UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ILSA SARAVIA, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know

Detention and Release of Unaccompanied Children

- against - NOTICE OF MOTION

XXXXXXX AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT C-122XXX

Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

Excerpted from AILA's Immigration Litigation Toolbox, 5th Ed. ( 2016, American Immigration Lawyers Association), and distributed with permission.

JTIP Handout:Lesson 34 Immigration Consequences

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Binding Mediation Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxx

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed affirmation of JEENA R. BELIL, dated XXXXXXX 4,

Case4:14-cv YGR Document104-2 Filed08/20/15 Page2 of 7

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

M E M O R A N D U M. Practitioners representing detained immigrant and refugee youth

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,

List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

The Texas Two Step: Protecting Abused Immigrant Children under State and Federal Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Appeals Board No. T B DECISION AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. v. No. XX-XX-XXX PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

(617) ext. 8 (tel) INSTANT MOTION TO REOPEN (617) (fax)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

United States Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Immigration Court [Location] File No. A# NON-DETAINED

Lawfully Residing Children and Pregnant Women Eligible for Medicaid and CHIP

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:06-cv MJP Document 98-6 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 5

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE XXXXXXX DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF FLORIDA

TVPRA 2008 & UACs. Sponsored by Houston UAC Task Force. University of Houston Law Center Immigration Clinic, Joseph A.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cv Document 2 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 30

Case 2:16-cv MJP Document 22 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum. Practice Advisory 1. June 14, 2018

Documentation Guide for People Fleeing Persecution & Victims of Trafficking

Case 3:07-cv WHA Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Child Migration by the Numbers

Summary of the Issue. AILA Recommendations

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 5:16-cv DMG-SP Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Lawfully Present Individuals Eligible under the Affordable Care Act

A. If at any time after the initial Wage Deduction Order or Pay Direct Order has been entered the

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/23/10 Page 1 of 9

Immigration Relief for Unaccompanied Minors

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 165 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

ORR GUIDE: DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

MOTION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REPLY UNDER PROTEST TO AN UNTIMELY OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX): Families First Act of Introduced 6/22/2018. Introduced 6/22/2018

Unaccompanied Alien Children Legal Issues: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

Case 3:07-cv JSW Document 1 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Citizenship & immigration questions on the ~arketplace application

Interim Guidance on Flores v. Sessions

Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

Case 1:17-cv CBA-LB Document Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: x : : : : : : : : : : : x SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

If 2nd Level review Required: List of additional documentation that may be required

Overview of Key Lease Provisions

5107 leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia Date of this notice: 12/31/2013

Case 2:09-cv PSG-E Document Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:7167

Case 2:85-cv DMG-AGR Document 318 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:10950

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF XXX OR COUNTY

Mariana s Story. Unaccompanied Children: The Journey from Home to Appearing before the Immigration Court in the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF KURT CASADINE IN SUPPORT 17. Defendants.

Practical Considerations for the Pro Bono Asylum Practitioner

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN Agency Efforts to Identify and Reunify Children Separated from Parents at the Border

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Immigration Law Overview

Status Eligibility Definition SAVE Code Documentation Card Documentation

Lawfully Present Individuals Eligible under the Affordable Care Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No Civ (Altonaga/Simonton)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SECOND APPELLATE DISTRlCT, DIVISION TWO. Petitioners and Appellants, Respondent and Appellee,

)

Q&A: DHS Implementation of the Executive Order on Border Security and Immigration Enforcement

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

DHS Notice of Modified System of Records, Docket Number DHS

Transcription:

XXXXXXXXX, Esq. (SBN XXXXX Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. 1530 James M. Wood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213 251-35XX Tel. (213 487-0986 Fax xxxxxxxxxx@ccharities.org NON DETAINED UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: NON-DETAINED XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx File No.: A XXX-XXX-XXX In Removal Proceedings Hon. Immigration XXXXX Next Hearing: June XX, 201XX at 8:30am MOTION TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE PROCEEDINGS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT - LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: NON-DETAINED XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx File No.: A XXX-XXX-XXX In Removal Proceedings Hon. Immigration XXXXX Next Hearing: June XX, 201XX at 8:30am MOTION TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE PROCEEDINGS Through counsel, Respondent, XXXXXXXXXX, moves the Immigration Judge to administratively close the instant proceedings in the above-captioned matter. Respondent applied for Asylum and Withholding of Removal on March XX, 20XX directly with U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS in accordance with the DHS designation of both XXXXXX and XXXXXX as UACs, pursuant to Section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 ( TVPRA. See TVPRA, Public Law 110-457 at 235(d(7(C. ( An asylum officer (as defined in section 235(b(1(E shall have initial jurisdiction over any asylum application filed by an unaccompanied alien child (as defined in section 462(g of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g, regardless of whether filed in accordance with this section or section 235(b.. (Emphasis added. Respondent s application was received and is pending as of March XX, 20XX. See Exhibit A Acknowledgement of Receipt of Application.

The Board of Immigration Appeals has explained that administrative closure is a procedural tool created for the convenience of the Immigration Courts. Matter of Gutierrez, 20 I&N Dec. 479, 480 (BIA 1996. This procedural tool is used to temporarily remove a case from an Immigration Judge s active calendar. Matter of Gutierrez, 20 I&N Dec. at 480. In general, administrative closure may be appropriate to await an action or event that is relevant to immigration proceedings but is outside the control of the parties or the court and may not occur for a significant or undetermined period of time. Matter of Gutierrez, 20 I&N Dec. at 479. In the instant matter, Respondent s application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal is pending with USCIS for an indefinite amount of time. Its status is outside the control of the parties and the court. As such, it is in the court s best interest that proceedings be administratively closed. Further, the government s failure to join in the motion does not serve as an absolute bar to administrative closure. In the Matter of Avestisyan, 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012, the Board of Appeals ruled that the Immigration Judges and Board may administratively close removal proceedings, even if a party opposes, if it is otherwise appropriate under the circumstances. Further, the Board rejected the notion that DHS opposition alone is sufficient to act as an absolute bar to action in motions such as one requesting administrative closure of one s removal proceedings. Consequently, the fact that government counsel has not actively joined this motion to administratively close Respondent s proceedings in this matter does not act as an absolute bar to such a request.

Based upon the foregoing, Respondent requests that the Immigration Judge grant this motion to administratively close proceedings. Attached, for the Immigration Judge s convenience is a proposed order relating to this motion. Respectfully submitted, XXXXXXXXX, Esq. Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. 1530 James M. Wood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 Date: May XX, 20XX

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT - LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: NON-DETAINED XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx File No.: A XXX-XXX-XXX In Removal Proceedings Hon. Immigration XXXXX Next Hearing: June XX, 201XX at 8:30am ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE Upon consideration of the Motion to Administratively Close Proceedings, the Court states the following: 1. The parties have agreed to administratively closure of the instant proceedings. 2. Other:. THEREFORE, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the motion be: [ ] GRANTED. These proceedings are hereby administratively closed upon the joint consent and motion of the parties. [ ] DENIED. Date: Immigration XXXXXX Certificate of Service This document was served by [ ] Mail [ ] Personal Service To: [ ] Alien [ ] Alien s Atty [ ] DHS Date: By: Court Staff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE XXXXXXXXXX A XXX-XXX-XXX I certify that I served a copy of this Motion to Administratively Close Proceedings on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of the Chief Counsel, by hand delivery at 606 S. Olive Street, Los Angeles, CA 90014. XXXXXXXXX, Esq. Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. 1530 James M. Wood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 Dated: June XX, 20XX