Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests

Similar documents
Connecticut Marijuana Arrests

Vermont Marijuana Arrests

I hereby certify that County conducts its support proceedings in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. No..

Maryland Marijuana Arrests

Rule Alternative Hearing Procedures for Partial Custody or Visitation Actions.

Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter

2010 TRENDS. Aggravated Assault

Oregon Marijuana Arrests

Washington Marijuana Arrests

Arkansas Marijuana Arrests

Illinois Marijuana Arrests

Tennessee Marijuana Arrests

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests

Louisiana Marijuana Arrests

Missouri Marijuana Arrests

Pennsylvania s Still-Lagging Economic Growth

Superior Court s Year in Statistics Calendar Year 2013 Office of the Prothonotary/Office of the Reporter

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests

PART VII. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS

Subpart B-1. TORT CLAIMS 111. TORT CLAIMS LITIGATION CHAPTER 111. TORT CLAIMS LITIGATION

THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS MULTIPLE DISTRICT 14 (PENNSYLVANIA) CONSTITUTION and BY LAWS AND POLICY MANUAL

Everyone Votes PA. Everyone.VotesPA.com

THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS MULTIPLE DISTRICT 14 (PENNSYLVANIA) CONSTITUTION and BY LAWS AND POLICY MANUAL

PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONSTABLES ASSOCIATION, INC. BYLAWS

THE RULES OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

PA Courts Expand Use of Video Conferencing, Saving $21 Million Annually in Defendant Transportation Costs

Table of Contents. (See also Summary of Contents on page xv)

OF THE THE RULES OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY COMMONWEAL TH OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEPORTATION DEFENSE. What We Will Cover Today

Georgia Marijuana Arrests

Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen s Clubs PFSC

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 668. SEIU 668 Elections. Article VI Structure

A Changing Landscape. Pennsylvania Counties Reevaluate Policies on Immigration Detainers

A proven winner in survey research and public opinion polling

Common Pleas Judicial Needs Assessment Project

Pennsylvania Physical Therapy Association Bylaws

BYLAWS. of the. Pennsylvania Bar Association. November 17, 2017

2017 Report to the Legislature

HUMAN TRAFFICKING: HIDDEN CRISIS IN OUR COMMUNITY PRESENTED BY: SHEA M. RHODES, ESQUIRE, DIRECTOR & CO-FOUNDER

The Shale Tipping Point: The Relationship of Drilling to Crime, Traffic Fatalities, STDs, and Rents in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio

BYLAWS AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE PENNSYLVANIA MAY 2013

STANDING PRACTICE ORDER

A Guide to Filing Pro Se with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

CONSTITUTION & BY-LAWS

PENNSYLVANIA JUVENILE JUSTICE

A proven winner in survey research and public opinion polling

STANDING PRACTICE ORDER

REGULATIONS AND OPERATING PROCEDURES THE CLASSICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE ATLANTIC STATES, INC.

Women's Organization for National Prohibition Reform (WONPR), Pennsylvania Division records

PATTERNS OF VOTING IN PENNSYLVANIA COUNTIES, 1944,1958

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT. No. 159 MM 2017

Fifth, we have unified the language in the various tie-breaking rules so that the similar processes they require read similarly.

Auditor General DePasquale: Officials in 18 Counties Report Accepting Gifts from Voting Equipment Vendors

Township Supervisors Inducted into the PSATS Supervisor Hall of Fame. Name Township County Years of Service. Month/Year in Pa.

PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN

Township Supervisors Inducted into the PSATS Supervisor Hall of Fame. Name Township County Years of Service. Month in Pa.

2011 Division Events

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District 159 MM 2017 LE

Urban Centers and Regional Economic Cohesion in Pennsylvania

PENNSYLVANIA TRIBAL CONSULTATION HANDBOOK

GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Recent Actions during the 2002 Regular Session of the General Assembly

PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON SENTENCING

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAWP s Legislative Scorecard

[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.

Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania 3915 Union Deposit Road #223 Harrisburg, PA R-RIGHTS

2012 Election Wrap Up What does it mean for our industry?

CAWP s Legislative Scorecard 2008

Special Exceptions, Conditional Uses and Variances

DEADLINE: 11:59 p.m. SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2018

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

DEADLINE: 11:59 p.m. SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2019

Filed 2/15/2018 3:03:00 PM Supreme Court Middle District

BYLAWS OF THE SOUTHWEST SECTION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION

REPORT ON COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN PENNSYLVANIA SPRING 2017

Registered Voters in Central PA

Geographic Mobility Central Pennsylvania

Rose M. Baker

House Members Who Became Governor

Using Self Organizing Maps to Analyze Demographics and Swing State Voting in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Applewhite, et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. No. 330 MD 2012 EXHIBIT 1. Petitioners Disclosure of Expert Reports

BEST PRACTICES TOOLKIT & USER MANUAL DATA QUALITY PROJECT

Volume 48 Number 27 Saturday, July 7, 2018 Harrisburg, PA. Part II. This part contains the SUBJECT INDEX for January June 2018

Pennsylvania State Archives 350 North Street Harrisburg, PA (717)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER

The Impact of Drug and Marijuana Arrests Within the Largest Cities of Massachusetts

2018 County and Economic Development Regions Population Estimates

DIRECTIVE October 16, All County Boards of Elections Directors, Deputy Directors, and Board Members SUMMARY

Microfilm Drawer 1. Springfield Daily News Jan 2, 1860-Dec 31, Springfield Daily News Jan 3, 1861-Dec 31, 1861

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE, BRIAN MCCANN et al.

Post Data Quality Implementation Screen Painter Adjustments

MASON-DIXON TENNESSEE POLL

The Protection and Advocacy System for Indiana Member: National Disability Rights Network

Post Data Quality Implementation Screen Painter Adjustments

Sunday, September 27, Monday, September 28, 2015

People System Conditions Safety Capital Program. Critical Success Factors SFY 2016 Q4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) Solicitation of Interest #014 Attorney for the Child Juvenile Delinquency Representation Services

Population Change in Southwestern Pennsylvania

Transcription:

Working to Reform Marijuana Laws The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests Marijuana Arrests 1995-2002 (Summary) Marijuana Possession Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Sales Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Arrests by County 1998-2002

Introduction The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics provides detailed data on the distribution and composition of marijuana arrests to supplement the analysis and data contained in NORML s 2005 report Crimes of Indiscretion: Marijuana Arrests in the United States. The data used for these tables were produced by the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program of the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. Local police agencies report data to state agencies, which compile and report it to the national program office. Some local agencies do not participate in the program, and neither do some states. Florida, Illinois, and Washington D.C. did not report data to the UCR program in 2002, though some Illinois data was obtained directly from the state for this report. This report relies on two UCR data sets. UCR County Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data have been used to generate state and county level arrest totals and rates, generally for the years 1995 to 2002. Countylevel data are reported along with codes that indicate 9 categories of population sizes. Generally the largest arrest rates reported are for small jurisdictions with significant numbers of arrests of non residents, such as in a popular vacation area. The UCR Age, Sex, and Race file has been used along with US Census population data to produce arrest rates by demographic category for marijuana possession and sales arrests in 2002. The four categories used for race based data in the UCR program are White, Black, Indian (Native American), and Asian. The race based data are also subdivided by general age group: adult, juvenile, and all. Age/sex data are presented in two formats. The primary presentation utilizes five year age categories for males, females, and both. Age/sex data are also presented using single year categories for age 15 to age 24 to highlight the impact of marijuana arrests on these specific age groups. All arrest rates reported in these tables are per 100,000 population. Some arrests rates may vary due to differences in the data sets; for example the arrest rate for possession derived from the county level file may be 200 while the same arrest rate derived from the age, sex and race file may be 192. Data reported in these tables may also differ from reports from state criminal justice agencies; UCR files are frequently updated at the state level. State sections include the following additional data: marijuana arrests as a percentage of drug arrests, marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests, the 2002 Census population, 2002 reporting coverage for demographic data, and the maximum state penalties for possession or sale of 1 ounce of marijuana. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all drug arrests indicate the resources marijuana offenses take away from other drug control efforts. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests provide an index of the cost of marijuana enforcement in a state; the percentage of all arrests indicates a general percentage of overall criminal justice costs that can be attributed to marijuana. The maximum penalties indicate the potential severity of punishment for marijuana offenses; these data also help characterize the potential cost of state marijuana laws under conditions of maximum enforcement. Jon B. Gettman, Ph.D. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 1

