Case 3:14-cv JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:15-cv JAM Document 86-2 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A: PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 3:15-cv JAM Document 86-3 Filed 12/12/17 Page 2 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 5:11-cv cr Document 82 Filed 10/16/12 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Case4:12-cv PJH Document82-1 Filed02/20/14 Page1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv RMC Document 35 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

August 29, VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Case 4:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

AHLA. U. Medicare Claims Appeals Soup to Nuts. Thomas E. Herrmann Strategic Management Services LLC Alexandria, VA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CAUSE NO

Case 1:15-cv RMB Document 35 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 5 U.S. Department of Justice

Case 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv JAM Document 67 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

LEGAL TEAM WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS ABBY PENDLETON, ESQ. JESSICA L. GUSTAFSON, ESQ.

Case 1:18-cv RC Document 23 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

Dear HealthPartners Minnesota Senior Health Options (MSHO) (HMO SNP) Member:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:10-cv NGG Document 24-1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 43 PageID #: 71

International Drum Horse Association, Inc. BYLAWS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 7:16-cv O Document 68 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1790

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case Document Filed in TXSB on 10/31/2007 Page t of 12 EXHIBIT A

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Alfredo Valentin of Manchester, New Hampshire (hereinafter, Plaintiff )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

State of California Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Care Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:17-cv JMV-CLW Document 23 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 168..EruvLitigation.com

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN SAMPLE CONTRACT NO DEVELOPMENT PARTNER

Medicare Appeals Backlog

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT FAIRBANKS

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK GROVE AND THE WILTON RANCHERIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

mg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL TECHNICAL REQUI REMENT PIHP GRIEVANCE SYSTEM FOR MEDICAID BENEFICIARIES. January, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PN /19/2012 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD PROCESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv DC Document Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

BYLAWS OF THE DAUPHIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, INC. A Non-Profit Corporation

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

BYLAWS of the FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALS AND INSPECTORS ASSOCIATION

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

BACKGROUND. this Agreement. 1 Due to privacy concerns, pseudonyms are used in place of Mother Smith s and Abraham Smith s legal names in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

PN /19/2013 DISPUTE RESOLUTION ADVISOR PROCESS

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 1. This Settlement Agreement is entered into this 23d day. of December, 1998 (hereinafter the Effective Date ) among

LICENSING AGREEMENT UCLA AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES CENTER. Terms & Conditions

CITY OF ENID RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:99-cv EGS Document 685 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOINT STATUS REPORT

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Case 1:16-cv WHP Document 4-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 NO. 1:16-CV-6544

CONTRACT BETWEEN THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN AND ABC COMPANY INTRODUCTION

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv N Document Filed 09/07/16 Page 50 of 138 PageID 67685

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Navy League Of The United States Bremerton-Olympic Peninsula Council

State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Asbestos Licensing Unit Request for Change of Status Form # DBPR ALU 4

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VERONICA EXLEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 3:14-cv-01230 (JAM) v. ) ) SYLVIA M. BURWELL, ) Secretary of Health and Human Services, ) ) Defendant. ) ) [PROPOSED] SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION WHEREAS the parties desire to resolve amicably all claims raised in this suit without admission of liability; WHEREAS the parties have agreed upon mutually satisfactory terms for the complete resolution of this Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) class action litigation; NOW THEREFORE, the plaintiffs and defendant hereby consent to the entry of this Settlement Agreement with the following terms. II. DEFINITIONS 1. ALJ refers to Administrative Law Judge and ALJ Hearing refers to Medicare appeal hearings conducted by ALJs. 2. Approval Date means the date upon which the Court approves this Settlement Agreement, after having determined that it is adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable, and just to the Class as a whole, after: (i) notice to 1

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 3 of 10 the Class; (ii) an opportunity for class members to submit timely objections to the Settlement Agreement; and (iii) a hearing on the fairness of the settlement. 3. Beneficiary and Beneficiaries mean individuals claiming entitlement to Medicare benefits. 4. Beneficiary Appellants means Beneficiaries who have or will have submitted (by themselves or by an authorized representative) a timely request for an ALJ Hearing to the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals. 5. Class Counsel or Plaintiffs Counsel means the Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. 6. The Class or Class Members means the class that was certified by order of the Court in this action on June 10, 2015 (ECF # 67). 7. Court means the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. 8. Defendant or the Secretary means the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his or her official capacity. 9. OMHA refers to the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Health and Human Services. 10. Parties refers to Plaintiffs and Defendant. 11. Plaintiffs means the named plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff in this action. III. ENTIRE AGREEMENT The terms of this Settlement Agreement and any attachments thereto are the exclusive and full agreement of the Parties will respect to all claims for declaratory 2

