NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter.

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

Get out of the lawsuit and the settlement. This is the only YOURSELF

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

EXHIBIT A

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

- 1 - Questions? Call:

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-BT-CTL

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you

LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY No. 3:04-cv SRC ) ) CLASS ACTION ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 35

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM FOR A PAYMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However, your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you were employed by Kaiser Foundations Hospitals ( KFH ) in California, and were terminated or resigned from your employment between February 10, 2003 and August 11, 2007, and did not receive your final paycheck on or before the date your employment terminated, then you may get money from a class action settlement. IMPORTANT: YOU MUST SIGN & MAIL OR FAX THE ENCLOSED GREEN CLAIM FORM POST-MARKED ON OR BEFORE THE DEADLINE, DECEMBER 11, 2007, TO RECEIVE YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS I. What is the purpose of this notice?... Page 2 II. Why do Plaintiffs seek Settlement approval?... Page 2 III. What is Defendants position on Settlement?... Page 2 IV. Why did I get this notice?... Page 2 V. Who are the Parties in this Class Action?... Page 3 VI. Who are the attorneys representing the Parties?... Page 3 VII. Is there a trial date set for this Class Action?... Page 3 VIII. What is the proposed Settlement?... Page 3 IX. What are my rights with regard to this matter?... Page 4 X. How much money will I get if I make a proper claim and do not request exclusion?... Page 5 XI. Additional important information... Page 6 XII. Who can I contact if I have further questions?... Page 6-1-

I. What is the purpose of this notice? The purpose of this notice is to let you know that there is a class action lawsuit pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, and you may be a member of the Class. This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff Unitie Cervantes in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG06254835 ( the lawsuit ). The lawsuit alleges that Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ( KFH ) and Southern California Permanente Medical Group ( SCPMG ) (collectively, Defendants ) have failed to pay employees final wages at the time of termination as required by Labor Code Sections 201 to 203. There was a mediation on July 11, 2007, during which the Parties to the lawsuit agreed to settle the matter. On August 30, 2007, in Department 20 of the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, the Court held a hearing in which it approved the Parties motion for a court order that does the following: 1.) temporarily and conditionally certifies the Class Action for Settlement purposes only; 2.) grants preliminary Court approval of the proposed Settlement; 3.) grants Court approval of this notice, which includes setting a schedule and procedure for filing claim forms and exclusion notices; and 4.) schedules a Final Fairness Determination Hearing for final Court approval of the Settlement for January 17, 2008, 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 20 of the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, located at 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California 94612. II. Why do Plaintiffs seek Settlement approval? Plaintiffs seek approval of the Settlement because they have reached a proposed Settlement with Defendants that they believe to be fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the members of the Class and all parties. III. What is the Defendants position on Settlement? Defendants view this Settlement as a compromise. They are not admitting to the allegations in the case. Defendants deny that any of their practices at issue in this lawsuit were or are unlawful and reserve the right to object to all claims if the Settlement fails for any reason. The Court file has the Settlement documents with more information on the lawsuit. IV. Why did I get this notice? You received this notice because Defendants records identify you as a member of the Settlement Class. You may submit the enclosed green Claim Form to get money from this Settlement if you worked for KFH in California; (2) you quit or were discharged and did not receive your final paycheck on or before the last day of your employment; and (3) you were discharged during the period February 10, 2003 to August 11, 2007. Specifically, the Settlement Class IS defined as follows: (1) All persons who worked for Kaiser Foundation Hospitals ( KFH ) in California and terminated their employment with KFH between February 10, 2003 and August 11, 2007 ( the KFH class period ) who quit or whom KFH discharged during the KFH class period and whose final paycheck date in KFH s database is later than the same date. -2-

