommodate UM both during the week of the scheduled September 9, 2017 game, and since to reschedule the game. 56. UM has made no good faith attempts to work with ASU, and has merely repeatedly stated that it cannot schedule a game until 2024 or later. Requests for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ASU requests the following relief against Defendant UM:

i. A judgment in favor of ASU and against UM for breach of contract for the $650,000 liquidated damages amount; equity. ii. Attorney s fees and costs; iii. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and iv. Any and all such other relief that the Court may deem appropriate in law or RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 16 th day of February, 2018. /s/ Brad Phelps /s/ Delena C. Hurst Brad Phelps (Ark. Bar No. 2001245) General Counsel Delena C. Hurst (Ark. Bar No. 2007089) Associate General Counsel Arkansas State University System 501 Woodlane Dr. #600 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Telephone: (501) 660-1008 Facsimile: (501) 660-1010 bphelps@asusystem.edu dhurst@asusystem.edu