COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Similar documents
Location (address): 1138 Howard Street, San Francisco CA (877)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

EXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

Dated: Louise Lawyer Attorney for Plaintiff

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY. As used in this Policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at

Case3:14-mc VC Document1 Filed11/04/14 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

DC Petitioner, Kurt Eichenwald (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner ) submits this Verified

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

POLICY TITLE: ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS POLICY NO. 309 Page 1 of 10

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014

Township of Middle 33 MECHANIC STREET CAPE MAY COURT HOUSE, NJ 08210

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

CITY OF OTHELLO POLICY AND PROCEDURE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to electronic documents and electronic signatures.

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

Case 1:09-cv EJL Document 5 Filed 02/26/2009 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

CHAPTER 5.14 PUBLIC RECORDS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 1 RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

Rhode Island False Claims Act

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

How to Prepare a Notice of Deposition or Subpoena in Federal Practice (with Forms)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

PLANNING BOARD RECORDS DISPOSAL SCHEDULE Municipal Government

ACCESS TO PORT PUBLIC RECORDS

DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY

District of Columbia False Claims Act

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, KITCHEN, TARTAGLIONE AND WASHINGTON, JANUARY 12, 2011 AN ACT

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018

CITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

POLICY TITLE: Public Access to District Records Policy No.: Page 1 of 6

EXEMPT (Reprinted with amendments adopted on June 5, 2017) FOURTH REPRINT A.B Referred to Committee on Judiciary

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 580 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2016

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017. Exhibit UU

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

IC Application of chapter Sec. 1. This chapter applies to all counties. As added by Acts 1980, P.L.212, SEC.1.

Defendants. A motion by Wimbledon Financing Master Fund, Ltd., on its own behalf and as

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

APPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS


Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing the administration of elections.

Tohono O odham Rules of Court

The 30.02(6), or 30(b)(6), Witness: Proper Notice, Preparation, and Deposition Techniques

Case: 2:16-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 112 Filed: 10/27/16 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1626

DEPARTMENTAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Miami-Dade Aviation Department DSOP No (Amendment 2) Effective: July 7, 2003

How to Prepare and Serve a Federal Notice of Deposition or Subpoena (with Forms)

United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

I. PURPOSE To establish procedures and guidelines governing the release of public records pursuant to Public Act 442 of 1976, as amended.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCEDURE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

CHAPTERS 61B-75 Through 79, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY

LEBANON COUNTY RIGHT-TO-KNOW POLICY

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

CITY OF KIMBERLEY GENERAL ELECTION AND OTHER VOTING BYLAW BYLAW NO. 2499, 2014

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

19-CV-0222 CAUSE NO. Plaintiff, v. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

Transcription:

1 GEORGE A. RILEY S.B. DAVID #118304) EBERHART S.B. #195474) 2 DHAIVAT H. SHAH S.B. #196382) IAN N. RAMAGE S.B. #224881) 3 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Embarcadero Center West 4 275 Battery Street San Francisco, California 94111-3344 5 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 Apple Computer, Inc. Document hosted at 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Apple Computer, Inc., Case No. 104-cv-032178 V. Plaintiff, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF NFOX.COM Doe 1, an unknown individual, and Does 2-25, inclusive, Defendants. TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Apple intends to take the deposition of Nfox.com at the offices of O'Melveny & Myers LLP, 275 Battery Street, San Francisco, CA 94111, commencing at 9:00 a.m. on February 24, 2004. A copy of the deposition subpoena is attached hereto and served herewith. Also attached are copies of the court order and commission granting leave to serve discovery on Karl Kraft and Nfox.com. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Apple intends to record the testimony at the above-referenced deposition by audiotape and/or videotape, in addition to recording the testimony by stenographic means. The deposition will be taken before an officer who is authorized to administer an oath. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF NFOX.COM

