CONSTITUTIONAL LAW R. Miller Fall 2004

Similar documents
Class Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 4:30 5:50 (Tureaud Hall, rm. 215) Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 6:00 7:00 (Stubbs, rm. 330), and by appointment

POS 471 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I Tuesday 6:40-9:30 SS 229

Constitutional Law I Fall 2015

Northern Illinois University Zulauf 403. DU 459 Office Hrs: Tues 2-5 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I

Constitutional Law: The Separation of Powers and Governmental Institutions Political Science 353 Fall 2009

ConLaw I: Structure of Government LAW 121 (002) Prof. Greve Fall Welcome

Final Revision, 11/7/16

POL 743: Constitutional Law I. Dr. Carrington Office Hours: M-W 2:00pm-3:00pm

Office: Classroom Building 347 Tues. 10:30-12:30, POLI 110: Governmental Power and the Constitution Spring 2011

Pol Sci 3325 Topics in Politics: Constitutional Politics in the United States

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES OF GOVERNMENT (Law A507) Autumn 2018 Syllabus. (Updated: )

Assigned reading has been posted on Blackboard as.pdf files under Course Materials. There is no assigned textbook.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I GOVT SYLLABUS (REVISED) Georgetown University Summer Tuesdays & Thursdays, 12:45-2:00 PM, by appointment

Office: Social Sciences & Management 304B Tues. & Thurs. 1-2, POLI 110: Governmental Power and the Constitution Spring 2014

G. J. Jacobsohn Fall 2011 Mezes Ph: Government 357M Unique CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES OF POWER

G. J. Jacobsohn Fall 2010 (T, Th, 12:30 1:45) Mezes Ph: Office Hours: T, Th, 10-11, Th, 2-3

Constitutional Law I. Prof. Fletcher. Mondays, 2:00 3:40 PM. Room 472. Syllabus v Mondays, 4PM to 5PM By appointment

Assigned reading has been posted on Blackboard as.pdf files under Course Materials. There is no assigned textbook.

PART I: THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES CHAPTER 1: THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE SC S AUTHORITY

1 1/16/ The Founding Foundational Documents The Constitution 96 96

This is a graduate level course; as such, be sure that you have met the perquisites for enrollment.

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD POL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: POWERS and INSTITUTIONS FALL SEMESTER 2015

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Syllabus Spring 2017 Section A Professor Renee Knake

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM I GVPT 431. Course Content. Course Requirements

Professor Ken Vandevelde Fall 2017 SYLLABUS. Description of the Course

CONTENTS PART ONE FOUNDATIONS 1. CHAPTER 1 Studying Constitutional Law 3

The Significant Marshall: A Review of Chief Justice John Marshall s Impact on Constitutional Law. Andrew Armagost. Pennsylvania State University

A State Sovereignty Limitation on the Commerce Power

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND DEVELOPMENT POSC 4241 MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, FALL 2013

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW B LAW 5501, Section 0622 (4 credits) Professor Berta E. Hernández-Truyol. Fall 2017 SYLLABUS

Constitutional Law Outline

RESEARCHING GONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Chief Justice, info Case Name and Year Holding Winners Losers Shorthand /Notes. -Strict Construction Power to tax is the (1819)

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Professor Emily Berman. Course Description

Federalism: The Next Generation

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment 2018 J. Cunning

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996)

ConLaw I: Structure of Government LAW 121 (002) Prof. Greve Fall Welcome

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA DIVISION

Commerce Clause Doctrine

A.P. US Government & Politics Summer Assignment THIS IS A TWO PART ASSIGNMENT! BE SURE TO READ THROUGH THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT!!!

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

CRS Report for Congress

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Syllabus Spring 2019 Professor D. Theodore Rave

State Sovereign Immunity:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Epstein and Walker, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR A CHANGING AMERICA, Vol. 1: Institutional Powers and Constraints

Introduction to Constitutional Litigation and Analysis A. Overview

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colombia Circuit

Legislation & Regulation (Section 2) Fall 2012 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, WCC 1010 SYLLABUS

The Negative Commerce Clause as a Restriction on State Regulation and Taxation: An Analysis in Terms of Constitutional Structure

Con law Outline Basic Formula for Analysis: -- Make flow chart for each test Overview C. Congress s Authority

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I LAW 650 SECTION 339 SPRING 2015 PROF. PETERS. Syllabus (version 1 dated 12/01/14)

