Priority and Patent Family Systems

Similar documents
Novelty. Japan Patent Office

"Grace Period" in Japan

Foundation Certificate

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Intellectual property defense and

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Patent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law. Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi

Section 5 Exceptions to Lack of Novelty of Invention (Patent Act Article 30)

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

IP Innovations Class

Martín BENSADON, Alicia ALVAREZ, Damaso PARDO, Ignacio SÁNCHEZ ECHAÜE.

European patent filings

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Patent Examination

Criteria for Patentability

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

Procedure of Determining Novelty and Inventive Step

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

Outline of PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination PCT Workshop Tokyo February 27-March

How patents work An introduction for law students

Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights. Dr. Joachim Renken

Prioritized Examination and New Prior Art defined for First-Inventor-to-File

First Inventor to File: Proposed Rules and Proposed Examination Guidelines

INFORMATION FOR INVENTORS SEEKING PATENT PROTECTION

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality

Inventive Step. Japan Patent Office

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

Bangkok, August 22 to 26, 2016 (face-to-face session) August 29 to October 30, 2016 (follow-up session)

Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.

SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology. Susan Perng Pan November 2010

Information for Associates

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part III Patentability

From the Idea to a Patent

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

The European Patent Office An overview on the procedures before the EPO: up to grant, opposition and appeal

Dynamic Drinkware, a Technical Trap for the Unwary

Applicants may use three types of granting procedures:

Patent Cooperation Treaty

Added matter under the EPC. Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

B+/SG/2/10 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 27/05/2015. B+ Sub-Group OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES, WITH COMMENTARY ON POTENTIAL OUTCOMES. prepared by the Chair

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

IP: Patent law & prosecution

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT

CIPA Introductory Certificate in Patent Administration Syllabus

Developing an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons

GUIDELINES FOR TRANSFERRING PRIORITY RIGHTS

exclusively in electronic form (no paper notifications will be sent). address: State (that is, country) of nationality:

Introduction to Patent Information

Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

MBHB snippets Alert October 13, 2011

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

Session Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part I -

Q233 Grace Period for Patents

The following fees must be paid in connection with the filing of a PCT application:

Overview of recent trends in patent regimes in United States, Japan and Europe

Practice for Patent Application

The transfer of priority rights

The life of a patent application at the EPO

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent

and Examination Reports

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

Procedures and Requirements for Filing a Request for Patent Prosecution. Highway Pilot Program (PPH) to the National Institute of Industrial Property

IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE

Client Privilege in Intellectual Property Advice

WSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar

The America Invents Act, Its Unique First-to-File System and Its Transfer of Power from Juries to the United States Patent and Trademark Office

NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer?

Provisional Patent Applications: Preserving IP Rights in First-to-File System

The Patentability Search

AIPPI Study Question - Conflicting patent applications

Framework Provisions for the Global Patent Prosecution Highway System

Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

Intellectual Property Primer. Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent

Machine Translation at the EPO Concept, Status and Future Plans

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

GLOSSARY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TERMS

Jordanian Patent Office

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

GENERAL INFORMATION ON PATENT APPLICATIONS IN JAPAN

LALL & SETHI ADVOCATES

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material

Transcription:

Priority and Patent Family Systems Domenico Golzio European Patent Office Imprenditorialità e Dottorato @UNIPI (un percorso di Imprenditorato) Università di Pisa Pisa 10.06.2011 dgolzio@epo.org

Contents Paris Convention Multiple Priorities Patent Family System Patent Documents with the Same Priority esp@cenet Patent Family (Equivalents) INPADOC Patent Family

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property After filing a patent application (priority document) in a state at a certain date (priority date) the applicant can file: another patent application (family member) based on the same subject-matter of the priority document at any time (filing date) in the next 12 months in any state member of the Paris Convention while maintaining the same priority date (priority rights)

Paris Convention First filing Priority State A "Second" filing in State B "Second" filing in State C "Second" filing in State D F0 F1 F2 F3 1 2 m o n t h s Second filings of an application based on the first filing F0 F1 and F2 entitled to use the priority date as the first filing date F3 NOT entitled to use the priority date as the first filing date

Paris Convention First filing Priority Italy F0 "Second" filing in Europe F1 EP "Second" filing in US F2 US 1 2 m o n t h s

Paris Convention First filing Priority State A "Second" filing in State B "Second" filing in State C "Second" filing in State D D1 F0 D2 F1 D3 F2 D4 F3 1 2 m o n t h s D1 prior art for all filings D2, D3 and D4 NOT prior art for F0-F2 D2, D3 and D4 prior art for F3! If F0, or F1 or F2, is published before the filing of F3, it will anticipate the application F3.

Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities First filing Priority 1 Japan F0 "Second" filing in Europe as combination of priority P1 and priority P2 F1 EP First filing Priority 2 Japan F0' 1 2 m o n t h s

Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities First filing Priority 1 Japan F0 "Second" filing in Europe as combination of priority P1 and priority P2 D1 D2 D3 F1 EP First filing Priority 2 Japan F0' 1 2 m o n t h s

Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities Priority F0 discloses invention A Priority F0' discloses invention B Patent Application F1 has three claims Claim 1 defines invention A Claim 2 defines invention B Claim 3 defines an invention combination of invention A and invention B. This combination is defined for the first time in F1, i.e. is not present in F0 or in F0'! The filing date for Claim 1 is that of the priority F0 The filing date for Claim 2 is that of the priority F0' discloses invention B The filing date for Claim 3 is that of the application, i.e. F1

Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities D1 prior art for all filings D2 NOT prior art for F0 D2 NOT and not for the clams in F1 based on F0 D2 prior art for F0' D3 NOT prior art for F0 and for F0' D3 NOT prior art for the clams in F1 based either on F0 or on F0' D3 prior art for the clams in F1 NOT based on F0 or F0' D3 prior art for the clams in F1 based on combination of features of F0 and of F0' Depending on the formulation of the claims in F1 Novelty and Inventive Step can be selectively attacked by the disclosures of D1-D3

Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities (from different countries) First filing Priority 1 US F0 "Second" filing in Europe as combination of priority P1 and priority P2 F1 EP First filing Priority 2 Japan F0' 1 2 m o n t h s

PCT Route Paris Route Paris Convention: Multiple Priorities - A non improbable example JP-1 EP-3 GB-2 IT-2 DE-4 DE-1 DE-2 GM-1 1 2 m PCT 30/31 m US-1 CN-1 EP-1 EP-2 GB-1 IT-1 GM-3 DE-3 GM-2

Patent Family Systems Family System of a patent document are all the parent documents directly or indirectly linked via a priority document Equivalents of a patent document are all the documents that have identical priority document or set of priority documents Family system and equivalents important because: indicate geographical coverage and supposed importance of the patent a members may be be written in a more familiar language may contain different/additional information might have a different publication date!

Patent Family: and exemplar set Patent Document D1 Priority P1 Patent Document D2 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D3 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D4 Priority P2 Priority P3 Patent Document D5 Priority P3

Patent Documents with a Common Priority All patent documents having at least one common priority belong to the same patent family.

Patent Documents with a Common Priority Family P1 Patent Document D1 Priority P1 Family P2 Patent Document D2 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D3 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D4 Priority P2 Priority P3 Patent Document D5 Priority P3 Family P3

esp@cenet Patent Family (Equivalents) All Patent Documents having exactly the same priority or the same set of priorities belong to one Patent Family.

esp@cenet Patent Family (Equivalents) Patent Document D1 Priority P1 Family P1 Family P1-P2 Patent Document D2 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D3 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D4 Priority P2 Priority P3 Patent Document D5 Priority P3 Family P2-P3 Family P3

esp@cenet Patent Family (Equivalents) But, "equivalent" members without original documents are not listed

An example of a patent family of EP0000001 All the following documents have the same priority date: 02.09.1977 They are all based on DE 2739689!

An example of a patent family of EP0000001 All the following documents have the same priority date: 02.09.1977 They are all based on DE 2739689!

An example of a patent family of EP0000001 All the following documents have the same priority date: 02.09.1977 They are all based on DE 2739689!

An example of a patent family of EP0000001 All the following documents have the same priority date: 02.09.1977 They are all based on DE 2739689!

All the documents directly or indirectly linked via a priority document belong to one patent family INPADOC Patent Family

INPADOC Patent Family Patent Document D1 Priority P1 Patent Document D2 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D3 Priority P1 Priority P2 Patent Document D4 Priority P2 Priority P3 Patent Document D5 Priority P3 INPADOC Family

INPADOC Patent Family! By clicking on "View INPADOC Patent family" of a patent document, esp@cenet runs an embedded routine interrogating INPADOC and other databases iteratively and retrieves all patent documents linked via their priorities! The routine takes care of different formulations of applicant and inventor names, different level of publications, legal status and any other information made available from the issuing patent office.

esp@cenet INPADOC Patent Family (US5000000) Click here

esp@cenet INPADOC Patent Family (US5000000)

More questions? Please consult www.epo.org or write to dgolzio@epo.org Thank you!! Happy Families!