Overview. In the beginning

Similar documents
Recent Developments in EU Public Law. Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014

Fundamental rights as general principles of law Eg Case 11/70 [1970] ECR 1125, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft.

The EU Charter, Environmental Protection, and Judicial Remedies

EU Charter of Rights and ECHR: The Right to a Fair Trial. Professor Steve Peers School of Law, University of Essex

THE HIGH COURT COMMERCIAL

The EU as an actor in International Law. Lund, 7 September 2017 Eduardo Gill-Pedro

Speakers`Contribution

Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union. Colloquium of Madrid June 2012.

Introduction. amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 341 of 24 December 2015, p.

Remedies and Sanctions in Anti-Discrimination Law

The Role of the Charter in the EU Legal Framework and its Relevance for National Legal Orders. Agenda

Respect for Fundamental Rights in the EU A broad introduction with a special focus on the EUCFR

The Conference of International Non-Governmental Organisations (INGOs) of the Council of Europe,

REGULATION (EC) No 593/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 17 June on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)

Dr. Kuras ERA Remedies and Sanctions in discrimination cases

EUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 5 April 2011 (OR. en) 2009/0098 (COD) LEX 1180 PE-CONS 68/1/10 REV 1 FRONT 169 CIREFI 11 COMIX 844 CODEC 1579

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings

The Dublin III System: More Derogations to the Duty to Transfer Individual Asylum Seekers? * and Elise Muir **

ACTIONES Handbook on the Techniques of Judicial Interactions in the Application of the EU Charter GENERAL MODULES

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 February 2017 (OR. en)

Opinion 3/2016. Opinion on the exchange of information on third country nationals as regards the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS)

Reports of Cases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON 1. delivered on 12 December Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O. v S.

L 348/98 Official Journal of the European Union

ANNUAL REPORT 2014 COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes

Official Journal of the European Union L 94/375

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 31 March 2008 (OR. en) 2005/0261 (COD) PE-CONS 3691/07 JUSTCIV 334 CODEC 1401

The Asylum and Immigration Implications of Brexit. Dr. Ciara Smyth, School of Law, NUI Galway

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL WATHELET delivered on 11 January 2018 (1) Case C 673/16

Background information:

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,

EU Internal Market Law

Index of the session

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 July 2017 (OR. en)

THE HIGH COURT RECORD NUMBER 2017/781 P. JOLYON MAUGHAM, STEVEN AGNEW JONATHAN BARTLEY and KEITH TAYLOR -AND- IRELAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

The legal framework on gender equality. Marjolein van den Brink ERA Trier, 21 November 2016

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2012/0010(COD)

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a) and (b) of Article 79(2) thereof,

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 November 2014 *

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Assessing the necessity of measures that limit the fundamental right to the protection of personal data: A Toolkit

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Statewatch Report. Consolidated agreed text of the EU Constitution. Judicial Provisions

PUBLIC COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,25February2014 (OR.en) 6795/14 InterinstitutionalFile: 2010/0209(COD) LIMITE

15275/16 AP/es 1 DGD 1B LIMITE EN

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOT delivered on 30 May 2017 (1) Case C 165/16. Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Foster: Q&A Human Rights and Civil Liberties

Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed delivered on 29 March Riksskatteverket v Soghra Gharehveran

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Official Journal of the European Union L 180/31

Oral Speaking Notes of Maximillian Schrems

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 1 February 2007 * APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 24 June 2005,

Data protection and privacy aspects of cross-border access to electronic evidence

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory) DECISION No 803/2004/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Dispute Resolution Around the World. Germany

Conference on the Charter of Fundamental Rights

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Brexit, Article 13, and the debate on recognising animal sentience in law

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 July 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 24 October 2013 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 25 March 2004 *

Session IV, Detention of asylum seekers and irregular migrants

L 375/12 Official Journal of the European Union

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 289/15

TREATY SERIES 2004 Nº 9. Criminal Law Convention on Corruption

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 January 2016 (OR. en)

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,

1 of 7 03/04/ :56

PE-CONS 71/1/15 REV 1 EN

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Art. 263 TFEU: Review of legality of EU acts and standing

Overview of the existing EU legislation on gender equality and definitions of key concepts

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Investment Protection and the Principle of Equality Before the Law. Professor Tarjei Bekkedal, Centre for European Law, University of Oslo

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 9 January 2003 *

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF PROJECTS RULINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

European Treaty Series - No. 173 CRIMINAL LAW CONVENTION ON CORRUPTION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

INITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3 P a g e

(Non) Ne bis in idem. European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings

The European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package?

