OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER. City Services Auditor 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report

Similar documents
BIG PICTURE: CHANGING POVERTY AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES IN SEATTLE

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

Juneau Transportation Survey

Racial Inequities in Fairfax County

NOVEMBER visioning survey results

APPENDIX G DEMOGRAPHICS

Labor Force Characteristics by Race and Ethnicity, 2015

Release #2475 Release Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 WHILE CALIFORNIANS ARE DISSATISFIED

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

R Eagleton Institute of Politics Center for Public Interest Polling

Seattle Public Schools Enrollment and Immigration. Natasha M. Rivers, PhD. Table of Contents

Interview dates: September 6 8, 2013 Number of interviews: 1,007

CLACLS. A Profile of Latino Citizenship in the United States: Demographic, Educational and Economic Trends between 1990 and 2013

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

Race, Ethnicity, and Economic Outcomes in New Mexico

Executive Director. Gender Analysis of San Francisco Commissions and Boards

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Skagit County, Washington. Prepared by: Skagit Council of Governments 204 West Montgomery Street, Mount Vernon, WA 98273

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

California s Congressional District 37 Demographic Sketch

AARP Pre-First-Debate National Survey Miami, September 30, 2004

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

U.S. immigrant population continues to grow

NAZI VICTIMS NOW RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES: FINDINGS FROM THE NATIONAL JEWISH POPULATION SURVEY A UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITIES REPORT

Far From the Commonwealth: A Report on Low- Income Asian Americans in Massachusetts

Young Elected Leaders are Few and Familiar

info Poverty in the San Diego Region SANDAG December 2013

We know that the Latinx community still faces many challenges, in particular the unresolved immigration status of so many in our community.

POLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

The Washington Poll King County Exit Poll, November 7, 2006

Racial Inequities in the Washington, DC, Region

Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 4: High Bridge, Concourse and Mount Eden,

City of Rancho Cucamonga Presentation of Draft Maps

Dominicans in New York City

Racial integration between black and white people is at highest level for a century, new U.S. census reveals

REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011

Environmental Justice Demographic Profile

REPORT TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND ON LAW ELIGIBLE TRAFFIC STOPS

The 2016 Minnesota Crime Victimization Survey

Rural Pulse 2016 RURAL PULSE RESEARCH. Rural/Urban Findings June 2016

Non-Voted Ballots and Discrimination in Florida

Telephone Survey. Contents *

2016 Appointed Boards and Commissions Diversity Survey Report

An Equity Assessment of the. St. Louis Region

Urban Coast Institute Polling Institute. Released: December 5, CONTACT: Tony MacDonald Director, Urban Coast Institute

APPENDIX H. Success of Businesses in the Dane County Construction Industry

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM

Cultural Frames: An Analytical Model

Foreign American Community Survey. April 2011

List of Tables and Appendices

South Salt Lake: Fair Housing Equity Assessment


Old Dominion University / Virginian Pilot Poll #3 June 2012

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF OF POLICE SURVEY 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA SURVEY RESULTS

City of Bellingham Residential Survey 2013

These socioeconomic indicators characterize the ROI. Community treatment by the Army; Greater public participation and public opinion;

UndecidedVotersinthe NovemberPresidential Election. anationalsurvey

REGIONAL. San Joaquin County Population Projection

Officer-Involved Shootings in Fresno, California: Frequency, Fatality, and Disproportionate Impact

TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM

LEFT BEHIND: WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN A CHANGING LOS ANGELES. Revised September 27, A Publication of the California Budget Project

Active Michigan Members by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Joining the Bar

Demographic, Social, and Economic Trends for Young Children in California

The Broken Pathway. Uncovering the Economic Inequality in the Bay Area

Chapter 17. The Labor Market and The Distribution of Income. Microeconomics: Principles, Applications, and Tools NINTH EDITION

The Airbnb Community in Ontario

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Regional Data Snapshot

ASIAN AMERICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

Texas Community Development Block Grant Program. Survey Methodology Manual. Texas Department of Agriculture Office of Rural Affairs

Last Name First Name M.I. Name You Prefer. City State Zip Address. Daytime Phone Evening Phone Best Time to Call. City State If yes, where?

