PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT

Similar documents
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC ADRIAN FlUDMAN. Petitioner V5. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS. Respondent

ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Lawsuit:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT & AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Herniated Disc Case Analysis Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts $ 417, Plaintiff MVA-Bus Bus None

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Lilliana Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.

The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES SURVEY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC L.T. Case No.: 3D LOUIS R. MENENDEZ, JR. and CATHY MENENDEZ, Petitioners,

Regent Candidate Advisory Council APPLICATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF REGENTS

HONORABLE JACK R. ST. ARNOLD 315 COURT ST., ROOM 423 CLEARWATER, FL (727) Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil / Foreclosures

IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA. October 25, 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF HONORABLE PETER D. WEBSTER TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO RULE 1.420

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. Case No CA

CONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

HIEU PHUONG HOANG NO CA-0749 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THORTON SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Master File: JAR NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

GENERAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES: Contested Foreclosures Docket

THOMAS E. ELFERS, ESQ. Law Office of Thomas Elfers S.W. 148 Lane, Miami, Florida Office (305)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Torts Tutorial Chapter 6 Joint Tortfeasors

October 11, Drafting Committee, Uniform Apportionment of Tort Responsibility Act (Fifth Tentative Draft)

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARON SWAN JOSEPH M. MOORE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA DIRECTOR CHIEF OPERATNG OFFICER

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv JG Document 236 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

10-1Supreme Court Cover Sheet. Form

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ANDREW MCKEE, Petitioner, vs. JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. THE FIELD CLUB, INC., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 1D ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M.

IN TH E SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CaseNo.: SCl UCF ATHLETICS ASSOCIAT10N. INC., and GREAT AMERICAN ASSUR ANCE COMPANY.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

WHAT IS REDISTRICTING. AND WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON MY COUNTY?

Supreme Court of Florida

ORANGE COUNTY COURT BUILDING

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D07-363) AHMAD ASAD, TONY GARCIA AND NOEL RIVERA, Petitioners, vs.

The Role of Medical Expenses in Personal Injury Cases: Stanley v. Walker

Plaintiff, v. Collective Action Nicka & Associates, Inc.,

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

SUMMER 1995 August 11, 1995 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM

Guidelines & Procedures Div. 70 County Civil. Judge Martha C. Adams Orange County Judge

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V. When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil (Revised March 2018)

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, AND (2) HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN NET SETTLEMENT FUND

Understanding New Jersey Policies That Drive Mass Incarceration

STRATEGIES FOR DEFENDING INFLATED DAMAGE CLAIMS IN AUTO & GL LITIGATION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

LITIGATION REPORT. Wall Of Confusion: GEICO General Insurance. Company v. Bottini And Its Ill-Begotten Progeny

Basic Guide to Wisconsin Small Claims Actions

Second Regular Session. Sixty-second General Assembly LLS NO Debbie Haskins HOUSE BILL STATE OF COLORADO.

EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTY/CIVIL DIVISION S COURTROOM C ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDELINES

PREFACE. Appeal certified direct conflict with the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Kokotis v.

Justice Court Precinct 8 Judge Tom Gillam III Justice of the Peace JUSTICE COURT PROCEDURES SMALL CLAIMS

DOCKET NO. the City of Millville, County of Cumberland and State of New Jersey, by way of FIRST COUNT

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case Nos. SC and SC IN RE: PRO BONO ACTIVITIES BY JUDGES AND JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEYS

State of Florida Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

7.32 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: INTERROGATORIES (Approved before 1985) NOTE TO JUDGE

The Vanishing Right To Federal Jurisdiction In Bad Faith Claims In Florida

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT ANALYSIS

Chapter 3 The Court System and Chapter 4 The Litigation Process

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cv ACC-KRS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

How to Sue in Small Claims Court

PLANO LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. v. ROBERTS 167 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App. 2005)

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

RYVMED MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., DEVON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DEVON MEDICAL, INC., d/b/a DEVON MEDICAL SUPPLIES, and SUPPLY MARKETING, INC.

CONSENT TO JOIN ACTION (FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, 29 U.S.C. 216(b))

Application form for civil litigation support

Plaintiffs, Defendants. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

So, You re Thinking of Filing A Lawsuit? San Mateo County Superior Court

Supreme Court of Florida

COURT AUTHORIZED NOTICE OF LAWSUIT

INFORMATION BEFORE YOU FILE

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

DISPUTES RESOLVING CONSUMER DISPUTES. Washington State Attorney General s Office. Small Claims Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC ADRIAN FRIDMAN, Petitioner, vs. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case 3:14-cv MMH-MCR Document 33 Filed 02/16/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID 171

Codebook. A. Effective dates: In the data set, the law is coded as if it changes from one month to

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Transcription:

PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT Instructor: Bryce P. Spano, Esquire 8950 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. N. Suite 220 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone: 727-570-4660 Fax: 727-570-4665 Email: bspano@rpslaw.net Legal Assistant: Becky Millican (bmillican@rpslaw.net)

