UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS

Similar documents
Effective January 1, 2016

Corrected f. EY. Rule la:l. Admission to Practice in This Commonwealth Without Examination.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS

Investigations and Enforcement

Investigations and Enforcement

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

E. Adverse Employment Decision means to decline to hire, not promote or discharge a person, or to revoke a person s Conditional Offer of Employment.

Supreme Court of Florida

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. concerning the Board s consideration of the Final Report of the Character. Background

SUBCHAPTER 1B - DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY RULES SECTION DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY OF ATTORNEYS

I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

SUBCHAPTER 07B NOTARY PUBLIC SECTION SECTION.0100 GENERAL PROVISIONS

NACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific

TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS

SUPREME COURT RULES FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE BAR OF OHIO

City of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

January 2018 RULES OF THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal

2. During the complaint intake process, no questions shall be asked of a complainant regarding their immigration status.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wexler, 139 Ohio St.3d 597, 2014-Ohio-2952.]

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

National Commission for Certifying Agencies Policy Manual

Rule Change #2000(20)

MAINE BAR ADMISSION RULES

MIDDLETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO Resume Supplement/Conviction History Form. Name: Last First M.I.

The Anatomy of a Complaint

STATE OF UTAH DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING APPLICATION FOR LICENSURE ATHLETE AGENT DOPL-AP-104 REV 03/13/2003

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH NUMBER: 14-DB-035 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

BYLAWS THE MEDICAL STAFF SHAWANO MEDICAL CENTER, INC. VOLUME II CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND FAIR HEARING PLAN ADDENDUM

A.A.C. T. 6, Ch. 5, Art. 75, Refs & Annos A.A.C. R R Definitions

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

DISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR

ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

A Message to Legal Personnel

Timothy J. McNamara appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION AS A CANADIAN LEGAL ADVISOR

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

Board of Certification, Inc. Version Effective September 1, 2016 Updated May 2016

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

MODEL CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GUIDELINES FOR ENFORCEMENT

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

COMMISSION ON CERTIFICATION FOR HEALTH INFORMATICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (CCHIIM)

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

BERMUDA POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT : 29

Discrimination Complaint and Investigation Procedure

POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 29 POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

The District Volunteer Coordinator shall notify any volunteer who is not approved for volunteer service based on their criminal history record.

Supreme Court of Florida

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:

SECTION 2 BEFORE FILING SUIT

People v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory

APPENDIX C CHAPTER 2: ETHICS PROCEDURES

APPLICATION FOR LMSW LICENSURE

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES. 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX

CONDUCTING LAWFUL AND EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT

REINSTATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. To facilitate the processing of Petitions for Reinstatement to practice law the

MISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993

Chapter 3 - General Institution

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 819. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION... 4

[Cite as Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kafantaris, 121 Ohio St.3d 387, 2009-Ohio-1389.]

CERTIFICATION APPEALS HANDLING PROCESS. For Individual Candidates seeking Certification and Qualified Individuals seeking Re-Certification

S14Y0692. IN THE MATTER OF LAXAVIER P. REDDICK-HOOD. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and

APR 28 LIMITED PRACTICE RULE FOR LIMITED LICENSE LEGAL TECHNICIANS. B. Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following definitions will apply:

American Midwifery Certification Board (Corporation) Discipline Policy and Procedures June 2007 Revised November 2012

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY. NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055

1.1 The organization shall be called the Youth Justice Committee and shall hereinafter be referred to as the "committee".

Research Governance Committee Charter RESEARCH GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER

WORLD DARTS FEDERATION

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046

Transcription:

UNRAVELING THE MYSTERY OF THE CHARACTER AND FITNESS PROCESS By Diane Van Aken Manager, State Bar of Michigan Character and Fitness Department In addition to completing law school and passing the Michigan bar examination, those who wish to practice law in this state must prove to the satisfaction of the State Board of Law Examiners that she or he possesses good moral character and otherwise possesses the requisite character and fitness to practice law. i Under the Supreme Court Rules Concerning State Bar of Michigan ii, investigation of character and fitness is initially the responsibility of the State Bar of Michigan Standing Committee on Character and Fitness, which forwards its recommendation to the State Board of Law Examiners after investigation. This character and fitness process, although a mystery to some, is not difficult to understand. The character and fitness process begins when an applicant files an Affidavit of Personal History with the State Bar, together with the required attachments and fees. The Affidavit of Personal History (APH) is a comprehensive questionnaire, submitted under oath, which is designed to assist the State Bar in promptly and fully investigating an applicant s character and fitness to practice law. Although some of its 58 questions pertain to identification and background (name, addresses, education, employment history, etc.), other questions on the APH request information about the applicant s business involvement, school discipline, employment terminations, participation in civil litigation, financial history, criminal history, and general fitness.

