IF IT S BROKE, FIX IT! Roger D. Townsend Alexander Dubose Jones & Townsend LLP

Similar documents
Utah Court Rules on Trial Motions Francis J. Carney

Case 3:14-cv SDD-EWD Document /05/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULING

shl Doc 2384 Filed 10/23/17 Entered 10/23/17 10:34:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8. Debtors. : : : : : : : : : Appellant, Appellee.

BRIEF OF APPELLEE, CASH FLOW EXPERTS, INC.

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 32

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION

8 California Procedure (5th), Attack on Judgment in Trial Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS (FILED DECEMBER 11, 2009) DECISION

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GREENE COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. CVF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 3, 2017

to the response may be filed unless ordered by the Court...

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

Civil Procedure Basics. N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure 7/6/2010

Transitioning from Trial to Appeal and Post Trial Motions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session. VICTORIA ROBBINS v. BILL WOLFENBARGER, D/B/A WOLF S MOTORS and SAM HORNE

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 9, 2008 Session. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY v. NEW HOPE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

When Judgments Go Wrong

Case 2:16-cv WHW-CLW Document 27 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 183

2018 VT 57. No In re Grievance of Edward Von Turkovich

Case 1:12-cv LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Case 4:17-cv JM Document 58 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 05AP-217 (C.P.C. No. 04CVC ) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR)

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 460 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 11, 2005 Session

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART, ORDER VACATED, AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division IV Opinion by: JUDGE CARPARELLI Casebolt and Román, JJ.

Case 1:05-cv RMC Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1570-L MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GREENE COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO CA 80. v. : T.C. NO. 95 TRC D

THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2006

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY John M. Paternoster, District Judge

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

MADELYN BOHANNON GALLAGHER PIPINO, INC., ET AL.

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 12 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 482

This case now comes before the Board for consideration. of applicant s motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to vacate

Case Doc 161 Filed 05/24/16 Entered 05/24/16 08:46:38 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Arbitration vs. Litigation

Rule Composition of Record on Appeal.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 21, 2005 Session

[Case Title]Bli Farms v. Greenstone Farm Credit & Srvc Agcy [Case Number] [Bankruptcy Judge]Bankruptcy Judge Walter Shapero [Adversary

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT/ORDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 24, 2009 Session

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 13-AA-1038

This memorandum decision is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter. IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS.

Decision on Motion to Vacate Default Judgment

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0609n.06. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF VERMONT. Decision on Motion to Strike Untimely Notice of Appeal and Motion to Allow Untimely Appeal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL NO. 4:86CV00291

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IF IT ISN T IN THE RECORD, IT NEVER HAPPENED: PRESERVING ERRORS, EVIDENCE, AND ARGUMENT FOR APPEAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE On-Brief May 25, 2007

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 15, 2015 Session

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM OPINION

Follow this and additional works at:

Spoliation Scrutiny: Disparate Standards For Distinct Mediums

Cite as 2019 Ark. 75 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS AFFIRMED. default judgment in favor of appellee Arkansas Teachers Federal Credit Union (ATFCU).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 13, 2015 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 10, 2004 Session. MARK K. McGEHEE v. JULIE A. McGEHEE

TITLE VII ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RICHARD VELOZ Plaintiff, Appellant

RUSSELL EMORY EILBER OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE WILLIAM C. MIMS December 7, 2017 FLOOR CARE SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL.

Transcription:

IF IT S BROKE, FIX IT! Roger D. Townsend Alexander Dubose Jones & Townsend LLP 19TH ANNUAL FIFTH CIRCUIT APPELLATE PRACTICE AND ADVOCACY SEMINAR AMERICAN ACADEMY OF APPELLATE LAWYERS AND LOYOLA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW February 5, 2004 New Orleans, Louisiana

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Oops I forgot to move for a directed verdict at the close of all evidence....... 1 II. Oops again I forgot to move for judgment as a matter of law after the trial..... 1 III. Double secret oops I forgot to preserve this at all during trial............... 1 IV. Oops, oops, oops-i just noticed a miscalculation in the interest award.......... 1 V. Is there a doctor in the house?......................................... 2 A. Clerical errors................................................ 3 B. Substantive mistakes........................................... 3 VI. Is our malpractice coverage up to date?.................................. 4 VII. This record won't play................................................ 4 VIII. If all else fails....................................................... 5

