Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State

Similar documents
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

If you have questions, please or call

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

2016 us election results

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Gun Laws Matter. A Comparison of State Firearms Laws and Statistics

Incarcerated Women and Girls

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

Now is the time to pay attention

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

America s Deficient Bridges: A State-by-State Comparison

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

Oregon and STEM+ Migration and Educational Attainment by Degree Type among Young Oregonians. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

Instructions for Completing the Trustee Certification/Affidavit for a Securities-Backed Line of Credit

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Governing Board Roster

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR FINGERPRINT CARDS (see attachment 1 for sample card)

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION DAY. September 26, 2017

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

VOCA 101: Allowable/Unallowable Expenses Janelle Melohn, IA Kelly McIntosh, MT

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

Fundamentals of the U.S. Transportation Construction Market

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Briefing ELECTION REFORM. Ready for Reform? After a day of chaos, a month of uncertainty and nearly two years of INSIDE. electionline.

Understanding UCC Article 9 Foreclosures. CEU Information

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

Relationship Between Adult and Minor Guardianship Statutes

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

Trends in Medicaid and CHIP Eligibility Over Time

Online Appendix. Table A1. Guidelines Sentencing Chart. Notes: Recommended sentence lengths in months.

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

How States Can Achieve More Effective Public Safety Policies

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

RIDE Program Overview

Sample file. 2. Read about the war and do the activities to put into your mini-lapbook.

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Voice of America s Private Schools.

RULE 7.5: FIRM NAMES AND LETTERHEADS

Election Cybersecurity, Voter Registration, and ERIC. David Becker Executive Director, CEIR

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Economic Nexus Standards in State Taxation. CEU Information

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

The Law Library: A Brief Guide

arxiv: v3 [stat.ap] 14 Mar 2018

Admitting Foreign-Trained Lawyers. Professor Laurel S. Terry Penn State Dickinson School of Law Carlisle, Pennsylvania

50 State Survey of Bad Faith Law. Does your State encourage bad faith?

Mineral Availability and Social License to Operate

Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group

RIDE Program Overview

14 Pathways Summer 2014

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Background Checks and Ban the Box Legislation. November 8, 2017

FSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN 1999: Estimates for Every Congressional District

STATISTICAL GRAPHICS FOR VISUALIZING DATA

RULE 1.16: DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION

Update on State Judicial Issues. William E. Raftery KIS Analyst Williamsburg, VA

The Progressive Era. Part 1: Main Ideas. Write the letter of the best answer. (4 points each)

Transcription:

Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State March 2011 Highlights: California, Illinois, and Texas are the states with the largest numbers of nonresidents. Students from Ohio and Wyoming persist and graduate at the highest rates, while students from Arizona and New Jersey have the lowest rates. Nonresident students have lower graduation and retention rates then resident students. The purpose of this research brief is to explore the retention and graduation rates of nonresident students by their state and region of residency. Future research will utilize the National Clearing House data to explore if nonresidents who leave CSU do so to attend an in-state institution. There are 15 states that have had less than 100 students start as new freshmen at CSU in the cohorts between Fall 1995 and Fall 2009. These states are West Virginia, Delaware, District of Columbia, Rhode Island, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky, Maine, Louisiana, Vermont, Arkansas, North Caroline, North Dakota, and Tennessee. Due to the small number of students, these states are excluded from state by state comparisons. On average, students from these 15 states make up 5% of a nonresident cohort. California, Texas, and Illinois are the states with the largest number of nonresident new freshmen. Students from these three states collectively make up about 30% of a nonresident freshmen cohort. Chart 1 displays the average proportion of nonresident freshmen from different states since fall 1995. Chart 1. Average Proportion of Nonresident Cohorts by State Students from the Rocky Mountain and Midwest regions are the most academically prepared and these regions have the highest graduation and retention rates. Remaining States 56% California, Texas, and Illinois 30% 15 smallest 5% Highest Performing (Ohio and Wyoming) 5% Lowest Performing (Arizona and New Jersey) 4% Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 1

Chart 2 compares the overall nonresident average retention and graduation rates to the state average retention and graduation rates for select states. Nine states were selected because they are the lowest performing states (AZ and NJ), the highest performing states (OH and WY), the largest states (IL, CA, and TX), and the two states with the largest gap between their retention and graduation rates (FL and MA). The cohort size, average graduation, and average retention rates by state are presented in the appendix. Chart 2. Nonresident Six Year Graduation and First Year Retention Rates of Combined Cohorts by State 90% 40% FA95 - FA09 Retention FA95 - FA04 Graduation Average NR Retention Average NR Graduation In order to show recent trends by state, Charts 3 and 4 represent the worst performing, best performing, and largest states retention and graduation rates over the last five years. Much of the volatility in the graduation and retention rates by sate could be due to the small cohort sizes. All cohorts averaged less than 100 students each fall and most averaged less than 20 students each fall. Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 2

Chart 3. 100% 95% 90% Arizona (N=125) Nonresident First Year Retention by State New Jersey (N=82) Ohio (N=67) Wyoming (N=78) Illinois (N=380) Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 California (N=485) Texas (N=435) Chart 4. Nonresident Six Year Graduation Rate by State 35% 25% 15% Arizona (N=92) New Jersey (N=48) Ohio (N=76) Wyoming (N=129) Illinois (N=344) Fall 2000 Fall 2001 Fall 2002 Fall 2003 Fall 2004 California (N=385) Texas (N=480) Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 3

