July 1, June 30, Nebraska Judicial Branch

Similar documents
Strategic Plan for the Maryland Judiciary moving justice forward

There Are Viable Alternatives to Court-Run Legal Services Programs

CIRCUIT COURT William T. Newman, Jr. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Testimony of Claire P. Gutekunst President New York State Bar Association

Court Support Agencies Organization Department Summary

Indigenous Problem Solving for Healing A Tribal Community Court

TESTIMONY MARGARET COLGATE LOVE. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY. of the

COLORADO COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

Chief Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Circuit Court Judge 19 th Judicial Circuit February 21, 2017

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES

Disability and Guardianship Project

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe,

Judicial Branch Overview

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2018 Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

Judicial Candidate Questionnaire: Judge Version

ANALYSIS OF THE NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR BUDGET THE JUDICIARY PREPARED BY OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE

Original action. Judgment of suspension. Julie L. Agena, Assistant Counsel for Discipline, for relator.

September 27, The Honorable Chairman Chuck Grassley Senate Judiciary Committee 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

-DENVER DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OVERVIEW

Oregon State Bar Judicial Voters Guide 2010

Year-End Legislation BILLS SIGNED INTO LAW & RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED

SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MAGISTRATE OR HEARING OFFICER

OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION DAVID SLAYTON ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

NEBRASKA REENGINEERING COMMITTEE. Concepts for Discussion

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

Minutes of the Kansas Judicial Branch Blue Ribbon Commission. Wednesday, March 9, 2011

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Note: New caption for Rule 1:38 adopted July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009.

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR THOSE CONSIDERING JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT

Disability and Guardianship Project

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

Vermont. Justice Reinvestment State Brief:

Connecticut s Courts

BYLAWS Washington State Bar Association

ANALYSIS OF THE NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR BUDGET THE JUDICIARY PREPARED BY OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

State of Minnesota Department of Finance

JUVENILE MATTERS Attorney General Executive Directive Concerning the Handling of Juvenile Matters by Police and Prosecutors

REMARKS BY SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON CHIEF JUSTICE, WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2448

**READ CAREFULLY** L.A County Sheriff s Civilian Oversight Commission Ordinance Petition Instructions

ETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE *

Oregon State Bar Judicial Voters Guide 2010

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

The Supreme Court of South Carolina

THE JUDICIARY.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

Courts of the Navajo Nation in the Navajo Nation Government

HOUSE BILL 299 A BILL ENTITLED

Executive Summary. Colorado Improving Outcomes for Youth (IOYouth)

JUSTICE: Fair and Accessible to All

Position Announcement. State Courts Administrator Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator

ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL State of Washington 62nd Legislature 2011 Regular Session

63M Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications.

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. CRIMINAL COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS PROGRAM (Effective May 1, 2013)

MEMORANDUM. TO: Senate Judiciary Committee FROM: Kansas Judicial Council DATE: January 30, 2008 RE: 2008 Senate Bill No.

Oregon State Bar Judicial Voters Guide 2014

The Anatomy of a Complaint

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

Teacher lecture (background material and lecture outline provided); class participation activity; and homework assignment.

DETERMINATE SENTENCING

North Carolina District Attorney Candidate Questionnaire

OPENING COURTHOUSE DOORS. LIBRARIANS' PORTFOLIO Fifth Judicial District RESOURCES FROM NEW YORK STATE COURTS

CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Judicial Ethics Advisory Committees by State Links at

COMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 399. Short Title: Young Offenders Rehabilitation Act. (Public)

SFDCCC Candidate Questionnaire

CALIFORNIA JUVENILE COURT PROCESS FOR DELINQUENCY CASES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Policies and Procedures of the TENNESSEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON CHILDREN S JUSTICE & CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE

Washington County Tennessee Staff Attorney Application

Candidate Q&As: Three face off in judge race

NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION

Law Society of Alberta National Mobility FAQs. Visiting Lawyers

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION FOR GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP. An organization to explore substitute decision-making. MAGiC BYLAWS

AGENDA Eau Claire County Criminal Justice Collaborating Council

No An act relating to jurisdiction of delinquency proceedings. (H.751) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

Effective January 1, 2016

Guardianship and Conservatorship

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER AND THE COMMISSIONER FOR LEGISLATIVE STANDARDS. Business Plan

