FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

Similar documents
Shri Rajeev Khosla, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Jatan Singh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association,

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR KOCHHAR

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE TRANSFER OF JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR TO THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

FAREWELL SPEECH DELIVERED BY JUSTICE GITA MITTAL IN THE FULL COURT REFERENCE ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE G. ROHINI, CJ

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007 W.P.(C) 3755/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Decision: 11 th March, 2010

Through Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate with petitioner in person. VERSUS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Versus

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE. CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No /2009(Stay)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017

O.M THANKACHAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS

Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR. Writ Petition No. 623 OF 2017 (PIL) PETITIONER : Kanhaiya Shailesh & Others. Vs.

Sub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.

Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: Versus...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO OF 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

CDJ 2010 SC 546 JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPH

Order Delhi State Association Page 1 of 8

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.92 of Monday, the 29 th day of July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) No. 469/2011

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

(in short RSKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI O R D E R. Rajasthan State Kabaddi Association (RSKA) affiliated to AKFI was invited to

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TR.P.(CRL.) 42/2015 & CRL.M.A.13562/2015 & CRL.M.A /2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY MATTER. Date of Decision : January 16, 2007 W.P.(C) 344/2007

An Interlocutory Application has been filed by the. writ petitioners for early disposal of this writ petition, which has been. admitted.

+ W.P.(C) 7127/2015, CM APPL. No /2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM THE PRIMARY ORIGINS OF LAW: The Indian Constitution customary law case law, and Statutes (legislation).

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 763 of 2008 and C.M. No.1484 of 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : GRATUITY. WP(C) No.19753/2004. Order reserved on : Date of Decision: August 21, 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Date of decision: 19th April, 2011 W.P.(C) 8647/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003. Judgment delivered on: versus

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment pronounced on: W.P.(C) 393/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2017 M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS VERSUS O R D E R

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for R-2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No. 422 of 2010 C.R.PARK M, N & P BLOCKS RESIDENTS WELFARE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 826 of 2010

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2174/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTEMPT OF COURT. Contempt case No. 293/2003 (With CM No /2006)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA AMENDMENT OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ENABLING RESTORATION OF COMPLAINTS. Report No.

Daryao and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh: A Case Analysis

MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION INAUGURAL FUNCTION TO CELEBRATE THE COMMENCEMENT OF ITS 150 TH YEAR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELALTE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No.

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH

LIST OF COMMITTEES. I. Committee dealing with the Building and Maintenance of Tis Hazari Court Complex :

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5096/2015 & Crl.M.A /2015 Date of Decision : January 13 th, 2016.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Through: Mr. P. Kalra, Advocate. Versus. Through: Mr. R.V.

THE FUTURE OF THE PAROLE BOARD RESPONSE OF THE CRIMINAL SUB COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF HM CIRCUIT JUDGES

Judicial Reforms in the Court of Appeal A discussion Paper by Hon. Justice Z. A. Bulkachuwa, CFR President, Court of Appeal of Nigeria

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 638/2009 & Crl.M.A.2384/09 (stay) Date of reserve:

Act, with the objective to serve as a post-graduate school for advanced. teaching and research in Economics and allied subjects and to admit students

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.8133/2011 & CM No.2004/2012 Date of Decision:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 03, 2007 WP(C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. Judgment delivered on: WP (Crl.) No.

INFORMATION UNDER RTI ACT, 2005 ABOUT NCLAT

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No /2018

LL.B. - II Term Paper LB Law of Crimes II The Code of Criminal Procedure

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4158/2015 Date of Decision : January 08 th, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Appeal No.625 of 2018 [Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

2. The Director General, Sashastra Seema Bal, Ministry of Home Affairs, East Block, R.K. Puram, New Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRL.L.P. 316/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

OPEN LETTER THE HON BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA, APPEAL TO RESTORE THE RIGHTS OF THE TELECOM CONSUMERS IN THE COUNTRY AND OR FOR SUO MOTU

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. AA No.396/2007. Date of decision: December 3, Vs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, 2002 Date of decision: 2ndJuly, 2014 LPA No.390/2014

With best Compliments RSHRC

Reserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010

! Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Batra, Mr. Aditya Kumar and Mr. Jitender Anand, Advs. Versus

BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN

versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2020 OF 2013 LT. COL. VIJAYNATH JHA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Transcription:

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA DELIVERED ON 09.12.2016 G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE Justice Sunita Gupta, My esteemed brother and sister colleagues, Shri Kirti Uppal, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Sanjay Jain, Additional Solicitor General, Shri J.P. Sengh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Amit Sharma, Secretary, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal), Govt. of NCT of Delhi Other Standing Counsel of the Central and State Government, Executive Members of the Delhi High Court Bar Association, Office-bearers of other District Bar Associations, Senior Advocates, Members of the Bar, District & Sessions Judges, Law Secretary, Family members of Justice Sunita Gupta, Ladies and gentlemen. Page 1 of 6

