CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

Similar documents
Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

Case 1:18-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. C O M P L A I N T. Attorney, and sues the Defendants, JUSTIN BIEBER ( BIEBER } and HUGO HESNY

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/31/2014

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE FOR THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT MEMPHIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

Filing # E-Filed 08/31/ :25:22 PM

The Honorable Chainnan and Members ofthe Board ofcounty Commissioners. William M. Davis, Interim Director, Risk Management

Filing # E-Filed 03/29/ :29:03 AM

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 269 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017

Case 5:15-cv gwc Document 1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL0RIDA

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2012 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

Case 7:16-cv NSR Document 5 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/21/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2015

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

CASE NO. 1D Charles F. Beall, Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

To the above named Defendants:

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

Case 3:13-cv JAF Document 1 Filed 02/12/13 Page 1 of 12

LAW REVIEW JANUARY 1987 MUST LANDOWNER PROTECT MOONING REVELER FROM HIMSELF? James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Case 1:17-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2017 Page 1 of 45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

CAUSE NO. SUSAN DAVIS and IN THE DISTRICT COURT PRASHANTH MAGADI

COMPLAINT. STEPHEN MISKELL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of KATHLEEN

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2013

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

ea iq5 corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and doing business in Orange County Florida. CASE NO.

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

George Mason University School of Recreation, Health & Tourism Court Reports SLOWE v. PIKE CREEK COURT CLUB, INC. (Del. Sup. Ct.

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/14/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 125 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2018

Notice Of Interrogatories

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

3/24/ :21:10 AM 17CV12356 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. ) ) Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

Case 2:14-cv HB Document 20 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :01 PM INDEX NO. E156010/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2018 EXHIBIT

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/26/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2015E

DEBORAH FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. FOOD LION, LLC, BUDGET SERVICES, INC., and FRANK S FLOOR CARE, Defendants NO. COA Filed: 6 September 2005

HOMEWARD BOUND SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA MARC ORTH

CASE N~.l COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, Juan Luis Guerra Seijas ("Mr. Guerra"), sues Karen Records, Inc., Karen. Introduction

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. BRCV C

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC FOURTH DCA CASE NO.: 4D L.T. No.: (27)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/21/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/21/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016

Case 1:12-cv RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 3:07-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :43 PM

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Transcription:

Electronically Filed 06/28/2013 01:01:15 PM ET IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL CIRCUIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON, AFFAIRS, AND THE ESTATE OF QUIRS WALKER, a disabled adult, v. Plaintiffs, ROSEN HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and MAJIC CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendants. / COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON, AFFAIRS, and the ESTATE OF QURIS WALKER, a disabled adult, sue Defendants, ROSEN HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and MAJIC CLEANING SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation, for damages and allege: ALLEGATION AS TO ALL COUNTS 1. This is an action for damages in excess of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00), exclusive of interest costs, and attorneys fees. 2. At all material times the Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON, AFFAIRS, and the ESTATE OF QURIS WALKER, a disabled adult, resided in the State of Mississippi. 1

3. CHARLESETTA WALKER (Hereinafter CONSERVATOR ) has been appointed as Conservator for the Person, Affairs, and Estate of Quris Walker (Hereinafter WALKER ) who is her disabled son. 4. At all material times Defendant, ROSEN HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC. (Hereinafter ROSEN ), was a Florida Corporation operating in Orange County, with a registered agent named HARRIS ROSEN who is located at 7600 International Drive, Orlando, Florida 32819. 5. At all material times, Defendant ROSEN owned and/or operated a hotel known as the Rosen Shingle Creek (Hereinafter SHINGLE ) located at 9939 Universal Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32819 in Orange County, Florida. 6. At all material times Defendant, MAJIC CLEANING SERVICES (Hereinafter MAJIC ) was a Florida Corporation operating in Orange County, with a registered agent named MARK D. DIXON who is located at 3569 Bellington Drive, Orlando, Florida, 32835. 7. At all material times, MAJIC was contracted to provide cleaning and janitorial services at the Rosen Shingle Creek Hotel. 8. On or about August 4, 2011, WALKER, was lawfully on the premises of SHINGLE as a business invitee of the hotel. 9. On August 4, 2011 Plaintiff, WALKER, slipped and fell in SHINGLE as a result of a dangerous condition; specifically, a wet floor. As a result, Plaintiff, WALKER, sustained serious and persisting injuries. 10. Venue is proper in Orange County, Florida because it is the site of the accident that is the subject matter of this Complaint 2