APPLICATION FOR CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNCIL

GUARDIANSHIPS AND CONSERVATORSHIPS IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Statement By Representative Robert C. Scott Chairman, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security

Criminal Justice System Modernization Strategy

WASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

STANISLAUS COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT 2215 Blue Gum Avenue Modesto, CA Telephone: Facsimile:

Prison Rape Elimination Act Annual Report Fiscal Year Stop Sexual Violence

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Principles on Fines, Fees, and Bail Practices

History. State Councils for Interstate Juvenile Supervision. Need for Change. New Compact

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

The Nova Scotia Restorative Justice Program

Transcription:

July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2017 Nebraska Judicial Branch

Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda 2015-2017 Page 1 NEBRASKA JUDICIAL BRANCH STRATEGIC AGENDA 2015-2017 The Nebraska Judicial Branch has six overarching goals for its 2015-2017 strategic agenda. This document identifies those goals and their respective objectives and initiatives. It is essential that in the twenty-first century, the provision of justice is sustained and maintained through a system of impartial, fair, and accessible courts and related services in order to achieve community safety, promote the general welfare, and encourage civility among people. The six overarching goals of the Nebraska Judicial Branch are: Goal 1: Providing Access to Swift, Fair Justice Goal 2: Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults Goal 3: Addressing Community Safety Goal 4: Being Accountable to the Public Goal 5: Strengthening Communication with Citizens and Government Goal 6: Regulating the Legal Profession

Page 2 GOAL 1: PROVIDING ACCESS TO SWIFT, FAIR JUSTICE A more detailed strategic plan for statewide court technology is available on the Judicial Branch Web site: www.supremecourt. ne.gov The role of courts is to swiftly and fairly resolve cases. To accomplish this goal the courts must be impartial, efficient, and accessible for the user. Our judicial system is based upon the principle that all citizens coming before the courts are entitled to equal justice. Courts must ensure that the accused fully understand their rights and that those rights are protected. Courts must provide meaningful access to all, ensuring that no litigant is denied justice due to the lack of counsel or the inability to understand legal proceedings. Victims of crime should have access to resources to assist them through the criminal process. Participants in the court process should have physical access to safe, secure courthouses. To that end, this strategic goal focuses on the following areas: providing adequate funding for the Judicial Branch; implementing and maintaining modern technology to support the internal work of the courts; enhancing technological access for external court users; processing and managing cases efficiently to resolve disputes in a fair and timely manner; continuously improving access to justice for limited English-speaking litigants and the deaf and hard of hearing; ensuring quality continuing education for judges and staff of the Judicial Branch; addressing bias in the judicial system; providing meaningful assistance to self-represented litigants; integrating alternative dispute resolution approaches to improve how trial and appellate courts conduct their business; and planning for courthouse accessibility and security. Funding for the Judicial Branch Technology and the Courts Fairness in the Judicial System Constitutional Rights and Criminal Justice Case Management Procedures Alternative Dispute Resolution Self-Represented Litigants Limited English-Speaking Litigants and the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Courthouse Accessibility, Security, and Continuity of Operations Judicial Branch Education

Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda 2015-2017 Page 3 GOAL 2: PROTECTING CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE ADULTS Nebraska s children and families are precious resources. Courts must be able to act swiftly and justly in child abuse and neglect cases so children in these vulnerable situations can be kept safe and cared for while seeking permanency. At the same time, courts must ensure that the rights of the parents are being addressed. In domestic relations cases in which children are involved, courts must be able to offer procedures and resources to decrease children s exposure to parental conflict, as well as make timely decisions so parents have certainty in their roles and responsibilities. Teens involved in juvenile court proceedings require a unique array of interventions from the court and community to address the legal and habilitative concerns of these young people. Judges and court staff must be knowledgeable about the legal, societal, and familial impact of domestic violence on parents and children involved in dissolution or child welfare matters. Additionally, protecting children includes an active role by the court to support permanency for children through legal adoption after timely relinquishment or termination of parental rights. Vulnerable adults are those individuals who, due to disability or aging, require involvement by the courts in terms of conservatorships, guardianships, and related actions. In guardianship and conservatorship matters, a higher level of initial and annual court scrutiny will be realized by establishing the Office of Public Guardian to provide for the protection of this vulnerable population. As the population of our state continues to age, the impact on courts in these arenas will also increase. Abused and Neglected Children Nebraska Court Improvement Project s Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative Children and Families in Domestic Relations Cases Juvenile Justice Adoption and Termination of Parental Rights Addressing the Needs of Vulnerable Adults Establish the Office of the Public Guardian

