LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

Similar documents
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Offense of Conviction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

USA v. David McCloskey

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

H 5695 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC001230/SUB A/2 ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PLEA AGREEMENT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:06-cr DDP Document 92 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 8. United States District Court Central District of California

On March 27, 2008, Scott Shields ("Shields" or. pleaded guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Fraudulently Obtain

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

3. \5"'- C (-- ~ '3-1JJ-t\ 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(l)(C) 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(2) 18 U.S.C U.S.C. 2461

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

Case 2:15-cr JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27. U.S. Department of Justice. United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

Case 1:11-cr RWS -CCH Document 50 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 8:07-cr CJC Document 50 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:213. United States District Court Central District of California

PETITION TO APPEAL NUNC PRO TUNC

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

PART A. Instituting Proceedings

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

v. 18 Cr. 850 (ALC) New York, N.Y. November 29, :00 a.m. HON. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge APPEARANCES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, No

Case 5:14-cr Document 589 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 15273

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career.

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342

United States District Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Offense of Conviction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 8:16-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

Transcription:

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 8 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Western District ofpennsylvania u.s. Post Office & Courthouse 700 Granl Sireel Suite 4000 Pilisburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 4121644-3500 December 10, 2009 Steven Begler, Esquire 100 Ross Street, Floor 3 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Re: United States of America v. Randy Berger Criminal No. eel. ~~-s; Dear Mr. Begler: This letter sets forth the agreement by which your client, Randy Berger, will enter a plea of guilty in the above-captioned case. The letter represents the full and complete agreement between Randy Berger and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The agreement does not apply to or bind any other federal, state, or local prosecuting authority. Upon entering a plea of guilty, Randy Berger will be sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 3551, et seq. and 28 U.S.C. 991, ggg. The Sentencing Guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission will be considered by the Court in imposing sentence. The facts relevant to sentencing shall be determined initially by the United States Probation Office and finally by the United States District Court by a preponderance of the evidence. A. The defendant, Randy Berger, agrees to the following: 1. He will waive prosecution by indictment and enter a plea of guilty to Count One of the Information at Criminal No. Cf,-??~, charging him with violating 18 U.S.C. 1349, pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A draft copy of the Information is attached hereto as Exhibit A. LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 8 December II, 2009 Page 2 2. He will pay mandatory restitution under the Victim Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 3663, 3663A and 3664, to the victims and/or other persons or parties authorized by law in such amounts, at such times, and according to such terms as the Court shall direct. 3. At the time Randy Berger enters his plea of guilty, he will deposit a spec assessment of $100 in the form of cash, or check or money order payable to "Clerk, U.S. District Court". In the event that sentence is not ultimately imposed, the special assessment deposit will be returned. 4. Randy Berger waives the right to take a direct appeal from his conviction or sentence under 28 U.S.C. 1291 or 18 U.S.C. 3742, subject to the following exceptions: (a) If the United States appeals from the sentence, Randy may take a direct appeal from the sentence. (b) If (1) the sentence exceeds the applicable statutory limits set forth in the United States Code, or (2) the sentence unreasonably exceeds the guideline range determined by the Court under the Sentencing Guidelines, Randy Berger may take a direct appeal from the sentence. Randy Berger further waives the right to file a motion to vacate sentence, under 28 U.S.C. 2255, attacking his conviction or sentence, and the right to file any other collateral proceeding attacking his conviction or sentence.

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 3 of 8 December 111 2009 Page 3 B. In consideration of and entirely contingent upon the provisions of Parts A and C of this agreement I the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania agrees to the following: 1. The United States Attorney retains the right of allocution at the time of sentencing to advise the sentencing Court of the full nature and extent of the involvement of Randy Berger in the offense charged in the Information and of any other matters relevant to the imposition of a fair and just sentence. 2. Prior to sentencing I the United States Attorney willi orally or in writing l move that l pursuant to 3E1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines I the Court reduce the offense level by 3 levels for acceptance of responsibilityi on the grounds that the offense level prior to application of 3E1.1 is 16 or greater I and Randy Berger timely notified authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guiltyi thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the Court to allocate its resources efficiently. 3. The united States Attorney will take any position he deems appropriate in the course of any appeals from the sentence or in response to any post sentence motions. C. Randy Berger and the United States Attorney further understand and agree to the following: 1. The penalty that may be imposed upon Randy Berger is: (a) A term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years; (b) A fine of $250 / 000; (c) (d) A term of supervised release of 3 years; A special assessment under 18 U.S.C. 3013 of $100;