Common Sense: Implicit Constitutional Limitations on Congressional Preemptions of State Tax

Legislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] SYLLABUS

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment Students have a FOUR part summer assignment ALL PARTS ARE DUE ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL

I. Introduction... 2 a. Supreme court Practice, Procedure, and Composition... 2 b. Ways of Interpreting the Constitution... 2 c.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Legal Reference Guide for Librarians. Handout for Legal Ease Workshop DO S & DON TS FOR LEGAL REFERENCE

Branches of Government

Federalism (States v. National Gov t & Regulation)

AHG 660: The Federal System Summer 2018, Session 2 Instructor: John Dinan

The Federal Commerce and Navigation Powers: Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County's Undecided Constitutional Issue

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CASES AND MATERIALS ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Sixth Edition

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Assigned Texts: Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (5 th ed. 2005) Supplement (2007)

Courthouse News Service

1. Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein and Mark V. Tushnet, Constitutional Law, 4 th ed. (Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, 2001).

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the

Not So Sweeping After All: The Limits of the Necessary and Proper Clause

Federalism. Rich Pedroncelli/AP Images. Copyright 2016, 2014, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Constitutional Law for a Changing America

Constitutional Law classnotes, Fall Professor R. Miller.

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

DATE: April 19, 2010 Chief of Staff Office of the Governor SUBJECT:

From Common Law Regime to the Regulatory State

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. The Supreme Court s Authority and Role Chapter 2. Federalism: History and Principles

APGAP Unit 3 Midterm Exam

WICKARD V FILBURN AND US V LOPEZ: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN?

Federal-State Relations in Energy Law in the United States of America

Differences between Canadian and U.S. Federal Systems--Resulting Effects on the Ability to Deal with Cross-Border and International Issues

The Presidency and the Constitution

Foreword: Symposium on Federal Judicial Power

LECTURE. A braham Lincoln is often paraphrased as saying, The best way. The President s Duty to Faithfully Execute the Law.

CHAPTER 3: Federalism

AMERICAN POLITICS: FEDERALISM: Overview of Today s Lecture The Marshall Court The Marshall Court The Taney Court The Taney Court

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 9:09-cv DWM-JCL Document 32 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 10

The Legislative Branch

State Employers Are Not Sovereign: By Analogy, Transfer the Market Participant Exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause to States as Employers

CRS Report for Congress

Name Date Class KEY TERMS AND NAMES

The United States Constitution

The Constitutionality of State Environmental Laws Under the Commerce Clause: City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey

Regulation and the US Intergovernmental System. Lori A. Brainard Associate Professor Director, MPA Program Trachtenberg School of PPPA

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

All indirect taxes must be levied at the same rate in all parts of the country Cannot taxes churches. Limits on The Taxing Power

Election Notice. Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots. October 20, Ballot Due Date: November 20, Executive Summary.

The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment

Transcription:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW R. Miller Fall 2004 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION FEDERALISM & COMMUNITY THE JUDICIARY REVIEW AUTHORITY LIMITS ON AUTHORITY CONGRESSIONAL JUSTICIABILITY POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE The art of constitutional interpretation Limits on the federal judicial power Interpretive limits How should the constitution be interpreted?: the second amendment as an example United States v. Emerson United States v. Emerson, amicus brief Massey on constitutional interpretation [handout] Federalism introduced What role should concern over protecting states have in defining Congress s powers? Rubin & Feeley s Federalism: Some Notes on a National Neurosis The sociology of federalism Putnam s Bowling Alone [handout] Lyon s The Community in Urban Society [handout] Mike Stern s guest lecture Judicial review The authority for judicial review Marbury v. Madison Simon s Mr. Marbury s Missing Commission [handout] Authority for judicial review of state judgments Martin v. Hunter s Lessee Cohens v. Virginia Limits on the federal judicial power Congressional limits The Exceptions and Regulations Clause Ex parte McCardle Felker v. Turpin Separation of powers as a limit on congress s authority United States v. Klein Justiciability limits The political question doctrine The political question doctrine defined Malapportionment Baker v. Carr Vieth v. Jubilirer The political question doctrine applied Congressional self-governance Powell v. McCormack Foreign policy Goldwater v. Carter Impeachment and removal Nixon v. United States