Key to Almanac Tables Marijuana Arrests 1995 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] All: Both adults and juveniles. Adults: Age 18 and older. Juvenile: Under age 18. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Pct of Drug Arrests: The percent of drug arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of all arrests for drug offenses. Pct of All Arrests: The percentage of all arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of arrests for all criminal offenses. Marijuana Sales/Possession Arrests 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race. [Computer File] Population: The total population estimated by the U.S. Census. population. This figure is calculated by dividing the coverage population by the census population for a region. Poss. Max: The maximum penalty for possession of 1 ounce of marijuana. Sales. Max: The maximum penalty for sales of one ounce of marijuana. Arrest Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 population, calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the population served by the arresting police agencies and multiplying the result by 100,000. Adults: Individuals age 18 and older. Juveniles: Individuals under the age of 18. Rate: The demographic composition of coverage populations has been estimated using U.S. Census data and used to calculate arrest rates for marijuana offenses per 100,000 population for specific demographic groups. Arrest Pct.: The percentage of arrests for the offense accounted for by the demographic group. Pop. Pct.: The estimated percentage of the regional population accounted for by the demographic group. Ratio: The ratio produced by dividing Arrest Pct by Pop. Pct. by the population percentage. A group that accounts for equal shares of marijuana possession arrests and the general population will have a ratio of 1.0. Coverage: The percentage of the total population represented by the coverage Page 2 www.norml.org

Marijuana Arrests by County 1998 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] Population Size: Nine categories are used to distinguish counties of similar population size. Special circumstances are more likely to disproportionately affect arrest rates in counties with smaller resident populations, such as high numbers of vacation visitors for beach and mountain resort areas. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Arrest Rates: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Rank (Rates): Ranking among all the counties in the State, from highest (1) to lowest. Population Size Codes Size 1 Population < 2,500 Size 2 Population 2,500 to 9,999 Size 3 Population 10,000 to 24,999 Size 4 Population 25,000 to 49,999 Size 5 Population 50,000 to 99,999 Size 6 Population 100,000 to 249,999 Size 7 Population 250,000 to 499,999 Size 8 Population 500,000 to 999,999 Size 9 Population 1,000,000 + Notes on the Calculation of Age and Race Specific Arrest Rates at the County, State, and National Level 1. County level Totals and Arrest Rates. Local agency data from the UCR Age, Sex, and Race file are combined to produce county level totals and arrest rates for the overall population. While the agency level file provides data on the number of blacks arrested by each agency, for example, it does not provide data on the local black population. However calculation of the arrest rate for blacks can take place at the county level through the use of Census Bureau data on county level populations. 2. State, and National Level Totals and Arrest Rates. County level data are combined to produce state, and national level totals of coverage populations and arrests by offense, providing a basis for calculating the arrest rate for the overall coverage population. 3. Demographic based Arrest Rates. The coverage population for Blacks in each region, for example, can be estimated using Census data on the overall Black population of the region. If Blacks comprise 65% of the population of a county, for example, these tables are based on the premise that Blacks also comprise 65% of the coverage population reported in the UCR data for that county. The estimation of the Black population within the overall coverage population provides a basis for calculating the arrest rates for Blacks in the region. 4. Coverage Indicators. A comparison of the coverage population of the reporting local agencies and the overall census population produces a coverage indicator indicating the extent the reported data represents a particular region and its diversity. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 3