One of our dear colleagues Justice Sunita Gupta is demitting office today after exemplary service to this High Court for more than three and a half years. Born on 14 th December, 1954, Justice Sunita Gupta did her schooling from West Bengal Board of Secondary Education in First Division in the year 1970 and her Graduation and Post Graduation in Philosophy from University of Delhi in 1973 and 1975 respectively. Justice Sunita Gupta did her LL.B. from Campus Law Centre, Delhi University and was awarded Hiralal Daga Memorial Gold Medal, University Law Union Prize and Certificate of Merit for securing first position in LL.B. She did her LL.M from Kurukshetra University in 2002. Justice Sunita Gupta enrolled with the with Bar Council of Delhi in 1978 and practiced at District Courts of Delhi before joining Delhi Judicial Service on 10 th September, 1980. She worked in different capacities such as Metropolitan Magistrate, Civil Judge, Additional Rent Controller, Mahila Court and ACMM before being promoted to Delhi Higher Judicial Service on 16 th November, 1996. Post her promotion to Higher Judiciary, Justice Sunita Gupta presided over the Bench as Additional District Judge, Additional Sessions Judge, Matrimonial Court, Special Judge (NDPS), Appellate Tribunal MCD. She was appointed as District Judge cum-additional Sessions Judge In-Charge, North-East District, Karkardooma Court in 2008 and as District & Sessions Judge on 17 th October, 2011. Page 2 of 6

Justice Sunita Gupta was elevated as an Additional Judge of Delhi High Court on 17 th April, 2013 and as Permanent Judge on 18 th March, 2015. From day one, Justice Sunita Gupta has discharged her duties with full dedication and commitment and her zeal to learn more and more made her stand away from others. Her judgments have always been analytical, well researched and well reasoned with innovative approach. While laying down the law, Justice Sunita Gupta has laid emphasis on the social values that a civilized and cultured society is required to perceive and follow. Her brief tenure as a Judge of this Court is dotted with many path breaking judgments on procedural as well as substantive laws. She has very efficiently dealt with number of Death References, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Revisions, Preventive Detention etc. apart from different subjects on civil jurisdiction. Some of her important judgments include Doodh Nath v. State (Crl.A. No.696/2000). This was a case of brutal rape of a seven year old girl. While dismissing the appeal, it was held that such an act leaves a permanent scar on the personality of the child, inhibiting growth and development and that there are no special reasons warranting imposition of a sentence of lesser term keeping in view the brutality of the crime. Page 3 of 6

In Ravi Kumar & Others v. State (Crl.A. No.819/2011), which was a case of honour killing, it was observed that Indian society is based on the deep routed value system and traditional values still play a key role in social operation, be it solemnization of marriages or other customary functions. While upholding the judgment and order of sentence passed by the Trial Court, it was observed that despite radical societal changes caused due to multiple factors, the parental dominance over the lives of their children, which includes their education and career decision still exists. In Raj Ballabh v. State (Crl.A. No.476/2004), insanity of the appellant at the time of commission of offence was the main plea that has been urged for reversing the conviction and sentence in question. While dismissing the appeal, it was observed that a person laboring under a delusion or a psychological or psychiatric ailment would not be entitled to be acquitted on the ground of insanity unless it is established that at the time when the crime was committed, he was suffering the delusion, psychological or psychiatric condition and was incapable of knowing the nature of his act or that he was not knowing that what he was doing was wrong or contrary to law. Page 4 of 6

In Sanjay Kumar Thakur v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi [W.P.(C) N.5828/2016], the Petitioners who were appointed as Lab Assistant in the erstwhile MCD were claiming that they should be covered under the Old Pension Scheme attributing the delay in appointment/joining to the Respondents. It was held that the delay in issue of appointment letters was bona fide and unintentional and by the time the appointment letters were issued, New Pension Scheme had become applicable. The contention of the Petitioners that the Old Pension Scheme would be applicable to all employees depending upon the date when the recruitment process was initiated was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed. It is deducible from the Judgments that Justice Sunita Gupta decided both procedural and substantive matters with the same level of care placing reliance upon the principles of social justice and equity to redress the grievance of the aggrieved parties as best as she can, without deviating from the letter of the law. As a member of the noble profession, she religiously worked to maintain the dignity, sincerity and nobility of the profession. Justice Sunita Gupta has also been a member of various committees including Criteria Committee, Monitoring Committee to Oversee the Functioning of All District Mediation Centres in Delhi, and has made enormous contribution for the well being of the institution. Page 5 of 6

On my behalf and on behalf of my brother and sister Judges, I wish her success in all her future endeavors. May the choicest blessings of the Almighty be showered on her and her family for more happy, healthy and prosperous years to come. Thank you. Page 6 of 6