1 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that deponent is required to produce at the time 2 and place set forth above the following documents: 3 All documents relating to the identity of any person or entity who 4 5 supplied information regarding an unreleased Apple product code-named "Asteroid" or "Q97" (the "Product"), including postings that appeared on Powerpage.com (the "Website") on November 19, November 22, 6 November 23, and November 26, 2004. These documents include: 7 (a) all documents identifying any individual or individuals who provided information relating to the Product ("Disclosing Person(s)"), including true name(s), address(es), internet protocol ("IP") address(es), and e-mail address(es); (b) all communications from or to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to the Product; (c) all documents received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to the Product; and (d) all images, including photographs, sketches, schematics and renderings of the Product received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s). Document hosted at Production of the above documents will complete deponent's obligations with respect to the subpoenas, following which no testimony will be required. Dated: February 4, 2005 GEORGE A. RILEY DAVID R. EBERHART DHAIVAT H. SHAH IAN N. RAMAGE O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 'David R. Eberhart Attorneys for Apple Computer, Inc. SF1:575672.1 2 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF NFOX.COM

982(a)(15.2) ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Document hosted at George A. Riley (S. B. #118304) David R. Eberhart(S.B. #195474) O'Melveny & Myers, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 TELEPHONE NO.: (415) 984-8700 FAX NO.: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Apple Computer, Inc. NAME OF COURT: Santa Clara County Superior Court STREET ADDRESS: 191 North First Street MAILING'ADDRESS: same CITY as above AND ZIP CODE: San Jose, California 95113 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/ PETITIONER: APPLE COMPUTER, INC. (415) 684-8701 DEFENDANT/ RESPONDENT: DOE 1, ET AL DEPOSITION SUBPOENA For Production of Business Records CASE NUMBER: 104-CV-032178 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF. CALIFORNIA, TO (name, address, and telephone number of deponent, if known): Nfox.com c/o Karl Kraft I 1. YOU ARE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THE BUSINESS RECORDS described in item 3, as follows: To (name of deposition ofcer): David R. Eberhart On (date) : February 24, 2005 At (time): 9:00 A. M. Location (address): O'Melveny & Myers, LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600, San Francisco, California 94111 Do not release the requested records to the deposition oficer prior to the date and time stated above. a. by delivering a true, legible and durable copy of the business records described in item 3, enclosed in a sealed inner wrapper with the title and number of the action, name of witness, and date of subpoena clearly written on it. The inner wrapper shall then be enclosed in an outer envelope or wrapper, sealed, and mailed to the deposition offcer at the address in item 1. b.? by delivering a true, legible, and durable copy of the business records described in item 3 to the deposition offcer at the witness's address, on receipt of payment in cash or by check of the reasonable costs of preparing the copy, as determined under Evidence Code section 1563(b). c.? by making the original business records described in item 3 available for inspection at your business address by the attorney's representative and permitting copying at your business address under reasonable conditions during normal business hours. 2. The records are to be produced by the date and time shown in item 1 (but not sooner than 20 days afer the issuance of the deposition subpoena, or 15 days afer service, whichever date is later). Reasonable costs of locating records, making them available or copying them, and postage, if any, are recoverable as set forth in Evidence Code section 1563(b). The records shall be accompanied by an afidavit of the custodian or other qualifed witness pursuant to Evidence Code section 1561. 3. The records to be produced are described as follows: See attachment. Continued on 4. IF Attachment YOU HAVE BEEN 3. SERVED WITH THIS SUBPOENA AS A CUSTODIAN OF CONSUMER OR EMPLOYEE RECORDS UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1985.3 OR 1985.6 AND A MOTION TO QUASH OR AN OBJECTION HAS BEEN SERVED ON YOU, A COURT ORDER OR AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, WITNESSES, AND CONSUMER OR EMPLOYEE AFFECTED MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE CONSUMER OR EMPLOYEE RECORDS. DISOBEDIENCE OF THIS SUBPOENA MAY BE PUNISHED AS CONTEMPT BY THIS COURT. YOU WILL ALSO BE LIABLE FOR THE SUM OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM YOUR FAILURE TO OBEY. Date issued: February 4, 2005 David R. Eberhart (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (Proof of service on reverse) (SIGNATURE OF PERSIUN ISSUING SUBPOENA) Attolfney for Apple Computer, Inc. Form Adopted for Mandatory Use DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION Code of Civil Procedure Judicial Council of California 2020 2025 982)a)(15.2) (Rev. January 1, 2000) OF BUSINESS RECORDS Government Code 68097.1 (TITLE) 2002 American LegalNet, Inc.

