The new gtlds - rights protection mechanisms

Similar documents
26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

TRADEMARK CLEARINGHOUSE

gtld Applicant Guidebook (v ) Module 3

Attachment to Module 3

Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Applicant Guidebook. Proposed Final Version Module 3

[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0

.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

DETERMINATION OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE (BGC) RECONSIDERATION REQUEST APRIL 2014

TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

the domain name is not identical to the mark on which the registrant based its Sunrise registration; (2)

EXPERT DETERMINATION LEGAL RIGHTS OBJECTION DotMusic Limited v. Victor Cross Case No. LRO

Final Issue Report on IGO-INGO Access to the UDRP & URS Date: 25 May 2014

.HEALTH STARTUP PLAN Version 1.0

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

For GNSO Consideration: Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) October 2009

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN

Final GNSO Issue Report on the Protection of International Organization Names in New gtlds

.Brand TLD Designation Application

Updates to Module 3: Dispute Resolution Procedures

NEW GENERIC TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN NAMES ( gtld ) DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE OBJECTION FORM TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OBJECTOR

ANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names. Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies.

Sunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy

Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

30- December New gtld Program Committee:

BETWEEN CORN LAKE, LLC. Claimant. -and- INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS. Respondent FINAL DECLARATION

.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

GNSO Working Session on the CWG Rec6 Report. Margie Milam 4 December 2010

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

IN THE MATTER OF AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY


The Uniform Rapid Suspension Policy and Rules Summary

New gtld Program. Community Priority Evaluation Result. Report Date: 8 April 2016

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011

.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

NGPC Agenda 28 September 2013

UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012

.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

EXPERT DETERMINATION LEGAL RIGHTS OBJECTION Starbucks (HK) Limited v. Amazon EU S.à.r.l. Case No. LRO

.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

American Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy

*,MERCK. Date. Phone Fax j02013

URS 2.0? WIPO Discussion Contribution

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

Appendix I UDRP. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999)

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 REVISED - NOVEMBER 2010

. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES

Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:

Dear ICANN, Best regards, ADR.EU, Czech Arbitration Court

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Attachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application

CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution

In the matter of the Domain <Noam-kuris.co.il>

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( the Rules )

FISH, VIA . ft. com. May 11, John O. Jeffrey General Counsel & Secretary ICANN Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094

Annex to NGPC Resolution NG01. NGPC Scorecard of 1As Regarding Non- Safeguard Advice in the GAC Beijing Communiqué

a) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and

Re: Letter of Opposition on Community Priority Evaluation for.llp ( )

The Adjudicator s Decision

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Workshop on the Current State of the UDRP

CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution

MEMORANDUM OPINION. HILTON, Chief Judge.

THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR EXPERTISE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. CASE No. EXP/411/ICANN/28 PROF. ALAIN PELLET, INDEPENDENT OBJECTOR

Re: Letter of Opposition on Community Priority Evaluation for.llc ( )

Reconsideration Request by Ruby Pike, LLC. Ruby Pike, LLC, as a party adversely affected by an ICANN action...

THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR EXPERTISE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. CASE No. EXP/413/ICANN/30 PROF. ALAIN PELLET, INDEPENDENT OBJECTOR

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR ADR CASE NO. EXP/619 FINAL EXPERT DETERMINATION. Sole Party:

dotcoop will cancel, transfer, or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations as rendered by a WIPO ruling.

THE LAW OF DOMAIN NAMES & TRADE-MARKS ON THE INTERNET Sheldon Burshtein

Submission of Adopted GNSO Council Review of the Johannesburg GAC Communiqué

21 December GNSO Council Review of the Hyderabad GAC Communiqué. From: James Bladel, GNSO Chair To: Steve Crocker, ICANN Board

2- Sep- 13. Dear ICANN and Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Re: Community Priority Evaluation Guidelines

URS DETERMINATION (URS Procedure 9, URS Rules 13)

Registration Agreement. Additional terms and conditions for the registration of.london domain names.