Page 4 GOAL 3: ADDRESSING COMMUNITY SAFETY A more detailed strategic plan for Problem-Solving Courts is available on the Judicial Branch Web site: www.supremecourt. ne.gov Courts are required to determine the appropriate sanctions or disposition for individuals who violate the law. When a court determines probation to be the most appropriate action, it must ensure that the individual not only is held accountable, but also is offered rehabilitative services designed to reduce or eliminate future criminal activity. Those individuals, including youth, with histories of substance use or mental illness present a unique challenge. Innovative approaches, such as specialized probation programs, restorative justice, or problem-solving courts, must be considered to reduce recidivism and promote public safety. Successful management of juvenile and adult probation populations requires following proven principles of effective community supervision and using treatment and rehabilitation programs supported by research and experience. It also requires accurate, relevant, and timely information. Initiatives that enhance probation and community supervision call for increased technology, advanced officer skill competency, access to services, and improved methods to assist individuals with special needs. In Nebraska, as well as across the country, more specialty courts and specialized probation programs have been established. The utilization of drug and other problem-solving courts results in a significant cost savings to the courts and the state. It is estimated that a tremendous cost savings for the state results when a case is handled through drug court versus incarcerating an individual, for one year. Recidivism rates for drug court participants also are shown to be less than those incarcerated. Available in 11 of the 12 judicial districts in the state, Nebraska offers 24 problem-solving courts, addressing the needs of adults, juveniles and families alike. Similarly, probation programs specializing in the management of adults and youth who sexually harm, use substances or engage in domestic violence, incorporate proven practices for risk-reduction and are yielding positive outcomes. Drug and Other Problem-Solving Courts Probation Services Community-Based Programs and Field Services

Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda 2015-2017 Page 5 GOAL 4: BEING ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PUBLIC The Judicial Branch, like the Executive and Legislative Branches of government, must be accountable to the public. This goal focuses on the obligation of courts and probation to ensure that staff at all levels are competent, professional, fiscally responsible, and customer service oriented; to establish standards by which court and probation operations and performance can be measured; to keep all branches of government and the public informed of Judicial Branch operations, programs, and initiatives; and to develop a clear strategic agenda that fosters public trust and confidence. Confidence in our judges is at the heart of maintaining the public s trust in the Judicial Branch. Allegations of misconduct must be investigated and resolved timely and fairly. Customer Service Oriented Workforce Performance Standards for the Judicial Branch Financial Accountability Professional Ethics and Conduct Codes Efficient Business Practices

Page 6 GOAL 5: STRENGTHENING COMMUNICATION WITH CITIZENS & WITHIN GOVERNMENT Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda is available on the Judicial Branch Web site: www.supremecourt. ne.gov While the Judicial Branch is a branch of government independent from the Executive and Legislative Branches, it does not exist in isolation. Courts exist to serve the public and cannot serve effectively if meaningful communication between the branches, within the branch, and with the public does not take place. This goal focuses on enhancing Judicial Branch communication with the Executive and Legislative Branches of state government, with all other levels of government, with the public, and with other courts. The Judicial Branch also should foster public understanding of the role of the branch and how it functions through community outreach and education programs. The Judicial Branch should provide information regarding the duties of a judge, the jury system, and the merit selection process. The court system should strive to share information with the public while safeguarding private information of court participants including victims of crimes. External Communications Executive and the Legislative Branches Local Governmental Groups, Specifically County Governmental Organizations Programs and Initiatives for Public Understanding of the Judicial Branch Internal Communications Coordination between the Chief Justice and the Presiding Judges Open Communication of Information between Court and Probation Administration and Statewide Judicial Branch Staff

Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda 2015-2017 Page 7 GOAL 6: REGULATING THE LEGAL PROFESSION The Judicial Branch has long recognized the indispensable role of the legal profession in protecting individual rights and liberties in a free society. We continue in that tradition. Because the Nebraska Supreme Court regulates the practice of law, the Court must determine how the legal profession can best serve the public. This strategic goal requires ongoing oversight of the attorney admissions process, disciplinary systems, and the unauthorized practice of law. Through the Court s Attorney Services Division, the Judicial Branch oversees the licensure of attorneys and the requirements of the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) rule. Attorney Admissions Process Annual Licensure of Attorneys Counsel for Discipline Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Rules of Practice in Appellate and Trial Courts Unauthorized Practice of Law