Release #2486 Release Date: Friday, September 12, 2014

Rural Pulse 2019 RURAL PULSE RESEARCH. Rural/Urban Findings March 2019

Trends in the Racial Distribution of Wisconsin Poverty, This report is the second in a series of briefings on the results.

The Impact of Immigrant Remodeling Trends on the Future of the Home Improvement Industry

THE COLOR OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP Why the Racial Gap among Firms Costs the U.S. Billions

Characteristics of Poverty in Minnesota

Nebraska s Foreign-Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

Advancing Equity and Inclusive Growth in San Joaquin Valley: Data for an Equity Policy Agenda

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

Counties of Winnebago and Boone

University of California Institute for Labor and Employment

EMPLOYMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA. A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll

Regional Data Snapshot

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)

Gauging the Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

OMP EIS Re-Evaluation: Interim Fly Quiet

BLACK-WHITE BENCHMARKS FOR THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH

Release #2345 Release Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Asian Pacific American Heritage Month: May 2004

Community perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r

Hispanics. A People in Motion

Ethnic and Racial Diversity of National Park System Visitors and Non- Visitors Technical Report

BY Amy Mitchell, Katie Simmons, Katerina Eva Matsa and Laura Silver. FOR RELEASE JANUARY 11, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Regional Data Snapshot

Midvale: Fair Housing Equity Assessment

Transcription:

OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER City Services Auditor 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report February 7, 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 SURVEY DATA ANALYSIS 5 I. The Survey Respondents 5 II. The Reasonableness of Taxi Service 6 III. The Length of Time Waiting for Taxi Service 7 IV. The Method of Reaching Taxi Service 9 V. The Time of Most Recent Taxi Service 10 APPENDIX 11 City of San Francisco Map by Zip code 11 Demographic Data Zip code 94114 12 Demographic Data Zip code 94121 14 Demographic Data Zip code 94124 16 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 2

INTRODUCTION This is a summary report of the results of the Taxi Commission Survey that the Controller s Office conducted in October/November 2005. Out of six thousand surveys mailed to citizens in three San Francisco Zip codes (94114, 94121, 94124), 548 responses were received. Adjusted for bad addresses (139 of the original 6000 surveys were returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable), this corresponds to an overall response rate of approximately nine percent. The three San Francisco Zip codes used in the survey correspond to three distinct areas of the City, demographically as well as geographically. Zip code 94114 corresponds to the Castro and Noe Valley neighborhoods, located in the heart of the City. This Zip code is predominantly white (83%), educated (67% hold a bachelor s degree), and is one of the wealthier areas of the City (median household income of $75,000). On the other hand, Zip code 94124, known as Bayview/Hunter s Point is located in the extreme southeastern corner of the City. This Zip code primarily consists of minority residents (90%), is relatively less educated (11% hold bachelor s degrees), and poorer (median household income of $37,000). Zip code 94121 is located in the extreme northwestern corner of the city in neighborhoods called the Outer Richmond and Seacliff. Demographically, 94121 lies between the other two Zip codes. This Zip code is comprised of a roughly equal mixture of white and minority residents, is relatively educated (46% hold bachelor s degrees), and on the wealthier side (median household income of $62,000). See Appendix Maps and Demographic Data for more information about these three Zip codes. We have analyzed the results of the survey data in two ways through a series of descriptive tables and crosstabulations. Interesting findings include: A quarter of respondents believe that they can usually not get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time, and a similar percentage of respondents report waiting longer than a half-hour for a taxi the last time they took one. 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 3

