SDC SONY DOCUMENT FJCiRONICAU FILED

Similar documents
Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

5:01-cv JF Document 363 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document 363 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 13. " E' FRO" Cf'LLY FILED DCJ #'^%C' SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: P/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No CIV-HUCK/O SULLIVAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. CV DSF (AJWx)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

40,00~ O1 1 2 CS 7 WESTERN DIVISIO N. Ctrm: Hon. George P. Schiavelli. 20 All Actions. t : ~~' I~ ' `' 21}06 EICEr,+

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : :

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : CLASS ACTION : : : : Master File No. 1:08-cv LTS

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-cv KBF Document 328 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:12-cv MCA-LDW CLASS ACTION

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

#0 I. ! l>a TE FILE ~ V 1 Q r USDC ~DNY, DOCU'.\'IENT I FLF.CTRO:\ICALLY FILED I I DOC#:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Transcription:

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SDC SONY DOCUMENT FJCiRONICAU FILED In re FOCUS MEDIA HOLDING LIMITED LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 1:07-cv-10617-LTS(GWG) -: CLASS ACTION 4 ' [RdSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE x 6966201

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 2 of 11 This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing for Notice ("Order") dated December 16, 2011, on the application of the Settling Parties for approval of the Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated September 26, 2011. Due and adequate notice having been given to the Class as required in said Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. This Final Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settlement Agreement, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, unless otherwise set forth herein. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all Settling Parties to the Action, including all members of the Class. 3. The Court hereby certifies the following class for settlement purposes only: All Persons who purchased or acquired Focus Media's American Depositary Shares or Focus Media's American Depositary Receipts during the period September 27, 2007 through November 19, 2007, inclusive, and including, without limitation, Focus Media's November 2007 secondary public offering (the "Class Period"). Excluded from the Class are Defendants, members of the immediate family of any such Defendant, any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director or other individual or entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Class Period, the officers and directors of any Defendant during the Class Period, and the legal representatives, agents, executors, heirs, successors or assigns of any such excluded Person. Also excluded from the Class are any putative Class Members who timely and validly excluded themselves from the Class in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Notice. 4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement and finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class. 6966201

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 3 of 11 5. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement and Settlement are fair, reasonable, and adequate as to each of the Settling Parties, and that the Settlement Agreement and Settlement are hereby finally approved in all respects, and the Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms. 6. Accordingly, the Court authorizes and directs implementation of all the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement, as well as the terms and provisions hereof. The Court hereby dismisses, as to Defendants, the Action and all Released Claims of the Class with prejudice, without costs as to any Settling Party, except as and to the extent provided in the Settlement Agreement and herein. 7. Upon the Effective Date hereof, and as provided in the Settlement Agreement, Lead Plaintiff shall, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Persons, whether or not such Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim and Release. 8. Upon the Effective Date hereof, and as provided in the Settlement Agreement, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged Lead Plaintiff, each and all of the Class Members and Plaintiffs' Counsel from all claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Action. 9. Upon the Effective Date hereof, and as provided in the Settlement Agreement, Lead Plaintiff and each of the Class Members, and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, shall also be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have fully, finally, and 696620_i -2-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 4 of 11 forever released, relinquished, and discharged Defendants and Defendants' counsel from all claims (including the Unknown Claims) arising out of the defense, conduct, settlement, or resolution of the Action and the Released Claims. 10. Lead Plaintiff, all members of the Class, the successors and assigns of any of them, and anyone claiming through or on behalf of any of them, are hereby permanently barred, enjoined, and restrained from instituting, commencing or prosecuting, either directly or in any other capacity, in the Action or any other action or proceeding, any Released Claims against any of the Released Persons. The Released Claims against each and all of the Released Persons shall be released and dismissed with prejudice and on the merits. Nothing in this paragraph shall release the Released Claims against the Released Persons by a Class Member who submitted a timely, signed request for exclusion from the Class and who did not submit a timely, signed request to revoke the prior request for exclusion and are identified on Exhibit I attached hereto ("Opt-Out Plaintiffs"). 11. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action given to the Class was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including the individual notice to all members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable effort. Said notice provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of those proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the requirements of due process. 12. Any plan of distribution submitted by Lead Counsel or any order entered regarding any attorneys' fee and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect this Judgment and shall be considered separate from this Judgment. 6966201-3-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 5 of 11 13. Neither the Settlement Agreement nor the Settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement Agreement or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of the Released Persons, or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Defendants or the Released Persons in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. Defendants and/or the Released Persons may file the Settlement Agreement and/or this Judgment from this Action in any other action in which they are parties or that may be brought against them in order to support a defense, claim, or counterclaim based on principles of resjudicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 14. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing exclusive jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this Settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining applications for attorneys' fees, interest, and expenses in the Action; and (d) all Settling Parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Settlement Agreement, 15. The Court finds that during the course of the Action, the Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 16. The Defendants have provided notification to all appropriate federal and state officials regarding the Settlement as required by 28 U.S.C. 1715. 696620_I -4-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 6 of 11 17. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to Defendants, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. 18. Without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. 19. The Court directs entry of this Final Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: THE MAORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 696606! -5-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 7 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 23, 2012, I submitted the foregoing to orders and judgments(nysd.uscourts.gov and c-mailed to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Court's Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-cm/ecf participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 23, 2012. s/ Ellen Gusikoff Stewart ELLEN GUSIKOFF STEWART ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101-3301 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) E-mail: elleng@rgrdlaw.com 696620_i -1-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 8 of 11 Richard A. Maniskas KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA 19087 6966201-2-

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 9 of 11 *FOCUS EXCL0000I * FEB 13 2012 CLAIMS CENTER Exclusion Cover Page Case Name: Focus Media Holding Limited Case Code: FOCUS Exclusion Deadline: 3/16/2012 (Postmark Date) Name of Person Filing Exclusion: Whitney Benefits

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 10 of 11 WHITNEY BENEFITS An educational foundation Cs ebistied by the I&t Edward A Whitney of Sheridan, Sheridan County, Wyoming EX[CIJTWI DIUCTORj Patrick Henderson In Re Focus Media Holding Limited Litigation Claims Administrator do Gilardi & Co LLC P.O. Box 990 Corte Madera, CA 94976-0990 February 10, 2012 Re: Exclusion from Focus Media Holding Limited Litigation To Class Counsel: Whitney Benefits requests to opt out of the Class and be excluded from the Settlement in Focus Media Holding Limited Litigation. The name, address and telephone number is: Transactions in Focus Media Holding Limited during the period September 27, 2007 through November 19, 2007 are as follows:. Sale of 500 shares on 11/05/07. Sincerely, Whitney Benefits T nmso Title: President of Whitney Benefits OAD OF TRt1S1EES p C-.,'e en HnNt M.jr,"n k To-n rce e Loe E.rctt E M: crlr, tr nj- -fl S StTCt L'jl J Wtten.v

Case 1:07-cv-10617-LTS Document 61 Filed 04/25/12 Page 11 of 11 LA YW 0 0 -S 'S co bo i-,- 0 L) L ci o 0<E o cz Q) _d cz 1 0 C. 0 I- U. UI UI (2i Jc-. w I-.- UI I- I hico LLJ -J C.) < rj)