Page 8 Nebraska Supreme Court in the State Capitol, Lincoln, Nebraska Nebraska s Judicial Branch is growing, it s dynamic, and it s busy. Our dedicated judges, support staff, and probation employees are carrying out the Court s long-term mission to do justice, resolve disputes, provide equal protection to all citizens, and ensure due process of law in all 93 of Nebraska s counties. The Supreme Court is very proud of the many accomplishments of our court family in the last year. We truly appreciate the support the Legislature has provided to the judiciary and we look forward to working with you in serving Nebraska s citizens in the coming year. Chief Justice Mike Heavican, State of the Judiciary Address January 2014

Nebraska Supreme Court Strategic Agenda 2015-2017 Page 9 The Nebraska Supreme Court wishes to acknowledge and thank the following Committees for integral participation in planning for the future of the Judicial Branch of Government: Chief Justice s Leadership Committee Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael G. Heavican and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court Court of Appeals Chief Judge Frankie J. Moore Workers Compensation Court Presiding Judge Laureen K. Van Norman and Court Administrator Glenn W. Morton, Jr. Nebraska District Judges' Association President Peter C. Bataillon, President-Elect James E. Doyle IV, Immediate Past President Steven D. Burns, Legislative Committee Co-Chairs Gary B. Randall and Robert R. Otte Nebraska County Judges' Association President Kurt T. Rager, Vice-President Anne M. Paine, Immediate Past President Laurie J. Yardley, Legislative Committee Co-Chairs Marcena M. Hendrix and Patrick R. McDermott Separate Juvenile Court Judges Association President Douglas F. Johnson, Immediate Past President Robert B. O Neal, Legislative Committee Chair Lawrence D. Gendler Presiding Judge Representatives Leo P. Dobrovolny, District Court; Curtis L. Maschman, County Court; Linda S. Porter, Separate Juvenile Court Administrative Office of the Courts and Probation Corey R. Steel, State Court Administrator Ellen Fabian Brokofsky, Probation Administrator Staff of the Administrative Office of the Courts and Probation Supreme Court Project Committees Case Management Curtis L. Maschman, County Court; Patricia A. Lamberty, Retired, District Court Guardianship/Conservatorship Francie C. Riedmann, Court of Appeals; Susan M. Bazis, County Court Children/Commission on Children in the Courts Everett O. Inbody, Court of Appeals; Douglas F. Johnson, Separate Juvenile Court Children/Through the Eyes of Child Initiative Lawrence D. Gendler, Separate Juvenile Court

Page 10 Supreme Court Project Committees (continued) Probation Evidence-Based Practices Committee Jodi Nelson, District Court Problem-Solving/Drug Court Committee James E. Doyle IV, District Court Technology Committee William B. Cassel, Supreme Court Interpreter Advisory Committee William B. Cassel, Supreme Court Minority Justice Committee John F. Irwin, Court of Appeals Pro Se Advisory Implementation Committee Frankie J. Moore Media/Community Outreach PEOPLE Todd J. Hutton, County Court Dispute Resolution/Parenting Act Committee Michael W. Pirtle, Court of Appeals Judicial Branch Education Committee Michael W. Pirtle, Court of Appeals Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Kenneth C. Stephan, Supreme Court Nebraska Court System Reengineering Committee Advisory Group Patrick R. McDermott, County Court, Chairman Linda S. Porter, Separate Juvenile Court, Policy Committee Thomas M. Maul, Lawyer, Policy Committee Sally R. Johnson, Lawyer, Policy Committee Liz Neeley, Consultant, Policy Committee Lawrence D. Gendler, Separate Juvenile Court, Structure Committee Paul W. Korslund, District Court, Structure Committee Gary B. Randall, District Court, Centralization Committee Thomas A. Otepka, District Court, Centralization Committee Anne M. Paine, County Court, Centralization Committee National Center for State Courts, Staff to the Advisory Group

Nebraska Supreme Court Office of the State Court Administrator Nebraska State Capitol 1445 K Street, Room 1213 P.O. Box 98910 Lincoln, NE 68509 Phone: 402-471-3730 Fax: 402-471-2197 www.supremecourt.ne.gov Adopted by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Released March 2015.