Federal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education

Similar documents
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017

4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014

I. Potential Challenges Post-Johnson (Other Than Career Offender).

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS APPELLEE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr WTM-GRS-1

Case 3:15-cr EMC Document 83 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr JDW-AEP-1.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 1:13-cr MC Document 59 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ORDER

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TRAVIS BECKLES, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Trevon Sykes - Petitioner. vs. United State of America - Respondent.

MICHIGAN OFFENSES WHICH ARE OR ARE NOT CRIMES OF VIOLENCE (AS OF AUGUST 14, 2018) SIXTH CIRCUIT AND EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN CASES PAGE 1

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Committee for Public Counsel Services Immigration Impact Unit 21 McGrath Highway, Somerville, MA 02143

Case 3:12-cr SI Document 48 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

with Ron, Tammy & Fritz

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV LH-CG and ALFONSO THOMPSON,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 135 S. Ct (2015): Its Impact and Implications

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

When a State Felony is not A Federal Felony. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term 2013

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER 2011 TERM. RICARDO MARRERO, Petitioner. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Post-Descamps World. Paresh Patel, Federal Public Defender, D.Md. October 8, 2015

Post-Descamps World. Paresh Patel, Federal Public Defender, D.Md.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit

Armed Career Criminal and Career Offender Enhancements. If you can t avoid them, deflect them.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: February 26, 2018 Decided: January 4, 2019 ) Docket No.

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals

OTHER GROUNDS OF DEPORTABILITY OR INADMISSIBILITY? 1

JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 135 S. Ct (2015)

Date Jan. 5, 2016 Original X Amendment Prepared: Bill No: HB 037 Correction Substitute. APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 135 S. Ct (2015): Its Impact and Implications

United States Court of Appeals

Crimes of Violence Updates. Michael Dwyer and Brocca Morrison Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDMO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:16-cv ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 135 S. Ct (2015): Its Impact and Implications

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman ANTHONY M. BUCCO District 25 (Morris and Somerset)

Federal Sentencing. Oxford, MS Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education

Summary: First Step Act, S. 756 (115th Congress, 2018)

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

NO MORE SIMPLE BATTERY IN WEST VIRGINIA: THE NEWLY AMENDED AND Katherine Moore*

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA U.S. SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE

United States Court of Appeals

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

When Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements

Case 3:15-cr Document 38 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 146

Select Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Mens Rea Defect Overturns 15 Year Enhancement

Matter of Martin CHAIREZ-Castrejon, Respondent

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

Summary: H.R. 5682, FIRST STEP Act (115th Congress, 2018) Sponsors: Representatives Doug Collins (R-GA) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION

NO: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2015 TRAVIS BECKLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AMILCAR LINARES-MAZARIEGO, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr JLK-1. versus

The Enumerated Offenses

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1282

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C INTRODUCTION

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

TIER 2 EXCLUSIONARY CRIMES

Woodward, Berger, Shaw Geter,

Case 9:02-cr DWM Document 55 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

(3) less than twenty-five years but ten or more years, as a Class C felony; (4) less than ten years but five or more years, as a Class D felony;

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 466 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT NO Plaintiff/ Appellee, Defendant/ Appellant.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

United States Court of Appeals

JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES: ITS IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Case 3:17-cr SI Document 67 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

For the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Petitioner, v. No LORETTA LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States,

Offenses Moved from the Commentary to the Enumerated Offense Clause at USSG 4B1.2 Effective August 1, 2016 Generic Definitions and Other Issues

Immigration Violations

For the purposes of this agreement, a person commits assault in the third degree if that person:

THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

Transcription:

Federal Sentencing Guidelines FJC Court Web Alan Dorhoffer Deputy Director, Office of Education Johnson v. U.S., 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) 2 The Armed Career Criminal Act s residual clause is unconstitutionally vague. ACCA Definition of Violent Felony 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(B) 3...has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. 1

Johnson s Potential Impact 18 U.S.C. 16(b) that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense 18 U.S.C. 924(c) that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense 4 924(c) Is Not impacted by Johnson 5 U.S. v. Hill, F.3d, 2016 WL 4120667 (2d Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Taylor, 814 F.3d 340 (6 th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Prickett, F.3d, 2016 WL 4010515 (8 th Cir. 2016) 18 U.S.C. 16(b) 6 16(b) is unconstitutional Golicov v. Lynch, F.3d, 2016 WL 4988012 (10 th Cir. 2016) Shuti v. Lynch, 828 F,3d 440 (6 th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Vivas Ceja, 808 F.3d 719 (7 th Cir. 2015) Dimaya v. Lynch, 803 F.3d 1110 (9 th Cir. 2015) 16(b) is constitutional U.S. v. Gonzalez Longoria, F.3d, 2016 WL 4169127 (5 th Cir. 2016) 2