EUROPEAN UNION (NOTIFICATION OF WITHDRAWAL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en)

LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 January /07 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0287 (COD) LIMITE VISA 7 CODEC 32 COMIX 25

Study on the Implementation of Article 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in 17 of the Member States of the European Union

CONSULTATION ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS GREEK MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

11161/15 WST/NC/kp DGD 1

COMMENTS OF THE GREEK DELEGATION ON THE GREEN PAPER ON AN EU APPROACH TO MANAGING ECONOMIC MIGRATION

I. THE CHARTER AND THE PRINCIPLE OF ATTRIBUTION.

The EU Green Paper on Detention

Transcription:

Fundamental Rights Lund, 24 January 2018 Eduardo Gill-Pedro 1 Overview How Fundamental Rights came into EU law. Sources of Fundamental Rights in EU law Scope of EU Fundamental Rights of the EU Limitations on the rights 2 In the beginning According to the evaluation of the Verwaltungsgericht, the system of deposits is contrary to [ ] principles of national constitutional law [ ], with the result that the primacy of supranational law must yield before the principles of the German basic law 3 1

In the beginning Recourse to the legal rules or concepts of national law in order to judge the validity of measures adopted by the institutions of the Community would have an adverse effect on the uniformity and efficacy of Community law. the validity of such measures can only be judged in the light of Community law. 4 In the beginning The law stemming from the Treaty, an independent source of law, cannot because of its very nature be overridden by rules of national law however framed, without being deprived of its character as Community law and without the legal basis of the Community itself being called in question. 5 In the beginning In fact, respect for fundamental rights forms an integral part of the general principles of law protected by the Court of Justice. The protection of such rights, whilst inspired by the constitutional traditions common to the member states, must be ensured within the framework of the structure and objectives of the community. 6 2

In the beginning A system of mere declaration of exports effected and of unused licences would, by reason of its retrospective nature and lack of any guarantee of application, be incapable of providing the competent authorities with sure data on trends in the movement of goods. 7 Fundamental Rights in the Treaty Article 6 TEU 3. Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, shall constitute general principles of the Union s law. 8 Fundamental Rights in the Treaty Article 6 TEU 1. The Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000, as adapted at Strasbourg, on 12 December 2007, which shall have the same legal value as the Treaties. [ ] 9 3

Scope of EU fundamental rights Article 51 Charter Scope 1. The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law. 10 EU Institutions and Fundamental Rights C-405/05 Kadi v Council and Commission the Community judicature must, ensure the review, in principle the full review, of the lawfulness of all Community acts in the light of the fundamental rights forming an integral part of the general principles of Community law, 11 EU Institutions and Fundamental Rights C-293/12 Digital Rights Ireland Directive 2006/24 entails a wide-ranging and particularly serious interference with [EU] fundamental rights [...] by adopting Directive 2006/24, the EU legislature has exceeded the limits imposed by [ ] the Charter. 12 4

EU Institutions and Fundamental Rights 46/87 Hoechst v Commission rights [ ] such as the right to legal representation and the privileged nature of correspondence between lawyer and client [ ]must be respected as from the preliminary-inquiry stage 13 Member States and Fundamental Rights C-426/11 Alemo-Herron Article 3 of Directive 2001/23, [ ] cannot be interpreted as entitling the Member States to take measures which, while being more favourable to employees, are liable to adversely affect the very essence of the transferee s freedom to conduct a business 14 Member States and Fundamental Rights 411/11 N.S. the derogation [ ] forms part of the mechanisms for determining the M.S. responsible for an asylum application [ ] under that regulation and is, therefore, merely an element of the Common European Asylum System. 15 5

Member States and Fundamental Rights C-60/00 Carpenter A Member State may invoke reasons of public interest to justify a national measure which is likely to obstruct the exercise of the freedom to provide services only if that measure is compatible with [EU] fundamental rights 16 Member States and Fundamental Rights C-617/10 Åkerberg Fransson fundamental rights must therefore be complied with where national legislation falls within the scope of European Union law, [ ] The applicability of European Union law entails applicability of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter. 17 Member States and Fundamental Rights C-206/13 Cruciano Siragusa The reason for [protecting fundamental rights in EU law] is the need to avoid a situation in which the level of protection of fundamental rights varies according to the national law involved in such a way as to undermine the unity, primacy and effectiveness of EU law 18 6

Limits to the scope of EU Law C-198/13 Hernandez the purpose of [the national measure] is not to recognise an employee s claim against his employer resulting from his employment relationship, [ ] but to recognise [ ] the right of the employer to request from the Spanish State compensation for the loss suffered as a result of irregularities in the administration of justice, 19 Limit to the scope of EU Law C-299/95 Kremzow The appellant in the main proceedings is an Austrian national whose situation is not connected in any way with any of the situations contemplated by the Treaty provisions on freedom of movement for persons. 20 Member States and Fundamental Rights Suggested test: Does the national measure invove something in respect of which the member states has a specific obligation under EU law? Yes = Scope of EU law = MS obligation under Art 51 CFREU 21 7

Limitations on rights Article 52 CFREU 1. Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. 22 Limitations on rights? C-438/05 Viking Line the right to take collective action for the protection of workers is a legitimate interest which, in principle, justifies a restriction of one of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty. 23 Limitations on rights? C-112/00 Schmidberger it is necessary to determine whether the restrictions placed upon intra-community trade are proportionate in the light of the legitimate objective pursued, namely, in the present case, the protection of fundamental rights. 24 8