IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 324 W. Market Street Greensboro, NC 27401

Similar documents
: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 02/17/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:163

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/19/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/15/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 3:13-cv JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division General Docket

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv KJM-KJN Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Courthouse News Service

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case

Case: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JTM-JEM document 1 filed 11/13/18 page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

Transcription:

Wen-chouh Lin Plaintiff [Address] Phone No [...] Email [.] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 324 W. Market Street Greensboro, NC 27401 Wen- chouh Lin, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. Richard Brodhead, Ph.D., President; Deborah Jakubs, Ph.D., University Librarian & Vice Provost for Library Affairs; Duke University; Bench Trial Demanded Defendant ELECTRONICALLY FILED COMPLAINT 1

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is an employment-related action for violations of the Plaintiff s civil rights by his employer, Duke University, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ( Title VII ) and The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. 623 ("ADEA"). The employer engaged in unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII and ADEA when the employer decided to layoff the plaintiff based on his age, national origin, race, and sex and in retaliation for his prior protected activity of filing discrimination complaints. The plaintiff is representing himself (pro se) in this proceeding. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The defendant, Duke University ( University ), employs 20 or more employees at the relevant time in this matter. 2. The unlawful employment practices alleged below were committed and/or executed by supervisory personnel of the University, which is located in Durham, North Carolina. Accordingly, venue lies in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. PARTIES 3. The Plaintiff, Wen-chouh Lin, is an adult individual who has a mailing address of 1500 Duke University Road, Apt. J3B, Durham, NC 27701-2934 and is 2

currently employed by Duke University as an Catalog Librarian. 4. The Defendant, Duke University, is located in Durham, North Carolina. 5. The University employs approximately 30,000 employees. 6. The University President is Richard Brodhead, Ph.D., at Duke University, 207 Allen Bldg, Durham, NC 27710. 7. The University Librarian and Vice Provost for Library Affairs is Deborah Jakubs, Ph.D., at Perkins 112, Durham, NC 27708. 8. The University s Office of Counsel is at 310 Blackwell Street, 4th Floor, Box 104124, Durham, NC 27710. STATEMENT OF FACTS 9. The Plaintiff has been employed full time by the University since 1968. 10. From 1968 to present, the Plaintiff maintained above average performance ratings throughout his employment with the University. 11. The Plaintiff was born on October 10, 1933. As of January 9, 2009, he was 76 years old. 12. The Plaintiff is Asian. 13. The Plaintiff was born in Shanghai, China. 14. The Plaintiff is male. 3

15. In or about 1984 and thereafter, the Plaintiff filed complaints of discrimination with U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging nonpromotion, unequal pay, and unfair tuition benefits for children. 16. On January 9, 2009 the Plaintiff was notified of elimination of his position for the feasibility of outsourcing cataloging of the Chinese language materials to be effective January 8, 2010. 17. On January 23, 2009, The University terminated Plaintiff s continuing appointment and deprived him of Rights of Staff Affected By A Reduction-in- Force. 18. On January 9, 2009 and on January 23, 2009 the University notified the Plaintiff that every effort would be made to reassign him to another position within the library system. 19. To date, the University failed to reassign the Plaintiff to another position within the library system. 20. The Plaintiff is the only one whose position was eliminated by outsourcing in 2009 without reassignment and/or compensation. 21. To the best of the Plaintiff s knowledge, information, and belief, no other similarly situated employees outside the protected classes with less seniority than the Plaintiff s were targeted for the reduction in force as the Plaintiff was, or were 4

targeted for the reduction in force like the Plaintiff (but were reassigned to other positions unlike the Plaintiff. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 22. The Plaintiff timely filed a complaint of discrimination with U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on June 9, 2009. See attached EEOC Charge form. 23. The EEOC issued a right to sue letter on August 19, 2009 and it was received 90 days or less before this filing. See attached EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights. 24. The Plaintiff has performed all conditions precedent, if any, required for the filing and pursuit of a claim for judicial relief under Title VII and its related regulations and under ADEA and its related regulations. REMEDIES and RELIEF 25. The Plaintiff is entitled to relief under Title VII and ADEA for his employer s unlawful discriminatory conduct and retaliation, including but not limited to for the Employer s disparate treatment of the Plaintiff for engaging in protected activities. 26. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in his favor and against the Defendant and direct the following relief 5

a. For a money judgment representing compensatory damages, including impending lost wages, and all other sums of money, including retirement benefits and other employment benefits, together with interest thereon; b. For a money judgment representing liquidated damages for the Defendants willful violations of Title VII and ADEA, and any related statutes, regulations and rights; c. For a money judgment representing prejudgment interest; d. For an Order directing the Defendant to restore the Plaintiff s position as Catalog Librarian or in a comparable position with back pay and benefits, if applicable; e. That the Court retain jurisdiction over this action until the Defendant has fully complied with Orders of this Court and that the Court require Defendant to file such reports as may be necessary to supervise such compliance; f. For costs of suit; and h. For such other and further relief, including punitive damages, as may be just and proper. BENCH TRIAL DEMAND 27. The Plaintiff herein hereby demands a bench trial 6

on all issues in this action. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in his favor and against the Defendant. Respectfully Submitted, Wen-chouh Lin Date November 17, 2009 Plaintiff, pro se [Address] [Phone] 7