IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 15 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 34 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Supreme Court of the United States

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION REGARDING INFORMAL COMPLAINTS

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AT&T INC. S OPPOSITION TO FCC S MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 402(a), 28 U.S.C. 2342(1) and 2344, and Federal

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 46 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. v. ) NOTICE OF ERRATA TO PETITION FOR REVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 497 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

16CV32458 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Appeal Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APPLE INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Case 1:99-cv PLF Document 6223 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION OF TELMATE, LLC FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

SUMNER SQUARE 1615 M STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C (202) FACSIMILE: (202) July 30,2008

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF COMPTEL

Case 2:18-cv WBS-DB Document 3 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 4

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 73 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 11

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

SUMNER SQUARE 1615 M STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C (202) FACSIMILE: (202) August 20, 2008

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

South Carolina v. North Carolina, No. 138, Original; Charlotte's Response to South Carolina's Request for Interim Report on Interventions

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Respondents. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 1:15-cv GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 2:68-cv MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No (and consolidated case)

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

REPLY COMMENTS OF THE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA)

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

U.S. District Court District of Oregon (Portland (3)) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE # 3:16-cv MO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS INTERVENOR

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, et al., v. Petitioners, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. Case No. 15-1063 (and consolidated cases MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2348, 1 Fed. R. App. P. 15(d, and Rule 15(b of the D.C. Circuit Rules, Level 3 Communications, LLC ( Level 3 hereby moves to intervene in the above-captioned proceeding in support of the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC and the United States of America. 2 Petitioners seek review of the FCC s order captioned Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28, Report and Order on 1 See 28 U.S.C. 2348 ( [A]ny party in interest in the proceeding before the agency whose interests will be affected if an order of the agency is or is not enjoined, set aside, or suspended [by the court], may appear as parties thereto of their own motion and as of right.. 2 Pursuant to Circuit Rule 15(b, this motion will be deemed an intervention motion in all appeals that have been filed and that will be filed in this Circuit involving the same underlying Commission order.

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 2 of 11 Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order, FCC 15-24 (rel. Mar. 12, 2015 ( Order on Remand. The Order on Remand classifies broadband Internet access services ( BIAS as telecommunications services and adopts carefully tailored rules designed to prohibit BIAS providers from interfering with the delivery of traffic over their telecommunications networks including through blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization arrangements pursuant to its authority under Titles II and III of the Communications Act and Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act. 3 Level 3 actively participated in the FCC proceeding below and is directly affected by the Order. 4 As a result, Level 3 is a party in interest in the proceeding and eligible to intervene under 28 U.S.C. 2348. 5 3 47 U.S.C. 1302(a. 4 The FCC s new rules provide for the first time an avenue for transit providers, such as Level 3, to file complaints against BIAS providers for unjust or unreasonable interconnection practices. 5 Intervention is permitted under Fed. R. App. P. 15(d for parties directly affected by the order at issue. Yakima Valley Cablevision, Inc. v. FCC, 794 F.2d 737, 744-45 (D.C. Cir. 1986. 2

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 3 of 11 CONCLUSION Level 3 respectfully requests that the Court grant the instant motion to intervene in these proceedings. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Markham C. Erickson Markham C. Erickson Andrew W. Guhr STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Counsel for Level 3 Communications, LLC Dated May 12, 2015 3

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 4 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, et al., v. Petitioners, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. Case No. 15-1063 (and consolidated cases CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 27(a(4 and D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a(1(A, Level 3 Communications, LLC ( Level 3 certifies the following: In Case No. 15-1063 and consolidated cases, the Petitioners are United States Telecom Association, Alamo Broadband Inc., AT&T Inc., American Cable Association, CTIA The Wireless Association, CenturyLink, National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Wireless Internet Service Providers Association, and Daniel Berninger. The Respondents are the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC and the United States of America. The intervenors for Respondents are Public Knowledge and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates. No amici have appeared before this court at this time. 4

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 5 of 11 Level 3 seeks leave to appear in this matter as an Intervenor in support of Respondents. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Markham C. Erickson Markham C. Erickson Andrew W. Guhr STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Counsel for Level 3 Communications, LLC Dated May 12, 2015 5