The class does not, however, include former employees who have already received waiting time penalties for their late final paycheck (either through a voluntary payment from KFH, or from a recovery in a lawsuit or labor commissioner action) or who entered into a Settlement and general release with KFH after their employment ended. Accordingly, to recover in this case, you will need to certify that you have not already received waiting time penalties for your late paycheck. V. Who are the Parties in this Class Action? Unitie Cervantes, former employee of Southern California Permanente Medical Group, is the Plaintiff who brought the action on behalf of herself and on behalf of all similarly situated former SCPMG employees. Plaintiff and class representative Vincent Acuna was added by amendment to the complaint to represent similarly situated former KFH employees. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Southern California Permanente Medical Group are the Defendants. VI. Who are the attorneys representing the Parties? Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for Defendants Dennis F. Moss Thomas R. Kaufman SPIRO MOSS BARNESS LLP SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 11377 West Olympic Boulevard, 5 th Floor 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3063 Phone: (310) 235-2468/Fax: (310) 235-2456 Phone: (310) 277-7200/Fax: (310) 201-5219 Michael D. Singer COHELAN & KHOURY 605 C Street, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619) 595-3001/Fax: (619) 595-3000 Joseph Lavi LAVI & EBRAHIMIAN LLP 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 840 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Phone: (323) 653-0086/Fax: (323) 653-0081 VII. Is there a trial date for this Class Action? No trial date has been set at this time. VIII. What is the proposed Settlement? Defendants agreed to pay a maximum Settlement amount of up to $3,600,000 to the approximately 8000 Settlement Class members. This sum includes payment of expenses and fees of the Claims Administrator which is anticipated to be no more than $50,000, an enhancement of $15,000 to the class representatives for the initiation of the lawsuit, prosecution and risks undertaken for costs in the event they were unsuccessful, and attorneys fees and costs of up to one-third of the Settlement Amount, as approved by the Court. -3-

The following is a summary of the Settlement provisions. The specific and complete terms of the proposed Settlement are stated in the Stipulation of Settlement and Release Between Plaintiffs and Defendants, ( Settlement Agreement ), a copy of which is filed with the Clerk of the Court. Settlement Payment. Defendants have agreed to pay all valid and timely claims through the Claims Administrator in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, after Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement. These Settlement payments will be distributed approximately fifteen days after the effective date of the Final Approval, provided there is no appeal of the Court s Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement. After the deduction of the Court-approved expenses from the Settlement Amount, the remaining sum ( Net Settlement Fund ) estimated to be $2,325,000 will be available to pay each member of the Settlement Class who submits a valid and timely Claim Form ( Qualified Claimant ) his or her pro-rata share of the net Settlement amount based his or her final daily rate of pay and on the number of days between his or her termination or resignation date and the date of his or her final paycheck, as compensation for the allegedly untimely payment of wages at termination. The actual payment will vary depending upon the number of Class Members who opt out of the Settlement, and whether less than 50% of the Net Settlement Fund is claimed. If less than 50% of the Net Settlement Fund is claimed, then Defendants have agreed to pay 50% of the Net Settlement Fund to the Qualified Claimants who will share the entirety of that 50% payment on pro-rata basis. IX. What are my rights with regard to this matter? If you fit the description of a Class Member, you have four options. Each option has its own consequences, which you should understand before making your decision. Your rights regarding each option, and the procedure you must follow to select each option, follow. A. Option One. Participation as a Class Member. To get money from the Settlement you must complete the enclosed green CLAIM FORM, sign it, and return it to Cervantes v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al., c/o The Garden City Group, Inc., P.O. Box 9201, Dublin, OH 43017-4601, post-marked or faxed to the number shown on the bottom of each page of this notice, on or before December 11, 2007. It is strongly recommended that you retain proof of your timely mailing or fax transmission until receipt of your Settlement payment. Class Counsel, appointed and approved by the Court for Settlement purposes only, will represent you. The Claims Administrator will process the Claim Form and send you a check at a later date. If you fail to timely return a completed and signed Claim Form, you will not receive any money from the Settlement and you will not be permitted to assert any claims based on the allegations in the Class Action. B. Option Two. You Can Exclude Yourself ( opt out ) From the Settlement. If you do not wish to participate in or be bound by the Settlement, you must return to the Claims Administrator, The Garden City Group, Inc., at the address provided above in Option One or by fax, the enclosed Request for Exclusion from the Class Action Settlement, post-marked or faxed on or before December 11, 2007. The Request for Exclusion must be signed and dated with the last four digits of your Social Security Number inserted. -4-