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 13,929 13,733 15,093 17,499 18,987 21,528 22,906 22,243 All Rate 115.38 113.91 125.57 145.81 158.30 175.29 186.42 180.32 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 36.80% 40.83% 41.71% 37.34% 37.99% 41.56% 40.87% 40.57% All Pct. Of All Arrests 3.01% 2.98% 3.10% 3.43% 3.83% 4.36% 4.52% 4.47% Adult Arrests 11,107 10,561 11,565 13,446 14,804 16,899 17,906 17,503 Adult Rate 92.01 87.60 96.21 112.04 123.43 137.60 145.73 141.90 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 29.34% 31.40% 31.96% 28.69% 29.62% 32.62% 31.95% 31.92% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 2.40% 2.29% 2.38% 2.64% 2.99% 3.43% 3.54% 3.52% Juvenile Arrests 2,817 3,154 3,530 4,045 4,179 4,620 4,996 4,736 Juvenile Rate 23.33 26.16 29.37 33.71 34.84 37.62 40.66 38.39 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 7.44% 9.38% 9.76% 8.63% 8.36% 8.92% 8.91% 8.64% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.61% 0.69% 0.73% 0.79% 0.84% 0.94% 0.99% 0.95% Pennsylvania Marijuana Possession Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 9,820 10,096 11,229 13,401 14,724 16,471 17,711 17,199 All Rate 81.35 83.74 93.42 111.67 122.76 134.12 144.14 139.43 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 25.94% 30.02% 31.03% 28.59% 29.46% 31.80% 31.60% 31.37% All Pct. Of All Arrests 2.12% 2.19% 2.31% 2.63% 2.97% 3.34% 3.50% 3.46% Adult Arrests 7,607 7,554 8,362 10,065 11,210 12,605 13,608 13,299 Adult Rate 63.01 62.66 69.57 83.87 93.46 102.64 110.75 107.81 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 20.10% 22.46% 23.11% 21.47% 22.43% 24.33% 24.28% 24.26% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 1.65% 1.64% 1.72% 1.98% 2.26% 2.56% 2.69% 2.67% Juvenile Arrests 2,210 2,533 2,871 3,334 3,514 3,863 4,104 3,899 Juvenile Rate 18.31 21.01 23.89 27.78 29.30 31.45 33.40 31.61 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 5.84% 7.53% 7.93% 7.11% 7.03% 7.46% 7.32% 7.11% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.48% 0.55% 0.59% 0.65% 0.71% 0.78% 0.81% 0.78% Pennsylvania Marijuana Sales Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 4,109 3,637 3,864 4,098 4,263 5,057 5,195 5,044 All Rate 34.04 30.17 32.15 34.15 35.54 41.18 42.28 40.89 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 10.85% 10.81% 10.68% 8.74% 8.53% 9.76% 9.27% 9.20% All Pct. Of All Arrests 0.89% 0.79% 0.79% 0.80% 0.86% 1.03% 1.03% 1.01% Adult Arrests 3,500 3,007 3,203 3,381 3,594 4,294 4,298 4,204 Adult Rate 28.99 24.94 26.65 28.17 29.96 34.96 34.98 34.08 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 9.25% 8.94% 8.85% 7.21% 7.19% 8.29% 7.67% 7.67% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 0.76% 0.65% 0.66% 0.66% 0.73% 0.87% 0.85% 0.85% Juvenile Arrests 607 621 659 711 665 757 892 837 Juvenile Rate 5.03 5.15 5.48 5.92 5.54 6.16 7.26 6.79 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 1.60% 1.85% 1.82% 1.52% 1.33% 1.46% 1.59% 1.53% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.13% 0.13% 0.14% 0.14% 0.13% 0.15% 0.18% 0.17% Page 4 www.norml.org

