UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

Similar documents
- 1 - Implementing the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols: legal and practical implications. Patrick J Boylan, City University London, UK

XVIII MODEL LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

The 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event

World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council Satellite meeting 31 July - 1 August 2003

Blue Shield. Lar Joye, 5 th November 2015.

Periodic Report by Canada on Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols

THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Directive for the Military Protection of Cultural Property and the Military Safeguarding of Cultural Heritage

A. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

The protection of cultural property in Romania is ensured through an extensive and complex normative system (Annex I).

General Assembly 3 (SOCHUM) Kai-Si Claire Tsuei & Isaac Wu

[No. 73 of 2016] Mar a tionscnaíodh. As initiated

UNESCO CONCEPT PAPER

Patrick Boylan, Professor Emeritus of Heritage Policy and Management, City University London

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. Destruction of cultural sites perpetrated by ISIS/Da'esh

SLOVAKIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of Ratification of the Convention

ANNEX I: APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK

I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 (with reference to its provisions)

Report on the national implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols

Emergency Safeguarding of the Syrian Cultural Heritage Project

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

NATURAL DISASTERS AND CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN THE AMERICAS by Michael F. Welch

REGULATIONS REGARDING THE CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION IN COLOMBIA

The facts: The Increasing Number of International and Non-International Armed Conflicts and the Consequences for Cultural Heritage

In Belgium, several national texts exist, including a Federal Act on conservation of

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE ARCHEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND ARTISTIC HERITAGE OF THE AMERICAN NATIONS

Protecting Cultural Property in Iraq: How American Military Policy Comports with International Law

REPUBLIC OF KOREA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

CHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES

GA 3. Haganum Model United Nations Gymnasium Haganum, The Hague Research Reports PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE IN TIMES OF WAR

PROTECTING CULTURAL HERITAGE

GHANA MUSEUMS AND MONUMENTS BOARD. Ghana Museums and Monuments Board

This publication was prepared by the Forces Employment Doctrine Center

PERIODIC REPORT BY ESTONIA

Prague, February 2017 Prague Model United Nations Conference. Model United Nations Prague z.s. Jaurisova 515/ Prague 4 The Czech Republic

Published on How does law protect in war? - Online casebook (

"Ensuring lasting protection against destruction and deterioration for the tangible and intangible cultural heritage of humanity "

Getting Ready in Indian Country: Emergency Preparedness and Response for Native American Cultural Resources

EU GUIDELINES on INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL REPORT: CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSETS

Art Loss In Iraq PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN TIME OF WAR AND ITS AFTERMATH. by JAMES A. R. NAFZIGER

I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 (with reference to its provisions)

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

The U.S. Committee of the Blue Shield and the Blue Shield Movement Patty Gerstenblith and Nancy C. Wilkie 1. Introduction

Spain, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE

MACEDONIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

COSTA RICA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

REPATRIATION POLICY February 2014

REPORTING COUNTRY: The Republic of Lithuania REPORTING PERIOD:

International humanitarian law and the protection of war victims

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/69/489)]

Implementing Archaeological Conservation During American Nation-Building Efforts

RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY ICOM S 28 TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2013

P.O. Box 65 Hancock, Michigan USA fax

SUMMARY. This agenda item has no financial and administrative implications. Action expected of the Executive Board: proposed decision in paragraph 3.

PROCEDURES REGARDING AMALGAMATIONS CLOSURE, AND PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS

Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907.

Measures undertaken by the Government of Romania in order to disseminate and implement the international humanitarian law

Three basic points can be made about the protection,

Programmatic Agreement on Protection of Historic Properties During Emergency Response Under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution

UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970)

Security Council. Topic B: Protection of Natural Resources and Cultural Heritage from Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1888 (2009)* Resolution 1888 (2009) Adopted by the Security Council at its 6195th meeting, on 30 September 2009

Is Japan a Cultural Looter?

Contact Person Surname Solomidou-Ieronymidou First Name Marina Address 1 Museum Street Postal Code 1516

FORTY SIXTH PLENARY SESSION OF THE PABSEC GENERAL ASSEMBLY CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT

Intangible Cultural Heritage Safeguarding System in Vietnam. Nguyen Kim Dung, Expert Ministry of Culture and Information. 1.

