THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Similar documents
THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. IN THE MATTER OF: ) Docket # 2002-DE-L-0711 Robert Barnwell Clarkson ) Respondent ) Return to Show Cause Order

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

Case 1:05-cv IMK-JSK Document 338 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER (FOR DEFENDANTS WHO MADE BOND) IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE COURT PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BY NOTICED MOTION How to Ask the Court to Prohibit an Action

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING AND PURSUING A CIVIL COMPLAINT IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY

Case 1:12-cv JMF Document 6 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 10. : : Plaintiff, : : Defendants.

EXECUTION FORMS COLLECTION OF THE JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County

TAKING A CIVIL CASE TO GENERAL DISTRICT COURT

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS

MAGISTRATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA 185 Central Avenue, SW, Suite TG-100, Atlanta, GA 30303

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Guide to proceedings in the Competition Tribunal: Reviewing a reviewable determination

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

MAGISTRATE COURT OF HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA

HOW TO FILE A CLAIM IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT

MAGISTRATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA 185 Central Avenue, SW, Suite TG-100, Atlanta, GA Case No.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 6714 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

Scrutineer s Guide (F0411)

SAMPLE GATEKEEPER ORDER IN RESPONSE TO FRIVOLOUS AND GROUNDLESS FILINGS

TOWNSHIP OF GALLOWAY OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST FORM

MAGISTRATE COURT OF HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

MAKING AN APPLICATION FOR A

IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Claiming your exempt funds in a bank account garnishment

Step-by-Step Commentary Accompanying Records Request Flowchart for Justice and Municipal Courts March 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NO. ED CV JLQ

HOW TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OR TO STRIKE

A.H.A! GUIDE: HOW TO FILE A FEDERAL SUIT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS CIVIL DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: COMPLAINT


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

FILED 17 FEB '1511 :2Q usru:-ijre

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT

AFFIDAVIT OF CREDITOR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

S m a l l C l a i m s

PRO SE GUIDE CHILD WELFARE APPEAL PROCEDURES

Step-by-Step Commentary Accompanying Records Request Flowchart for Justice and Municipal Courts October 2011

Freedom of Information Act/ Privacy Act Explained Compiled by Prisoners of the Drug War and The November Coalition

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR FILING SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

The Hackers Guide to Search and Arrest. by Steve Dunker J.D. It is legal for an Officer at any time to Ask a person to stop and talk.

TAKING A CIVIL CASE TO GENERAL DISTRICT COURT

IF YOU RENTED PUBLIC HOUSING OWNED BY THE VANCOUVER HOUSING AUTHORITY, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

Orange County Registrar of Voters. Survey Results 72nd Assembly District Special Election

OBTAIN A WRIT OF GARNISHMENT (Non-Earnings)

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

CHAPTER 5.14 PUBLIC RECORDS

Discovery. Thea Whalen. Executive Director, TJCTC

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 31 1

Division 58 Procedures Fla. R. Jud. Admin (b) requires the trial judge take charge of all cases at an early stage in the litigation and shall

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:08cv230

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

Coastal Carolina Taxpayers Association Candidate Vetting Interview Summary. Candidate Vetting Questions. Arthur J. Rich. District 1.

EXPUNGEMENT WORKSHEETS

NEW SMYRNA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FLORIDA POLICY AND PROCEDURE DIRECTIVE

Administrative Appeal Procedures. Effective July 1, 2015

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

CC ATTACHMENT SUMMONS PAGE: 1 USING THIS FORM. a. Original to sheriff for proof of service of process, then to court.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

JUSTICE COURT CIVIL SUITS-SMALL CLAIMS CASE

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY: PROTECTING DATA AND RIGHTS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

CHILD CUSTODY OR VISITATION AND OR/ SUPPORT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

FIFTEEN (15) DAY NOTICE

Case 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 54 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 476

SOME PRACTICAL AND LEGAL TIPS ABOUT TOWN MEETING AND HOW TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON (EVEN IF THE MODERATOR DOES NOT) BY MICHAEL V

AGREED MOTION TO MODIFY PRIOR COURT ORDER POST DIVORCE OR DISSOLUTION COMMON PLEAS COURT

Cause Number (Complete the heading so it looks exactly like the Petition) In the (check one):

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:08CV230

PERSONAL PROPERTY BRIEF DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RULES & REGULATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

IF YOU RECEIVED A PHONE CALL ABOUT A CASH FOR RELOCATION PROGRAM OFFERED BY ALTISOURCE, YOU COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

CIVIL SUMMONS TO:, Defendant 1 ADDRESS:

Case 1:14-cv JG Document 236 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Department of Justice Policy Guidance: Use of Cell-Site Simulator Technology

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

Case 1:17-cv LJO-EPG Document 22 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Freedom of Information Policy

ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES

Court Of Common Pleas Supreme Court Of Ohio

Case 3:19-cv SK Document 1 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 11

REPORT, RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER. This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara,

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records

SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUNTY 316 Fayetteville St, Raleigh, NC 27602

Transcription:

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION United States of America ) No. Plaintiff ) ) Vs ) Motion For Return of Property ) (Rule 41g) Robert Clarkson ) Defendant ) Defendant Robert Clarkson moves this Court, pursuant to Rule 41g FRCrimP, to order the FBI and US Attorney to return his possessions and property based upon the following grounds: 1. Heretofore, on May 3 2007, a team of FBI agents invaded the home of Robert Clarkson at 515 Concord Avenue in Anderson, South Carolina pursuit to search warrant by US Magistrate Judge William M. Catoe on behalf of the FBI in Asheville, NC Defendant Clarkson moves this court to order the return of his personal properties, his political materials and those properties not needed by the FBI for a lawful legal investigation. 2. The FBI seized many items which can not be part of a criminal investigation by their nature and must be returned, including: A. Hundreds of copies of the Declaration of Independence (a revolutionary document, truly) the US Constitution (most hated by the people in power) and the Bill of Rights (This greatly interferes with all governments especially law enforcement agencies). B. All of the Patriot Network political association s, books, literature, videos, DVD s, audio tapes, CDs and items for distribution, including law dictionaries. The FBI of course can keep one copy of each item, but simply has no use for the thousands of duplicate items. C. Clarkson s computer and hardrive. The computer is a valuable piece of property which does the FBI no good after making a copy of the document file. D. Uncashed checks and money orders, cash, silver and gold coins. FBI has no use for these items except for a sample copy of the coins.

E. Copies of Clarkson s newsletter, pamphlets and articles including Default on the National Debt plus various government protest handout for distribution to the public. F. Various family pictures, awards, diplomas, certificates. None of these needed after making a copy. G. Blank stationary, plain paper, empty parchment paper, blank membership cards, membership cards, holiday cards, Christmas cards, blank papers of various sorts, blank DVD s, blank audio tapes and his tool box. H. Personal books, lawsuit materials, pleadings in active civil cases, and research materials including Clarkson s ancient files on COINTELPRO. I. Membership cards and financial records. J. Records and materials for Clarkson s church and his religious activities. K. Numerous other items 3. The vast majority of seized items have no bearing or relationship in any way to a criminal investigation. All the other items can be quickly and cheaply duplicated by the FBI and returned to Clarkson. The FBI used two trucks to haul away a ton of documents of which they have no use at all. The FBI already had possession of 99.9% of the articles seized. Almost everything is posted on Clarkson s website www.patriotnetwork.info. Also the FBI had two undercover agents following Clarkson around and working in his office. The agents attended the Patriot Network meetings. The only thing not made public and already in possession of the FBI was one small box of membership cards and donation records. 4. Incidentally, much of the material seized consisted of pleadings drawn up by Clarkson on behalf of others which were filed in tax court or federal court. Almost all of the members have filed Clarkson s clear and distinct pleadings that were well known to the IRS. While our children were being massacred at Virginia Tech by a madman, eight highly paid and skilled FBI agents spent all day collecting a vast amount of political literature, pamphlets, and books.

5. The FBI investigation of the other patriot groups in Asheville, NC for private banking was not helped one iota by this time consuming and expensive raid on Patriot Network headquarters. The FBI knows very well that Clarkson is simply not involved in the other protest. 6. On May 8, 2007 Clarkson met with Agent Andy Romagnuolo for three hours at his office in Asheville, NC. The special agent explained the four purposes of the search warrant: A. To collect evidence on Clarkson s involvement with the other Patriot group in western NC. However, he started out stating that he knew that Clarkson had no involvement with the activities of the other group, after a two year intensive investigation. B. Clarkson s anti-irs activities. However this is exclusive bailiwick of the IRS, which like all bureaucracies is very jealous of its territory. C. Clarkson s brief writing service and appearances in the offices of the IRS, state tax collectors and various courts with persons classified by the IRS as tax protestors. However, in the promoter law suit in federal court in Greenville, SC docket # 8:05-cv-02734-HMH, the Department of Justice has abandoned its injunction request on these items. In a civil suit, the government must prove "ponderance of the evidence. However, in a criminal case, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. If the highly qualified DOJ attorneys with discovery rights can not prove the lesser standard, how in the world is the FBI going to meet the much higher burden of proof in a criminal case? D. Agent Andy kept making references to another purpose of taking and refusing to return Clarkson s political material which everybody knows has no use in a criminal case. The agent stated very clearly he was not going to return the Patriot Network book inventory, handouts because they wanted to prevent him from distributing this political information to the American people. 7. None of the four purposes listed by Agent Andy have any relationship to Clarkson or a criminal investigation. Therefore these materials should be returned to Clarkson. Further, a hearing should be held so the FBI can explain to the Magistrate why

