Cross-Border Class Actions

Similar documents
International Litigation in Intellectual Property and Information Technology

Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law

Collective Redress and Private International Law in the EU

International Antitrust Litigation

European Commentaries on Private International Law Brussels IIbis Regulation

Patent Cooperation Treaty

Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context

Patent Cooperation Treaty

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

3.1.2 Scope of Application Basic Principle: Freedom of Choice Applicable Law in the Absence of Choice

Directors Duties. Andrew Keay LLB, M Div, LLM, PhD

Arbitration Law of Canada: Practice and Procedure

Cross Border Contracts and Dispute Settlement

Law of the United States

National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe


EMERGENCY REMEDIES IN THE FAMILY COURTS

AGREEMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT THE INTERNATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION ACADEMY AS AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

The International Court of Justice

COLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY COUNCIL. ARTICLE I Authority

AGREEMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMISSION FOR CONTROLLING THE DESERT LOCUST IN THE WESTERN REGION PREAMBLE

Association Agreement

The Participation of the EU in International Dispute Settlement

TOWN OF WINDSOR BYLAW # 29 FIRE CHIEF and SERVICES BY-LAW

A practical guide, with ICC model contracts

THE LAW OF CONTRACT REMEDIES FOR BREACH. Towards Codification of Israeli Civil Law

THE PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION

Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law 6

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

Creamer Media Pty Ltd

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

TORTS IN CYBERSPACE: THE IMPACT OF THE NEW REGULATION ROME II MICHAEL BOGDAN *

FIFTH CIRCUIT PRACTICE

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON MUTUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. Brussels 27 June, 2003

Content and Meaning of National Law in the Context of Transnational Law

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

100 Years of Telecommunications Regulation : The Changing Paradigm In: Erhvervsretlige

EU Treaties & Legislation

The Status Of Recognition And Enforcement Of Judgments In The European Union

The Law of Obligations in Europe

Enforcement Rules for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Tentative translation)

The role of national courts in the application of EU law and hearings for a preliminary ruling before the CJEU

CLASS ACTION DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE (April 2015) Stefaan Voet. Recommendation on Common Principles for Collective Redress Mechanisms

SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, REGULATIONS UNDER THE SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS AND RESOLUTION BY THE DIPLOMATIC

Table of contents TREATY ON THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION PART I ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

CONTENTS. PART ONE Introduction 1. Preface Abbreviations Table of cases Table of legislation. vii xxi xxix liii

b) to promote the exchange of ideas sustainable management practices, knowledge, technology, and

Treaties. of May 20, 2015

International Encyclopaedia of Laws. Private International Law - Outline. The author(s) Table of Contents List of abbreviations

Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks

DIRECTIVE ON ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR CONSUMER DISPUTES AND REGULATION ON ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR CONSUMER DISPUTES

CONSTITUTION Ratified April 18, 2016

GENEVA ACT OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

A SHORT GUIDE TO CUSTOMS RISK

The Law of State Immunity

SCC ARBITRAL AWARDS

List of Authors... xiii. List of Abbreviations... xv. Acknowledgements...xvii

Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters

(EU) Private International Law & International Property Rights

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAM MODEL ACT 2010 Revision

CURRENT PAGES OF THE LAWS & RULES OF THE MOBILE COUNTY PERSONNEL BOARD

HONG KONG (Updated January 2018)

MEMORANDUM OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE

Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and Ukraine

Table of contents. Foreword to the sixth edition 5. Translator's Note 7. Table of contents 9. A. General Structures 15. B.

The Agreement on Social Security between Canada and the United States was signed on March 11, It entered into force on August 1, 1984.

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich Year: 2011.

Case study on Licence contract, environmental damage, unfair competition and defamation. Conflict of laws. Project

Rome II and Intellectual Property Infringement

EXOR N.V. Compensation and Nominating Committee Charter

Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement for the Iowa Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (IOWARN) AGREEMENT

Agreement on the Creation of the African Regional Industrial Property Organization (ARIPO)*

REGULATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PARQUES REUNIDOS SERVICIOS CENTRALES, S.A.

European Patent Law. Towards a Uniform Interpretation. Stefan Luginbuehl PhD, Lawyer, European Patent Office, Germany

Out-of-court dispute settlement systems for e-commerce

Wolters Kluwer. Constitutional Values and European Contract Law. Stefan Grundmann KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL. Law & Business

Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law

Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression

GUIDELINES ON ELECTIONS. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 51 st Plenary Session (Venice, 5-6 July 2002)

COLLABORATIVE LAW ALLIANCE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Statute of Etudes Sans Frontières International

Consolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Public Assistance (Amendment) (Guernsey) Law, 1990 [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE

The NATIONAL CONGRESS decrees: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS

2017 No POLICE, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Police Federation (England and Wales) Regulations 2017

Party Walls Law and Practice

Operating Code. ICHPER SD World Congress & Exposition

Summary Contents. Introduction: European Constitutional Law. lxiii

Rome I Regulation. Pocket Commentary. Bearbeitet von Prof. Franco Ferrari

TREATY SERIES 2010 Nº 5

Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters

THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL

The Relationship of WTO Law and Regional Trade Agreements in Dispute Settlement. From Fragmentation to Coherence. Malebakeng Agnes Forere