WHC-12/36.COM/INF.5A.1

COLLECTING CULTURAL MATERIAL. Ministry for the Arts. Ministry for the Arts AUSTRALIAN BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO. Attorney-General s Department

entry into force 7 December 1978, in accordance with Article 23

SAFEGUARDING CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE PACIFIC TWO PROTOCOLS 1954 HAGUE CONVENTION AND ITS FIRST WORKSHOP FOR THE FIJI, 2016

I. The 1954 Hague Convention

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and the notion of military necessity by Jan Hladík

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

Fortification of the International Defense of Cultural Property Trapped In Areas of Armed Conflict

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

New Challenges to the Traditional Principles of the Law of War Presented by Information Operations in Outer Space

The Possibility of a Swedish Market for Antiquities Looted From Conflict and War Zones: A Risk Analysis

Trainers and facilitators:

13647/1/15 REV 1 MM/lv 1 DG E - 1C

Small Arms. Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects

LIMUN HS TH 25TH NOVEMBER 2018 UNESCO

SAMPLE DOCUMENT USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY

CULTURAL PROTECTION FUND

Federal Act on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, Disaster or Emergency Situations*

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Address by Mr Federico Mayor

CONSIDERATIONS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE OF GEORGIA

1. Regulations on the return of stolen and unlawfully exported cultural objects.

Official Journal of the European Union L 335/3

MEASURES FOR PROTECTION OF CULTURAL OBJECTS AND THE ISSUE OF THEIR ILLICIT TRAFFICKING

Transcription:

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS CIVIL-MILITARY OPERATIONS SCHOOL WEAPONS TRAINING BATTALION TRAINING COMMAND 2300 LOUIS ROAD (C478) QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5043 STUDENT OUTLINE ARTS, MONUMENTS, AND ARCHIVES 0530-CAS-115 CIVIL AFFAIRS OFFICER COURSE M020A3D SEPTEMBER 2015 115-1

LEARNING OBJECTIVES a. TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE. Given a mission, area assessment and Commander's intent, plan for the protection of Arts, Monuments, and Archives (AMA), so that all identified AMA are secure without intentional or gratuitous destruction, theft or damage. (CACT-EXEC-2016) b. ENABLING LEARNING OBJECTIVES (1) Without the aid of references, define international Arts, Monuments, and Archives (AMA) agencies involved in preservation of AMA, in accordance with GTA 41-01-002. (CACT- EXEC-2016b) (2) Without the aid of references, define the legal imperatives that guide DoD considerations for AMA in accordance with GTA 41-01-002. (CACT-EXEC-2016a) (3) Without the aid of references, define the responsibilities of CA Marines when working with AMA, in accordance with GTA 41-01-002. (CACT-EXEC-2016d) (4) Given a scenario involving AMA, conduct initial assessment, in accordance with a PE checklist. (CACT-EXEC-2016c) 115-2

1. CULTURAL PROPERTY. Cultural property is the tangible representation of significant human events, beliefs, and values. This definition is purposefully broad to allow for the full range of items which may be considered culturally significant. a. Identifying Cultural Property. Cultural properties are often unique to each culture; however, they may fall into these typical categories: (1) Historic and ancient buildings and their ruins (2) Works of art (3) Archeological sites and artifacts (4) Shipwrecks (5) Museum and library collections (6) Sacred places (sanctuaries, shrines, churches, mosques, temples cemeteries, and pilgrimage routes) b. Cultural Property Markers. Many cultural properties are not clearly marked. Local organizations such as historical preservation societies may mark historic buildings. The international community has agreed upon markers which indicate the cultural importance of a site. Two examples are: c. Archives. One must not only consider historical archives of cultural significance, but civil and even private archives as well. Maintenance of administrative records such as, local government registrars, land deeds, police records, 115-3

