LMM108: Criminal Evidence 2

Similar documents
LMM143: Criminal Procedure 1

The Impact of the Silence Provisions of the CJPOA 1994 on Practicing the Right to Silence by Suspects in Police Stations and Courts

LX CPE Evidence ( )

Diffusion: the UCLan Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 8 Issue 2 (December 2015)

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

Dr. Scholastica Omondi (Ph.D.)

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

Common law system foundations for excluding evidence obtained illegally or unfairly and the relevant case law

Police Station Advice Advising on Silence

1. Jeffrey Pinsler SC, Evidence and the Litigation Process, 4th ed. (LexisNexis, Butterworths, 2013)

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE FIFTEENTH EDITION

INITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT

City, University of London Institutional Repository. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.

Restrictions on the Use of Sexual History Evidence: an Examination of Section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999

LPG Models, Methods and Processes

A Fair Hearing : Voice Identification, Parades and PACE. Jeremy Robson, Principal Lecturer and Barrister

LG3105 : Forensic Science and the Legal Process ( )

Council meeting 15 September 2011

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014

Criminal Law ( )

ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY IN VISUAL IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE. Subhash Chandra Singh Abstract

Jury Directions Act 2015

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL

PCLL CONVERSION EXAM June 2010 Examiner s Comments Evidence

BPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18

Stubley v. Western Australia, [2011] HCA 7, (2011) 275 A.L.R. 451 (March 30, 2011) High Court of Australia Evidence Bad character Propensity

Justice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission the Law Society of Scotland

Giving Legal Advice at Police Stations: Practical Pointers

Law of Evidence MENS REA 1. Law of Evidence

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

JUDGMENT. R v Horncastle and others (Appellants) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division)

RESTRICTIONS ON ADMISSIBILITY OF IMPROPERLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIAL. By Volha Ramanenka

How defense attorneys describe the Reid Technique in the courtroom and where they go wrong

SHELDON THOMAS. and THE QUEEN : March 11; October

Law Commission. EVIDENCE OF BAD CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A Summary

Preparation and Planning: Interviewers are taught to properly prepare and plan for the interview and formulate aims and objectives.

Response of the Law Society of England and Wales to draft CPS guidance for consultation on 'Speaking to Witnesses at Court'

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

Paper prepared by Dr Vicky Kemp for the International Legal Aid Group Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa June 2017.

Canadian Judicial Council Final Instructions. (Revised June 2012)

Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Act 2014 No 83

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015

Myths, Misconceptions and #MeToo: Expert Evidence in Historic Sexual Offence Trials

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Williams, Venning and Mander JJ. A G V Rogers, M H McIvor and J Kim for Appellant M H Cooke for Respondent

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

Hearsay confessions: probative value and prejudicial effect

Inside Police Custody

You re Nicked! UK Police Powers Compared. Laura Gillespie

In what circumstances can the right to self-incrimination be abrogated?

Give a brief description of case, particularly the. confession at issue and the pertinent circumstances surrounding

PART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Part One Briefing and Suggested Amendments. Stage 2. September 2015

Kyd PS, Elliott DT. Clarkson & Keating: Criminal Law: Text and Materials. 9th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell Ltd 2017.

WHY SO SILENT ON THE RIGHT TO SILENCE? MISSING MATTERS IN THE REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE ACT 2006

Indexed As: R. v. J.F. Supreme Court of Canada McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ. March 1, 2013.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

THE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, Arrangement of Sections

RUDI FORTSON Q.C. -- BIOGRAPHY BIOGRAPHY RUDI FORTSON Q.C.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 15, 2002 Session

ENGLISH WARNINGS. Mike Redmayne * INTRODUCTION

The People of the State of New York. against. Ismael Nazario, Defendant.

TRIAL DIRECTIONS FOR THE LOCAL COURT ADVOCATE

Michael SHIELDS. - and. The Republic of BULGARIA. Petition to the Varna District Prosecutor

Glossary of Terms (Theme 1)

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CRJ114 RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE. 3 credit hours. Prepared by: Mark A. Byington

RESPONSE by FACULTY OF ADVOCATES To Pre-Recording evidence of Child and Other Vulnerable Witnesses

Quality and Criminal Legal Aid in England and Wales

Introduction. Deciding to report abuse. Reporting to police

Keywords: Article 6 ECHR right of confrontation, absent and anonymous witnesses

Case Name: Laudon v. Roberts. Between Rick Laudon, Plaintiff, and Will Roberts and Keith Sullivan, Defendants. [2007] O.J. No.

Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2010

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES. Senior Airman TRAVIS W. PRICE United States Air Force ACM

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 184 th C. WESLEY FIELDS HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FUNDS

USALSA Report U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. Trial Judiciary Note. Claiming Privilege Against Self-Incrimination During Cross-Examination

The Attack on the Right to Silence An English Method in the Antipodes SHOULD WE WORRY?

v No Wayne Circuit Court

The Honorable Society of King s Inns. Entrance Examination 2014 LAW OF EVIDENCE

Criminal Justice Act 2003

The Law Commission. The consultation. Dr Chris Pamplin 5/5/2009. The Expert Witness 1

Module 1: Fundamentals of Law

THE CONFESSIONS RULE IN CANADA

THE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

The Criminalisation of Victims of Trafficking

R v. Hart: A Welcome New Emphasis on Reliability and Admissibility David M. Tanovich *

IN HER MAJESTY S COURT OF APPEAL IN NORTHERN IRELAND REGINA STASYS BARANAUSKAS. Before Stephens LJ, Treacy LJ and Horner J

NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011.

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

Jan Hoth, for appellant. Meredith Boylan, for respondent. Innocence Project, Inc.; Legal Aid Society et al., amici curiae.

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

The Examination and Crossexamination. Vulnerable Witnesses

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

Absconding Clients what to do if your defendant has absconded

Justice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Victim Support Scotland

Transcription:

LMM108: Criminal Evidence 2 View Online 1. Skinns, L. **The right to legal advice in the police station: past, present and future [2011] Crim. L.R. 1, 19-39. Criminal Law Review 2. Pleasence, P., Kemp, V. & Balmer, N. *The justice lottery? Police station advice 25 years on from PACE [2011] Crim. L.R., 1, 3-18. Criminal Law Review 3. Thompson, S. Judicial gatekeeping of police-generated witness testimony, 2012, J. Crim. L. & Criminology, Vol. 102, Issue 2, 329. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 4. *Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 5. European Convention on Human Rights. Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer. 6. www.gov.uk - PACE Codes of Practice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/police-and-criminal-evidence-act-1984-pace-cu 1/15

rrent-versions. 7. Baxter, J., Bain, S. & McAusland, J. Are you thick? : A case study of confrontational aspects of a police interview with a suspect (2007) Police Journal, Vol. 80, Issue 2, 99. Police Journal 8. Baldwin, J. Legal advice at the police station [1993] Crim. L.R. 371. Criminal Law Review 9. R v Grandinetti [2005] 1 S.C.R. 27. 10. R v Oickle [2000] 2 S.C.R. 3. 11. R v Shaheed [2002] 2 NZLR 377. 12. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 13. Dennis, I. H. The law of evidence. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2013). 14. 2/15

Mirfield, Peter. Silence, confessions and improperly obtained evidence / Peter Mirfield. (1997). 15. Mirfield, Peter & Oxford Scholarship Online Law. Silence, confessions, and improperly obtained evidence. Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice, (Clarendon Press, 1997). 16. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 17. Code C Section 6 (October 2013). 18. O Mahoney, B., Milne, B. & Grant, T. *To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects, Policing (2012) 6(3) 301. Policing 19. Dennis, I. Miscarriages of justice and the law of confessions: evidentiary issues and solutions (1993) PL 291. Public Law 20. Munday, R. *Adverse denial and purposive confession [2003] Crim. L.R. Dec, 850. Criminal Law Review 21. Roberts, A. *Evidence: Police and Criminal Evidence act 1984 ss.76, 78 - "safety interviews - admissibility [2009] Crim. L.R. 2, 110. Criminal Law Review 3/15

22. *Right to silence: confessions - Canada (case comment) [2008] Crim. L.R., 3, 248. Criminal Law Review 23. Mirfield, P. *Successive confessions and the poisonous tree [1996] Crim. L.R., Aug, 554. Criminal Law Review 24. Dennis, I. Instrumental protection, human right or functional necessity? Reassessing the privilege against self-incrimination (1995) C.L.J. Vol. 54, 342, 359-66, 367-69. Cambridge Law Journal 25. Gudjonsson, Gisli. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: a handbook. Wiley series in the psychology of crime, policing and law, (Wiley, 2003). 26. Gudjonsson, Gisli H. & Wiley Online Library EBS. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: a handbook. Wiley series in the psychology of crime, policing and law, (Wiley, 2003). 27. Wolchover, David & Heaton-Armstrong, Anthony. Wolchover and Heaton-Armstrong on confession evidence / David Wolchover and Anthony Heaton-Armstrong. The Criminal law library, (1996). 28. Choo, A. & Nash, S. Improperly obtained evidence in the Commonwealth: lessons for England and Wales? (2007) International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 11 (2) 75. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 4/15

