LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 1 OF 5

Similar documents
Chart 12.7: State Appellate Court Divisions (Cross-reference ALWD Rule 12.6(b)(2))

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL AUTHORITIES AND LEGAL RESEARCH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv GAP-DAB. versus

2016 National Legal Research Teach-In Kit

Experiential Legal Writing I - Citations Quiz INSTRUCTIONS

Status of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHAPTER 8 RESEARCHING A STATE LAW PROBLEM

Cases: A Primary Source of Law. Professor Lisa Smith-Butler Nova Southeastern University

PUBLISH TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. No PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., L.P.,

Strickland v. Arch Ins. Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cv ACC-TBS. versus

Ethical Issues Arising in Alternative Dispute Resolution

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON MARCH 5, 2002 Session

Ethical Considerations That Plaintiff s Counsel Must Address In A Multi-Plaintiff Settlement

Case: , 06/11/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 36-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Terance Healy v. Attorney General Pennsylvania

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

Cases & Court Documents

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE TIME, INC., MAGAZINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos ,

LEXSEE 2006 US APP LEXIS 28280

STATE STANDARDS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2016

CHAPTER 7 CASE LAW RESEARCH

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 6, 2010

Case 1:05-cr MGC Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 13

Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:05-cr MSK Document 604 Filed 04/14/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11

SUMMIT CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ASHLAND HEIGHTS, LP, Defendant. Civil No. 3:16-CV-17

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

RESPONDENT S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. The Respondent, Robert L. Schimmel, by and through undersigned counsel,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv WYD-MEH Document 9 Filed 09/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

which we were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction against borrowers. Additionally, SAC later received summary judgment over all of Plaint

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 5, 2001 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 17, 2008 Session

Nevada Right to Publicity Statute I. ISSUES PRESENTED. The client has requested research regarding Nevada s right to publicity statute

NO In The Supreme Court of the United States. Petitioner, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GULF COAST, INC., ET AL., Respondents.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv KJM-AC Document 56 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case5:11-cv EJD Document133 Filed11/20/13 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cv WPD.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

APPENDIX C Citation Guide

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ROBERT KOENEMUND, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC DCA No. 5D

ISAACMAN KAUFMAN & PAINTER, P.C., a California professional corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge. The Defendant, Schumacher Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 20, 2008 Session

C.A. No D. Ct. No. CV PCT-GMS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. BLACK MESA WATER COALITION, et al.

U.S. Law and Legal Research

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Introduction to Federal Case Law Research

No United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPELAS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC th DCA Case No.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2006

Dipoma v. McPhie. Supreme Court of Utah July 20, 2001, Filed No

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2014

Appendix 6 Right of Publicity

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

In this case we must decide whether Kentucky law or Illinois law governs a lawsuit arising

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:00-cv JF Document 257 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH ROGERS, BY AND ) THROUGH HIS MOTHER AND NEXT ) FRIEND, JUDY LONG, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Shelby Law No T.D. ) vs.

July 1, Dear Administrator Nason:

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

STAT E ST AND A RDS F OR AP P OINTM ENT OF COU NS EL I N DE ATH P EN ALTY CAS ES

Case: , 05/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANTAN SALDAÑA, Plaintiff/Appellant, No. 2 CA-CV Filed July 21, 2017

Maximize Your Contract s Exculpatory Provisions

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 14, 2010 Session

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 13, 2005 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE September 21, 2009 Session

Transcription:

LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 1 OF 5 PROBLEM ONE 10 Points Directions: Cite to the following case. At this time, the case is not yet published in a reporter. However, it is available on Westlaw. The unique database identifier is 2012 WL 2010191. A case that has not yet been published is not the same as an opinion that has been designated unpublished by the court. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INCORPORATED et al., Defendants-Appellants Docket Number 1291 Colorado Court of Appeals September 10, 2012, Decided PROBLEM TWO 30 Points Directions: Cite to the portion of the concurrence described below. PETER JACKSON et al., BROTHERHOOD OF TOLKIEN APPRECIATION AND SCHOLARSHIP et al. No. 54-3039 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 192 U.S. 398; 493 S. Ct. 2094; 112 L. Ed. 982; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 1822 December 10, 2008, Argued July 29, 2009, Decided CONCURRENCE BY JUSTICE ROBERTS Justice Roberts cites sections 560 through 567 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, published in 2006. This appears on page 420 of the United States Reports and page 2102 of the Supreme Court Reporter.

LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 2 OF 5 PROBLEM THREE 15 Points Directions: Cite to text appearing on pages 396 through 399 of the Pacific Reporter in the following case. Supreme Court of Arizona Plaintiff-Appellant: CITY OF PHOENIX Defendant-Appellee: WALTER WHITE; JESSE PINKMAN et al. PROBLEM FOUR 20 Points Case No. 502393FG2 364 P. 3d 392; 2007 Az.. LEXIS 555 April 2, 2007, Argued May 19, 2007, Decided Directions: The text below is a sample from a legal memo. On your answer sheet, correct the bolded citations so that they conform to the Bluebook. In Gloria Vanderbilt American Diabetes Association 610 So.2d 501, (Florida Supreme Court 2000), the Florida Supreme Court held that standing to pursue a legal malpractice action is conferred upon those who can show that the testator's intent is frustrated by the negligence of the testator's attorney. This exception has been relaxed in will drafting situations. 535. [This citation refers to page 535 of the Gloria Vanderbilt case, which you have referred to elsewhere in the memo as Vanderbilt ] In these cases, even a non-client may have standing to sue for malpractice. Brogan, 844 F.Supp. 753, 756 (S.D.Fla. 1994). However, courts apply this exception narrowly. Id at 556 [This reference refers to page 556 of the Gloria Vanderbilt case]

LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 3 OF 5 PROBLEM FIVE 10 Points Directions: Cite to the bolded portions of the statute. UNITED STATES CODE ***Approved in 2007. The selected portion appears in the 2008 publication of the U.S. Code*** TITLE 7. FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER 11. LIVESTOCK 1907 Practices involving nonambulatory livestock (a) Report The Secretary of Agriculture shall investigate and submit to Congress a report on-- (1) the scope of nonambulatory livestock; (2) the causes that render livestock nonambulatory; (3) the humane treatment of nonambulatory livestock; and (4) the extent to which nonambulatory livestock may present handling and disposition problems for stockyards, market agencies, and dealers. (b) Authority Based on the findings of the report, if the Secretary determines it necessary, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations to provide for the humane treatment, handling, and disposition of nonambulatory livestock by stockyards, market agencies, and dealers.

LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 4 OF 5 PROBLEM SIX 20 Points Directions: Cite to the following case. Include subsequent history in the citation. PAUL RYAN on behalf of JOE BIDEN, Plaintiff STATE OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants No. 06-5421 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39191; 531 F.Supp.3d 666 April 29, 2006, Decided SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Paul Ryan on behalf of Joe Biden, et al., Plaintiffs State of Indiana, et al., Defendants No. 09-33091 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DISPOSITION: Reversed. 2006 App. LEXIS 3029; 2007 FED App. 84322 ( Cir.); 290 F.3d 984 November 19, 2006, Argued December 10, 2007, Decided December 23, 2007, Filed

LRW FALL SEMESTER 2012 PROBLEMS PAGE 5 OF 5 PROBLEM SEVEN 15 Points Directions: Cite to the following case. First Appellate District, Division 2, Court of Appeal of California STEPHEN COLBERT et al., Petitioners SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION, Respondent Ci No. 690420 454 Cal. App. 3d 574; 653 Cal. Rptr. 221; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 4221 September 19, 2011 Decided