PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES PARENT S CLAIM FOR NEGLIGENT OR WRONGFUL INJURY TO MINOR CHILD.

Similar documents
MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of North Carolina

DEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INDIRECT EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE ONLY ( RES IPSA LOQUITUR )

(Use for claims arising on or after 1 October For claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I. Civil )

PAGE 1 OF 8 N.C.P.I. Civil MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE ONLY. GENERAL CIVIL VOLUME JUNE

[to use his best judgment in the treatment and care of his patient] 3

by the negligence of the defendant in treating the plaintiff s emergency medical condition 2?"

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 19, 2015) SECOND REPRINT S.B Referred to Committee on Judiciary

DEFAMATION--SLANDER ACTIONABLE PER QUOD--PRIVATE FIGURE--NOT MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN. 1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE AUGUST 6, 2002 Session

1. Who is eligible for State compensation?

NC General Statutes - Chapter 130A Article 17 1

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

Damages - The Compensatory Theory Favored over the Colateral Source Doctrine - Coyne v. Campbell, 11 N.Y.2d 372, 183 N.E.

June 2015 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases

Your verdict in this case will take the form of an answer to. the issue. That issue appears on the verdict sheet which has been

Court of Appeals. Slip Opinion

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

DEFAMATION--SLANDER ACTIONABLE PER QUOD--PRIVATE FIGURE--MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN. 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

In the Supreme Court of Florida

H 5452 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Special Damages. Nebraska Law Review. R. M. Van Steenberg District Judge of the 17th Judicial District of Nebraska. Volume 38 Issue 3 Article 7

The defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1

Transition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of This chapter may be cited as the "Criminal Injuries Compensation Act.

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY PART II

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

The Survival of Actions Act

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2. Petitioner filed a Victim Compensation Application seeking reimbursement for medical expenses.

Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92

FLORIDA STATUTES ANNOTATED TITLE 46. CRIMES CHAPTER 775. DEFINITIONS; GENERAL PENALTIES; REGISTRATION OF CRIMINALS (2010)

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

In Indiana, the nature and extent of damages recoverable for wrongful death are dependent on the status of the decedent and his/

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

Did the defendant control (state name of affiliated company) with regard to the [acts] [omissions] that [injured] [damaged] the plaintiff?

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the

SAMOA ACCIDENT COMPENSATION AMENDMENT ACT. No. 7, Arrangement of Provisions

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DISTRICT CIVIL DIVISION

1 Economic Damages are defined for Washington State in RCW (1)(a) as:

18 U.S.C discretionary restitution. (a) (1)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

June 2017 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BILL, Arrangement of Clauses PART I PRELIMINARY PART II

Title 4: JUDICIARY. Chapter 7: PROBATE COURT. Table of Contents

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

In the event you find (have found) the defendant guilty of (name offense), you must then consider and answer the following question:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004

The Disabled Persons Allowances Act

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPENDIUM OF LAW

PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN TORT LAW

Emerging Trend. Impetus for Trend 9/22/2017. Hold em or Fold em: Gambling with the Introduction of Medical Bills

HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 43 1

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA

plaintiff claiming to be the administratrix of a decedent's estate, but who filed the action prior to qualifying as such, is

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPENDIUM OF LAW

The Disabled Persons Allowance Act

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,841 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARY J. PICKETT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED OCTOBER 13, 2005

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 September 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E KATHLEEN T. CORDRY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT

Date: July 17, In Re: Dear

GUARDIANSHIP ISSUES FOR THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN

The defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1. Under the law and the evidence in this case, it is your duty to return

Case 3:07-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS THE TIMING OF AN ORDER AWARDING FEES: JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Look Mom, I Can Do It on My Own: A Child's Independent Right to Recover Medical Expenses in Missouri

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 38, No. 76, 28th April, No. 18 of 1999

DEBORAH FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FOOD LION, LLC, BUDGET SERVICES, INC., and FRANK S FLOOR CARE, Defendants NO. COA Filed: 6 September 2005

