February 6, United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY.

Similar documents
Case 3:15-cr AJB Document 11 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:08-cr JM Document 10 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

Case 3:08-cr BTM Document 27-3 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 11

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 71 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. -against- PEOPLE'S VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FORM

Friday 30th January, 2004.

Criminal Law Section Luncheon The Current State of Discovery in Virginia vs. The Intractable John L. Brady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Hello! I am Artin DerOhanian

Re: PEOPLE V. Indictment No Dear Justice Wolfgang:

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 5, 2006 Session

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

the defense written or recorded statements of the defendant or codefendant, the defendant s

moves this Court for an order for the Disclosure of the Grand Jury Transcripts. This

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

Drug Chemistry Essentials: Importance of Standardized Forensic Methods for the Analysis of Seized Drugs A Legal Perspective

BILL AS INTRODUCED AND PASSED BY SENATE AND HOUSE S Page 1 of 11. Subject: Crimes; innocence protection; eyewitness identification

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NASSAU STATE OF NEW YORK. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- RANDY STITH, Defendant

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

Case 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

SECOND CIRCUIT REVIEW: CRIMINAL LAW: DISCLOSING IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE UNDER 'BRADY'

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 372 Filed 01/26/11 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 1265 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 8

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: GOVERNMENT HAS DUTY TO IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE GUIDELINES TO PRESERVE DISCOVERABLE EVIDENCE

ADOPTED JUNE 19, 2013 MODEL POLICY DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FOR RECURRING INVESTIGATIVE OR PROFESSIONAL WITNESSES

AFFIRMATION. Sample. 1. I am a member of the law firm,, attorneys for the accused herein. I make this affirmation in support of the within motion.

filed against him on February 2, 1995 from the counts contained in the same indictment against

BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION

Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

Exoneration Project Intake Application

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. 92,885 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS

Criminal Law Table of Contents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background

USA v. Anthony Spence

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE HARBOR JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 184 th C. WESLEY FIELDS HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FUNDS

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION

CRIMINAL TRESPASS AFFIDAVIT

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

ADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1

CHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458

PART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by

Follow this and additional works at:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to bail. (BDR )

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS: EVERYTHING A JUDGE NEEDS TO KNOW - ALMOST

DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 3:16-cr TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

New Pa.Rs.Crim.P. 567, 568, and 569, Amendments to Pa.Rs.Crim.P.119 and 573 NOTICE OF DEFENSES; EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT BY MENTAL HEALTH EXPERT(S)

JAMAL RUSSELL, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Case 1:13-cr LJO-SKO Document 151 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 94-CF-163. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY. CASE No. 07-CR-0043

PRE-TRIAL PROCESSES INITIAL APPEARANCE. What you should know before you get started

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA

York Regional Police. Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ANNEX D. Classified Information Procedures Act: Statute, Procedures, and Comparison with M.R.E. 505

Criminal Procedure Rules Part and Part 33A New Practice Direction

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Chapter 11: Rights in Juvenile Proceedings

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of

Transcription:

February 6, 2003 United States Attorneys Office 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 Dear: Re: United States v. XXXXX, No. YYYY Pursuant to the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the United States Sentencing Guidelines and/or existing case law, Defendant, XXXXX, hereby requests the Government 1 to produce the following items, to the extent they may exist, for his inspection and use in connection with the preparation, and/or trial, and/or sentencing in the above referenced case: A. Any relevant written or recorded 2 statements 3 made or adopted by the Defendant, or copies thereof, within the possession, custody, or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known, to the Government; that portion of any written record containing the substance of any relevant oral statement made by the Defendant whether before or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person then known to the Defendant to be a Government agent; and recorded testimony of the Defendant before a grand jury which relates to the offense charged. You shall also disclose the substance of any other relevant oral statement made by the Defendant whether before or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person then known by the Defendant to be a Government agent if the Government intends to use the statement at trial. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(a)(1)(A). 4 1 The term "Government" as used throughout this Request includes all branches of the Government, all levels of the Government and all agencies within each branch and level of Government. 2 The term "recorded" as used throughout this Request includes both audio and visual recordings. 3 The term "statements" as used throughout this Request includes any form of assertive conduct and is, therefore, not limited to verbal statements. 4 This Request is also intended to cover the substance of Defendant s response to Miranda warnings if such warnings were given. See United States v. McElroy, 697 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1982).