Pennsylvania Marijuana Possession Arrests - 2002 Population 12,300,000 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 90.87% 2000 128.29 Rate 107.10 429.59 21.06 41.07 Poss. Max. 1 months 2001 138.54 Arrest Pct. 50.78% 26.55% 0.03% 0.37% Sales Max. 1 months 2002 137.95 Pop. Pct. 67.52% 7.14% 0.12% 1.56% Ratio 0.75 3.72 0.25 0.24 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 103.49 511.99 29.21 32.61 Rate 119.89 245.12 0.00 68.38 Arrest Pct. 67.37% 32.23% 0.03% 0.61% Arrest Pct. 16.60% 5.68% 0.00% 0.24% Pop. Pct. 86.57% 10.33% 0.17% 2.04% Pop. Pct. 19.05% 3.19% 0.05% 0.48% Ratio 0.78 3.12 0.18 0.30 Ratio 0.87 1.78 0.00 0.50 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 800.10 551.51 260.21 136.91 99.66 74.56 41.71 20.20 9.41 3.08 Arrest Pct. 39.65% 26.63% 10.51% 6.53% 5.28% 4.36% 2.34% 1.00% 0.38% 0.10% Pop. Pct. 6.84% 6.66% 5.57% 6.57% 7.31% 8.06% 7.74% 6.85% 5.50% 4.35% Ratio 5.80 4.00 1.89 0.99 0.72 0.54 0.30 0.15 0.07 0.02 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,358.26 965.60 455.38 230.44 167.79 124.46 66.54 32.69 16.13 5.65 Arrest Pct. 34.56% 23.24% 9.23% 5.48% 4.39% 3.58% 1.84% 0.80% 0.31% 0.08% Pop. Pct. 3.51% 3.32% 2.80% 3.28% 3.61% 3.97% 3.82% 3.36% 2.66% 2.05% Ratio 9.85 7.00 3.30 1.67 1.22 0.90 0.48 0.24 0.12 0.04 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 211.08 139.93 63.36 43.85 33.24 26.15 17.52 8.18 3.14 0.78 Arrest Pct. 5.09% 3.39% 1.27% 1.05% 0.89% 0.78% 0.50% 0.21% 0.06% 0.01% Pop. Pct. 3.33% 3.34% 2.77% 3.30% 3.70% 4.09% 3.92% 3.49% 2.84% 2.29% Ratio 1.53 1.01 0.46 0.32 0.24 0.19 0.13 0.06 0.02 0.00 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 416.64 652.08 866.38 1,102.46 979.58 787.64 597.02 522.00 425.94 401.05 Arrest Pct. 4.20% 6.55% 8.61% 10.77% 9.52% 7.84% 6.05% 5.17% 4.02% 3.56% Pop. Pct. 1.39% 1.39% 1.37% 1.35% 1.34% 1.37% 1.40% 1.37% 1.30% 1.22% Ratio 3.02 4.73 6.28 7.99 7.10 5.71 4.33 3.78 3.09 2.91 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 681.97 1,096.63 1,502.35 1,864.44 1,676.97 1,394.19 1,039.30 904.48 752.86 694.55 Arrest Pct. 3.54% 5.67% 7.68% 9.37% 8.31% 6.95% 5.22% 4.46% 3.53% 3.09% Pop. Pct. 0.72% 0.71% 0.70% 0.69% 0.68% 0.69% 0.69% 0.68% 0.65% 0.61% Ratio 4.94 7.95 10.89 13.52 12.16 10.11 7.53 6.56 5.46 5.03 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 135.88 181.54 192.98 294.65 253.93 179.59 162.10 144.01 102.36 105.39 Arrest Pct. 0.67% 0.89% 0.93% 1.40% 1.21% 0.89% 0.83% 0.72% 0.49% 0.47% Pop. Pct. 0.68% 0.67% 0.67% 0.65% 0.66% 0.69% 0.70% 0.69% 0.65% 0.61% Ratio 0.99 1.32 1.40 2.14 1.84 1.30 1.18 1.04 0.74 0.76 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 5

Pennsylvania Marijuana Sales Arrests - 2002 Population 12,300,000 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 90.87% 2000 40.88 Rate 24.24 206.24 10.53 14.42 Poss. Max. 1 months 2001 43.56 Arrest Pct. 40.96% 42.05% 0.02% 0.57% Sales Max. 1 months 2002 42.59 Pop. Pct. 67.52% 7.14% 0.12% 1.56% Ratio 0.61 5.89 0.17 0.37 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 25.80 250.62 7.30 15.45 Rate 18.69 106.89 18.87 11.09 Arrest Pct. 49.33% 50.06% 0.04% 0.69% Arrest Pct. 8.37% 8.01% 0.02% 0.13% Pop. Pct. 86.57% 10.33% 0.17% 2.04% Pop. Pct. 19.05% 3.19% 0.05% 0.48% Ratio 0.57 4.85 0.24 0.34 Ratio 0.44 2.51 0.40 0.27 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 203.71 192.72 98.48 50.47 33.79 23.01 13.48 6.78 3.24 1.64 Arrest Pct. 32.70% 30.14% 12.88% 7.79% 5.80% 4.36% 2.45% 1.09% 0.42% 0.17% Pop. Pct. 6.84% 6.66% 5.57% 6.57% 7.31% 8.06% 7.74% 6.85% 5.50% 4.35% Ratio 4.78 4.53 2.31 1.19 0.79 0.54 0.32 0.16 0.08 0.04 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 365.74 352.23 172.52 89.78 55.35 38.19 22.65 12.23 5.38 3.48 Arrest Pct. 30.14% 27.46% 11.33% 6.91% 4.69% 3.56% 2.03% 0.96% 0.34% 0.17% Pop. Pct. 3.51% 3.32% 2.80% 3.28% 3.61% 3.97% 3.82% 3.36% 2.66% 2.05% Ratio 8.59 8.27 4.05 2.11 1.30 0.90 0.53 0.29 0.13 0.08 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 32.72 34.18 23.80 11.37 12.77 8.28 4.55 1.53 1.25 0.00 Arrest Pct. 2.56% 2.68% 1.55% 0.88% 1.11% 0.80% 0.42% 0.13% 0.08% 0.00% Pop. Pct. 3.33% 3.34% 2.77% 3.30% 3.70% 4.09% 3.92% 3.49% 2.84% 2.29% Ratio 0.77 0.80 0.56 0.27 0.30 0.20 0.11 0.04 0.03 0.00 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 87.82 137.75 220.01 278.10 300.79 272.29 211.99 180.74 141.98 148.75 Arrest Pct. 2.87% 4.48% 7.08% 8.80% 9.47% 8.78% 6.95% 5.80% 4.34% 4.27% Pop. Pct. 1.39% 1.39% 1.37% 1.35% 1.34% 1.37% 1.40% 1.37% 1.30% 1.22% Ratio 2.06 3.23 5.17 6.53 7.06 6.39 4.98 4.24 3.33 3.49 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 159.58 245.36 391.09 497.96 546.81 491.99 397.95 321.62 266.12 268.81 Arrest Pct. 2.68% 4.11% 6.47% 8.11% 8.78% 7.94% 6.47% 5.13% 4.04% 3.88% Pop. Pct. 0.72% 0.71% 0.70% 0.69% 0.68% 0.69% 0.69% 0.68% 0.65% 0.61% Ratio 3.75 5.76 9.18 11.69 12.84 11.55 9.34 7.55 6.25 6.31 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 11.87 23.85 38.86 45.02 44.81 52.05 29.13 41.52 19.11 27.81 Arrest Pct. 0.19% 0.38% 0.61% 0.69% 0.69% 0.84% 0.48% 0.67% 0.29% 0.40% Pop. Pct. 0.68% 0.67% 0.67% 0.65% 0.66% 0.69% 0.70% 0.69% 0.65% 0.61% Ratio 0.28 0.56 0.91 1.06 1.05 1.22 0.68 0.97 0.45 0.65 Page 6 www.norml.org