PROPOSED.AU DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) AND RULES. auda Dispute Resolution Working Group. May 2001

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION. INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS Case No MERCKKGaA (Claimant) -v-

NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION. Advertising Magic, Inc. v. Ad Magic Inc., d/b/a Ad Magic c/o Shari Spiro Claim Number: FA

The Governmental Advisory Committee

Impact of the CTM. on the daily work of the trademark profession. Dominique Kaesmacher Chief IP Attorney

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Trademark Rights; Overview of Provisions in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement

DotMusic Limited s Reconsideration Request 16-5: the Council of Europe Report DGI (2016)17. Dear Chairman Disspain and members of the BGC:

THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR EXPERTISE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. CASE No. EXP/417/ICANN/34

FRL Registry BV. Terms & Conditions for the registration and usage of.frl domain names

Domain Name Panelists Meeting October 16, 2006 VII. Burden of Proof Under the UDRP

Detailed Table of Contents

Registry-Registrar Agreement.FRL

Transcription:

The new gtlds - rights protection mechanisms Tony Willoughby Johannesburg 14 April 2014

Session Outline Pre-Delegation Objection Mechanisms Trade Mark Clearing House ( TMCH ) Uniform Rapid Suspension ( URS ) Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( UDRP ) Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure ( PDDRP )

Background 26 June, 2008 - process commenced 12 January, 2012 - application window opened 30 May, 2012 - application window closed 13 March, 2013 - objection filing period closed 23 October, 2013 - first new domains delegated

Applicant Guidebook Background screening and initial evaluation (module 2) Government Advisory Committee ( GAC ) (module 3.1) Public Objections (module 3.2) Independent Objector (module 3.2.5) Dispute Resolution Principles (module 3.5)

Public Objections (263) String Similarity Objections (ICDR) - 67 Legal Rights Objections (WIPO) - 69 Limited Public Interest Objections (ICC) - 23 Community Objections (ICC) - 104

String Confusion Objections String is confusingly similar to an existing gtld or another applied-for gtld Probability that confusion will arise in the mind of the average, reasonable Internet User Objector must be an existing gtld operator or an applicant in the same round

Updated informally by TW 21.10.13

Issues arising from the decisions Panel selection Who is the average, reasonable Internet user/consumer Where does he/she reside? What is his/her first language? Issues giving rise to diverging views: possibility v. probability of confusion; relevance of potential damage; open or closed domain; finding of string similarity panel; context of planned use/target market; second level use; trade mark law; UDRP decisions; doctrine of foreign equivalents; co-existence of parties trade marks; the relative significance of visual and aural similarities and similarity in meaning

Existing Legal Rights Objections takes unfair advantage of the distinctive character/reputation of the objector s trade mark unjustifiably impairs the distinctive character/ reputation of the objector s trade mark otherwise creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion

Existing Legal Rights Objections 49 selected panelists responsible for 6,000 of the 20,000 WIPO UDRP decisions very high level of consistency in reasoning only 4 objections succeeded

Limited Public Interest Objections String is contrary to generally accepted legal norms of morality and public order that are recognised under principles of international law Objector can be anybody and may be the Independent Objector Quick-look review to exclude those manifestly unfounded and those constituting an abuse of the right to object

Limited Public Interest Objections 23 objections of which only 7 appear to have gone through to a decision (at least 11 still pending) 10 filed by the Independent Objector - mainly health related (e.g..health,.med,.hospital) the only LPI objection to have succeeded thus far is.hospital (by a majority)

Community Objections Objector must be an established institution associated with a clearly delineated Community Substantial Opposition within the Community Targeting (strong association between Community and String) Likelihood of Material Detriment to the Community

Post-Delegation Rights Protection Mechanisms Trade Mark Clearing House ( TMCH ) Uniform Rapid Suspension ( URS ) Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( UDRP ) Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure ( PDDRP )

Trade Mark Clearing House Centralised database of verified trade mark data (Deloitte and IBM) nationally or regionally registered word marks; judicially validated word marks; word marks protected by statute/treaty; other marks that constitute IP

Trade Mark Clearing House Sunrise Services Trade Mark Claims Services Registrations need to be renewed annually trade marks featuring dots will be excluded

Uniform Rapid Suspension abbreviated form of UDRP for clear-cut cases of abuse intended to be low-cost and efficient and complementary to the UDRP only relief is suspension scope for appeal

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy the UDRP is applicable to all the new gtlds

Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure the PDDRP is the route to go if a gtld registry is mis-behaving only covers affirmative misconduct does not cover 3rd party abuse at the second level implementation of remedies at ICANN s discretion

thank you