ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 02/ at 11:58:07 AM

Similar documents
This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz, LLP Ventura Blvd., Suite 1650 Sherman Oaks, CA Telephone (818)

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

Sample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

)

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2018

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

Petition, there is. staff for this form. the other party s

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES D. SALISBURY DEPUTY CLERK B. HALL, CSL/CT.ASST.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/30/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013]

Case 2:15-cr SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023

Auto accident Motion for Summary Judgment complete package

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Sample required format for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale (with provisions for attorney s fee and additional allowance)

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

rdd Doc 267 Filed 08/16/13 Entered 08/16/13 14:47:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 3

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS F-5. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA JUDGMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Unofficial Copy Office of Chris Daniel District Clerk

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. This matter came for hearing in Department 16 on May 18, Plaintiff, Diana P.

E D AUG 1 G 2 0 « CLERK OF THE COURT CSeriT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Case No.

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

a. Name of person served:

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/13/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/13/2018

Unless otherwise expressly provided, in Part V of these Rules of Civil Procedure:

When It Is Concerning Matters Of Law. Go First To The Specific. Then To The General

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/03/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/03/2018

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL. Self Help Center Loca ons:

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

Title 1. General Provisions

Individuals & Businesses Filing Check Deception Complaints. Elkhart County Prosecutor s Office, Check Deception Division

Superior Court of California County of Orange

Transcription:

I ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange 0/ at ::0 AM Clerk of the Superior Court By Sonya Wilson,Deputy Clerk FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER MAR ALAN CARLSOB, Clerk or Ms Court ) a/mal BY D. LAMM. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE-UNLIMITED JURISDICDTION SHAY BARTON Plaintiff, Case No.: 0--000 Judge: Monroe Dept C-1 1 1 1 1 Vs. RICHARD HANSEN, D.D.S., ANDY SANG YOON, D.D.S. Defendants This action came on regularly for trial on January 0, in Department 1 of the Orange County Superior Court, the Honorable William Monroe Judge Presiding. The plaintiff, Shay Barton, appeared by attorney Michael E. Wasserman, Esq. The defendants Richard Hansen, D.M.D. and Andy Sang Yoon, D.M.D. appeared by attorney James T. Stroud, Esq. A jury of persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the jury was duly instructed by the Court and the cause was submitted to the jury with directions to return a verdict on special issues. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned into court with Its verdict as follows:

1 We answer the questions submitted to us as follows: 1 1 1 1 1. Were any of the Defendants negligent in the diagnosis or treatment of Shay Barton? Richard Hansen, D.M.D. X Yes No Andy Sang Yoon, D.M.D. X Yes No If your answer to question 1 is "Yes" for any Defendant, then answer question as to that Defendant If you answered "No" as to all Defendants, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.. Was the negligence of Defendant(s) a substantial factor in causing harm to Shay Barton? Richard Hansen, D.M.D. X Yes No Andy Sang Yoon, D.M.D. X Yes No If your answer to question is "Yes" to any Defendant, then answer question,, and. If you answered "No" as to all Defendants, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.. What are Shay Barton's damages? a. Past economid loss dental and medical expenses $,.00 Total Past Economic Damages: $,.00 b. Future economic loss dental and medical expenses $ 0 Total Future Economic Damages: $ 0

1 c. Past noneconomic loss, including physical pain and mental suffering: $0,000.00 d. Future noneconomic loss, including physical pain and mental suffering: TOTAL $,.00 $ 0 1 1 1 1. Was Shay Barton negligent? X Yes If your answer to this question is yes, then answer question. If you answered no, then insert the number zero (0) next to Shay Barton's name in question number. Was Shay Barton's negligence a substantial factor in causing her harm? X Yes If your answer to this question is yes, then answer question. If you answered no, then insert the number zero (0) next to Shay Barton's name in question.. Assuming that 0% represents the total negligence which was the cause of Shay Barton's damages, what percentage of this 0% is due to the negligence of the following? No Richard Hansen, D.M.D. Andy Sang Yoon, D.M.D. 1 Shay Barton % Signed: Med Razavi Presiding Juror Dated February, No

I It appearing by reason of said verdict that Plaintiff Shay Barton is entitled to judgment against Defendants; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff Shay Barton have and recover from Defendant Richard Hansen, D.M.D. the sum of $1,.0 and recover from Defendant Andy Sang Yoon, D.M.D. the sum of $,. with interest at the rate of ten per cent (%) per annum from the date of the entry of this judgment until paid, together with costs and disbursements in the sum of $ pursuant to the filing a memorandum of costs 1 1 1 1 DATED: IJ I Iut WILLIAM MONROE Judge of the Superior Court

Amended Proof of Service by Mail I am a resident of Los Angeles County, over the age of eighteen () years, and not a party to the action. My business address is 0 Admiralty Way #00, Marina del Rey, CA 0. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California, license number. On February,, I served on Defendants: (corrected) by enclosing a true copy of said documents in separate envelopes for each addressee, postage prepaid, and depositing same In a regularly maintained United States Postal Service mail depository in Marina Del Rey and County of Los Angeles, California, addressed as follows: James T. Stroud, Esq. Ventura Blvd, Suite 1 Tarzana, CA ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Dated this of tar--, in Marina del Rey, California. Michael E. Wasserman