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 4 of 8 December 11, 2009 Page 4 (e) Mandatory restitution under the Victim-Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. 3663, 3663A and 3664. 2. The Court shall determine the victims and/or other persons or parties who will receive restitution as authorized by law. 3. The parties stipulate that the loss associated with the conduct charged in the Information, and all relevant conduct, is between $1,000,000 and $2,500,000 for the purpose of the Sentencing Guidelines. This stipulation represents the parties' best understanding on the basis of the information available as of the date of this agreement. The stipulation is not binding on the Court and does not preclude the parties from bringing to the attention of the United States Probation Office or the Court any information not within their knowledge at the time this agreement is executed. 4. The parties agree that the attached stipulation is a complete and accurate account of the offense conduct, including all relevant conduct, and therefore that under 2B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines, the base offense level is 7. The parties further agree that the base offense level of 7 should be raised by 16 levels under 2B1.1(b) (1) (I) of the Guidelines. 5. The parties further agree that the adjusted base offense level should be raised by a total of 2 levels under section 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or Special Skill) of the Guidelines. 6. The parties also agree that the adj usted base offense level should be lowered by a total of 3 levels under section 3E1.1 (Acceptance of Responsibility) of the Guidelines. 7. Thus, the parties agree that Randy Berger's overall offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines is 22.

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 5 of 8 December II, 2009 Page 5 8. This agreement does not preclude the government from pursuing any civil or administrative remedies against Randy Berger or his property. This letter sets forth the full and complete terms and conditions of the agreement between Randy Berger and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and there are no other agreements, promises, terms or conditions, express or implied. Very truly yours, ROBERT S. CESSAR Acting United States Attorney I have received this letter from my attorney, Steven Begler, Esquire, have read it and discussed it with him, and I hereby accept it and acknowledge that it fully sets forth my agreement with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. I affirm that there have been no additional promises or representations made to me by any agents or officials of the United States in connection with this matter. 2- -(1,., fa Date Witnessed by: STEVE Couns EGLER, ESQUIRE for Randy Berger

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 6 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. v. (18 U.S.C. 1349) RANDY BERGER INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges: INTRODUCTION 1. At all material times to the information, the defendant, RANDY BERGER, and an individual known to the United States Attorney as EB/ operated a mortgage business called All Credit Finance that assisted individuals to obtain financing collateralized by real estate. COUNT ONE THE CONSPIRACY AND ITS OBJECTS 2. From in and around September 2000, and continuing thereafter until in and around May 2005, in the Western District of Pennsylvania and elsewhere, the defendant, RANDY BERGER, knowingly and willfully did conspire, combine, confederate and agree with other persons known to the United States Attorney, to commit an offense against the United States/ that is, Wire Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY 3. It was a part of the conspiracy that the defendant/ RANDY BERGER/ with the assistance of other members of the conspiracy, submitted loan applications that, as the defendant, RANDY BERGER, Exhibit A

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 7 of 8 then well knew, contained material misrepresentations about the borrowers' financial condition. 4. It was further a part of the conspiracy that the defendant, RANDY BERGER, with the assistance of other members of the conspiracy, submitted false documents in connection with the loan applications, including but not limited to, appraisals that inflated the true value of the properties, appraisals that represented that they were prepared by licensed appraisers when they were really prepared by unlicensed appraisers, and employment and income verification documents that misrepresented the borrowers' employment status and overstated the borrowers' income. S. It was further a part of the conspiracy that the defendant, RANDY BERGER, with the assistance of other members of the conspiracy, directed and caused payments associated with the loan transactions to be distributed contrary to the representations to the lender about how the loan proceeds would be distributed. 6. It was further a part of the conspiracy that the defendant, RANDY BERGER, and other members of the conspiracy submitted and caused the submission of fraudulent loan applications and other fraudulent documents through the use of the interstate wires, in furtherance of the Wire Fraud scheme. 7. It was further a part of the conspiracy that the defendant, RANDY BERGER, caused wire transfers from the accounts of the lending institutions located outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to the account of the closing agent located in the

Case 2:09-cr-00335-JFC Document 6 Filed 02/12/10 Page 8 of 8 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania{ in furtherance of the Wire Fraud scheme. All in violation of Title 18 { United States Code I Section 1349. ROBERT S. CESSAR Acting United States Attorney PA ID No. 47736