Johnson Is Retroactive for ACCA Cases 7 Welch v. U.S., 136 S. Ct. 1257 (April 18, 2016) Johnson announced a new substantive rule that has retroactive effect in cases on collateral review Johnson was decided on June 26, 2015 Career Offender Cert Granted Beckles v. U.S., 616 F. App x 415 (11 th Cir. 2015), cert granted, 136 S. Ct. 2510 (2016) (1) Whether Johnson applies retroactively to collateral cases challenging federal sentences enhanced under the residual clause at 4B1.2(a)(2) (2) Whether Johnson's constitutional holding applies to the residual clause in 4B1.2(a)(2), thereby rendering challenges to sentences enhanced under it cognizable on collateral review; and (3) whether mere possession of a sawed off shotgun, an offense listed as a crime of violence only in commentary to 4B1.2, remains a crime of violence after Johnson. 8 Crime of Violence Definition at Career Offender ( 4B1.2(a)) 9 Means any offense under federal or state law punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or is murder, voluntary manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, a forcible sex offense, robbery, arson, extortion, or the use or unlawful possession of a firearm described in 26 U.S.C. 5845(a) or explosive material as defined in 18 U.S.C. 841(c) 3

Summary of Changes to the List of Enumerated Offenses at 4B1.2 10 Moves a number of enumerated offenses from the commentary to the guideline Changes manslaughter to voluntary manslaughter Eliminates burglary of a dwelling and extortionate extension of credit as enumerated offenses Creates definitions of forcible sex offense and extortion New Departure Provisions 11 Upward departure at 4B1.2 to address certain cases in which the instant offense or a prior felony conviction was a burglary involving violence Downward departure provision in 4B1.1 for cases in which one or both of the defendant s two prior felony convictions is based on an offense that was classified as a misdemeanor at the of sentencing for the instant federal offense (e.g., South Carolina) Iowa burglary 702.12 12 An occupied structure is any building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures, land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, 4

Burglary under ACCA 13 ACCA enumerated offenses: burglary, arson, explosives, extortion Generic definition of burglary: an unlawful or unprivileged entry into... a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime. Mathis v. U.S, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) 14 Iowa burglary is not a violent felony under the categorical approach because statute was too broad The Eighth Circuit incorrectly used the modified categorical approach because the statute did not contain multiple elements Mathis v. U.S, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) Distinguishing between elements and facts is therefore central to ACCA's operation. 15 Elements are the constituent parts of a crime's legal definition the things the prosecution must prove to sustain a conviction. At a trial, they are what the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the defendant and at a plea hearing, they are what the defendant necessarily admits when he pleads guilty 5

Mathis v. U.S, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) 16 Facts, by contrast, are mere real world things extraneous to the crime's legal requirements. They are circumstance[s] or event[s] having no legal effect [or] consequence : In particular, they need neither be found by a jury nor admitted by a defendant. And ACCA, as we have always understood it, cares not a whit about them. Iowa burglary 702.12 An occupied structure is any building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures, land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, 17 And those listed locations are not alternative elements, going toward the creation of separate crimes. To the contrary, they lay out alternative ways of satisfying a single locational element, as the Iowa Supreme Court has held: Each of the terms serves as an alternative method of committing a single crime of burglary, so that a jury need not agree on which of the locations was actually involved. How to determine if a statute contains elements or facts 18 State supreme court decisions interpreting the statute Plain language of the statute (different penalties?) Jury instructions 6

Elements vs Facts 19 2.01(a)(1) Aggravated Assault (1) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse Robbery Offense Remands 20 U.S. v. Parnell, 818 F.3d 974 (9 th Cir. 2016) MA armed bank robbery not a violent felony U.S. v. Gardner, 823 F.3d 793 (4 th Cir. 2016) NC common law robbery not a violent felony U.S. v. Jones, F.3d, 2016 WL 3923838 NY first degree robbery is not categorically a crime of violence at 4B1.2 Robbery Offense Remands 21 U.S. v. Eason, 829 F.3d 633 (8 th Cir. 2016) AR robbery is not a violent felony U.S. v. Sheffield, F.3d, 2016 WL 4254995 (D.C. Cir. 2016) DC attempted robbery statute is not a crime of violence U.S. v. Dixon, 805 F.3d 1193 (9 th Cir. 2015) CA robbery is not a violent felony 7