An applicant's candor when filling out the APH, and during the entire character and fitness process, may be the most telling indicator of the applicant's current character and fitness. If an applicant is not truthful concerning a past incident, that lack of candor may say more about the applicant's true character than any incident that may have previously occurred. Because required disclosures may be sensitive in nature, and because the process requires applicants to be candid, the Character and Fitness process is confidential. Information obtained in the course of processing an application for admission to the bar may not be used for any other purpose or otherwise disclosed without the consent of the applicant or by order of the Supreme Court. iii Because of that confidentiality, applicants should not hesitate to answer honestly and completely. Additional items that must be provided to the State Bar along with the Affidavit of Personal History include: Application to Sit for the Michigan Bar Examination Completed fingerprint card, or receipt for fingerprint scanning Criminal history reports Certified driving records Reference letters Law School Certification Litigation Records Applications submitted timely iv must be accompanied by two separate fees: an examination fee and an investigation fee. Additionally, a fingerprint processing fee must be submitted with a completed fingerprint card from out-of-state bar applicants. In-state applicants are required by the Michigan State Police to submit to fingerprint scanning at designated locations, and must include a receipt indicating the applicant 2

has paid to be scanned with their APH. Incomplete or incorrectly executed applications, or those with incorrect fees, are rejected and returned to the applicant for correction. Once the application is accepted, State Bar staff undertakes an investigation of each applicant. Various methods are used to follow up on applicant responses. Letters are sent, phone calls are made, and when needed field investigation is done to collect information and interview witnesses. As information is received, it is compared with the applicant's disclosures. The applicant may be asked to explain a discrepancy between the applicant's disclosure and official records, or to explain a nondisclosure when information is discovered during the course of the investigation. Once all information is collected for each file, the file is viewed as a whole. The Supreme Court Rules for the State Bar of Michigan Rule 15 Sec.1, (5)(a) state: "An applicant shall be recommended favorably by State Bar staff without referral to committee when investigation of all past conduct discloses no significant adverse factual information." No single action or incident will per se result in an applicant being denied admission to practice in Michigan. Every applicant is considered individually, based upon the applicant's personal history and record. Although all issues that concern an applicant s current requisite character and fitness to practice law are examined, the following issues are among those treated as cause for further inquiry and considered when making a recommendation: unlawful activities 3

academic misconduct making of false statements, including omissions, on the APH or other documents misconduct in employment acts involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation abuse of legal process neglect of financial responsibilities neglect of professional obligations violation of a court order evidence of mental or emotional instability evidence of drug or alcohol dependency denial of admission to the bar in another jurisdiction on character and fitness grounds activities that constitute practicing law without the benefit of licensure disciplinary actions by a lawyer disciplinary agency or other professional disciplinary agency of any jurisdiction Applicant files that are not approved by staff go to a District Character and Fitness Committee for interview. A Notice of Referral that identifies specific issues that need to be explored is prepared and forwarded to a district committee, along with a copy of the applicant s file. District Character and Fitness Committees are composed of lawyers and judges in each of the State Bar Commissioner districts. The size of the district committee is determined by the number of files typically referred within a given district for interview. Each member of the district committee is appointed for a renewable two-year term by the Board of Commissioners upon nomination by the Commissioner for the area served by that committee. In making appointments, the Board seeks to obtain ethnic and gender diversity, to appoint members willing to make a commitment to their participation, and to pinpoint members with the requisite knowledge and experience as lawyers to make sound decisions. The Board also appoints a chairperson for each district committee. Throughout the entire character and fitness process, the applicant bears the burden of proof (by clear and convincing evidence) of showing that she or he currently possesses 4

