IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No.

Similar documents
Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -1-

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 19. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS San Antonio Division

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

)(

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

6:16-cv KEW Document 3 Filed in ED/OK on 02/17/16 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No.

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit A

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

)

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:13-cv JG-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/01/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/01/2017

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY PASSAIC COUNTY, LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO.: COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

Case 0:12-cv RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Courthouse News Service

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

In the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v.

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE:

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/19/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Munir Zanial, Plaintiff, v. Spirit Boeing Employees Association, Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Defendant. Plaintiff Munir Zanial, by and through his attorneys, brings this action against Defendant Spirit Boeing Employees Association and alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. In an act of egregious racial profiling and blatant religious discrimination, Defendant caused the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) to investigate Plaintiff Munir Zanial and restricted his membership rights simply because an employee had deemed him suspicious. Defendant by its statements to the FBI and representations to Mr. Zanial, formed its suspicion because he was seen with a Malaysian flag and associated with visibly Muslim people. 2. On September 2, 2017, Mr. Zanial hosted a party to celebrate Eid-al Adhara at Spirit Boeing Employees Association ( SBEA ) Recreational Lake in Wichita, Kansas. Following the party, SBEA reported Mr. Zanial to the Spirit Aerosystems ( Spirit ) security team based on a concern that Mr. Zanial was affiliated with radical Islamic terrorism and alleged that he had used the SBEA lake to hold an ISIS meeting. SBEA alleged that Mr. Zanial and his

guests had an American flag that had been desecrated by ISIS insignia and were wearing Muslim garb. SBEA restricted Mr. Zanial s membership so he could no longer rent property to host events at the lake. 3. Spirit, based on SBEA s report, filed a complaint with the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ). 4. Defendant never contacted Mr. Zanial to express its concerns or notify him that his membership had been restricted. Mr. Zanial brings this suit to ensure that he is never again subjected to unlawful and humiliating treatment by Defendant and restore equal access to places of public accommodations. Mr. Zanial also seeks compensatory and punitive damages to remedy the discrimination he has experienced. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This civil rights action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1981 and Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000a-2000a-6. This court has jurisdiction over Mr. Zanial s claims as an action arising under federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1343(a)(4). 6. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims herein occurred in the District of Kansas. PARTIES 6. Plaintiff Munir Zanial (hereinafter Plaintiff or Zanial ) is a lawful permanent resident of the United States and a resident of the State of Kansas. Plaintiff is a Malaysian national of Indian ancestry. Plaintiff, like the majority of Malaysian citizens, is a practicing Muslim. Mr. Zanial s first name and surname are Arabic in origin. 2

7. Since 2011, Mr. Zanial has resided in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and two young children. Mr. Zanial earned a master s degree in Aerospace Engineering from Wichita State University and completed a work study program at the National Institute for Aviation Research. 8. Mr. Zanial is employed as a Senior Stress Engineer at Spirit. In 2016, Mr. Zanial became a member of Spirit Boeing Employees Association in order to access the association s recreational lake. He pays $14 per month via payroll deduction to fish and enjoy other outdoor recreational activities available at the lake. Prior to his suspension, Mr. Zanial also regularly rented property at the lake. 9. Defendant Spirit Boeing Employees Association (hereinafter SBEA ) is a 501(c)(4) member-owned non-profit organization. SBEA is incorporated in Kansas and operates a recreational lake and several stores in Wichita, Kansas. Membership in SBEA is open to employees of Spirit, their family members, as well as armed services and emergency relief personnel. 10. Defendant SBEA s recreational lake (hereinafter lake ) is located in southwest Wichita and is open to all members, their family members, and guests. SBEA permits members to rent recreational areas at the lake to host events and parties. Access to recreational areas is not restricted. All members can rent recreational areas if they execute a rental agreement and pay a deposit and user fee. STATEMENT OF FACTS 11. On September 2, 2017, Mr. Zanial rented space at the SBEA recreation lake to host a party celebrating the end of Ramadan. The party was attended by approximately 45 guests, the majority of whom were of Malaysian Indian ancestry. Several of Plaintiff s female guests, including his wife, were wearing hijabs. 3

12. Because the party took place shortly after the 60th Anniversary of Malaysian Independence Day, Mr. Zanial s guest, Nik Azri brought a Malaysian flag to the party. Mr. Zanial and his guests took turns posing with the flag. 13. Mr. Zanial arrived at the lake at 2:00 P.M. to set up the picnic area he had reserved for the party. His guests arrived shortly after. During the party Plaintiff and his guests fished and boated in the lake. Mr. Zanial was fishing while his guests took turns riding in the paddleboats. On one occasion, Plaintiff observed the lake ranger speaking to his guests while they were in a boat. Otherwise, Mr. Zanial does not recall his guests being approached or addressed by a SBEA employee. Mr. Zanial departed from the lake at 5:30 P.M. after the majority of his party had dispersed. 14. On information and belief, the ranger made a complaint to SBEA alleging that Mr. Zanial and his guests were in possession of an ISIS flag during the September 2nd party at the lake. Defendant then filed a report about Mr. Zanial with the Spirit Security Team. 15. At no point did Defendant SBEA speak to or question Mr. Zanial about the ranger s allegations prior to reporting the matter to Mr. Zanial s employer, Spirit AeroSystems. 16. On information and belief, Spirit filed a complaint with the FBI reiterating the allegations provided by SBEA. 17. On October 3, 2017, Mr. Zanial received a notification from Facebook s Law Enforcement Response Team stating that the company had received legal process from law enforcement seeking information about his account. Facebook provided Mr. Zanial with a copy of the subpoena as well as the National Security Investigation number assigned to his case. 18. On October 17, 2017, FBI Special Agent Tracy Jenkins, notified Mr. Zanial that the 4