Respondents from the Zip code 94124 report that they do not take taxis nearly as often as their counterparts, and that when they do, their wait times are longer 79% of the time they wait more than fifteen minutes, and 40% of the time they wait longer than a half-hour. This long waiting period may help to explain why residents of 94124 are less likely to use taxi service. It may also help to explain this Zip code s lower survey response rate, as perhaps its residents are relatively disillusioned about taxi service in the City. Conversely, less demand for taxis in this area of the City may result in fewer taxis nearby and therefore longer wait times. With a total sample size of 548 responses, the estimated sampling error for this survey is about +/- 4% at the 95% confidence level. This means that we are 95% confident that all residents of the areas surveyed would produce responses to each survey question within approximately four percentage points of the results obtained from this sample. For example, 34% of survey respondents say they can almost always get a taxi in San Francisco within a reasonable amount of time. Statistical theory suggests that if we repeated additional random samples of this size, we could expect between 30% and 38% of the population to answer this question almost always. Sampling errors are larger for individual Zip codes. For 94114, with 269 survey responses, the margin of error is +/- 6%; for 94121, with 174 survey responses, the margin of error is +/- 8%; and for 94124, with 105 survey responses, the margin of error is +/- 10%. Unless otherwise noted, all tables are statistically significant. These and other statistical conclusions are explained more fully in the tables and analysis below. 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 4

SURVEY DATA ANALYSIS I. Survey Respondents Of the six thousand surveys that were mailed to the residents of the three San Francisco Zip codes 94114, 94121 and 94124, less than ten percent of the surveys were returned. The response rates by Zip codes ranged from five percent in 94124 to fourteen percent in 94114. (See Table 1.) As such, nearly half (48%) of the total returned responses came from the Zip code 94114; whereas a disproportionately smaller amount (18%) was returned from the Zip code 94124. (See Tables 2 and 3.) Responses have not been weighted to adjust for varying response rates. Table 1. Zip code response rate Zip Code Sent Responses Percent Margin of error 94114 1916 269 14% 6% 94121 1982 174 9% 8% 94124 1963 105 5% 10% Total 5861 * 548 9% 4% Table 2. Zip code to which survey was addressed Zip Code Frequency Percent 94114 269 49% 94121 174 32% 94124 105 19% Total 548 100% * Of the 6000 surveys mailed, 139 were returned by the post office as invalid addresses. 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 5

Table 3. Zip code reported by respondent Zip Code Frequency Percent 94114 258 48% 94121 157 29% 94124 99 18% Other 23 4% Total 537 100% II. The Reasonableness of Taxi Service Respondents reported that they get taxis in a reasonable amount of time almost always or sometimes about three-quarters of the time (77%). Only 23% of respondents reported that they usually can not get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time. (See Table 4.) Table 4. Can you get a taxi in SF in a reasonable amount of time? Answer Frequency Percent Almost Always 182 34% Sometimes 227 43% Usually Not 121 23% Total 530 100% However, when the same question is analyzed by Zip code, a stark difference appears. Only 23% of respondents in the Zip code 94124 report that they almost always get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time; while 33% of 94124 respondents report usually not being able to get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time. This assessment contrasts sharply with the other two Zip codes, where more respondents (35% and 41%) report getting a taxi almost always in a reasonable amount of time. Additionally, respondents from 94114 and 94121 are less likely to report usually not being able to get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time (21% and 19%). (See Table 5.) 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 6

Table 5. Can you get a taxi in a reasonable amount of time? by Zip code Answer 94114 94121 94124 Total Almost Always 35% 41% 23% 34% Sometimes 44% 40% 44% 43% Usually Not 21% 19% 33% 23% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% III. The Length of Time Waiting for Taxi Service The survey also asked respondents to report how long it took from the last time calling or flagging a taxi until it actually arrived to pick them up. Correspondingly, 41% of people were picked up within fifteen minutes, and 74% within a half-hour. Only 26% of respondents waited for more than thirty minutes before arrival of the taxi. (See Table 6.) Table 6. How long did it take from the last time you called or started trying to flag a taxi until it arrived? Answer Frequency Percent Less than 15 mins 212 41% 15-30 mins 172 33% More than 30 mins 132 26% Total 516 100% When this data is cross-examined by Zip code, it is apparent that wait times are longer in Zip code 94124 than in the others. Taxis arrive within fifteen minutes only 20% of the time in 94124, compared with rates in the mid-40 percent range in the other two Zip codes. Furthermore, taxis arrive more than thirty minutes after the last call or flagging 40% of the time in 94124, in contrast with the mid-20 percent range in the other two Zip codes. While taxis arrive within thirty minutes at rates approaching 75-80% in 94114 and 94121, the corresponding rate in 94124 is only at 60%. (See Table 7.) Table 7. How long did it take from the last time you called or started trying to flag a taxi until it arrived? by Zip code Answer 94114 94121 94124 Total Less than 15 mins 45% 47% 20% 41% 15-30 mins 35% 27% 39% 33% More than 30 mins 20% 26% 40% 26% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 7