1 ATTACHMENT 3 2 DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 3 Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following words and phrases have the 4 meanings given: 5 1. "You" or "your" mean and refer to Nfox.com, its employees, agents, 6 representatives and attorneys, and its corporate predecessors, successors, affliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries and related entities, and all persons acting for or on its behalf; and Karl Kraft, his agents, representatives and attorneys, and all persons acting for or on his behalf. 2. Your production must include requested documents, materials and fles from any file server, mainframe computer, mini computer, personal computer, notebook or laptop computer, personal data assistant, or other storage device, including but not limited to e-mail. All requested fles that are still on storage media and identifed as erased, but are still recoverable, shall be included. Document hosted at 3. The term "document" is used as interpreted under the California Civil Code and the California Evidence Code and includes, without limitation, all originals and copies, duplicates, drafts, and recordings of any written, printed, graphic, photographic, electronic or otherwise recorded matter, however produced or reproduced, and all writings, as defned in California Evidence Code 250, of any nature, whether on paper, magnetic tape, electronic or optical media or other information storage means, including film, tapes, computer disks or cards, or personal data assistant memory; and where any such items contain any marking not appearing on the original or are altered from the 23 original, then such items shall be considered to be separate original documents. 24 4. The term "relate," "related," "relates," or "relating" means concerning, 25 referring to, summarizing, reflecting, constituting, containing, embodying, pertaining to, 26 involved with, mentioning, discussing, consisting of, comprising, showing, commenting 27 on, evidencing, describing or otherwise relating to the subject matter. 28 5. As used herein, "all," "any," "each," or "every" means "all, any, each and ATTACHMENT TO SUBPOENA

1 every." 6. All documents shall be, produced in the booklet, binder, fle, folder, envelope, or other container in which the documents are kept or maintained by you. If for any reason the container cannot be produced, please produce copies of all labels or other identifying markings. Documents attached to each other should not be separated. 6 7. In the event any document is withheld on a claim of attorney/client privilege 7 or work product immunity, provide a detailed privilege log that describes the nature and basis for your, claim and the subject matter of the document withheld, in' a manner sufficient to disclose facts upon which you rely in asserting your claim, and to permit the grounds and reasons for withholding the,document to be identifed. Such description should, at a minimum: a. state the date of the document; b. identify each and every author of the document; c. identify each and every,person who prepared or participated in the preparation of the document; d. "identify each and every person who received the document; e. identify each and every person from whom the document was received; f. state the present location of the document and all copies thereof; g. identify each and every person having custody or control of the document and all copies thereof, h. describe the subject and purpose of the document; and i. provide suffcient further information concerning the document and circumstances thereof to explain the claim of privilege or immunity and permit the adjudication of the propriety of that claim. 8. If a document once existed, but has been lost, destroyed, erased or otherwise is no longer in your possession, identify the document and state the details concerning the loss or destruction of such document, including the name and address of the present custodian of any such document known to you. 2 ATTACHMENT TO COMMISSION

1 DOCUMENT REQUESTS 2 DOCUMENT REQUEST NO 1: All documents relating to the identity of any person or entity who supplied 4 information regarding an unreleased Apple product code-named "Asteroid" or "Q97" 5 (the "Product"), including postings that appeared on Powerpage.com (the "Website") on 6 November 19, November 22, November 23, and November 26, 2004. These documents 7 include: Document hosted at (a) all documents identifying any individual or individuals who provided information relating to the Product ("Disclosing Person(s)"), including true name(s), address(es), internet protocol ("IP") address(es), and e-mail address(es); (b) all communications from or to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to the Product; (c) all documents received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to the Product; and (d) all images, including photographs, sketches, schematics and renderings of the Product received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s). Dated: February 4, 2005 GEORGE A. RILEY DAVID R. EBERHART DHAIVAT H. SHAH IAN N. RAMAGE O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP avid R. Eberhart Attorneys for Apple Computer, Inc. SFI:573817.1 28 3 ATTACHMENT TO COMMISSION