The Nature and Purposes of the Common Frame of Reference

1. The duties and responsibilities of the Committee shall include the following:

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BERKELEY SCHOOLS EXCELLENCE PROGRAM (BSEP) PLANNING & OVERSIGHT (P&O) COMMITTEE BYLAWS

The Charter of the United Nations

Transcription:

Cross-Border Class Actions

Cross-Border Class Actions The European Way edited by Arnaud Nuyts Nikitas E. Hatzimihail s e l p sellier european law publishers

Published with the support of the European Commission ISBN (print) 978-3-86653-231-1 ISBN (ebook) 978-3-86653-967-9 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio nalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. 2014 by sellier european law publishers GmbH, Munich All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior per mission of the publisher. Production: Karina Hack, Munich. Printing and binding: AZ Druck und Datentechnik GmbH, Kempten. Printed on acid-free, non-ageing paper. Printed in Germany.

Foreword The rise in multi-party litigation and claims for collective redress is challenging the traditional mechanisms of civil litigation in Europe and worldwide. The recent recast of the Brussels I Regulation an instrument designed primarily for individual litigation has provided the impetus for an examination as to whether the legislative instruments of EU private international law and the institutional mechanisms of judicial cooperation can effectively and efficiently address the challenges that collective litigation poses for European civil justice. Can the Brussels I jurisdictional system be used to handle collective redress litigation? Should entirely new rules of private international law be designed? What should be the territorial reach of collective redress mecanisms within and outside the EU? Should one law or multiple laws apply? What is the role of arbitration to settle collective claims? Should the EU adopt different rules to deal with cross-border redress in specific fields, such as competition law, financial regulation and consumer protection? These questions, amongst others, are examined in this book. Taken together, the papers in this volume offer a comprehensive effort to cover the various issues pertaining to European judicial cooperation in collective redress litigation. The division in three parts corresponds to the emphasis in the respective papers: the papers by Hess, Nuyts, Fentiman and Michaels discuss the conflicts aspects of collective redress in general; the papers by Athanasiou, Gorywoda, Karayanni and Radicati renew the policy discussion on collective redress and the mechanics of class actions; the papers by Hellner, Posnow, Gonzalez / Anovero, Kapetanaki and Corneloup present case studies in the most characteristic fields involving EU market regulation, i.e. competition, consumer and securities law. They are preceded by an introductory concept paper discussing market regulation and the policies underlying EU private international law. This is the culmination of a two-year international research project coordinated by the Unit for Private International Law of the University of Brussels (Université Libre de Bruxelles) and the Laboratory for Private International Law, Commercial Law and Comparative Legal History of the University of Cyprus, led respectively by Professor Arnaud Nuyts (the project s director) and Professor Nikitas Hatzimihail (the project s co-director), with the participation of a group of experts coming from other leading universities in Europe and in the United States. v

Foreword The project was funded by the European Commission. The first phase of the project involved background research by Lukasz Gorywoda, research fellow at the University of Brussels and led to a series of background papers, the identification of issues that would benefit the most from further research and the assignment of paper topics among the group s experts. An initial meeting of the group took place in Cyprus in late September 2011 and was accompanied by a public workshop aimed at acquainting the local audience with these themes. The project culminated in an international conference held in Brussels on 27 April 2012, where the experts presented communications based on the papers contained in this volume. In the published version of some of these contributions, we have sought to take account of developments up to the June 2013 Commission Communication on collective redress and the Directive Proposal on damages for competition violations. Our academic collaborators in this project have included Richard Fentiman (Cambridge), Burkard Hess (Heidelberg), Horatia Muir Watt (Sciences Po Paris), Alegria Borras, Joaquim Forner, Cristina Gonzalez (Barcelona), Anna Gardella, Luca Radicati di Brozolo (Catholic University of Milan), Louise Ellen Teitz (Hague Conference on Private International Law), Michael Karayanni (Hebrew University, Jerusalem), Ralf Michaels (Duke), Lia Athanassiou (Athens), Aurelia Colombi-Ciacchi (Groningen), Maciej Szpunar (Silesia-Katowice), but also Ioannis Voudouris (Cyprus), Lukasz Gorywoda, Natalia Kapetanaki, Malgorzata Posnow-Wurm (Brussels). We wish to acknowledge ECtHR Judge André Potocki, ECJ Judge George Arestis, Alexander Layton QC, Dean Andrée Puttemans and Salla Saastamoinen for their own contributions to this project. The administrative help of Fleur Godefroid was vital to the successful conclusion of the project, as was the moral support and practical advice of Carole Moal-Nuyts and Maria-Tsampika Lampitsi. The research project was financed through the European Commission s Framework Program for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters. The general objective of this program is to promote judicial cooperation in civil matters, aiming in particular at improving access to justice, promoting mutual recognition of judicial decisions, advancing the necessary harmonization of legislation, and eliminating obstacles created by the disparities in civil law and procedure. Arnaud Nuyts & Nikitas Hatzimihail Editors vi