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 4 of 10 and injunctive relief and attorney s fees and costs as set forth in this Settlement Agreement and in the Complaint and Complaint in Intervention. No representations or inducements or promises to compromise this action or enter into this Settlement Agreement have been made, other than those recited or referenced in this Settlement Agreement. IV. APPROVAL 1. This Settlement Agreement is expressly conditioned upon its approval by the Court. 2. The terms of this Settlement Agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate. The entry of this Settlement Agreement is in the best interest of the Parties and the public. V. FINAL JUDGMENT If, after the fairness hearing, the Court approves this Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, the Court shall direct entry of Final Judgment (the Final Judgment ) dismissing this action with prejudice, pursuant to the terms of this Settlement Agreement and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the limited purposes described in Section VI of this Settlement Agreement. The Final Judgment shall incorporate and be subject to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. VI. CONTINUING JURISDICTION The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction for a period not to exceed three years from the Approval Date for the sole purposes of (i) enforcing the provisions of the Settlement Agreement in the event that one of the Parties claims that there has been a breach of any of those provisions and the Parties cannot resolve the dispute after diligent and good faith efforts, (ii) modifying the Settlement Agreement if 3

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 5 of 10 requested by the Defendant pursuant to Section VII, and (iii) entering any other order authorized by the Settlement Agreement. VII. MODIFICATION 1. The Parties recognize that Defendant is required to comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including any future revisions to the statutes and regulations that govern Medicare coverage and that nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall prohibit Defendant from modifying its policies and procedures to comply with any relevant statutory or regulatory changes, or to make appropriate programmatic changes, so long as such programmatic changes are consistent with the purpose of promoting and facilitating timely ALJ decisions for Beneficiary Appellants. 2. If Defendant believes that it is necessary or advisable to modify any of the commitments set forth in Section VIII herein, Defendant may do so after complying with the provisions of this subparagraph. First, Defendant shall provide notice to Plaintiffs Counsel by letter of its proposed modification and the reasons Defendant considers such modification necessary or advisable. Second, Defendant shall permit Plaintiffs Counsel to comment in writing on its proposed modification and shall consider such comments in good faith. Third, no earlier than 30 calendar days after the date on which Defendant provided notice of the proposed modification to Plaintiffs Counsel, Defendant may effectuate its proposed modification by a motion pursuant to section VI(ii). Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide for judicial review in any court of Defendant s determination to effectuate a modification of any of the commitments set forth in Section VII herein. 4

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 6 of 10 VIII. INJUNCTIVE PROVISIONS 1. Defendant will commit to maintaining a policy of providing all Beneficiary Appellants, subject to restrictions listed in Section VIII.2 below, with priority over other appellants in receiving ALJ decisions (or other appropriate disposition of their appeals, such as dismissals or remands). As is currently the case, Defendant may occasionally need to give certain Beneficiaries priority over the appeals of other Beneficiaries. Also, as is currently the case, this policy will apply to all Beneficiaries, regardless of whether their particular statutory claim entitles them to an ALJ decision (or other disposition) within a specific time frame (for example, 90 days). 2. The Beneficiary priority policy will not apply to appeals brought by Beneficiaries where the Beneficiary has been recruited by a provider or supplier to file an appeal on the provider s or supplier s behalf and where the Beneficiary has no financial liability for the claim at issue in the appeal beyond standard co-insurance amounts. Defendant will apply the prioritization policy to Beneficiary Appellants (where the appeal is actually from the Beneficiary, not from a provider or supplier who has recruited a Beneficiary) where the issue is denial of coverage, even when the Beneficiary has been found not to be financially liable. 3. Within six months of the Approval Date, Defendant will agree to introduce a new unified request form to replace the current Request for ALJ Hearing form (CMS-20034A/B) and Request for Review of Dismissal form (HHS-725). The new form will allow beneficiaries to self-identify, and also add provisions for Medicare Part D requests as there is currently no official form for Part D requests. The form will also include a phone number in large print (18 point 5