GEORGE A. RILEY (s.b. #118304) DAVID EBERHART (S.B. DHAIVAT #195474) H. SHAH (s.b. #196382) IAN N. RAMAGE (s.b. 3 O'MELVENY #224881) & MYERS LLP CHIEF Embarcadero Center 4 West 275 Battery Street L. San Francisco, Califoria 94111-3344 QV ia 5' Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 Apple Computer, Inc. C SUF'. FILED FEB - 4 A PINACATF 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 11 Apple Computer, Inc., Case No. 104-cv-032178 2005 'zrrk 12 Plaintiff, P ORDER GRANTING X P FOR 13 V. AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO SERVE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 14 Doe 1, an unknown individual, and Does ON NFOX.COM AND KARL KRAFT 2-25, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Based on the ex parse application of Plaintiff Apple Computer, Inc. 18 ("Apple"), and good cause appearing, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Apple's request for discovery is granted 20 and that Apple is authorized to serve subpoenas, whether through the use of commissions 21 or in-state process, on Nfox.com and Karl Kraft seeking the following information: All documents relating to the identity of any person or entity who supplied information regarding an unreleased Apple product code-named "Asteroid" or "Q97" (the "Product"), including postings that appeared on Powerpage.com (the "Website") on November 19, November 22, November 23, and November 26, 2004. These documents include: yca (a) all documents identifying any individual or individuals who provided information relating to the Product ("Disclosing Person(s)"), [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

I including true name(s), address(es), internet protocol ("IP") address(es), 2 and e-mail address(es); 3 (b) all communications from or to any Disclosing Person(s) 4 relating to the Product; 5 (c) all documents received from or sent to any Disclosing 6 Person(s),relating to the Product; and 7 (d) ' all images, including photographs, sketches, schematics and 8 renderings of the Product received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s). 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DATED: Februar,,2005 SFl :564530.3 I JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) DAVID EBERHART (S.B. 2? #195474) DHAIVAT H. SHAH (S.B. #196382) IAN N. RAMAGE (s.b. #224881) 11 3 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Embarcadero Center West 11 4 275 Battery Street San Francisco, California 94111-3344 5!I Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 Apple Computer, Inc. 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 11 Apple Computer, Inc., Case No. 104-cv-032178 12 Plaintiff, COMMISSION 13 V. 14 Doe 1, an unknown individual, and Does 2-25, inclusive, 15 Defendants. WHEREAS, a certain civil action is pending in the Superior Court for Santa Clara County, California in which Apple Computer, Inc. ("Apple") is plaintiff and defendants are unknown individuals; and WHEREAS, Apple believes that Nfox.com, an entity that provides collocation and e-mail server services for Powerpage.org, is likely to have information relating to the identity of the proper defendant or defendants; and WHEREAS, Apple has requested that the Clerk of the Court issue a commission for a subpoena seeking documents from Nfox.com and/or its owner Karl Kraft; and WHEREAS, the documents requested by Apple are identifed in the Attachment hereto; COMMISSION