investigation had been initiated in response to a report made by SBEA regarding an incident that occurred at SBEA s recreation lake. Special Agent Jenkins explained that a SBEA groundskeeper had observed a group dressed in Muslim garb and an American flag desecrated with ISIS symbols. Special Agent Jenkins explained that through an open source search he was able to determine the desecrated flag was a Malaysian flag. He expressed his intent to recommend closing the investigation. 19. On October 26, 2017, Special Agent Jenkins reiterated that he would recommend that the FBI end its investigation into Mr. Zanial but warned that SBEA was working with a private investigator. Jenkins explained that the investigator had been sharing information with the FBI, including social media posts that purportedly belonged to Mr. Zanial and the license plate numbers of all of the guests. 20. On information and belief, the FBI closed its investigation into Mr. Zanial. 21. On October 26, 2017, Defendant SBEA still had not contacted Mr. Zanial about the September 2nd party though it continued to accept membership dues payments from him. Mr. Zanial used the lake property to fish on three days in November 2017. He registered with the ranger each time he entered the lake and was never told his rental benefits had been restricted. 22. On January 10, 2018, Mr. Zanial applied to rent SBEA s enclosed pavilion. After submitting the rental agreement, Mr. Zanial was informed that he was barred from renting the pavilion and directed to call SBEA Executive Director, Trish Pulliam. Pulliam told Mr. Zanial that his membership had been restricted due to an incident that occurred during his September 2nd party. Pulliam described the incident as involving a guest holding a flag. Mr. Zanial was told he would have to attend a meeting of the board of directors for a full description of the reasons his membership had been restricted. 5

23. Mr. Zanial continues to experience stress and anxiety relating to the FBI investigation. He is concerned that the investigation could affect his lawful permanent resident status. He also feels distress and humiliation based on this experience of being singled-out because of his ethnicity, race, and religion. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. 1981 Discrimination Based on Race or Ethnicity 24. Plaintiff incorporates all of the allegations contained in the previous paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 25. Intentional race discrimination in the formation and enforcement of contracts is prohibited under 42 U.S.C. 1981. 26. The ranger, director, and board members were at all relevant times agents and/or employees of Defendant SBEA. 27. Defendant is liable for the unlawful acts of its agents and employees directly and/or under the doctrine of respondeat superior. 28. Defendant identified Mr. Zanial as a threat because of his perceived ethnicity or race. 29. Defendant engaged in intentional discrimination on the basis of Mr. Zanial's perceived race, ethnicity, and national origin in causing him to be investigated by the FBI and denying him membership benefits. Defendant s actions deprived Mr. Zanial of the right to make and enforce contracts regardless of his race, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1981. 30. In causing Mr. Zanial to be investigated by a federal law enforcement agency, Defendant 6

engaged in intentional discrimination on the basis of Mr. Zanial s race, ethnicity, and national origin. In doing so, Defendant deprived Mr. Zanial of the same rights enjoyed by white citizens in the performance and enjoyment of their contractual relationships. 31. By restricting Mr. Zanial s membership rights and alleging to his employer that he is affiliated with ISIS, Defendant SBEA discriminated against Mr. Zanial in the making and enforcement of his contract with the association, namely his membership agreement. 32. Defendant acted with reckless or callous indifference to Mr. Zanial s right to be free from discrimination in the making and enforcement of his contract with SBEA, entitling him to punitive damages. COUNT II VIOLATION OF TITLE II OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Discrimination in Public Accommodations Based on Race, Religion, or National Origin 33. Plaintiff incorporates all of the allegations contained in the previous paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 34. Denying a person service, on account of his race, religion, or ethnicity, at a place of public accommodation whose operations affect commerce is prohibited by 42 U.S.C. 2000a. 35. SBEA is a place of public accommodation and is therefore subject to Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000a. 36. The ranger, director, and board members were at all relevant times agents and/or employees of Defendant. 37. Defendant is liable for the unlawful acts of its agents and employees directly and/or under the doctrine of respondeat superior. 38. In denying Mr. Zanial full use of SBEA property because of his race, ethnicity, and 7

religion, Defendant's conduct constituted discrimination in a place of public accommodation in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Plaintiff makes the following prayer for relief, respectfully requesting that this Court: 1. Declare that Defendant violated Mr. Zanial's rights to be free from discrimination under 42 U.S.C. 1981 and Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 2. Enter a permanent injunction directing Defendant to take all affirmative steps necessary to remedy the effects of the illegal, discriminatory conduct described herein and to prevent similar occurrences in the future; 3. Enter a permanent injunction ordering Defendant to provide Mr. Zanial with an opportunity to publicly clear his name of false statements it has made about him. 4. Award Mr. Zanial compensatory damages for the injury and distress he endured and continues to endure as a result of Defendant s unlawful conduct; 5. Award Mr. Zanial punitive damages against SBEA for its unlawful conduct; 6. Award Mr. Zanial reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988; and 7. Grant any other relief the Court deems appropriate. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff respectfully requests a jury trial on all issues triable to a jury. DESIGNATION OF THE PLACE OF TRIAL Plaintiffs designate Kansas City, Kansas as the place of trial in this action. 8

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert V. Eye Robert V. Eye, KS Sup. Ct. No. 10689 Robert V. Eye Law Office, LLC 4840 Bob Billings Pkwy, Suite 1010 Lawrence KS 66049 (785) 234-4040 (785) 749-1202 (fax) bob@kauffmaneye.com /s/ Lauren Bonds* ACLU Foundation of Kansas 6701 W. 64th St., Suite 210 Overland Park, KS 66202 (913) 490-4114 (913) 490-4119 lbonds@aclukansas.org *Application for Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFF 9