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 6 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, et al., v. Petitioners, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. Case No. 15-1063 (and consolidated cases RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26.1 and D.C. Circuit Court Rule 26.1, Level 3 Communications, LLC ( Level 3 submits this disclosure of interests. Insofar as relevant to the litigation, Level 3 is a Tier 1 Internet Service Provider, providing Internet services, including content-delivery and transit services, to customers in the United States and globally. Level 3 is a wholly owned subsidiary of Level 3 Financing, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Level 3 Communications, Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated in the State of Delaware. No publicly traded company owns 10% or more of Level 3 Communications, Inc. 6

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 7 of 11 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Markham C. Erickson Markham C. Erickson Andrew W. Guhr STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Counsel for Level 3 Communications, LLC Dated May 12, 2015 7

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 8 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12th day of May, 2015, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing Motion to Intervene to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the Case Management and Electronic Case Files ( CM/ECF system for the D.C. Circuit. Participants in the case will be served by the CM/ECF system or by U.S. Mail. James M. Carr David Morris Gossett Jacob M. Lewis Richard Kiser Welch FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Room 8-A741 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 (202 418-1700 Counsel for Respondent Federal Communications Commission Helgi C. Walker Michael R. Huston GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. (202 887-3599 Counsel for Petitioner CTIA The Wireless Association Nickolai Gilford Levin Kristen Ceara Limarzi Robert J. Wiggers UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 (202 514-2001 Counsel for Respondent United States of America Brett A. Shumate Andrew G. McBride Eve Klindera Reed WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202 719-7000 Counsel for Petitioner Alamo Broadband Inc. 8

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 9 of 11 Peter D. Keisler James P. Young C. Frederick Beckner III SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202 736-8000 Wayne Watts David R. McAtee II Lori A. Fink Gary L. Phillips Christopher M. Heimann AT&T SERVICES, INC. 1120 20th Street, N.W., Suite 1000 (202 457-3055 Counsel for Petitioner AT&T Inc. David H. Solomon Russell P. Hanser WILKINSON BARKER KNAUER LLP 2300 N Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20037 (202 783-4141 Timothy M. Boucher CENTURYLINK 1099 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 250 Washington, D.C. 20001 (303 992-5751 Kathleen M. Sullivan QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22 nd Floor New York, NY 10010 (212 849-7000 Jonathan Banks UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION 607 14 th Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202 326-7272 Counsel for Petitioner USTelecom Jeffrey A. Lamken MOLO LAMKEN LLP The Watergate, Suite 660 600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202 556-2000 Ross J. Leiberman AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION 2415 39 th Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007 (202 494-5661 Counsel for Petitioner American Cable Association Counsel for Petitioner CenturyLink 9

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 10 of 11 Miguel A. Estrada Theodore B. Olson Jonathan C. Bond GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. (202 955-8500 Rick C. Chessen Neal M. Goldberg Michael S. Schooler Steven F. Morris NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION 25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20001 (202 222-2445 Matthew A. Brill Matthew T. Murchison Jonathan Y. Ellis LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 555 Eleventh Street, N.W. Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202 637-2200 Counsel for Petitioner National Cable & Telecommunications Association Michael K. Kellogg Scott H. Angstreich KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400 Counsel for Petitioners USTelecom, CTIA, and AT&T Stephen E. Coran Dennis P. Corbett LERMAN SENTER PLLC 2000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202 429-8970 Counsel for Petitioner Wireless Internet Service Providers Association Richard E. Wiley Bennett L. Ross Brett A. Shumate WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202 719-7000 Counsel for Petitioner Daniel Berninger 10

USCA Case #15-1063 Document #1552127 Filed: 05/12/2015 Page 11 of 11 Harold Jay Feld PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE 1818 N Street, N.W., Suite 410 (202 861-0020 Counsel for Intervenor Public Knowledge David Bergmann LAW OFFICE OF DAVID C. BERGMANN 3293 Noreen Drive Columbus, OH 43221 (614 771-5979 Counsel for Intervenor National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Sincerely, /s/ Andrew W. Guhr Andrew W. Guhr STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. (202 429-1359 11