Purpose 1. Contractual agreement to resolve claim reasonably 2. Ends judicial labor 3. Allow recovery of attorneys' fees if opposing party doesn't accept

Statutory Law 1. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 2. Florida Statutes 768.79

Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.442 1. Timing 4. Withdrawal guidelines 2. Form 5. Acceptance guidelines 3. Joint Proposal 6. Good faith

Florida Statutes 768.79 1. Form 4. Defendant's recovery of fees 2. Acceptance guidelines 5. Definition of "Judgment Obtained" 3. Withdrawal guidelines

Calculations of Judgment Obtained Jury verdict - PIP benefits paid - Other collateral source set-offs + Pre-offer taxable costs Judgment Obtained

End Results Recoverable Fees versus Judgment Obtained 3 scenarios for defense

When Recoverable Fees < Judgment Obtained Judgment Obtained: $100,000 Defendant prevailed on PFS Defendant's fees/costs $50,000 Defendant still owes Plaintiff $50,000

When Recoverable Fees = Judgment Obtained Judgment Obtained: $50,000 Defendant prevailed on PFS Defendant's fees/costs $50,000 Neither party owes the other party any money

When Recoverable Fees > Judgment Obtained Judgment Obtained: $25,000 Defendant prevailed on PFS Defendant's fees/costs $50,000 Plaintiff owes Defendant $25,000

Example 1 3 rd Party Case (Plaintiff is suing your insured) 01/01/17 Lawsuit Filed 07/01/17 D served PFS for $20,000 07/01/17 P s pre-offer taxable costs are $2,500 Verdict $30,000 PIP paid: $10,000 Write-offs: $10,000 What is the judgment obtained? Did Defendant prevail on the PFS?

Calculations of Judgment Obtained $30,000 (Verdict) - $10,000 (PIP paid) - $10,000 (Write-offs) $10,000 (Net Verdict) + $2,500 (pre-offer taxable costs) $12,500 (judgment obtained) Defendant prevails

Example 2 (more realistic numbers) 3 rd Party Case (Plaintiff is suing your insured) 01/01/17 Lawsuit Filed 07/01/17 D served PFS for $20,000 07/01/17 P s pre-offer taxable costs are $6,738.32 Verdict $28,674.33 PIP paid: $9,879.54 Write-offs: $7,854.97 What is the judgment obtained? Did Defendant prevail on the PFS?

Calculations of Judgment Obtained $28,674.33 (Verdict) - $ 9,879.54 (PIP paid) - $ 7,854.97 (Write-offs) $10,939.82 (Net Verdict) + $ 6,738.32 (pre-offer taxable costs) $17,678.14 (judgment obtained) Defendant does not prevail

Hardest Decisions? 1. When to serve a PFS? 2. Amount of PFS?

When to Serve a PFS? The earlier the better! Considerations: a) Most likely will not be accepted b) May effect negotiations in future c) Must have some "bite" to it

When to Serve a PFS? Considerations: a) When are you serving PFS b) What is amount of past medical bills likely awarded c) What type of case is it

Example 1 3 rd Party Case (Plaintiff is suing your insured) Mediation just impassed 9 months into lawsuit Total past medical bills: $43,456.43 PIP has exhausted Write-offs/adjustments: $ 7,467.35???

Calculation of Judgment Obtained $43,456.43 (total past medical bills) Less $10,000.00 (PIP set-off) Less $ 7,467.35 (collateral source set-offs) Equals $25,989.08 Assume taxable costs thru mediation are $2,500.00 Equals $28,489.08 (Judgment obtained)

Trial & Error Approach Take a number and multiply it by.75 Looking for result that is over the judgment obtained amount

$35,000.00 PFS 25% less is $26,250.00 $26,250.00 < $28,489.08 This isn't over the judgment obtained

$40,000.00 PFS 25% less is $30,000.00 $30,000.00 > $28,489.08 This would be a good PFS amount

Example 2 1 st Party Case (Underinsured Motorist Claim) Mediation just impassed 9 months into lawsuit Total past medical bills: $68,567.34 PIP has exhausted Write-offs/adjustments: $12,765.43 Tortfeasor has liability limits of $25,000.00???

Calculation of Judgment Obtained $68,567.34 (total past medical bills) Less $10,000.00 (PIP set-off) Less $12,765.43 (collateral source set-off) Less $25,000.00 (tortfeasor s limits) Equals $20,801.91 Assume taxable costs thru mediation are $2,500.00 Equals $23,301.91 (Judgment obtained)

Trial & Error Approach Take a number and multiply it by.75 Looking for result that is over the judgment obtained amount

$30,000.00 PFS 25% less is $22,500.00 $22,500.00 < $23,301.91 This isn't over the judgment obtained

$35,000.00 PFS 25% less is $26,250.00 $26,250.00 > $23,301.91 This would be a good PFS amount

$32,500.00 PFS 25% less is $24,375.00 $24,375.00 > $23,301.91 This would be a good PFS amount

Fee Hearing Must have evidentiary hearing Standard of Review - Abuse of Discretion Strict Compliance Burden of Proof