IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Similar documents
Supreme Court of the United States

Nos (L), , , (Consolidated) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Nos & 16A1190. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 63 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 10 Filed 01/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 90 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 26 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Nos (L), , , (Consolidated) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv DKW-KSC Document Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 6784 EXHIBIT A

RESPONDENTS OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR STAY

Case 5:17-cv OLG Document 58 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 262 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7

2:11-cv RMG Date Filed 03/03/14 Entry Number 152 Page 1 of 7

(See Next Page for Additional Counsel) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI I

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 26 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv TDC Document 130 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 345 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 6

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. Defendants-Appellants.

Case: , 11/17/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 36, Page 1 of 12 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

No. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. IN RE ANGELICAVILLALOBOS, JUAN ESCALENTE, JANE DOE #4, and JANE DOE #5

Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 80 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv ABJ Document 41 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. Defendants-Appellants.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Supreme Court of the United States

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

Case3:14-cv RS Document66 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 9

Case: , 02/06/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 26-1, Page 1 of 9. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Case: Document: 15 Filed: 07/06/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: July 06, 2016

Case 3:15-cv N Document 13 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID 663 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv AT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case 1:15-cv TSE Document 116 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) )

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv Document 2 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 30

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Supreme Court of the United States

NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (8:17-cv TDC)

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

Case KG Doc 200 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:17-cv OLG Document 79 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 61 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 77 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID#: 998

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv MHT-CSC Document 70 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 66 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:03-cv KAM

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

Pakootas, Donald R. Michel, and State of Washington,

Defendants. Judge: Hon. Manuel L. Real

Appeal No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Bradley Berentson, et al. Brian Perryman,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

Nos (L), IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

HISPANIC INTEREST COALITION OF ALABAMA, ET AL. Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. ROBERT BENTLEY, ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 15 Filed: 01/16/2018 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No MARC VEASEY; et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (5:15-cv D)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016

Case: Document: 20 Filed: 01/26/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: January 26, 2017

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 1 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

Transcription:

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 17-2231 (L), 17-2232, 17-2233 IRAP PLAINTIFFS-CROSS- APPELLANTS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO EXPEDITE MERITS BRIEFING SCHEDULE IRANIAN ALLIANCES ACROSS BORDERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants-Appellants. EBLAL ZAKZOK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 8 The plaintiffs proposed schedule differs by a single week from the government s. Specifically, the plaintiffs respectfully request that they be afforded three weeks to respond to the government s opening brief, while the government has proposed that plaintiffs have only two. The plaintiffs proposed schedule including plaintiffs proposed due date for their initial brief is already highly expedited. Cf. F.R.A.P. 28.1(f). And in the previous appeal in this case, this Court provided plaintiffs the same amount of time to file their principal brief that they are currently requesting. Shortening that time could unnecessarily compromise plaintiffs ability to fully respond to the government s brief, particularly in light of the requirement that plaintiffs in three separate cases, each represented by separate groups of counsel, coordinate their response, see L.R. 28(a), (d). The government has not identified any concrete harm that will result if the briefing on this appeal takes a total of seven weeks rather than six, and none exists. Nor has the government demonstrated that providing the additional week would prevent the Supreme Court from hearing a subsequent appeal this Term or explained why the plaintiffs time to respond should be shortened in order to accommodate the government s 2

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 3 of 8 preference regarding the scheduling of a subsequent appeal, even if that were the case. 1 In any event, even under plaintiffs proposed schedule, the appeal will be fully briefed before the end of the Court s scheduled December sitting. And if an earlier cross-appeal reply deadline would facilitate the Court s consideration of the appeal, the plaintiffs could file their cross-appeal reply brief on Monday, December 4. For these reasons, plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court set the plaintiffs proposed schedule, which will expedite the appeal while allowing plaintiffs a full and fair opportunity to respond: Appellants brief: November 1, 2017 Response/Cross-Appellants brief: November 22, 2017 Reply/Cross-Appellees brief: November 29, 2017 Cross-Appellants reply brief: December 6, 2107 1 That is especially true given that earlier in this litigation, the government was content to allow the Supreme Court s merits review to occur in a subsequent Term, see App. Stay, No. 16A1190 at 40 (U.S. filed June 1, 2017). 3