IF IT'S BROKE, FIX IT! This very serious paper discusses how to try to fix things that have gone wrong at trial or with the perfection of the appeal. It happens more often than you think it does. I. Oops I forgot to move for a directed verdict at the close of all evidence. A party's objections to the jury charge on grounds of lack of sufficiency of the evidence can satisfy the purposes of Rule 50(a). See Greenwood v. Societe Francaise De, 111 F. 3d 1239, 144-45 (5th Cir. 1997); Scottish Heritable Trust, PLC v. Peat Marwick Main & Co., 81 F.3d 606, 610-11 (5th Cir. 1996). II. Oops again I forgot to move for judgment as a matter of law after the trial. If you file a motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of all evidence, but do not renew it after the trial, the best you can hope for on an appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence is a new trial. E.g., Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 330 U.S. 212, 217-18 (1947); Whitehead v. Food Max, 163 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 1998); Satcher v. Honda Motor Co., 52 F.3d 1311, 1315 (5th Cir. 1995). Thus, you should at least file a motion for new trial attacking the sufficiency of the evidence. But that will still be of little help. In this situation, the standard of review becomes that of plain error-whether "any evidence" supports the verdict. Whitehead, 163 F.3d at 269. III. Double secret oops I forgot to preserve this at all during trial. You might be able to preserve the complaint with a motion for new trial. The general rule is that a party cannot raise new issues for the first time in post-trial motions. See, e.g. Cunningham v. Healthco, Inc., 824 F.2d 1448, 1454 (5th Cir. 1987). Yet the trial court has discretion to consider them. See, e.g. Quest Medical, Inc. v. Apprill, 90 F.3d 1080, 1087 (5th Cir. 1996); Abbott v. Equity Group, Inc., 2 F.3d 613, 629 n.59 (5th Cir. 1993); Southwestern Eng'g Co. v. Cajun Elec. Power Co-op, Inc., 915 F.2d 972, 979 (5th Cir. 1990). IV. Oops, oops, oops-i just noticed a miscalculation in the interest award. You can challenge more technical mistakes with a motion to alter or amend the judgment. 1

V. Is there a doctor in the house? 1 When all else fails, or as Ross Perot would say, you are in deep doo-doo, try a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. But these are limited to narrow situations. One basis is to correct clerical errors. FED. R. CIV. P. 60(a). The other bases are (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b). Your time for filing the motion varies according to why you are filing it. If you want to correct a clerical mistake in the judgment, you can file the motion at any time. If you are moving on the basis of (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, (2) newly discovered evidence, or (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party, you must file the motion within one year of the judgment, order, or proceeding entered or taken. FED.R.Civ.P.60(b). For the other complaints, as well as those just listed, the motion must be filed within a reasonable time. Id. If you file the motion after you have noticed an appeal, things get more complicated. If you are trying to correct a clerical mistake, you must obtain leave from the Fifth Circuit to permit the district court to make the correction. If your motion is based on one of the other grounds, the district court can only deny the motion; then, you must either file a separate notice of appeal or amend your prior notice to obtain review of the denial of that motion. See Williams v. Chater, 87 F. 3d 702, 705 n.1 (5th Cit. 1996). If the district court wants to grant the motion, it must obtain leave from the court of appeals. Id.; see also Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc., 223 F.2d 697, 699 (5th Cir. 1955). Since we're in New Orleans, perhaps Marie Laveau would have said deep voodoo. But Muddy Waters, a. k. a. McKinley Morganfield, would have said deep hoodoo. As long as we've got our mojo working, who cares? 1 Since we re in New Orleans, perhaps Marie Laveau would have said deep voodoo. But Muddy Waters, a.k.a. McKinley Morganfield, would have said deep hoodoo. As long as we ve got our mojo working, who cares? 2

