Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos

Similar documents
6/5/2018 THE RULE AND THE NOTICE THE STANDARD NOTICE ATTACKING THE NOTICE, PREPARING FOR AND DEFENDING THE RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION

Best Practices For NC In House Counsel To Avoid Being Deposed

Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls in the Deposition Process

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

Litigating in California State Court, but Not a Local? (Part 2) 1

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

USE OF DEPOSITIONS. Maryland Rule Deposition Use. (a) When may be used.

Professionalism/Ethics Series: Ethical Issues Arising While Conducting Discovery in 42 U.S.C Cases

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Pennsylvania Code Rules Rule and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS

GT Crystal Systems, LLC and GT Solar Hong Kong, Ltd. Chandra Khattak, Kedar Gupta, and Advanced RenewableEnergy Co., LLC. NO.

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 06/03/15 Entry Number 72 Page 1 of 9

Do I have your permission to record this? Taking an effective recorded statement of an injured worker.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This Practice Note discusses the key. preparing a corporate representative OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(B)(6)

Deposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. JANE BOUDREAU, Case No Hon. Victoria A.

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 1349 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 22 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Case: 4:15-cv NCC Doc. #: 61 Filed: 04/21/16 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 238

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

Overview. n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery

Conducting Effective Motion Practice

Table of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.

Case 6:09-cv GAP-TBS Document 149 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID 3714

Avoiding the Deposition Debacle: Tips for Successfully Taking and Defending the Insurer s Corporate Deposition

Strategies for Defending 30(b)(6) Depositions

ediscovery Demystified

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2010 Amendments to Expert Witness Discovery Under Federal Rule 26 Address Four Issues:

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

Dartmouth College. North Branch Construction, Inc. & Lavalle/Brensinger, P.A. AND. North Branch Construction, Inc.

A Primer on 30(b)(6) Depositions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )

Case 1:11-mc RLW Document 1 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.

Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Taking and Defending Key Depositions in Employment and Wage and Hour Cases

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

AMENDED RULE 26 EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Reprinted with permission from Westlaw. Page 1. Slip Copy, 2009 WL (D.Kan.) (Cite as: 2009 WL (D.Kan.))

NC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3A 1

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Case3:14-mc JD Document1 Filed10/30/14 Page1 of 13

ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

Department of Labor Employment Security Board of Review

STATE OF VERMONT VERMONT SUPREME COURT TERM, Order Promulgating Amendments to Rules 16.2 and 26 of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure

RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)

Update on 2015 Amendments to the FRCP

Case 1:17-mc DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:13-cv MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RPC Rule 3.7. Purpose. The Lawyer as Witness: RPC Rule 3.7. County Attorneys Summer Conference. UNC School of Government

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

The 30.02(6), or 30(b)(6), Witness: Proper Notice, Preparation, and Deposition Techniques

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012

TAKING EFFECTIVE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITIONS IN WAGE & HOUR CASES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

The 2010 Amendments to the Expert Discovery Provisions of Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Brief Reminder

CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,257. In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

Civil Procedure II. Final Examination. Winter Essay Answer Outline

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P.

Depositions of Company Witnesses The Ethical Rules You Need to Know

Drafting and Issuing Discovery Subpoenas: Maryland

DISQUALIFICATION OF THE ADVOCATE/WITNESS Adopted June 18, 1988 Revised June 18, 1994, May 10, 1997 and October 20, 2012

This is an employment discrimination case in which Plaintiff claims, inter alia, that

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Louisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

Deposition Trivia Gems

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. C

Minnesota Discovery Practice. By Roger S. Haydock with David F. Herr

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST v. Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp OPINION AND ORDER

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

Depositions in Oregon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Compelling an Out-Of-State Witness to Give Testimony or Produce Records at a Deposition for Use in a Foreign Jurisdiction

DEMYSTIFYING THE SURETY CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE DEPOSITION: KNOWING HOW TO SELECT YOUR CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE

Case 2:15-cv DN-EJF Document 517 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:16-cv AWT Document 69 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Transcription:

Kansas Missouri

Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos February 15, 2017 Association of Corporate Counsel Mid-America Chapter

Preventing or limiting depositions of in-house attorneys Discovery rules (federal, Kansas, Missouri) Applicable ethics rules and privilege Motions to Quash and Protective Orders Impact of lawyer as business advisor vs. legal advisor or litigation counsel Tips for how to avoid being noticed for deposition entirely

Discovery rules FRCP 26: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case.... Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.

MO Rule 56: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or to the claim or defense of any other party. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

K.S.A. 60-226: Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the action, whether it relates to any party's claim or defense. Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Ethics Rules & Privilege Missouri Rule 4-1.6 A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is permitted by Rule 4-1.6(b). KRPC 1.6

Organization as Client Kansas Rule 1.13 Missouri Rule 4-1.13 A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents the organization acting through its duly authorized constituents.

