INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

Similar documents
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Lion Mexico Consolidated L.P. United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No.

PROCEDURAL ORDER NO 1. Daniel Bethlehem, Presiding Arbitrator Mark Kantor, Arbitrator Raúl E. Vinuesa, Arbitrator

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Sanum Investments Limited. Lao People's Democratic Republic (ADHOC/17/1)

Poštová banka, a.s. and ISTROKAPITAL SE v. Hellenic Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/8) Procedural Order No. 1

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. ACP Axos Capital GmbH. Republic of Kosovo. (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/22)

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Lao Holdings N.V. Lao People's Democratic Republic. (ICSID Case No.

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Carnegie Minerals (Gambia) Limited. Republic of The Gambia

PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 7

A11Y LTD. CZECH REPUBLIC. (ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/1) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 9 Organization of the Hearing

Burimi S.R.L. and Eagle Games SH.A. Claimants. Republic of Albania Respondent. ICSID Case No. ARB/11/18

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. B-Mex, LLC and others. United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No.

(ICSID Case. No. UNCT/18/3) PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 1

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Eco Oro Minerals Corp. Republic of Colombia. (ICSID Case No.

AND CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) PROCEDURAL ORDER ON TWO DISPUTED ISSUES DATED 6 FEBRUARY 2015 (English Text)

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Churchill Mining Plc and Planet Mining Pty Ltd. Republic of Indonesia

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

PCA Case No

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Corona Materials, LLC v. Dominican Republic. (ICSID Case No.

THE RENCO GROUP, INC. V. REPUBLIC OF PERU (UNCT/13/1) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1

PCA Case No

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited. United Republic of Tanzania

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Procedural Order No. 3

PCA CASE NO

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties

CORRECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE AWARD

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A. Arab Republic of Egypt. (ICSID Case No.

10 th SPC Heads of Fisheries Meeting

CONGRESS HANDBOOK. Seoul, South Korea, 2-6 November Version 4 20/02/2014 Version 3 10/01/2014 Version 2 7/11/2013 Version 1 30/06/2013

Discipline Committee Rules

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

PCA Case No

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Hela Schwarz GmbH. People s Republic of China. (ICSID Case No.

Governing Body 317th Session, Geneva, 6 28 March 2013

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

Arbitration Procedures Guide

RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

Operate the recorder. There are no off the record conversations between the parties and yourself. Record the entire proceeding!

Presentation Guideline

ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5 ABACLAT AND OTHERS (CLAIMANTS) and THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (RESPONDENT) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 32

MODEL PROCEDURAL TIMETABLE

COMMERCE GROUP CORP. SAN SEBASTIAN GOLD MINES, INC. REPUBLIC OF EL SALVADOR REJOINDER REPUBLIC OF EL SALVADOR S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION.

The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia September 2017 THE RULES

Case 1:10-mc JDB Document 3-3 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT 3

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Preamble. i. 1. Aims and objectives Application Timetable Statement of Claim; Counterclaim Statement of Defence...

A. Measurements and Points Measurement Possible Points Comments PowerPoint 10. Up to 10 points for PowerPoint research project Journal entries 15

ON1CALL RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARINGS 1) DEFINITIONS

Procedural Order (PO) No.1

GOVERNMENT OF CANADA

Innovative Techniques in Arbitration. Could these approaches help in your next arbitration?

THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL

Manual of Procedure for the Host City of the OWHC World Congress

Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa. United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) Interim Decision on. Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues

ORDER NO September 2010

IPNA CONGRESS BIDDING GUIDELINES

In the presence of Mrs. Nicole BELLOUBET, Keeper of the Seals, Minister of Justice, The Paris Bar, represented by the elected head of the Paris Bar,

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

THE LMAA TERMS (2006)

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTORY RULES...

INQUIRY PROCEDURES MEMORANDUM NO. 01 OF BOARD OF INQUIRY DATED 5 SEPTEMBER 2017: ISSUE 06. Act 1991 (the RMA) AND

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Eco Oro Minerals Corp. Republic of Colombia. (ICSID Case No.

Superior Civil Court Trials and Motions

PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 2 (Revised) May 31, Glamis Gold, Ltd., Claimant v. The United States of America, Respondent

Initial Pre-hearing Conference Scheduling Order in the Matter of:

JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON CIVIL PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON. (Revised February 8, 2018)

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A

CIRCUIT COURT PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL ACTIONS

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/56/737)] 56/242. Pattern of conferences

How to Conduct a Hearing on the Merits Part 2 of a 4-Lecture Series on the Basics for ALJs

New York, 14 November Excellency,

PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 12

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) AND THE 1976 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

Archived Content. Contenu archivé

A BASIC GUIDE TO MEETING PROCEDURE

Wish Farms Berry Lover Weekly Sweepstakes. Official Rules

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BERNHARD VON PEZOLD AND OTHERS (CLAIMANTS)

PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER

DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.