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Adams 5 77 67 61 93 103 89.93 77.47 66.82 101.82 112.33 36 Allegheny 9 1,886 2,095 1,997 2,674 2,297 147.56 165.32 155.87 208.60 178.50 10 Armstrong 5 100 76 60 126 122 136.14 103.92 82.88 173.97 167.79 15 Beaver 6 164 190 368 252 286 88.79 103.55 203.68 139.40 157.60 22 Bedford 5 34 65 58 33 41 69.14 131.73 116.04 65.99 81.67 55 Berks 7 396 500 635 656 515 112.02 140.55 169.95 175.49 139.66 26 Blair 6 179 145 151 133 129 136.94 111.08 117.03 103.03 99.54 47 Bradford 5 48 50 50 66 69 77.18 80.10 79.67 105.11 109.46 39 Bucks 8 786 812 879 927 1,027 135.38 138.61 147.63 155.61 171.73 12 Butler 6 146 142 301 209 195 86.43 83.20 172.91 120.00 111.52 37 Cambria 6 208 217 192 196 149 132.34 139.12 125.72 128.28 97.14 48 Cameron 2 11 7 3 6 10 192.64 124.62 50.22 100.38 166.64 18 Carbon 5 37 54 61 80 57 62.98 91.80 103.74 135.98 96.51 49 Centre 6 283 243 258 289 290 213.13 183.23 190.04 212.77 212.68 6 Chester 7 401 431 465 452 451 96.42 102.27 107.27 104.22 103.58 45 Clarion 4 43 48 34 67 70 102.98 114.79 81.41 160.34 166.87 17 Clearfield 5 97 59 85 90 79 120.53 73.16 101.99 107.94 94.38 51 Clinton 4 41 49 42 28 44 111.33 132.51 110.78 73.81 115.54 34 Columbia 5 71 110 122 108 167 110.72 171.66 190.18 168.27 259.18 3 Crawford 5 124 89 159 158 146 139.04 99.60 175.95 174.76 160.86 20 Cumberland 6 287 399 395 378 369 137.63 190.37 183.90 175.90 171.04 14 Dauphin 7 797 867 908 873 914 324.77 353.26 360.61 346.53 361.40 2 Delaware 8 966 1,025 1,113 1,132 1,123 178.18 189.02 202.05 205.39 202.97 8 Elk 4 15 30 79 16 25 43.03 86.91 224.99 45.55 70.89 61 Erie 7 314 329 403 373 360 112.56 119.10 143.50 132.75 127.62 30 Fayette 6 197 178 171 133 151 136.04 122.96 115.04 89.43 101.14 46 Forest 2 9 7 10 4 7 183.60 140.03 202.18 80.84 140.90 25 Franklin 6 192 269 276 339 304 152.19 212.08 215.30 264.31 236.10 5 Fulton 3 9 19 20 19 20 62.35 131.13 140.24 133.17 139.63 27 Greene 4 43 53 39 53 58 102.03 130.17 95.89 130.25 141.98 24 Huntingdon 4 38 49 65 65 50 84.26 109.94 142.59 142.52 109.20 40 Indiana 5 185 160 188 167 113 207.77 180.77 209.81 186.28 125.56 32 Jefferson 4 32 44 51 43 49 68.75 95.08 110.93 93.48 106.11 44 Juniata 3 18 9 15 9 18 82.33 40.75 65.73 39.42 78.53 56 Lackawanna 6 276 289 217 224 156 131.35 138.72 101.74 104.97 72.82 59 Lancaster 7 610 838 776 844 809 134.56 183.72 164.88 179.23 171.13 13 Lawrence 5 60 66 66 62 56 62.52 69.01 69.20 64.97 58.46 66 Lebanon 6 72 113 167 197 193 61.52 96.28 138.79 163.64 159.69 21 Lehigh 7 493 445 544 730 624 177.18 158.45 185.63 248.97 207.40 7 Luzerne 7 314 257 402 413 365 99.04 81.96 125.92 129.30 113.83 35 Lycoming 6 138 91 160 155 153 116.73 77.62 133.28 129.05 126.89 31 McKean 4 18 24 38 51 24 38.52 51.65 82.72 110.97 52.02 67 Mercer 6 94 141 127 135 202 77.14 115.70 105.58 112.17 167.19 16 Mifflin 4 17 33 34 72 29 36.09 70.31 73.14 154.81 62.11 63 Monroe 6 198 166 162 142 154 161.85 132.27 116.81 102.34 110.56 38 Montgomery 8 693 694 880 986 923 97.27 96.25 116.97 131.00 122.15 33 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 7