Downloaded From

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Jeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon (503)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15B Article 1 1

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

THE FAILURE TO CHARGE ON ALL OF THESE MATTERS CONSTITUTES REVERSIBLE ERROR

IDAHO VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS¹

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. The plaintiff, David Lutz, by and through his counsel of record, Brett Dressler, Esq.

c 82 Compensation for Victims of Crime Act

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

NO. COA (Filed 4 January 2011) Workers Compensation settlement agreement required language omitted not enforceable

A libelous statement is one which (select the appropriate alternative):

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

Insurance - Is the Liability Carrier Liable for Punitive Damages Awarded by the Jury?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE July 26, 2001 Session

/ Court: 055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Transcription:

Page 1 of 5 MINOR CHILD. NOTE WELL: Although the claims of a parent and an injured child as a result of a single act of negligent or wrongful conduct can be joined under N.C. GEN. STAT. 1A-1, Rule 20, they remain separate damage issues. The (state number) issue reads: What amount is (state name of parent) entitled to recover for the personal injury 1 to (state name of child)? If you have answered the (state issue number) issue in favor of (state name child), (state name of parent) is entitled to nominal damages even without proof of actual damages. Nominal damages consist of some trivial amount such as one dollar in recognition of the technical damages incurred by (state name of parent). (State name of parent) may also be entitled to recover actual damages. On this issue the burden of proof is on (state of name parent). This means (state name of parent) must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the amount of actual damages [proximately caused by the negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant. (State name of parent) is entitled to fair compensation for the actual [loss of services of (state name of child)] [loss of earnings of (state name of child)] 1. If the child dies as a result of his injuries, the wrongful death statute displaces a parent s claim under this instruction and, accordingly, the wrongful death instructions should be given. See N.C.P.I. Civil 810.40 ( Wrongful Death Damages Issue and Burden of Proof ). Only the personal representative or the collector of the estate of the deceased may bring a wrongful death action. See N.C. GEN. STAT. 28A-18-2 (2009); Burcl v. N.C. Baptist Hosp., Inc., 306 N.C. 214, 217, 293 S.E.2d 85, 87 (1982). Thus, a parent cannot bring an action in his own name for the death of a minor child. See Killian v. Southern Ry. Co., 128 N.C. 261, 263, 38 S.E. 873, 873 (1901); Scarlett v. Norwood, 115 N.C. 284, 286, 20 S.E. 459, 460 (1894) (dictum). Likewise, a parent has no right of action for medical and funeral expenses incurred on behalf of deceased unemancipated minor children. See Keys v. Duke U., 112 N.C. App. 518, 520, 435 S.E.2d 820, 821 (1993); Christenbury v. Hedrick, 32 N.C. App. 708, 712, 234 S.E.2d 3, 5 (1977).

Page 2 of 5 [necessary expenses incurred for medical treatment of (state name of child) s injuries] [proximately caused by the negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant. In considering this issue, you must not duplicate any damages you have already awarded to (state name of child). Thus, any damages you award (state name of parent) may not include any compensation which can only be claimed by (state name of child), such as [loss of earnings after the age of majority] [scars or disfigurement] [loss (of use) of part of the body] [pain and suffering] [permanent injury] [state any other type of damage at issue in child s case-in-chief]. You must limit your consideration to (state name of parent) s actual [loss of services of (state name of child)] [loss of earnings of (state name of child)] [necessary expenses incurred for medical treatment of (state of name child) s injuries]. The total of all damages are to be awarded in one lump sum. I will now explain the law of damages as it relates to each of these. [Loss of Services. A parent is entitled to the services of his child during minority. 2 Where the child s services are lost as a [proximate result of the negligence] [result of the wrongful conduct] of a person, the parent is entitled to fair compensation. Loss of services, whether voluntary or obligatory, includes the monetary value of reasonably expected services, protection, care and assistance from the child. 3 [Loss of Earnings. A parent is entitled to the earnings of his child during minority. Where these earnings are lost as a [proximate result of the negligence] [result of the wrongful 2. See Smith v. Hewett, 235 N.C. 615, 617, 70 S.E.2d 825, 827 (1952). 3. See id.