B. A copy of the Defendant s prior criminal record, if any, as is within the possession, custody, or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the Government. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(a)(1)(B). C. Books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, or copies or portions thereof, which are within the possession, custody or control of the Government, and which are related to the above referenced case, or are intended for use by the Government as evidence at trial, or were obtained from or belong to the Defendant. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(a)(1)(C). D. Any results or reports of physical or mental examinations, and of scientific tests or experiments, or copies thereof, which are within the possession, custody, or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known, to the Government, and which are related to the above referenced case or are intended for use by the Government as evidence at trial. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(a)(1)(D). You are also hereby specifically requested to preserve for testing by the Defendant any and all substances capable of being tested by scientific means whether or not such substances were tested by the Government. E. A complete written summary of testimony to be presented by any Government witness called as an expert witness including the witness opinions, the basis and the reasons therefore, and his/her qualifications. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(E). F. All evidence favorable to the Defendant which is material either to the issue of guilt or punishment in the above referenced case or which serves to impeach a Government witness who will testify at trial. See generally Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). This request includes, but is by no means limited to: 1. The existence of any witness known to the Government who is favorable to the defense together with any and all statements made or adopted by that witness (whether they be written, recorded or the substance of oral statements) within the custody or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the Government. 2. Any statements made or adopted by any individual (including co defendants) (whether they be written, recorded or the substance of oral statements) within the custody or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the Government, which exculpate or do not mention the Defendant.

3. Any and all evidence showing any bias, narcotic habit, psychiatric treatment, lack of competence, lack of impartiality, or criminal record, on the part of any witness the Government intends to call to testify at trial in the above referenced case. 4. The results of any lie detector tests given to the Defendant or witnesses the Government intends to call to testify at trial in the above referenced case. 5. Any promises, rewards and inducements (financial or otherwise) offered (including a list of payments) or any threats of criminal prosecution made to any witness the Government intends to call to testify at trial in the above referenced case. 6. Presentence investigation reports, if any, relating to any witness the Government intends to call to testify at trial in the above referenced case. 7. Any and all evidence about which the Government is now aware, or about which the Government may become aware by the exercise of due diligence that might indicate, however remotely, that another individual committed the offense(s) for which the Defendant now stands accused. This includes all evidence which the Government believes indicates that another individual committed the offense(s) in connection with the Defendant. 8. Names and addresses of eyewitnesses to the offense(s) for which the Defendant now stands accused whose identity is now known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the Government. 9. Information regarding any indecisive, incomplete or hesitant identification of the Defendant by any witness to the offense(s) for which the Defendant now stands accused (regardless of whether the Government intends to call that witness to testify at trial). 10. Any and all information that tends to detract from the credibility or probative value of the testimony and/or evidence that the Government anticipates it will present at trial or sentencing in the above referenced case. 11. Any and all differences between information provided to the government by a cooperating witness and information provided to the government in a proffer made by that witness s attorney. See Spicer v. Roxbury Correctional Institute, No. 99-6119 (4th Cir. 1999).

G. Copies of any statements made or adopted by any alleged co conspirator, co defendant or agent of the Defendant regardless of whether the Government intends to introduce these statements at trial. See United States v. Turoff, 701 F. Supp. 981 (E.D.N.Y. 1988). H. The identify of any informant connected to the above referenced case who was a percipient witness to or participated in the alleged defense. See Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957). The Defendant also requests information regarding the present address of said informant; any prior criminal record of said informant; any bias, narcotic habit, psychiatric treatment, lack of competence, lack of credibility, lack of impartiality, or criminal record on the part of said informant; and any promises, rewards and inducements (financial or otherwise) offered or any threats of criminal prosecution made to said informant. I. Any statements made or adopted by witnesses which the Government intends to call to testify at any hearing (including a sentencing hearing) connected with the above referenced case, or notes made by said witnesses within the possession, custody, or control of the Government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the Government. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3500; Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 26.2. This includes any statements made by a government witness while he or she was incarcerated in the course of telephone conversations with government agents or others that were tape recorded by the institution in which the witness was incarcerated. See United States v. Ramirez, 174 F.3d 584 (5th Cir. 1999). J. The general nature of any and all evidence the Government intends to introduce at trial pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). See Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). The Defendant further requests a statement of the Government s theory of admissibility with respect to all such evidence. K. Facts and circumstances of the offense and offense characteristics that are relevant to the application of the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. 6B1.2, Commentary. Defendant hereby requests that the Government comply with the above Requests or inform Defendant of the Government s intent not to comply on or before XXXXX so that Defendant will be able to effectively prepare his defense. Please note that the Defendant specifically requests all items he is entitled to review as provided by the United States Constitution, the laws of the United States, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the United States Sentencing Guidelines and/or existing case law. If those sources require production of items not specifically requested herein, a request for these items is now specifically made. Furthermore, this request is a continuing request; if the Government discovers additional evidence or material responsive to any of the above Requests subsequent to the Government s initial production, the Government shall

promptly and without delay provide the Defendant with the additional evidence or material. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(c). In the event that the Government fails to produce all, or any part, of the evidence or materials herein requested, the Defendant reserves the right to oppose the introduction of such evidence or materials at any hearing in the above referenced case and/or move for dismissal of the indictment against the Defendant. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(d)(2). Your anticipated cooperation is appreciated. Very truly yours, F. Clinton Broden cc: XXXX