To mitigate some of the volatility, analysis was also done grouping nonresident students by their region of residency. Over the last 15 years the proportion of nonresident students from each region has remained relatively stable; although, the nonresident class size has grown. Chart 5 is a stacked bar graph that represents the last 15 years of nonresident cohorts and the proportion of them from each region. The appendix includes information on which region each state is from. Chart 5. 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Fall 1995 to Fall 2010 Nonresident Freshmen Cohorts by Region of Residency Northeast South Midwest Plains Rocky Mountain West FA95 FA96 FA97 FA98 FA99 FA00 FA01 FA02 FA03 FA04 FA05 FA06 FA07 FA08 FA09 FA10 Academic preparation influences retention and graduation rates; therefore, average academic preparation indicators should be considered by region. Table 1 displays the overall nonresident average high school GPA, Index score, high school percentile rank, and test score averages for the last 15 nonresident cohorts and the difference by region from the overall average. Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 4

Table 1. Fall 1995- Fall 2010 Nonresident Academic Preparation Region Averages Compared to Overall Nonresident Averages Nonresident Average Midwest Northeast Plains Rocky Mountain South West High School GPA 3.5 0.05 0.17 0.06 0.23 0.06 0.01 Index 114.6 1.15 2.35 0.60 4.52 1.09 0.54 High School Percentile Rank 63.1 0.91 7.28 2.45 11.95 10.22 2.19 ACT composite 24.7 0.26 0.69 0.06 0.77 0.12 0.28 SAT verbal 563.5 0.69 1.50 4.96 8.76 5.55 10.16 SAT math 571.8 2.25 1.54 0.21 5.50 3.63 2.80 Chart 6 displays the average retention and graduation rates by region compared to the overall nonresident averages. Chart 6. Nonresident Six Year Graduation and First Year Retention Rates of Combined Cohorts by Region 40% Rocky Mountain Midwest West South Northeast Plains FA95 - FA09 Retention FA95 - FA04 Graduation Average NR Retention Average NR Graduation Charts 7 and 8 represent the graduation and retention rates for nonresidents from different regions over the last five years. Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 5

Chart 7. Nonresident First Year Retention by Region 90% Rocky Mountain (N=550) Midwest (N=979) West (N=897) South (N=299) Northeast (N=524) Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Plains (N=719) Chart 8. Nonresident Six Year Graduation Rate by Region 40% Rocky Mountain (N=644) Midwest (N=975) West (N=907) South (N=288) Northeast (N=384) Fall 2000 Fall 2001 Fall 2002 Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Plains (N=856) Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 6

Appendix. State (Region) Count of New Freshmen from Fall 1995 to Fall 2009 Average Proportion of Cohort Average Persistence Rate Average Graduation Rate AK (West) 354 3% 79.9% 65.6% AZ (Rocky Mnt) 284 2% 73.9% 51.3% CA (West) 1,322 11% 78.4% 53.2% CT (Northeast) 133 1% 78.2% 59.6% FL (South) 198 2% 83.3% 53.3% GA (South) 153 1% 81.0% 60.3% HI (West) 389 3% 81.7% 60.1% IA (Midwest) 214 2% 79.0% 63.3% ID (Rocky Mnt) 141 1% 83.0% 58.3% IL (Midwest) 1,001 9% 82.1% 63.1% IN (Midwest) 128 1% 75.6% 62.4% KS (Plains) 220 2% 80.0% 55.2% MA (Northeast) 176 2% 83.0% 53.8% MD (Northeast) 183 2% 85.8% 58.9% MI (Midwest) 175 2% 78.3% 59.1% MN (Midwest) 440 4% 74.8% 53.8% MO (Midwest) 306 3% 78.8% 56.6% MT (Rocky Mnt) 192 2% 77.6% 64.1% NE (Plains) 380 3% 74.7% 60.7% NH (Northeast) 103 1% 76.7% 56.1% NJ (Northeast) 208 2% 72.6% 52.4% NM (Rocky Mnt) 530 5% 83.2% 67.4% NV (Rocky Mnt) 219 2% 81.3% 63.5% NY (Northeast) 197 2% 76.7% 54.9% OH (Midwest) 236 2% 84.3% 71.4% OK (Plains) 105 1% 77.1% 56.2% OR (West) 299 3% 77.6% 60.9% PA (Northeast) 238 2% 77.3% 56.6% SD (Plains) 174 2% 74.6% 59.3% TX (Plains) 1,167 10% 75.1% 53.8% UT (Rocky Mnt) 127 1% 78.6% 62.6% VA (South) 165 1% 77.6% 62.4% WA (West) 282 2% 79.0% 62.3% WI (Midwest) 267 2% 77.5% 58.9% WY (Rocky Mnt) 301 3% 85.7% 67.6% 15 smallest states* 558 5% 76.3% 46.3% * West Virginia, Delaware, District of Columbia, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont (Northeast), South Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, North Caroline, Tennessee (South), and North Dakota (Plains). Nonresident retention and graduation rates by state, March 2011 7