1 WHEREAS, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2 2026(c), the Clerk may issue a commission for deposition in a foreign jurisdiction; and 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2029, 4 the Court will honor commissions from another state for deposition in California; and 5 NOW THEREFORE, the Court requests that process issue requiring the 6 attendance and enforcing the obligations of Nfox.com and Karl Kraft to produce 7 documents. Any document production may be effectuated and/or enforced by the 8 methods authorized under the laws of the State of Nevada. 9 DATED: February 4, 2005 c,>mye' Ca??? \ e' < a CLERK OFD THE OR COURT?ecw 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTACHMENT 2 DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 3 Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following words and phrases have the meanings given: 1. "You" or "your" mean and refer to Nfox.com, its employees, agents, representatives and attorneys, and its corporate predecessors, successors, affliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries and related entities, and all persons acting for or on its 8 behalf; and Karl Kraft, his agents, representatives and attorneys, and all persons acting for 9 or on his behalf. 10 2. Your production must include requested documents, materials and fles from 11 any file server, mainframe computer, mini computer, personal computer, notebook or 12 laptop computer, personal data assistant, or other storage device, including but not limited 13 to e-mail. All requested fles that are still on storage media and identifed as erased, but 14 are still recoverable, shall be included. 15 3. The term "document" is used as interpreted under the California Civil, Codq 16 and the California Evidence Code and includes, without limitation, all originals and 17 copies, duplicates, drafts, and recordings of any written, printed, graphic, photographic, 18 electronic or otherwise recorded matter, however produced or reproduced, and all 19 writings, as defned in California Evidence Code 250, of any nature, whether on paper, 20 magnetic tape, electronic or optical media or other information storage means, including film, tapes, computer disks or cards, or personal data assistant memory; and where any such items contain any marking not appearing on the original or are altered from the original, then such items shall be considered to be separate original documents. 4. The tern "relate," "related," "relates," or "relating" means concerning, referring to, summarizing, reflecting, constituting, containing, embodying, pertaining to, involved with, mentioning, discussing, consisting of, comprising, showing, commenting on, evidencing, describing or otherwise relating to the subject matter. 28 5. As used herein, "all," "any," "each," or "every" means "all, any, each and ATTACHMENT TO COMMISSION

1 every." 2 6. All documents shall be produced in the booklet, binder, fle, folder, 3 envelope, or other container in which the documents are kept or maintained by you. If for 4 any reason the container cannot be produced, please produce copies of all labels or other 5 identifying markings. Documents attached to each other should not be separated. 6 7., In the event any document is withheld on a claim of attorney/client privilege 7 or work product immunity, provide a detailed privilege log that describes the nature and 8 basis'for your claim and the subject matter of the document withheld, in a manner 9 sufficient to disclose facts upon which you rely in asserting your claim, and to permit the 10 grounds- and reasons for withholding the document to be identifed. Such description 11 should, at a minimum: 12 a. state the date of the document; 13 b. identify each and every author of the document; 414 c. identify each and every person who prepared or participated in the 15 preparation of the document; 16 d. "identify each and every person who received the document; 17 C. identify each and every person from whom the document was received; 18 f. state the present location of the document and all copies thereof; 19 g. identify each and every person having custody or control of the document 20 and all copies thereof; 21 h. describe the subject and purpose of the document; and 22 i. provide suffcient further information concerning the document and 23 circumstances thereof to explain the claim of privilege or immunity and 24 permit the adjudication of the propriety of that claim. 25 8. If a document once existed, but has been lost, destroyed, erased or otherwise 26 is no longer in your possession, identify the document and state the details concerning the 27 loss or destruction of such document, including the name and address of the present 28 custodian of any such document known to you. 2 ATTACHMENT TO COMMISSION

I DOCUMENT REQUESTS 2 DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 1: 3 All documents relating to the identity of any person or entity who supplied 4 information regarding an unreleased Apple product code-named "Asteroid" or "Q97" 5 (the "Product"), including postings that appeared on Powerpage.com (the "Website") on 6 November 19, November 22, November 23, and November 26, 2004. These documents 7 include: 8 (a) all documents identifying any individual or individuals who provided 9 information relating to the Product ("Disclosing Person(s)"), including true name(s), 10 address(es), internet protocol ("IP").address(es), and e-mail address(es); 11 (b) all communications from or to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to the 12 Product; 13 (c) all documents received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s) relating to 14 the Product; and 15 (d) all images, including photographs, sketches, schematics and renderings of 16 the Product received from or sent to any Disclosing Person(s). 17 18 Dated: February 4, 2005 19 20 GEORGE A. RILEY DAVID R. EBERHART 21 DHAIVAT H. SHAH IAN N. RAMAGE O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP vid R. Eberhart Attorneys for Apple Computer, Inc. SFI:573817.1 3 ATTACHMENT TO COMMISSION