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 7 of 10 font) to direct the visually impaired to OMHA for assistance on obtaining a large print form. There will also be an associated revision of instructions for requesting an ALJ Hearing issued by Medicare Part A and Part B qualified independent contractors (QICs), Part D independent review entities (IREs), and quality improvement organizations (QIOs). The instructions will include: (i) the toll-free number established for the Division Director s staff (see Section VIII.5, below) who will be available to trouble-shoot problems in appeals filed by Beneficiary Appellants; (ii) a complete address associated with instructions for Beneficiary Appellants to send requests to the OMHA Beneficiary Mail Stop ; (iii) a plain-language description that draws the attention of Beneficiary Appellants, and those who may be assisting them, to encourage them to send appeals to the OMHA Beneficiary Mail Stop if the appeal qualifies for prioritization; and (iv) information on obtaining largeprint instructions. 4. Within three months of the Approval Date, OMHA will publish additional information on its website and update this information monthly. See attached chart (Attachment 1), indicating the data that OMHA will publish. OMHA will provide such additional information from Fiscal Year 2015 forward until the end of defendant s obligations under the Agreement. 5. Within 30 calendar days of the Approval Date, OMHA will designate a Headquarters Division Director to oversee inquiries about appeals initiated by Beneficiary Appellants, and to address any complaints or questions concerning the processing of those appeals. In addition, OMHA will establish a toll-free help line for Beneficiary Appellants (and those who may be helping 6

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 8 of 10 them), which the Division Director s staff will answer during normal, Eastern Standard Time business hours, with voicemail function activated. 6. Within three months of the Approval Date, Defendant, acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), will modify the written scripts provided to contractors who staff the 1-800-Medicare toll-free assistance line to properly route Beneficiaries with questions regarding appeals pending at OMHA (including the toll-free number of the OMHA Division Director s staff assigned to address problems with ALJ appeals) and to highlight the Beneficiary prioritization policy for ALJ appeals. 7. The Parties agree to as-needed teleconferences or in-person meetings between counsel if written correspondence does not resolve disagreements about implementation of the Settlement Agreement. If in-person meetings are necessary, they shall be held in Washington, D.C. Defendant shall not be liable to pay attorney fees, costs, or expenses in connection with any correspondence, teleconferences or meetings to discuss issues or disagreements about implementation of the Settlement Agreement. IX. DURATION OF COMMITMENTS Defendant will maintain all of the commitments made in this Settlement Agreement for three years from the Approval Date. X. ATTORNEY S FEES Defendant agrees to pay $47,500 to Plaintiffs Counsel in full resolution of all claims for attorney fees and costs that Plaintiffs Counsel might have incurred in this litigation, including future work. Defendant will make best efforts to issue payment to Plaintiffs Counsel within 60 days of the Approval Date. 7

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 9 of 10 XI. RELEASE 1. In consideration of the promises of Defendant as set forth in this Settlement Agreement, the Plaintiffs and all Class Members, and their heirs, administrators, successors, or assigns (together, the Releasors ), hereby release and forever discharge Defendant and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), along with Defendant s and HHS s administrators, successors, officers, employees, and agents (together the Releasees ) from any and all claims and causes of action that have been asserted or could have been asserted in this action by reason of, or with respect to, Plaintiffs allegations as set forth in the First Amended Complaint in this litigation (ECF # 49). 2. The above release shall not affect in any way the right of any Class Member to seek any and all individual relief that is otherwise available in satisfaction of an individual claim against Defendant for Medicare benefits that is not based upon the allegations set for the Section XI.1 above. XII. SAVING CLAUSE Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create a right to an ALJ Hearing not otherwise provided for by statute or regulation. The undersigned representatives of the Parties certify that they are fully authorized to consent to the Court s entry of the terms and conditions of this Settlement Agreement. Dated: February 26, 2016 8

Case 3:14-cv-01230-JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 10 of 10 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General /s/alice Bers /s/daniel Bensing ALICE BERS JOEL McELVAIN Federal Bar No. ct28749 DANIEL BENSING abers@medicareadvocacy.org D.C. Bar No. 334268 GILL DEFORD United States Department of Justice Federal Bar No. ct19269 Civil Division gdeford@medicareadvocacy.org Federal Programs Branch JUDITH A. STEIN 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Federal Bar No. ct08654 Rm. 6114 jstein@medicareadvocacy.org Washington, D.C. 20530 Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Telephone: (202) 305-0693 P.O. Box 350 Telefacsimile: (202) 616-8470 Willimantic, CT 06226 Daniel.Bensing@USDOJ.gov (860) 456-7790 Fax (860) 456-2614 DEIRDRE M. DALY Attorneys for Plaintiffs United States Attorney and Class Counsel CAROLYN A. IKARI Assistant U.S. Attorney 450 Main Street, Room 328 Hartford, Connecticut 06103 (860) 760-7953 Fed. Bar No. ct13437 Attorneys for Defendant 9