budget documents, and bank records, if lost, can destabilize an area. 2. AMA AGENCIES. There are a number of agencies (USG agencies, and IGOs) that are specifically dedicated to the identification, cataloging, and preservation of cultural sites and property. a. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Developed after WWII, this organization was formed to rebuild education systems in war torn countries. b. US Committee of the Blue Shield. Modeled after the Hague Convention, this organization acts like the Red Cross for cultural property. c. Combatant Commander s Cultural Heritage Action Group. Specifically identifies those places, persons, and objects of cultural significance within a CCMD. This is an existing and easily referenced data base. d. Defense Intelligence Agency. This is another resource for identifying cultural property in an area of operation, but it is more difficult to access than those listed above. 3. LEGAL IMPERATIVES. Protection of cultural property is mandated by federal and international law. a. Roerich Pact. The first attempt to preserve cultural sites and objects; recognized the neutrality of cultural properties. It was signed in 1936 by the United States. b. Geneva Convention Article 33. Pillaging is prohibited. c. Geneva Convention Article 53. Any destruction by the occupying power of real or personal property, belonging individually or collectively to private persons or to the state, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations. In addition to being an ethical, tactical, and strategic concern, protecting cultural property is a legal obligation. d. Hague Convention and Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. In 2009, the United States ratified the 1954 Hague Convention. The articles of this convention are now U.S. Code. The convention mandates that belligerents make no use of cultural property that might 115-4

expose it to damage or destruction, and direct no military force against it unless required by military necessity. It also forbids theft, pillaging, requisitioning, or even moving cultural property. (1) Hague, Article 3. The high contracting parties undertake to prepare in time of peace for the safeguarding of cultural property situated within their own territory against the foreseeable effects of an armed conflict, by taking such measures as they consider appropriate. (2) Hague, Article 7. The high contracting parties undertake to plan or establish in peacetime, within their armed forces, services or specialized personnel whose purpose will be to secure respect for cultural property and to cooperate with the civilian authorities responsible for safeguarding it. e. National Historic Preservation Act, Public Law 89-665. 16 U.S.C. 470. Mandates the protection of cultural heritage during federal undertakings. Legally, military operations outside the continental United States are considered federal undertakings; this and other environmental and cultural protection acts apply to deployed military units. 4. CIVIL AFFAIRS AMA RESPONSIBILITIES a. Planning. Through Area Study, Country Study and CPB, identify cultural property locations and annotate them on maps and overlays (protected target list). Plan with supported units to protect the locations throughout the operation. b. Key Leader Engagement. Make contact with local authorities (law enforcement, cultural ministries, museum officials, engineers, academics, elders, NGOs) as soon as possible. They may have expertise on the value and maintenance of the AMA sites. c. Documentation. Accurate documentation is absolutely necessary. Record the GPS location. Inventory each item and record its condition and appearance. Take detailed pictures. Catalog points of contact, whether they are groups or individuals, that are able to support your efforts. Do this as soon as possible. d. Imminent Destruction. Take action without advice of preservation or conservation professionals only if the building or collection is in immediate danger of destruction or collapse. 115-5

Do as little as possible and as much as necessary to stop active damage and avoid further damage. e. Protection. Place cultural structures off-limits to military and civilian personnel, and post security around the area. Inform the chain of command of particularly valuable or sensitive material so it can be sealed or isolated. 5. HISTORIC EXAMPLES. Throughout human history, cultural treasures have suffered from the effects of war, vandalism and raiding. Not until the last century has the international community begun to take measures to protect culturally significant sites and objects both in peacetime and in war. The following are a few examples of wonton and unintentional destruction of cultural property that have occurred since antiquity. a. Library at Alexandria b. Baghdad 1258 c. The Sphinx d. Washington D.C. 1814 e. Cathedral at Reims f. Nazi Occupation 1939 1945 g. Monte Cassino h. Bamiyam Buddhas i. Baghdad Museum 2003 j. Aleppo Souk k. ISIS/ISIL REFERENCES: JP 3-57 Civil-Military Operations MCWP 3-33.1 MAGTF Civil Military Operations MCRP 3-33.1A Civil Affairs Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures GTA 41-01-001 Civil Affairs Planning and Execution Guide 115-6

Notes: 115-7