The data on wait times was also cross-examined by two other measures time of day and method of reaching taxi service. It appears that wait time does not vary much by day and time of service. Roughly 40% (range: 39-44%) of taxis are arriving within fifteen minutes, and approximately 70% (range: 67-77%) are arriving within a half-hour. Differences by the time of day were not statistically significant. (See Table 8.) Table 8. How long did it take from the last time you called or started trying to flag a taxi until it arrived? by time of day Answer Weekday Weeknight Weekend Weekend Day Night Percent Less than 15 mins 42% 39% 44% 41% 41% 15-30 mins 35% 35% 35% 26% 33% More than 30 mins 23% 26% 22% 33% 26% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cross-tabulating wait times by method of reaching a taxi shows that, as would be expected, flagging down a taxi is likely to correlate with a short wait time. Of respondents who attempted to flag a taxi, 59% received a taxi within fifteen minutes, and 88% within a half-hour. On the other hand, calling from home or somewhere else usually correlates with a longer waiting time. Respondents reported that roughly 35% of the time waiting longer than thirty minutes, and roughly 70% of the time waiting longer than fifteen minutes. (See Table 9.) Table 9. How long did it take from the last time you called or started trying to flag a taxi until it arrived? by method of reaching taxi service Answer Call from Home Call from Somewhere Else Flag down Taxi Other Percent Less than 15 mins 28% 27% 59% 79% 41% 15-30 mins 38% 36% 29% 5% 33% More than 30 mins 34% 36% 12% 16% 26% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 8

IV. The Method of Reaching Taxi Service The survey also asked respondents what method they used to reach a taxi the last time they used taxi service. Nearly half of the respondents called the taxi from home (48%), but a large percentage (35%) simply flagged the taxi down on the street. A smaller proportion (13%) called the taxi from somewhere other than home. (See Table 10.) Table 10. How did you try to reach a taxi? Answer Frequency Percent Call from Home 260 48% Flag down Taxi 190 35% Call from Somewhere Else 68 13% Other 22 4% Total 540 100% When this question was broken down further by Zip code, some interesting data presented itself. For instance, while nearly half of survey respondents called a taxi from home, 70% of respondents from 94124 used that method to procure their last taxi. Correspondingly, while 35% of survey respondents flagged down a taxi the last time they used the service, only 14% of respondents from 94124 did so, whereas 46% of respondents from 94114 did so. This would suggest that there are fewer opportunities to flag down taxis in 94124, and that residents of 94124 do not flag down taxis frequently in other areas either. Those living in the Richmond (94121) flag down taxis less frequently than residents of centrally-located 94114, but considerably more often than those who live in 94124. Residents of 94121 report calling taxis from places other than home more frequently than those in the other two Zip codes. (See Table 11.) Table 11. How did you try to reach a taxi? by Zip code Answer 94114 94121 94124 Total Call from Home 41% 47% 70% 48% Call from Somewhere Else 10% 17% 12% 13% Flag Down Taxi 46% 31% 14% 35% Other 3% 5% 4% 4% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 9

V. The Time of Most Recent Taxi Service When queried as to the time the respondent last sought taxi service, the results were fairly predictable. Given that the survey was mailed in October/November 2005, a vast majority (87%) of the respondents reported their most recent taxi service was also in 2005. (See Table 12.) Table 12. What year did you last seek taxi service? Answer Frequency Percent 2005 466 87% 2004 32 6% Before 2004 36 7% Total 534 100% The survey also asked respondents to share the time of day of the last time they used taxi service in the City. Weekday taxi rides were the most common (45%), while weeknights and weekend nights were roughly equal (24% and 22%, respectively). Weekend day trips were the least common, representing only 9% of trips. (See Table 13.) Table 13. What day and time did you last seek taxi service? Answer Frequency Percent Weekday 241 45% Weeknight 130 24% Weekend Night 118 22% Weekend Day 47 9% Total 536 100% 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 10