COUNT I NEGLIGENCE AGAINST ROSEN HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC. 11. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 10. 12. On August 4, 2011, Plaintiff, WALKER, was a business invitee of Defendant, ROSEN by nature of his status as a hotel patron of the SHINGLE. 13. Defendant, ROSEN, owed a non-delegable duty to the general public and to the Plaintiff of keeping the SHINGLE premises in a reasonably safe condition so that business invitees of said premises would not be injured. 14. Defendant, ROSEN, retained third party MAJIC to help maintain and clean the subject premises. ROSEN is derivatively and vicariously liable for any negligence of MAJIC on its premises. 15. Defendant, ROSEN, by and through its agents, vendors, servants, and/or employees, breached its non-delegable duty to the Plaintiff by engaging in the following acts and/or omissions: a. Creating and/or allowing the presence of a dangerous condition, to wit: a wet floor. b. Knowing, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the existence of said dangerous conditions and failing to exercise reasonable care in correcting those conditions. c. Failing to warn Plaintiff, WALKER, of said dangerous conditions; or in the alternative, allowing said dangerous conditions to exist for a length of time sufficient under which a reasonable inspection of the premises would have disclosed its dangerous condition. 3

d. Failing to post any type of warning signs in the vicinity of said area, to alert persons on the premises of the dangerous and hazardous conditions present when the accident occurred. e. Failing to clean, dry, or otherwise section off or close off said wet area after learning of the presence of wet floor, so as to prevent business invitees access to the dangerous condition. f. Failing to properly train its staff or third party vendors to clean, dry, or otherwise make inaccessible to business invitees the hazardous substance on the floor. 16. The Defendant, ROSEN, its agents, servants, and/or employees, failed to establish adequate procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the area where the subject accident occurred; or in the alternative, a. It had procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the premises; however, ROSEN failed to implement said procedures; or in the alternative, b. It had procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the premises; however, ROSEN implemented those procedures in a careless and negligent manner. 17. As a result of the acts and omission of ROSEN, the Plaintiff, WALKER, slipped and fell, becoming permanently injured. As a result of the incident, Plaintiff, WALKER, incurred continuing and substantial medical bills, as well as special, incidental and out-of-pocket expenses. Plaintiff WALKER, suffered physical and mental handicaps, which impaired his ability to lead and enjoy a normal life, and resulted in a loss of income and the impairment of his earning capacity, both in the past and in the future; as well the 4

aggravation of a pre-existing condition. All said injuries are permanent and continuing in nature, such that the Plaintiff, WALKER, will suffer these losses and impairments in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, CONSERVATOR, demands judgment against Defendant, ROSEN, for compensatory damages, interest, costs, and any further relief this Court deems proper. COUNT II NEGLIGENCE AGAINST MAJIC CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC. 18. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1 through 10. 19. On August 4, 2011, Defendant, MAJIC, had a contractual agreement for cleaning services with the Defendant, ROSEN, to clean and maintain the hotel premises located at 9939 Universal Boulevard, Orlando, Florida, 32819, known as the Rosen Shingle Creek. 20. On August 4, 2011, Plaintiff, WALKER, was a business invitee of Defendant, MAJIC by nature of his status as a customer of SHINGLE. 21. Defendant, MAJIC, owed a non-delegable duty to the general public and to the Plaintiff of keeping the SHINGLE premises in a reasonably safe condition so that business invitees of said premises would not be injured. 22. Defendant, MAJIC, by and through its agents, servants, and/or employees, breached its non-delegable duty to the Plaintiff by engaging in the following acts and/or omissions: a. Creating and/or allowing the presence of a dangerous condition, to wit: a wet floor. b. Knowing, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the existence of said dangerous conditions and failing to exercise reasonable care in correcting those conditions. 5

c. Failing to warn Plaintiff, WALKER, of said dangerous conditions; or in the alternative, allowing said dangerous conditions to exist for a length of time sufficient under which a reasonable inspection of the premises would have disclosed its dangerous condition. d. Failing to post any type of warning signs in the vicinity of said area, to alert persons on the premises of the dangerous and hazardous conditions present when the accident occurred. e. Failing to clean, dry, or otherwise section off or close off said wet area after learning of the presence of wet floor, so as to prevent business invitees access to the dangerous condition. f. Failing to properly train its staff to clean, dry, or otherwise make inaccessible to business invitees the hazardous substance on the floor. 23. The Defendant, MAJIC, its agents, servants, and/or employees, failed to establish adequate procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the area where the subject accident occurred; or in the alternative, a. It had procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the premises; however, MAJIC failed to implement said procedures; or in the alternative, b. It had procedures for the maintenance, inspection, and supervision of the premises; however, MAJIC implemented those procedures in a careless and negligent manner. 24. As a result of the acts and omission of MAJIC, the Plaintiff, WALKER, slipped and fell, becoming permanently injured. As a result of the incident, Plaintiff, WALKER, incurred 6

continuing and substantial medical bills, as well as special, incidental and out-of-pocket expenses. Plaintiff WALKER, suffered physical and mental handicaps, which impaired his ability to lead and enjoy a normal life, and resulted in a loss of income and the impairment of his earning capacity, both in the past and in the future; as well the aggravation of a pre-existing condition. All said injuries are permanent and continuing in nature, such that the Plaintiff, WALKER, will suffer these losses and impairments in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, CONSERVATOR, demands judgment against Defendant, MAJIC CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC., for compensatory damages, interest, costs, and any further relief this Court deems proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all issues triable as a right by jury. DATED THIS DAY OF JUNE, 2013. THE HAGGARD LAW FIRM, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 330 Alhambra Circle, First Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Telephone: (305) 446-5700 Fax: (305) 446-1154 BY: TODD J. MICHAELS Florida Bar No. : 568597 7