If you request exclusion, you will neither receive any money from the Settlement, nor will you be considered to have released your claims alleged in the Class Action. If you request exclusion from the Class Action Settlement, you may not pursue any recovery under the Class Action Settlement. You may, however, pursue other remedies separate and apart from the Class Action Settlement that may be available to you. Do NOT return both a Claim Form and a Request for Exclusion Form. Should you do so, your Request for Exclusion will be invalidated and you will be bound by the terms of the Settlement and paid according to Defendants records and the terms of the Settlement. C. Option Three. You May Object to the Settlement. If you are a Class Member, and you do not exclude yourself from the Settlement Class (opt out), you may object to the Settlement before final approval of the Settlement by the Court. If you choose to object to the Settlement, you may enter an appearance in propria persona (meaning you choose to represent yourself), or through an attorney that you hire and pay for yourself. In order to object to the Settlement, or any portion of it, you must file and serve any such written objection postmarked on or before December 11, 2007. Objections must be timely filed in the Clerks Office, Superior Court for the State of California, County of Alameda, 1225 Fallon Street, Room 109, Oakland, California 94612, and timely served on the attorneys for Plaintiffs and the attorneys for Defendants, to be considered by the Court. If you intend to object to the Settlement, but wish to receive your share of the Settlement proceeds, you must timely return the enclosed Claim Form as indicated herein. If the Court approves the Settlement despite any objections and you have not returned the enclosed Claim Form, you will NOT receive your share of the Settlement proceeds. Any comments in support or opposition of the Settlement, as well as a Notice of Intent to Appear at the Final Approval hearing may be filed at any California Court location which has a civil filing facility, or be mailed to the Clerks Office, Superior Court for the State of California, County of Alameda, 1225 Fallon Street, Room 109, Oakland, California 94612. D. Option Four. Do Nothing. If you are a Class Member, and you do not file a claim and do not exclude yourself from the Class, you will be bound by the Settlement, receive none of the Settlement proceeds, and be barred from separately pursuing the claims released by the Settlement. The judgment will bind all Settlement Class Members who do not request exclusion. Any member who does not request exclusion may, if the member so desires, enter an appearance through his or her own lawyer. X. How much money will I get if I make a proper claim and do not request exclusion? Defendants have agreed to pay a maximum gross Settlement Amount of $3,600,000 in consideration for this Settlement and a release of all claims asserted in the lawsuit by the Settlement Class against it. After the Court-approved deduction listed above, if all Settlement Class Members returned valid and timely Claim Forms, $2,325,000 would be distributed to the Settlement Class on a pro-rata basis as described above in Section VIII. The amount you will receive will depend upon your hourly rate of pay at the time of termination and the number of days between your termination date and your final paycheck. The amount you would receive under this Settlement is shown on the enclosed green Claim Form, in Section 2(A), as reflected in Defendants company records. -5-

In the event the Court approves less than the full amount requested for attorneys fees, or attorneys costs or the enhancement, then the amount not awarded will be added to the Net Settlement Fund. XI. Additional important information. You will get your share of the Settlement Proceeds only if you return a signed and dated Claim Form post-marked or faxed on or before December 11, 2007. It is your responsibility to ensure that the Claims Administrator has received your timely Claim Form. You may contact the Claims Administrator at the toll-free number listed at the bottom of each page to confirm it has been timely received. It also is your responsibility to keep a current address on file with the Claims Administrator to ensure that you receive your Settlement payment should the Court order final approval of the Settlement. For additional information regarding this case and the court, you may access the DomainWeb's Complex Litigation page at http://www.alameda.courts.ca.gov/domainweb/. XII. Who can I contact if I have further questions? The court-appointed Administrator for this Class Action Settlement is as follows: Cervantes v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. P.O. Box 9201 Dublin, OH 43017-4601 Telephone No.: 1-800-918-1062 Fax No.: 1-206-876-5295 If you have questions, you may call the Claims Administrator, toll free at 1-800-918-1062. Ask about the Cervantes Class Settlement. You may also call any of the attorneys for Plaintiffs listed in Section VI above. PLEASE DO NOT CALL THE COURT. -6-