F&C Federalism and community at the founding Federalist papers nos. 42, 44, 45, and 46 de Tocqueville s Democracy in America THE LEGISLATURE COMMERCE POWER 10TH AMENDMENT LIMITED ERA EXPANSIVE ERA LIMITED ERA Federal legislative power Scope of congressional authority Congress and the states McCulloch v. Maryland What role should concern over protecting states have in defining Congress s powers? Commercial power Initial era Gibbons v. Ogden Limited era: 1890s 1937 What is commerce? United States v. E.C. Knight Co. Carter v. Carter Coal Co. What does among the states mean? Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United States A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States Expansive era: 1937 1990s Dorothea Lange photos and Studs Terkel interviews [handout] Key decisions N.L.R.B. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. United States v. Darby Wickard v. Filburn The meaning of commerce among the states Heart of Atlanta, Inc. v. United States Katzenbach v. McClung Sr. and McClung Jr. Perez v. United States Tönnies s Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft Limited era?: 1990s??? What is Congress s authority to regulate commerce among the states? United States v. Lopez United States v. Morrison Does the Tenth Amendment limit congressional powers? Limited era: 1890s 1937 Hammer v. Dagenhart Champion v. Ames Expansive era: 1937 1990s National League of Cities v. Usery Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Limited era?: 1990s??? New York v. United States Printz v. United States; Reno v. Condon

THE LEGISLATURE F&C THE EXECUTIVE TAXING & SPENDING SUITS AGAINST STATE GOVERNMENTS THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Federalism and community today? Riesman s The Lonely Crowd [handout] Nisbet s The Quest for Community [handout] Viteritti & Russello s Community and American Fedralism [handout] Federal legislative power Taxing and spending For what purposes may congress tax and spend? United States v. Butler Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis Conditions on grants to state governments South Dakota v. Dole Sabri v. United States Congress s power to authoritze suits against state governments Background on the Eleventh Amendment and state sovereign immunity Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Congress s power to authorize suits against state governments Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida Board of Trustess, University of Alabama v. Garrett Nevada Dep t of Human Resources v. Hibbs Tennessee v. Lane Federal executive power Inherent presidential power Introduction Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer The scope of inherent power: the issue of executive privilege United States v. Nixon Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia The authority of congress to increase executive power Clinton v. City of New York The constitutional problems of the administrative state The non-delegation doctrine and its demise A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan Mistretta v. United States Whitman v. American Trucking Association, Inc. The legislative veto and its demise INS v. Chadha Checking administrative power The appointment power Morrison v. Olson The removal power The impeachment of Andrew Johnson

(EXECUTIVE) THE STATES (ADMIN. STATE) FOREIGN AFFAIRS PREEMPTION DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE Myers v. United States Humphrey s Executor v. United States Wiener v. United States Bowsher v. Synar Morrison v. Olson Separation of powers and foreign policy Are foreign policy and domestic affairs different? United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Treaties and executive agreements Dames & Moore v. Regan War powers War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) Are military tribunals constitutional? Detention, Treament, and Trial of Cetrain Non- Citizens in the War against Terrorism (66 Fed. Reg. 57,833). Ex parte Quirin Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Checks on the president Suing and prosecuting the president Nixon v. Fitzgerald Clinton v. Jones Impeachment Limits on state regulatory and taxing power Preemption of state and local laws Express preemption Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly Implied preemption Conflicts preemption Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. paul Preemption because state law impedes the achievement of a federal objective PG&E Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Comm n Preemption because federal law occupies the field Hines v. Davidowitz The dormant commerce clause Why a dormant commerce clause? H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. du Mond The dormant commerce clause before 1938 Cooley v. The Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia The contemporary test for the dormant commerce clause The shift to a balancing approach South Carolina State Highway Dep t v. Barnwell Bros., Inc. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ex rel. Sullivan

(STATES) F&C (DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE) Determining if a law is discriminatory Facially discriminatory laws City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkston, New York Hughes v. Oklahoma Facially neutral laws Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm n Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy State of Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. Analysis if a law is deemed discriminatory Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison, Wisconsin Maine v. Taylor and United States Analysis if a law is deemed non-discriminatory Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America Exceptions to the domeant commerce clause Congressional approval Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of California The market participant exception Reeves, Inc. v. Stake South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke Federalism and community: final thoughts Kymlicka s Community [handout] Powell s The other Double Standard: Communitarianism, Federalsm, and American Constitutional Law [handout] Kemmis s Comunity and Politics of Place [handout] Current s Tarhalls and Badgers [handout]