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 4 of 8 Dated: October 25, 2017 Respectfully submitted, Karen C. Tumlin Nicholas Espíritu Melissa S. Keaney Esther Sung National Immigration Law Center 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Tel: (213) 639-3900 Fax: (213) 639-3911 tumlin@nilc.org espiritu@nilc.org keaney@nilc.org sung@nilc.org Justin B. Cox National Immigration Law Center PO Box 170208 Atlanta, GA 30317 Tel: (678) 279-5441 Fax: (213) 639-3911 cox@nilc.org Kathryn Claire Meyer Mariko Hirose International Refugee Assistance Project 40 Rector Street, 9th Floor New York, New York 10006 Tel: (646) 459-3044 Fax: (212) 533-4598 4 /s/ Omar C. Jadwat Omar C. Jadwat Lee Gelernt Hina Shamsi Hugh Handeyside Sarah L. Mehta David Hausman American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 Tel: (212) 549-2600 Fax: (212) 549-2654 ojadwat@aclu.org lgelernt@aclu.org hshamsi@aclu.org hhandeyside@aclu.org smehta@aclu.org dhausman@aclu.org Cecillia D. Wang Cody H. Wofsy Spencer E. Amdur American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 343-0770 Fax: (415) 395-0950 cwang@aclu.org cwofsy@aclu.org samdur@aclu.org

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 5 of 8 kmeyer@refugeerights.org mhirose@refugeerights.org David Rocah Deborah A. Jeon Sonia Kumar Nicholas Taichi Steiner American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Maryland 3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 350 Baltimore, MD 21211 Tel: (410) 889-8555 Fax: (410) 366-7838 jeon@aclu-md.org rocah@aclu-md.org kumar@aclu-md.org steiner@aclu-md.org Johnathan Smith Sirine Shebaya MUSLIM ADVOCATES P.O. Box 66408 Washington, D.C. 20035 Tel: (202) 897-2622 Fax: (415) 765-1774 johnathan@muslimadvocates.org sirine@muslimadvocates.org (I.A.A.B., et al. Plaintiffs) Richard B. Katskee Eric Rothschild Andrew L. Nellis AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 1310 L St. NW, Ste. 200 Washington, D.C. 2005 David Cole Daniel Mach Heather L. Weaver American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 915 15 th Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 675-2330 Fax: (202) 457-0805 dcole@aclu.org dmach@aclu.org hweaver@aclu.org Mark H. Lynch Mark W. Mosier Herbert L. Fenster Jose E. Arvelo John W. sorrenti Karun Tilak COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One City Center 850 10 th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202) 662-6000 Fax: (202) 662-6302 mlynch@cov.com mmosier@cov.com hfenster@cov.com jarvelo@cov.com jsorrenti@cov.com ktilak@cov.com (I.A.A.B., et al. Plaintiffs) Rebecca G. Van Tassell COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars 5

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 6 of 8 Tel: (202) 466-3234 Fax: (202) 466-3353 katskee@au.org rothschild@au.org nellis@au.org (I.A.A.B., et al. Plaintiffs) Charles E. Davidow Robert A. Atkins Liza Velazquez Andrew J. Ehrlich Steven C. Herzog PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019-6064 Tel.: (212) 373-3000 Fax: (212) 757-3990 ratkins@paulweiss.com lvelazquez@paulweiss.com aehrlich@paulweiss.com sherzog@paulweiss.com (Zakzok, et al. Plaintiffs) Faiza Patel Michael Price Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law 120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271 Tel.: (646) 292-8335 Fax: (212) 463-7308 faiza.patel@nyu.com michael.price@nyu.com (Zakzok, et al. Plaintiffs) Los Angeles, California 90067 Tel: (424) 332-4800 Fax: (424) 332-4749 RVanTassell@cov.com (I.A.A.B., et al. Plaintiffs) Lena F. Masri Gadeir Abbas Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) 453 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20003 Tel.: (202) 488-8787 Fax: (202) 488-0833 lfmasri@cair.com gabbas@cair.com (Zakzok, et al. Plaintiffs) Jethro Eisenstein Profeta & Eisenstein 45 Broadway, Suite 2200 New York, New York 10006 Tel.: (212) 577-6500 Fax: (212) 577-6702 jethro19@gmail.com (Zakzok, et al. Plaintiffs) 6

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 7 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 25th day of October, 2017, I caused a PDF version of the foregoing document to be electronically transmitted to the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF System for filing and for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants. Dated: October 25, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Omar Jadwat Omar C. Jadwat

Appeal: 17-2231 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/25/2017 Pg: 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to FRAP 32(g)(1), I hereby certify that the foregoing corrected motion complies with the type-volume limitation in FRAP 27(d)(2)(A). According to Microsoft Word, the motion contains 349 words and has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Times New Roman in 14 point size. Dated: October 25, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Omar Jadwat Omar C. Jadwat