Page 3 of 5 conduct] of a person, the parent is entitled to fair compensation. Loss of earnings includes the amount the child would have earned but for the [loss of time] [the inability to work] [the reduced capacity to earn money] [proximately caused by the negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of another. You may consider: [the child's age and occupation] [the nature and extent of the child s employment] [the value of the child s services] [the amount of the child s income from fixed salary or wages at the time of his injury] [disability or disfigurement affecting the child s earning capacity] [loss of profits from the child s business or profession] [specify any other factor supported by the evidence].] [Necessary Medical Expenses. A parent is under a duty to support his child during minority, including a duty to care for the child. 4 As such, a parent is liable for any necessary medical treatment received by the child. Thus, a parent is entitled to fair compensation for any reasonably necessary medical expenses for the child [proximately resulting from the negligence] [resulting from the wrongful conduct] of a person. Medical expenses include the actual amounts paid or incurred by the parent for hospital, doctors and drug bills, and other reasonably necessary medical expenses.] You are instructed that (state name of parent) is entitled to recover for [the loss of services of (state name of child)] [the loss of earnings of (state name of child)] [the necessary 4. See id.

Page 4 of 5 expenses incurred for the medical treatment of (state of name child) s injuries] only for so long as (state name of child) is a minor. Once (state name of child) [attains the age of eighteen] [becomes emancipated] 5, (state name of parent) is no longer entitled to [(state name of child) s services] [(state name of child) s earnings] [reimbursement for (state name of child) s necessary medical expenses] 6. Any damages you award (state name of parent) must be limited to the period of time before (state name of child) [turns eighteen] [becomes emancipated]. (Use the next paragraph only if there is evidence which would justify a finding that services or earnings will be lost or additional medical expenses will be incurred in the future: [Lost services] [Lost earnings] [Necessary medical expenses] also include the amount which you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, will hereafter [be lost] [be paid or incurred by (state name of parent) for necessary medical expenses] as a [proximate result of the negligence] [result of the wrongful conduct] of the defendant until the time (state name of child) reaches eighteen. However, any amount you allow for future [lost services] [lost earnings] [necessary medical expenses] must be reduced to its present value, because a smaller sum received now is equal to a larger sum received in the future. These future losses are limited to the period from now until the child reaches the age of eighteen.) (There is evidence before you that (state name of parent) s actual damages for future [lost services] [lost earnings] [necessary medical expenses] have already been reduced to their present value. 5. See N.C. GEN. STAT. 7B-3500 (2009). 6. Ordinarily, the obligation of the parent to support the child ends with the attainment of majority. However, if the child is too weak in mind or body that he is unable to support himself and remains in the parent s home unmarried, the parent s duty to support continues. See Ramsey v. Todd, 25 N.C. App. 605, 607, 214 S.E.2d 307, 309 (1975).

Page 5 of 5 Whether they have in fact been so reduced is for you to determine from the evidence and from your logic and common sense. However, if you find that (state name of parent) s actual damages for future [lost services] [lost earnings] [necessary medical expenses] have already been reduced to present value, you must not reduce them again.)) I instruct you that your findings on the (state issue number) issue must be based upon the evidence and the rules of law I have given you with respect to the measure of damages. You are not required to accept the amount of damages suggested by the parties or their attorneys. Your award must be fair and just. You should remember that you are not seeking to punish either party, and you are not awarding or withholding anything on the basis of sympathy or pity. Finally, as to the (state issue number) issue on which (state name of parent) has the burden of proof, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence the amount of actual damages [proximately caused by the negligence] [caused by the wrongful conduct] of the defendant, then it would be your duty to write that amount in the blank space provided. If, on the other hand, you fail to so find, then it would be your duty to write a nominal sum such as One Dollar in the blank space provided.