APPENDIX MAP AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 11

Demographic Profile - 94114: General Characteristics Number Percent Total population 30,574 Male 18,273 59.8 Female 12,301 40.2 Median age (years) 37.7 (X) 18 years and over 28,384 92.8 65 years and over 2,478 8.1 One race 29,365 96 White 25,349 82.9 Black or African American 679 2.2 American Indian and Alaska Native 145 0.5 Asian 2,200 7.2 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 54 0.2 Some other race 938 3.1 Two or more races 1,209 4 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 2,655 8.7 Household population 30,357 99.3 Group quarters population 217 0.7 Social Characteristics Population 25 years and over 27,211 High school graduate or higher 25,954 95.4 Bachelor's degree or higher 18,149 66.7 Foreign born 4,747 15.5 Speak a language other than English at home (population 5 years and over) 5,252 17.7 Economic Characteristics 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 12

In labor force (population 16 years and over) 22,705 79.6 Median household income in 1999 (dollars) 75,727 (X) Per capita income in 1999 (dollars) 56,892 (X) Families below poverty level 109 2.6 Individuals below poverty level 1,975 6.5 Housing Characteristics Single-family owner-occupied homes 3,195 Median value (dollars) 672,300 (X) (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 13

Demographic Profile - 94121: General Characteristics Number Percent Total population 42,473 Male 20,231 47.6 Female 22,242 52.4 Median age (years) 39.1 (X) Under 5 years 1,619 3.8 18 years and over 36,217 85.3 65 years and over 7,047 16.6 One race 40,970 96.5 White 20,649 48.6 Black or African American 664 1.6 American Indian and Alaska Native 98 0.2 Asian 18,849 44.4 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 51 0.1 Some other race 659 1.6 Two or more races 1,503 3.5 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 1,862 4.4 Household population 42,112 99.2 Group quarters population 361 0.8 Social Characteristics Population 25 years and over 33,056 High school graduate or higher 27,686 83.8 Bachelor's degree or higher 15,308 46.3 Foreign born 19,024 44.5 Speak a language other than English at home (population 5 years and over) 22,684 55 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 14

Economic Characteristics In labor force (population 16 years and over) 24,847 66.9 Median household income in 1999 (dollars) 61,776 (X) Per capita income in 1999 (dollars) 32,881 (X) Families below poverty level 485 5 Individuals below poverty level 2,979 7 Housing Characteristics Single-family owner-occupied homes 4,695 Median value (dollars) 484,500 (X) (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 15

Demographic Profile - 94124: General Characteristics Number Percent Total population 33,170 Male 15,867 47.8 Female 17,303 52.2 Median age (years) 31.6 (X) Under 5 years 2,352 7.1 18 years and over 23,128 69.7 65 years and over 3,451 10.4 One race 31,820 95.9 White 3,190 9.6 Black or African American 15,922 48 American Indian and Alaska Native 138 0.4 Asian 8,100 24.4 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1,168 3.5 Some other race 3,302 10 Two or more races 1,350 4.1 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 5,528 16.7 Household population 32,654 98.4 Group quarters population 516 1.6 Social Characteristics Population 25 years and over 19,553 High school graduate or higher 12,426 63.6 Bachelor's degree or higher 2,180 11.1 Foreign born 10,202 31 Speak a language other than English at home (population 5 years and over) 13,367 43.6 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 16

Economic Characteristics In labor force (population 16 years and over) 12,677 52.8 Median household income in 1999 (dollars) 37,146 (X) Per capita income in 1999 (dollars) 14,200 (X) Families below poverty level 1,538 21.6 Individuals below poverty level 7,033 21.7 Housing Characteristics Single-family owner-occupied homes 4,336 Median value (dollars) 254,100 (X) (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) 2005 Taxi Commission Survey Report 17