2 SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES

3. The formal opening of the Assembly will take place at 10 a.m. on Monday, 8 April 2002, in the Plenary Hall on the third floor of the Palacio.

ICCM International Committee on Composite Materials

PCA Case No

International Civil Aviation Organization. ASSEMBLY - 36th SESSION

Assessment Review Board

Suggested Model Directions for Clinical Negligence cases before Master Ungley and Master Yoxall

PART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS CONTENTS

BY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

CONGRESS HANDBOOK. Mexico City, Mexico September 2011

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ICDR) Independent Review Panel CASE #

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Lion Mexico Consolidated L.P. v. United Mexican States (lcsid Case No. ARB(AF)115/2) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.4 (on the Organization of the Hearing on Jurisdiction) Members of the Tribunal Juan Fermindez-Armesto, President of the Tribunal David la. Cairns, Arbitrator Ricardo Ramirez, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal Anneliese Fleckenstein Assistant to the Tribunal Luis Fernando Rodriguez Washington D.C.,

ICSIO Case No. ARB(AF)115/2 Table of Contents A. Background... 3 B. Hearing Dates and Location... 3 C. Attendance... 3 O. Examination of experts and witnesses....4 E. Allocation of Time... 4, F. Tentative Schedule... 5 G. Hearing Materials... '"''... 6 H. Hearing Equipment.... 6 I. Interpretation... 6 J. Records of the Hearing... 7 20f7

ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)I1SI2 A. Background 1. This procedural order addresses the organization of the hearing on jurisdiction in this case [the "Hearing"]. 2. Subject to the terms of this order, the Hearing shall otherwise be conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Procedural Order No. 1 and the other directions by the Tribunal. 3. On January 4,2018, the Tribunal circulated a first draft of this Procedural Order, requesting the Parties to confer and submit by January 18, 2018, (i) a joint version, reflecting the points and language agreed upon and-where applicableeach Party's suggested wording on those points they had not agreed upon; and (ii) each Party may submit a brief with its position on those points that had not been agreed, for the Tribunal's consideration. 4. On January 22, 2018, at 11 :00 a.m. EST the Tribunal and the Parties held a prehearing conference call to discuss the draft and any outstanding procedural, administrative, and logistical matters in preparation for the Hearing, pursuant to Section 21.1 of Procedural Order No. 1. 5. Following the conference, the Tribunal now issues the present PROCEDURAL ORDER. B. Hearing Dates and Location 6. Pursuant to paras. 26 and 28 of the Procedural Order No.3 and the Parties' communications of July 20, 2017, the Hearing will take place on February 19 and 20,2018, at the World Bank Group Headquarters in Washington D.C. 7. In accordance with the procedural calendar, February 21, 2018, remains in reserve. As pointed out in para. 27 of Procedural Order No.3, "a two-day hearing should be enough for the Parties to make their allegations and present all relevant evidence." In case a third day is necessary, the Tribunal will set the schedule for that specific day as appropriate. 8. Further logistical details including setup, entry passes, room assignment, internet connection and catering will be provided by the Secretary in due course. c. Attendance 9. Pursuant to Section 22.6 of Procedural Order No.1, the Hearing will be closed to the public; however, provisions shall be made for representatives of the other NAFT A Parties that formally request to attend the Hearing. 30f7

ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)115/2 10. The Parties shall provide the names and affiliations of all representatives who will attend the Hearing, including Parties' counsel and representatives, by January 31,2018. ICSID will circulate a draft table for that purpose in due course. D. Examination of experts and witnesses 11. On January 15,2018, each Party provided to the opposing Party, with a copy to the Tribunal, the names of witnesses and experts whose statement or report has been submitted by the other Party with the request that they be available for crossexamination at the Hearing. Claimant notified it did not wish to call any witnesses or expert proposed by the Respondent. Mexico called Mr. Rodrigo Zamora Etcharren, Claimant's expert on Mexican law. 12. On January 19,2018, Claimant filed its Rejoinder on Jurisdiction. It attached a third report prepared by Mr. Zamora. 13. At the January 22 pre-hearing conference, Mexico asked to call its own expert, Mr. Rene Irra Ibarra, to the Hearing, on grounds that Claimant's third expert report introduced new arguments. After hearing the Parties, the Tribunal grants this request. Mr. Irra's examination will be centered on the new arguments introduced in Mr. Zamora's third report. Mr. Zamora may be present at Mr. Irra's examination. 14. The rules regarding the examination of experts are set out in Section 20 of Procedural Order No.1. In particular, the Tribunal will control the examination of both experts and might ask questions to both experts simultaneously. E. Allocation of Time 15. Each Party shall have a total time allocation for the Hearing of no more than 5.5 hours, inclusive of opening statements, closing statements, and witness examination. 16. The Tribunal shall have a total time allocation for questions and procedural issues of no more than 4 hours. 17. In the interest of time, each Party shall be afforded up to 45 minutes to present its opening submission. With the Tribunal's approval, the rest of the time available to each Party can be freely allocated as the Party considers it appropriate within the total allocation of time set above. 18. The Tribunal Secretary will keep track of time using a chess clock method. 40f7

ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/15/2 January 23,2018 F. Tentative Schedule 19. The daily schedule of the Hearing shall be as follows: Start: 9:00 a.m. Breaks: mid-morning and mid-afternoon, each 15 minutes in duration. Lunch: around 1 :00 p.m., from 60 to 90 minutes in duration. End: no later than 6:00 p.m. 20. The tentative hearing schedule for Monday, February 19 (day 1), will be as follows: - Welcome and procedural issues (15 min.) - Opening statement by the Respondent (45 min. max.) - Opening statement by the Claimant (45 min. max.) - Examination of Experts (beginning with Respondent's Expert) - Lunch (60-90 min.) - Examination of Experts (continuation) - Examination of the Experts (continuation) - Examination of the Experts (continuation) - Questions ofthe Tribunal, if any. 21. The tentative hearing schedule for Tuesday, February 20 (day 2), will be as follows: - Procedural issues (15 min.) - Closing statement by the Respondent (90 min.) - Break (to be determined by the Tribunal) - Closing statement by the Claimant (90 min.) - Lunch (60 min.) 50f7

rcsrd Case No. ARB(AF)/I5/2 January 23,2018 Questions of the Tribunal (60 min.) Break (15 min.) Questions of the Tribunal (60 min.) Final procedural issues (30 min.) G. Hearing Materials 22. The rules regarding additional documents and new evidence are set out in Section 18 of Procedural Order No. 1. 23. The rules regarding demonstrative exhibits are set out in Section 18.7 of Procedural Order No. 1. For ease of reference, the Parties are reminded that "demonstrative exhibits (such as PowerPoint slides, charts tabulations, etc.) may be used at any hearing, provided they contain no new evidence." 24. The Parties shall number its demonstrative exhibits consecutively as CH-I, CH- 2, etc., (for Claimant) or RH-I, RH-2, etc. (for Respondent). Demonstrative exhibits must indicate from which legal authorities or documentary exhibits they are derived. 25. The Party submitting such exhibit shall provide them in hard copy to the other Party, the Tribunal Members, the Tribunal Secretary, the Assistant to the Tribunal, the court reporter(s) and the interpreter(s) at the Hearing immediately prior to the respective presentation for which it is used. 26. Sufficient copies of cross-examination bundles (exhibits or legal authorities on the record to which the witness or expert is to be referred) are to be provided immediately before the cross-examination. H. Hearing Equipment 27. Each Party commits to carry a laptop that shall be connected to the screens made available by rcsrd for projections of demonstrative exhibits and visual aids. 28. Upon a timely request, rcsid may arrange to have a blackboard at the hearing room. I. Interpretation 29. Pursuant to Section 12 of Procedural Order No.1, the Hearing will be conducted in Spanish and English. There shall be simultaneous Spanish-English and English-Spanish interpretation throughout the Hearing. 60f7

Lion Mexico Consolidated LP. v. United Mexican States ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/15/2 Procedural Order No. 4 30. The Parties will notify by January 22, 2018, which witnesses or experts require services of interpretation. 31. In accordance with Section 12.9 of Procedural Order No. 1, the costs of the interpreter(s) will be paid from the advance payments made by the Parties, without prejudice to the decision of the Tribunal as to which Party shall ultimately bear those costs. J. Records of the Hearing 32. Pursuant to Section 23 of Procedural Order No. 1, sound recordings will be made of the Hearing as well as verbatim transcripts in the two procedural languages. 33. ICSID has made arrangements to have English and Spanish verbatim transcripts available in real-time using Live Note or a similar software during the Hearing. 34. Electronic versions of the transcripts will be provided to the Parties and the Tribunal on a same-day basis. 35. The Parties shall agree on any corrections to the transcripts within 30 days. The agreed corrections may be entered by the court reporter in the transcripts ("revised transcripts"). The Tribunal shall decide upon any disagreement between the Parties and any correction adopted by the Tribunal shall be entered by the court reporter in the revised transcripts. 36. The original language (non-translated) version of the transcript will be the only authoritative transcript for use in any other subsequent pleading or presentation. On behalf of the Tribunal, [Signed] Juan F andez-armesto Pr ent of the Tribunal ate: 7 of7