Lawyer as Witness Kansas Rule 3.7 Missouri Rule 4-3.7 (a) A lawyer shall not act as an advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness except where: (1) the testimony relates to an uncontested issue; (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or (3) disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on the client. (b) A lawyer may act as an advocate in a trial in which another lawyer in the lawyer's firm is likely to be called as a witness unless precluded from doing so by Rule 1.7 or Rule 1.9.

Motions to Quash and Protective Orders Confer with Outside Counsel Motion to Quash/Motion for Protective Order Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and 37 Understand scope of topics Geographic limitations Undue Burden Proprietary/Commercial Information Responding party has burden to prove objections

Potential Pitfalls Attorney-Client Communications Attorney Work Product It is important to distinguish between facts learned by a lawyer, a memorandum or document containing those facts prepared by the lawyer, and the lawyer's mental impressions of the facts. The facts are discoverable if relevant. The document prepared by the lawyer stating the facts is not discoverable absent a showing required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3). State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. New Horizon, Inc., 254 F.R.D. 227, 233 (E.D. Pa. 2008).

In-House Counsel: Legal Advisor v. Business Advisor Sony Elecs., Inc. v. Soundview Techs., Inc., 217 F.R.D. 104 (D. Conn. 2002) ( When general counsel is designated by a party as one of its Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses, the witness is required to testify about the business operations of the corporation to the extent his knowledgeable about the operations, irrespective of the fact that he also serves as legal advisor for the corporation. )

In-House Counsel: Legal Advisor v. Business Advisor But what happens when those roles intersect - when business decisions/actions are intertwined with otherwise privileged legal advice?

Tips for how to avoid being noticed for deposition entirely Select non-attorneys as 30(b)(6) representative Have personnel other than in-house counsel provide/sign discovery responses Assist outside counsel in preparing witness

Corporate Representative Depositions Overview Applicable civil procedure rules Handling the corporate representative deposition notice Objections and Motions for Protective Order Selecting the appropriate witness or witnesses Preparing the witness for deposition Use of a corporate representative deposition at trial

Applicable civil procedure rules FRCP 30(b)(6) Missouri 57.03(b)(4) K.S.A. 60-230(b)(6)

Notice or subpoena directed to an organization. In its notice or subpoena, a party may name as the deponent a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, a governmental agency or other entity and must describe with reasonable particularity the matters for examination. The named organization must then designate one or more officers, directors or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on its behalf; and it may set out the matters on which the person designated will testify. A subpoena must advise a nonparty organization of its duty to make this designation. The persons designated must testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization. This subsection does not preclude a deposition by any other procedure allowed by the rules of civil procedure.

30(b)(6) Breakdown Party may name a corporation as deponent Requesting Party Burden: Describe with particularity matters for examination Producing Party Burden: Designate 1 or more persons to testify on its behalf Designee must testify as to information known or reasonably available to the organization

30(b)(6) Breakdown Designee s testimony represents knowledge of the corporation, not the individual deponent Corporation has duty to provide witness who is knowledgeable in order to provide binding answers on behalf of the corporation Starlight International, Inc. v. Herlihy, 186 F.R.D. 626, 638 (D. Kan. 1999).

Handling the corporate representative deposition notice Review the Deposition Topics Confer with Opposing Counsel on Topics Time for compliance Key: Strategy in selecting the witness and preparing the witness

Objections and Motions for Protective Order Kansas/Missouri/Federal procedures Object to vague topics Object to disclosure of privileged information Person most knowledgeable

Selecting the appropriate witness or witnesses Duty to prepare the witness or be sanctioned Possibly no witness with information Personal knowledge is not a requirement Be prepared to explain the basis for knowledge, what preparation was done Is there anyone more knowledgeable than you? How did you determine what to review/prepare? In-house counsel assist in overall strategy, witness selection for trial

Preparing the witness for deposition Again, duty to prepare the witness Educate witness on what will be asked per the topics Reptile Theory In-house counsel assist outside counsel with prior testimony of witnesses Litigation strategy/messaging Videotaped?

Depositions Outside the Scope of Notice Objections Redirect the question to the scope, advise beyond the scope and advise attorney that another witness can testify on that topic Question will be allowed Testimony beyond scope may not be binding on the company, binding on individual Potentially still binding on the company depending on the employee s management level and scope of employment

Use of a corporate representative deposition at trial Answers binding Can be used when? Can still make objections as to relevance (and resolve pending objections as to form of questions) Continue to prepare the witnesses for trial Videotape

Questions?

Kate B. McKinney Attorney at Law Practicing In: Litigation Insurance Defense Business Law

Lora M. Jennings Attorney at Law Practicing In: Employment Law Health Law Insurance Defense Business Litigation

Kate McKinney: kbmckinney@martinpringle.com Lora Jennings: lmjennings@martinpringle.com 913-491-5500 or 816-753-6006

Kansas Missouri