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Montour 3 29 19 11 11 11 161.62 107.23 60.32 60.29 60.06 65 Northampton 7 339 359 463 472 472 122.89 129.68 161.83 164.90 164.26 19 Northumberland 5 164 124 134 117 103 172.72 131.97 141.71 123.67 108.45 41 Perry 4 34 38 41 35 36 77.11 85.67 94.03 80.23 82.20 54 Philadelphia 9 3,508 4,512 5,551 5,929 6,223 242.03 314.34 365.79 390.50 408.27 1 Pike 4 49 29 49 38 35 125.49 72.23 105.83 82.03 75.26 58 Potter 3 21 34 37 32 36 122.57 197.99 204.65 176.90 198.25 9 Schuylkill 6 166 118 154 184 143 109.92 79.64 102.44 122.33 94.70 50 Snyder 4 30 34 32 41 29 78.50 89.00 85.23 109.14 76.90 57 Somerset 5 63 89 73 64 86 78.62 110.95 91.22 79.94 107.00 42 Sullivan 2 17 11 14 10 4 279.01 180.24 213.54 152.46 60.74 64 Susquehanna 4 29 48 71 96 75 69.02 113.97 168.10 227.17 176.79 11 Tioga 4 47 71 38 31 28 113.12 170.76 91.85 74.89 67.38 62 Union 4 29 30 26 35 30 69.53 73.40 62.46 84.04 71.76 60 Venango 5 188 146 127 149 147 324.28 252.56 220.62 258.71 254.25 4 Warren 4 40 38 40 20 38 90.58 86.59 91.19 45.57 86.25 53 Washington 6 434 284 394 377 272 210.76 137.95 193.79 185.34 133.20 29 Wayne 4 43 36 50 65 65 94.89 79.65 104.77 136.14 135.61 28 Westmoreland 7 451 383 426 389 325 120.56 102.99 115.13 105.08 87.45 52 Wyoming 4 29 24 30 23 30 98.84 82.39 106.84 81.87 106.37 43 York 7 572 516 480 530 559 154.62 138.33 125.74 138.77 145.79 23 State Total 17,499 18,987 21,528 22,906 22,243 145.81 158.30 175.29 186.42 180.32 Page 8 www.norml.org