29. Ashworth, A. Re-drawing the boundaries of entrapment [2002] Crim. L.R., Mar, 161. Criminal Law Review 30. Wadham, J. & Arkinstall, J. Rights to a fair trial (1999) 149 NLJ 381, 436 (published as Crime and human rights). New Law Journal 31. Wadham, J. & Arkinstall, J. Crime and human rights (1999) 149 NLJ 381. New Law Journal 32. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 33. Bucke, T., Street, R. & Brown, D. *The right of silence: the impact of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (Home Office Research Study 199). 34. Ferguson, P. *Repercussions of the Cadder case: the ECHR s fair trial provisions and Scottish criminal procedure [2011] Crim. L.R. 10, 743. Criminal Law Review 35. Birch, D. J. Suffering in silence: a cost-benefit analysis of section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 [1999] Crim. L.R. 769. Criminal Law Review 36. Jackson, J. D. Silence and proof: extending the boundaries of criminal proceedings in the 5/15

United Kingdom (2001) 5 E&P 145. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 37. Dennis, I. Silence in the police station: the marginalisation of section 34 [2002] Crim. L.R. 25. Criminal Law Review 38. *Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, ss 34-38. 39. *Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, ss 5 and 11. 40. Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, s.6. 41. *Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Codes of Practice - PACE Code C, para 10 and Annex B & C. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pace-code-c-2013. 42. Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction para. IV.44. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/practice-direction/part4. 43. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 44. 6/15

Criminal Justice Act 2003. 45. James, J. Good character directions and blemished defendants [1996] 2 Web JCLI. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/webjcli/1996/issue2/james2.html. 46. Mirfield, P. Character and credibility [2009] Crim. L.R. 135. Criminal Law Review 47. Roberts, A. Case comment, Evidence: bad character [2012] Crim. L.R. 3, 215. Criminal Law Review 48. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 49. Criminal Justice Act 2003. 50. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 51. Crinion, C. Adducing the good character of prosecution witnesses [2010] Crim. L.R. 7, 570. Criminal Law Review 52. 7/15

Munday, R. Cut-throat defences and the propensity to be untruthful under s.104 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 [2005] Crim. L.R. 624. Criminal Law Review 53. Elliott, D. W. Cut throat tactics: the freedom of an accused to prejudice a co-accused [1991] Crim. L.R. 5. Criminal Law Review 54. Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal Proceedings - Law Commission Report No. 273, para 1.7. Available at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/evidence-of-bad-character-in-criminal-pro ceedings.htm. 55. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 56. September 2013 online update of The Modern Law of Evidence by Adrian Keane and Paul McKeown. 57. Spencer, J. R. & Flin, Rhona. The evidence of children: the law and the psychology. (Blackstone, 1993). 58. Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 59. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. 8/15

60. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 61. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 62. Ormerod, D. C. Sounds familiar? Voice identification evidence [2001] Crim. L.R. 595. Criminal Law Review 63. Lewis, P. A comparative examination of corroboration and caution warnings in prosecutions of sexual offences [2006] Crim. L.R. 889. Criminal Law Review 64. Warburton, D. & Lewis, T. Opinion evidence; admissibility of ad hoc expert voice recognition evidence: R v Flynn (2009) E. & P., 13(1), 50. International Journal of Evidence & Proof 65. O Floinn, M. & Ormerod, D. Social networking material as criminal evidence [2012] Crim. L.R. 486. Criminal Law Review 66. Davies, Graham & Beech, Anthony R. Forensic psychology: crime, justice, law, interventions. (Wiley, 2012). 67. 9/15

Valentine, T. & Mesout, J. Eyewitness identification under stress in the London Dungeon (2009) Appl. Cognit. Psychol., Vol. 23, Issue 2, 151. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23, 151 161 68. Bruce, V. & Young, A. Understanding face recognition (1986) British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305. British Journal of Psychology 77, 305 327 (1986). 69. Guidelines on memory and the law, a report from the Research Board of the British Psychological Society Judicial Commission of New South Wales. Available at: http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/sexual_assault/british-guidelines_on _memory_and_the_law.html. 70. Keane, A. The use at trial of scientific findings relating to human memory [2010] Crim. L.R. 19. Criminal Law Review 71. R v Turner [1975] QB 834. 72. Jury directions on identification evidence from Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012. 73. Joffe, V. Reports of committees: Report of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases (1976) 39 Mod. L. Rev. 707. Modern Law Review 39, 707 714 (1976). 74. R v Turnbull [1977] QB 224, CA. 10/15

75. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 76. GOV.UK - PACE Code D 2011. 77. Ruling of Fulford J in R v Simpson, Sutton, Russell & Russell, Central Criminal Court, 15 October 2012. 78. Bruce, V. Fleeting images of shade: Identifying people caught on video - The Psychologist, Vol. 11, Part 7, 331 ( July 1998). Available at: http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/archive/archive_home.cfm?volumeid=11&editionid=65 &ArticleID=265. 79. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. 80. GOV.UK - PACE Code D 2011. 81. Spencer, J. R. & Flin, Rhona. The evidence of children: the law and the psychology. (Blackstone, 1993). 82. Cornell University College of Human Ecology - Law, Psychology, and Human Development 11/15

Resources. Available at: http://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/outreach-extension/memory_children_law.cfm. 83. Myers, J. E. B., Saywitz, K. J. & Goodman, G. S. Psychological research on children as witnesses: practical implications for forensic interviews and courtroom testimony. Pacific Law Journal 28, 3 92 (1996). 84. OU researcher identifies techniques to improve the accuracy of eye witness identification with children Platform Open University. Available at: http://www.open.ac.uk/platform/news-and-features/eye-witness-identification. 85. Robinson, B. Family Law Week: ABE Interviews: Is the Child s Best Evidence being achieved in alleged sexual abuse cases? (Part 1). Available at: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed24715. 86. Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant s previous criminal record: a simulation study [2000] Crim. L.R., Sep, 734. Criminal Law Review 87. Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on lay magistrates of hearing that the defendant is of good character, being left to speculate, or hearing that he has a previous conviction [2006] Crim. L.R., Mar, 189. Criminal Law Review 88. Osman, M. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning, Pyschonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2004, Volume 11, Issue 6, 988. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, (2004). 12/15

89. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. 90. Spencer, J. R. & Flin, Rhona. The evidence of children: the law and the psychology. (Blackstone, 1993). 91. The British Psychological Society. Guidelines on memory and the law, recommendations from the scientific study of human memory. (2008). 92. Myers, J. E. B., Saywitz, K. J. & Goodman, G. S. Psychological research on children as witnesses: practical implications for forensic interviews and courtroom testimony. Pacific Law Journal 28, 3 92 (1996). 93. Robinson, B. Family Law Week: ABE Interviews: Is the Child s Best Evidence being achieved in alleged sexual abuse cases? (Part 1). Available at: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed24715. 94. Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant s previous criminal record: a simulation study [2000] Crim. L.R., Sep, 734. Criminal Law Review 95. Lloyd-Bostock, S. The effects on lay magistrates of hearing that the defendant is of good character, being left to speculate, or hearing that he has a previous conviction [2006] Crim. L.R., Mar, 189. Criminal Law Review 96. 13/15

Criminal Justice Act 2003, ss.114-116. 97. Al-Khawaja v United Kingdom (2011) 32 BHRC 1. 98. R v Riat [2012] EWCA Crim 1509, [2013] 1 All ER 349. 99. R v Twist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143 [2011] 3 All ER 1055. 100. Keane, Adrian & McKeown, Paul. The modern law of evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 101. Spencer, John R. & Hart Publishing Law E-Book Collection. Hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings. (Hart Pub, 2008). 102. Spencer, John R. Hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings. (2008). 103. Dennis, I. H. The law of evidence. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2013). 104. Tapper, Colin & Cross, Rupert. Cross and Tapper on evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2010). 14/15

105. Choo, Andrew L.-T. Evidence. (Oxford University Press, 2012). 106. Ormerod, D. Case comment evidence: hearsay - Criminal Justice Act 2003 ss.114-115 [2011] 10 Crim. L.R. 793. Criminal Law Review 107. Birch, D. Criminal Justice Act 2003: (4) hearsay - same old story, same old song? [2004] Crim. L.R., Jul, 556. Criminal Law Review 108. Graham, M. H. Stickperson hearsay: a simplified approach to understanding the rule against hearsay (1982) University of Illinois Law Review 887. University of Illinois Law Review 109. R v Mateza [2011] EWCA Crim 2587. 110. Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Hearsay - Law Commission (LC245) 19 June 1997, Part VII. Available at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/evidence-in-criminal-proceedings-hearsay.htm. 111. Bad Character & Hearsay - David Ormerod. 15/15