A. Clerical errors As the Fifth Circuit noted in In re West Texas Marketing Corp., 12 F.3d 497, 504-05 (5th Cir. 1994), [T]he relevant test for the applicability of Rule 60(a) is whether the change affects substantive rights of the parties and is therefore beyond the scope of Rule 60(a) or is instead a clerical error, a copying or computational mistake, which is correctable under the Rule. As long as the intentions of the parties are clearly defined and all the court need do is employ the judicial eraser to obliterate a mechanical or mathematical mistake, the modification will be allowed. If, on the other hand, cerebration or research into the law or planetary excursions into facts is required, Rule 60(a) is not a perpetual right to apply different legal rules or different factual analyses to a case. It is only mindless and mechanistic mistakes, minor shifting of facts, and no new additional legal perambulations which are reachable through Rule 60(a). B. Substantive mistakes Legal errors usually do not constitute the kind of mistake that will justify relief, McMillan v. MBank Fort Worth, N.A., 4 F.3d 362, 367 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor will inexcusable neglect by counsel. See Edward H. Bohlin Co. v. Banning Co., 6 F.3d 350-57 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Pryor v. United States Postal Serv., 769 F.2d 281, 287-89 (5th Cir. 1985). Whether to set aside a default judgment depends on (1) the extent of prejudice to the plaintiff; (2) the merits of the defendant's asserted defense; and (3) the culpability of [the] defendant's conduct. Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 167 F.3d 933, 938-39 (5th Cir. 1999) (quoting Hibernia National Bank v. Administracion Central Sociedad Anonima, 776 F. 2d 1277, 1280 (5th Cir. 1985)). To obtain relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence the evidence must be newly discovered not new (post-trial) evidence. See Longden v. Sunderman, 979 F.2d 1095, 1102-03 (5th Cir. 1992); Chilson v. Metropolitan Transit Auth., 796 F.2d 69, 70 (5th Cir. 1986). But it must not have been discoverable before the time to file a motion for new trial had expired. FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(2). The newly discovered evidence must be so important that it would have changed the outcome of the trial. See New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Manech USA, Inc., 993 F.2d 1195, 1200-01 (5th Cir. 1993); Brown v. Petrolite Corp., 965 F.2d 38, 50 (5th Cir. 1992). 3

With regard to fraud or misconduct by your opponent, you must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the adverse party engaged in misconduct that you from fairly presenting your case. E.g., Washington v. Paths, 916 F.2d 1036, 1039 (5th Cir. 1990). If the judgment is void because there was no jurisdiction, then a rule 60(b) motions can be appropriate. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Brown, 84 F. 3d 137, 143 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. 119.67 Acres of Land, 663 F.2d 1328, 1331 (5th Cir. 1981). When the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or vacated; or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application, a rule 60(b) motion can be used. But reversal of a prior judgment matters only for claim or issue preclusion. VI. Is our malpractice coverage up to date? You forgot to file the notice of appeal on time. GULP! The district court may extend the time to file the notice of appeal if (i) a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by [FRAP] 4(a) expires; and (ii) that party shows excusable neglect and good cause. FED. R. APP. P. (4)(a)(5)(A). So what is excusable neglect? the determination [of what constitutes excusable neglect ] is at bottom an equitable one, taking into account all of the relevant circumstances surrounding the party's omission. These include... the danger of prejudice to the [non-moving party], the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant, and whether the movant acted in good faith. Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993), cited in Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 468-470 (5th Cir. 1998). Generally, a misunderstanding of the deadline by counsel won't cut it. Halicki, 151 F.3d at 470. VII. This record won't play. Suppose a transcript is unavailable. You should prepare a statement of the evidence or proceeding from the best available means, including the appellant's. FED. R. APP. P. 10(c)). You also should serve your statement of the evidence on the appellee, who may 4

serve objections or proposed amendments thereto within 10 days after service. Id. Then, you should submit both to the district court for settlement and approval. Id. Whatever the court then approves becomes the record. Id. it: If, as is more common, the record is available but contains a mistake, you can correct If any difference arises as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the district court,. the difference shall be submitted to and settled by that court and record made to conform to the truth. If anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident or is misstated therein, the parties by stipulation, or the district court, either before or after the record is transmitted to the court of appeals, or the court of appeals, on proper suggestion or of its own initiative, may direct that the omission or misstatement be corrected, and if necessary that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted. All other questions as to the form and content of the record shall be presented to the court of appeals. FED. R. APP. P. 10(e) But rule 10(e) does not permit a party to introduce new evidence in the court of appeals. S&E Shipping Corp. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry., 678 F.2d 636, 641 (6th Cir. 1981); see also United States v. Smith, 493 F.2d 906, 907 (5th Cir. 1974) VIII. If all else fails.... Call a better lawyer or move to Tahiti! I recommend the latter. Good luck! 5