they raided the headquarters of a political organization. The Judges in Greenville are paid by the taxpayers to examine and scrutinize the workings of the administrative agencies. 8. Clarkson thought Agent Andy was acting strange and making strange statements because a motive to suppress political material by way of a search warrant is highly improper and highly illegal. Clarkson was familiar with the FBI disgraced COINTELPRO activities and the resulting in the Privacy Act which specially outlawed political motives in federal law enforcement. Clarkson was aware that the FBI agents are generally lawyers and defiantly had education on the Constitutional rights of the American people. 9. Now, Why was the FBI raiding the Patriot Network headquarters? Clearly no legal investigation existed; at most Clarkson s possible involvement with the other protest group was so small that the expense of a search warrant was absolutely ridiculous. No legitimate reason is ascertainable at this time. Why does not the FBI just return Patriot Network book and flyers, blank stationary, Clarkson's VA check, Ronald Reagan video where our future President calls for a tax revolt? Why, what s going on? Why is the FBI spending this amount of resources? Why don t they return the material that they can not possibly use under any circumstances? COINTELPRO RETURNS!!! The new FBI Dismantling Program 10. FBI has a new COINTELPRO type program for demolishing political groups. The top officials of the FBI hold a meeting in Washington, DC and pick out certain political programs and information that they decided the American people should not see or hear. Then the highly-paid law enforcement officers harass and intimidate these political groups.

11. Now a favorite tool is to seize their inventory of unfavorable political groups and never return it even though it has no law enforcement value. The FBI has the following information available to this court: A. Documentation on the secret program aimed at identifying and "DISMANTLING" any organization that the FBI perceives disagreeing with the current governmental policies, domestic and/or foreign. B. FBI Form FD-515 with accompanying "DISRUPTION OR DISMANTLEMENT OF AN ORGANIZATION" supplemental page. C. The form FXC-515 or the "Accomplishment Report" listing investigative techniques such as Financial Analysis, Aircraft Surveillance Assistance, Computer related investigations, Consensual monitoring (electronic surveillance), purchasing evidence, forensic laboratory analysis, pen registers on phones, search warrants, 'show money', SWAT teams, phone toll records, and many others. D. The Supplemental Page which goes into detail on the description of what constitutes an organization, and the definitions. 12. These documents can not pertain to a lawful investigation. The First Amendment to our Constitution provides that the Americans citizens have the right to pick and chose their own religious and political beliefs without interference from the government. 13. This court should require the FBI to produce information about the laws or regulations that authorize the FBI to spend taxpayer s dollars and limited law enforcement resources on dismantling certain political organizations. 14. This case and the underlying search warrant deal with the free speech rights of a political organization. No one can deny that the Patriot Network is a political action group and everything seized by the FBI is political material. The political activities of a free people warrant the highest protections by our blessed independent judiciary. Police state suppression of political rights has proven to be

unworkable and disastrous to everybody. A free and open society as we have in America is by far the best way to live. 15. To support and request the search warrant, the FBI filed a nine page affidavit. Then the government requested some type of gag order to prevent Clarkson from seeing it. The order for the secret affidavit is unwarranted and unjustified. Clarkson request that the court send him his copy. 16. In conclusion Clarkson requests that his court examine very carefully this Dismantling operation. Further, Clarkson requests that this court order the FBI to abandon their dismantling program against the Patriot Network. The DOJ attorneys in Greenville and Judge Herlong are well able to determine which of Clarkson s programs need to be eliminated. History has shown us that law enforcement an agency operating in secret against political dissenters just does not work. CO INTELPRO was a total disaster for the federal law enforcement agencies, wasted billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to fight crime, severely embarrassed the FBI. However, the exposure of COINTELPRO caused Congress to pass the Privacy Act which clearly outlawed any similar program including Dismantling. Certificate of Service: I hereby certify that on this date I sent properly a copy to opposing counsel. June 11, 2007 Robert Clarkson, Pro Se 515 Concord Avenue Anderson, SC 29621 (864) 225-3061 Nations that have a secret police need them.

June 11, 2007 Robert Clarkson 515 Concord Ave. Anderson, SC 29621 (864) 225-3061 To: Clerk of Court Washington Street Greenville, SC Re: USA vs. Clarkson, docket# (search warrant) Gentlemen: Please find enclosed original and one copy of Motion of Return of Property from search warrant of May 3, 2007. I am sending a copy of this to the US attorney s office in Greenville, SC as I do not know who in the DOJ has been assigned in this case. The search warrant was signed Magistrate Catoe, so I assume he would be assigned this case. The FBI took from me a large amount of expensive material which I need back quickly. Therefore, please schedule a hearing as soon as you can. Yours, Robert B. Clarkson Cc: AUSA Greenville, SC