Robbery is a Violent Felony/Crime of Violence U.S. v. Hill, F.3d, 2016 WL 4120667 (2d Cir. 2016) Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence at 924(c) 22 U.S. v. McBride, 826 F.3d 293 (6 th Cir. 2016) Here, 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) was a crime of violence at 4B1.2 U.S. v. House, 825 F.3d 381 (8 th Cir. 2016) Hobbs Act robbery was a serious violent felony under 3559(c)(2)(F)(ii) U.S. v. Duncan, F.3d, 2016 WL 4254936 (D.C. Cir. 2016) IN robbery is a violent felony Attempted Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter 23 U.S. v. Hernandez Montes, F.3d, 2016 WL 3996698 (5 th Cir. 2016) FL attempted 2 nd degree murder was not a crime of violence at 2L1.2 U.S. v. Benally, F.3d, 2016 WL 4073316 (9 th Cir. 2016) Involuntary Manslaughter (18 U.S.C. 1112) is not a crime of violence under 924(c) Assault and Battery 24 U.S. v. Jordan, 812 F.3d 1183 (8 th Cir. 2016) AR aggravated assault (a)(1) not a violent felony U.S. v. Braun, 801 F.3d 1301 (11 th Cir. 2015) FL aggravated battery of a pregnant woman not a violent felony FL battery on law enforcement officer not a violent felony U.S. v. Fogg, F.3d, 2016 WL 4698954 (8 th Cir. 2016) MN drive by shooting was a violent felony 8

Assault 25 U.S. v. Garcia Longoria, 819 F.3d 1063 (8 th Cir. 2016) NE assaulting police officer a crime of violence at 2K2.1 U.S. v. Fields, 823 F.3d 20 (1 st Cir. 2016) Massachusetts assault with a deadly weapon is a crime of violence under 4B1.2 Sexual Abuse of A Minor U.S. v. Alfaro, F.3d, 2016 WL 4501950 (4 th Cir. 2016) MD 3 rd degree sex. offense is forcible sex offense at 2L1.2 26 U.S. v. Madrid, 805 F.3d 1204 (10 th Cir. 2015) TX aggr. sex. assault under 14 not a crime of violence at 4B1.2 U.S. v. Puga Yanez, F.3d, 2016 WL 3708243 (5 th Cir. 2016) GA child molestation is a crime of violence under 2L1.2 Drug Trafficking Offenses U.S. v. Hinkle, F.3d, 2016 WL 4254372 (5th Cir. 2016) TX delivery of heroin did not qualify as a controlled substance offense under 4B1.2 27 U.S. v. Martinez Cruz, F.3d, 2016 WL 4728806 (10 th Cir. 2016) 21 U.S.C. 846 is not a drug trafficking offense at 2L1.2 U.S. v. Dominguez Rodriguez, 817 F.3d 1190 (10 th Cir. 2016) 21 U.S.C. 841 is categorically a drug trafficking offense for purposes of 2L1.2 9

Highlights of 2L1.2 Amendment 28 Eliminates categorical approach in almost all cases Focuses on: Number of prior illegal reentry convictions Length of prior felony sentence before first order of removal or deportation Length of felony sentence after reentry Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release 5B1.3 & 5D1.3 The amendment revises, clarifies, and rearranges the conditions of probation and supervised release in order to make them easier for defendants to understand and probation officers to enforce 29 The classifications of mandatory, standard, and special have been changed for some conditions Mens rea requirements are added in some conditions Child Pornography and File Sharing Distribution Enhancement Application 30 The 2 level specific offense characteristic applies if the defendant knowingly engaged in distribution The 5 level specific offense characteristic applies if the defendant knowingly distributed in exchange for any valuable consideration with any person 10

Molina-Martinez v. U.S., 136 S. Ct. 1338 (2016) 31 The Guidelines' central role in sentencing means that an error related to the Guidelines can be particularly serious. A district court that improperly calculat[es] a defendant's Guidelines range, for example, has committed a significant procedural error. The Government remains free to poin[t] to parts of the record including relevant statements by the judge to counter any ostensible showing of prejudice the defendant may make. Alternative Sentences U.S. v. Hentges, 817 F.3d 1067 (8 th Cir. 2016) We find it unnecessary to address whether he qualifies as a career offender, because the district court's alternative decision to vary upward from the advisory guideline range is sufficient to justify the sentence imposed. 32 U.S. v. Davis, 825 F.3d 359 (8 th Cir. 2016) Since the record is silent as to what the district court might have done had it considered the correct Guidelines range, the court's reliance on an incorrect range is sufficient to show that the error affected Davis' substantial rights. Recent Supervised Release Conditions Remands 33 U.S. v. Gall, 829 F.3d 64 (1st Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Fey, F.3d, 2016 WL 4363131 (1st Cir. 2016) U.S. v. West, F.3d, 2016 WL 3947815 (9 th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Von Behren, 822 F.3d 1139 (10 th Cir. 2016) 11

Recent Restitution Remands U.S. v. Mahmood, 820 F.3d 177 (5th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Fowler, 819 F.3d 1381907 (6th Cir. 2016) 34 U.S. v. Titus, 821 F.3d 930 (7 th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Thomsen, F.3d, 2016 WL 4039711 (9 th Cir. 2016) U.S. v. Nosal, 828 F.3d 865 (9 th Cir. 2016) Commission Resources www.ussc.gov helpline (202) 502 4545 @theusscgov pubaffairs@ussc.gov 12