the requisite character and fitness to practice law. v During the interview, which is informal, but does afford the applicant the right to be represented by counsel if the applicant chooses, the applicant is asked to explain his or her conduct surrounding each of the issues, and the panel members ask questions as well. The interview panel evaluates the applicant's responses and compares them to the information contained in the applicant's file. The panel also takes into account the applicant's demeanor, evidence of rehabilitation, remorse, and whether the applicant demonstrates an understanding of why the issues that brought the applicant before the committee are of concern to the Bar. Following the conclusion of the district committee interview, which is recorded, the interview panel forwards a report and recommendation to the Standing Committee on Character and Fitness. The Standing Committee, consisting of 18 regular and 18 associate members, is appointed annually by the President of the Bar. The regular members review each recommendation of the district committees, and may endorse the recommendation, take the recommendation under advisement pending receipt of additional information deemed necessary, remand the recommendation to the district committee with instructions for further proceedings, or reject the recommendation and conduct a hearing de novo. An applicant who receives a recommendation of denial from the district committee is entitled to request a hearing before the Standing Committee. Hearings before the Standing Committee are more formal than district committee interviews. Members of the Standing Committee vi act as factfinders and ultimately make 5

a written recommendation to the Board of Law Examiners. Associate members of the Committee serve as State Bar Counsel to represent the interests of the Bar. A regular committee member serves as the Presiding Chairperson and conducts a prehearing conference, hears and rules on motions, and issues subpoenas when requested. The rulings of the presiding Chairperson regarding procedure, admissibility of evidence, and motions are final. The Michigan Rules of Evidence and the Michigan Rules of Civil Procedure may be used as guidelines but are not binding in character and fitness proceedings. The proceedings are transcribed and all witnesses are sworn. The applicant continues to bear the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence. Following the conclusion of the Standing Committee hearing, the hearing panel meets in executive session, or in follow-up telephone deliberations, to reach a determination. The standing committee considers all mitigating and aggravating circumstances when it deliberates, including: the applicant s age at the time of the conduct the time elapsed since the conduct the seriousness of the conduct the reliability of the information concerning the conduct the factors underlying the conduct the cumulative effect of conduct or information the evidence of rehabilitation the applicant s positive social contributions since the conduct the applicant s candor in the admissions process the materiality of any omissions or misrepresentations affirmative efforts to rectify or prevent a recurrence of the conduct timeliness of the applicant s cooperation with the application and investigation process After a decision is reached, the committee prepares and forwards a written report and recommendation to the Board of Law Examiners. That report will conclude either that 6

the applicant has or has not met his or her burden of proof as to the applicant s current requisite character and fitness to practice law. The Board of Law Examiners is composed of five members appointed by the governor on nomination by the Supreme Court. vii In addition to writing and administering the bar examination, the Board ultimately decides whether an applicant possesses the requisite character and fitness to practice law in this state. The Board has the authority to adopt the recommendation of the State Bar s Standing Committee on Character and Fitness, reject the recommendation, or hold a de novo hearing. Also, applicants who have received an unfavorable recommendation from the Standing Committee are entitled to a de novo hearing before the Board of Law Examiners. The final layer of due process for the character and fitness process is the Michigan Supreme Court. Although rarely invoked, if properly petitioned, the Court has supervisory control over the Board of Law Examiners and jurisdiction to review the Board s character and fitness decisions. Under the procedures described above, individuals who are found to have significant adverse information in their background are given the opportunity to convince character and fitness authorities (by clear and convincing evidence) of their good character at four different levels: the District Committee, the Standing Committee, the Board of Law Examiners, and the Michigan Supreme Court. If an applicant is unable to sustain his or her burden of proof and the Board of Law Examiners denial of character 7

and fitness clearance becomes final, an applicant may reapply after a two-year waiting period. viii Additional details of the character and fitness process, as well as the forms, rules and instructions necessary to initiate the process, may be found on the State Bar s website, www.michbar.org, under the Bar Admissions heading. i MCL 600.934 ii RCSBM, Rule 15, Section 1(2) iii RCSBM, Rule 15, Section 1(7) iv Postmarked by November 1 for the February exam or by March 1 for the July exam. Late fees are imposed between November 2 and December 15, and between March 2 and May 15. v RCSBM, Rule 15, Section 1(15). vi Usually 5 members, unless the applicant consents to fewer members. vii MCL 600.922. viii Unless a longer waiting period is imposed under RCSBM 15, Section 1(17) or (18). 8