List of Authors Beatriz Añoveros Terradas Associate Professor of Law, ESADE Law School, University Ramón LLull Lia Athanassiou Ph.D. (Paris I), Associate Professor of Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, National University of Athens, Attorney at Law, Sabine Corneloup Professor of Law, University of Burgundy, France Richard Fentiman Professor of Private International Law, University of Cambridge Cristina González Beilfuss Professor of Law, University of Barcelona Lukasz Gorywoda Ph.D. (European University Institute), LL.M. 13 (Columbia Law School), former Researcher at the Unit for Private International Law of the Université Libre de Bruxelles Nikitas E. Hatzimihail Associate Professor of Commercial Law, Private International Law and Comparative Legal History, University of Cyprus Michael Hellner Professor of Private International Law, Stockholm University Burkhard Hess Professor of Law, Director of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law Natalia A. Kapetanaki Lecturer, PhD Candidate, Centre for Private Law, Université Libre de Bruxelles vii

List of Authors Michael M. Karayanni Edward S. Silver Professor of Civil Procedure, Faculty of Law, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Ralf Michaels Arthur Larson Professor of Law, Duke University Arnaud Nuyts Professor of Law, Université Libre de Bruxelles; Partner, Liedekerke Wolters Waelbroeck Kirkpatrick, Brussels Małgorzata Posnow-Wurm Administrator, European Commission; former Researcher at the Unit for Private International Law of the Université Libre de Bruxelles Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo Professor of Private International Law, Catholic University of Milan; Member of the Bar of Milano, Arbitration Practice ARBIT viii

Short Table of Contents Foreword List of Authors v vii Introduction: Market Regulation, Judicial Cooperation and Collective Redress 1 Lukasz Gorywoda, Nikitas Hatzimihail and Arnaud Nuyts A. The Private International Law of Collective Redress Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Model of the Brussels I Regulation 59 Burkhard Hess The Consolidation of Collective Claims Under Brussels I 69 Arnaud Nuyts Recognition, Enforcement and Collective Judgments 85 Richard Fentiman European Class Actions and Applicable Law 111 Ralf Michaels B. New Perspectives on Collective Redress Collective Redress and Competition Policy 145 Lia Athanassiou The Emerging EU Legal Regime for Collective Redress: Institutional Dimension and Its Main Features 173 Lukasz Gorywoda ix

Short Table of Contents The Class Action Experience in Israel and the Value of Having a Representative with a Personal Claim 189 Michael M. Karayanni Class Arbitration in Europe? 209 Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo C. Case Studies on Cross-Border Collective Redress Private International Law and Collective Redress The case of Antitrust damage claims 223 Michael Hellner Compensatory Consumer Collective Redress and the Brussels I Regulation (Recast) 241 Cristina González Beilfuss and Beatriz Añoveros Terradas Rethinking Collective Redress, Consumer Protection and Brussels I Regulation 259 Małgorzata Posnow-Wurm Transnational Securities Fraud Class Actions: Looking Towards Europe? 277 Natalia A. Kapetanaki Rome II and the Law of Financial Markets: The Case of Damage Caused by the Breach of Disclosure 291 Sabine Corneloup Collective Redress and Global Governance (Concluding Remarks) 315 Nikitas E. Hatzimihail x

Table of Contents Foreword List of Authors v vii Introduction: Market Regulation, Judicial Cooperation and Collective Redress Lukasz Gorywoda, Nikitas Hatzimihail and Arnaud Nuyts I. Introduction... 1 II. Market Regulation and Private Law in Europe... 4 1. The European Union as a Regulatory State... 5 a) Governance approaches towards public-interest objectives: from Welfare State to Regulatory State... 10 b) Defining Regulation... 12 aa) Social Regulation... 12 bb) Economic Regulation... 13 c) The EU Program for the Regulation of the Internal Market. 13 d) Market Integration as the Key Concept behind the European Regulatory State... 15 2. EU Private Law as Regulatory Law... 17 a) Modern Concept of Regulation... 18 b) Fitting Private Law into the Modern Concept of Regulation 19 III. Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Market Regulation... 24 1. The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice... 25 2. The Brussels I Regulation... 27 a) Objectives and Principles of Brussels I Regulation... 29 b) The Revision Process of the Brussels I Regulation... 30 3. The EU Private Regulatory Law and its Impact on Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters... 32 a) Cross-Border Civil Litigation, Private Enforcement and the European Regulatory Space... 34 xi

Table of Contents aa) Enforcement Rules and the Transformation of Private Law 34 bb) Public Regulation and Private Law Relationships... 35 cc) Civil Procedure and Its Purposes... 36 dd) The Public / Private Divide and the Regulatory Function of European Civil Litigation... 37 ee) Public and Private Enforcement of EU Law... 40 b) Extraterritoriality of Regulatory Regimes... 43 aa) Extraterritoriality of Claims based on Securities Regulation Measures... 43 bb) Extraterritoriality of Competition Law Claims... 44 c) Development of Collective Redress Proceedings... 45 aa) Specific Cross-border Problems in the Practical Application of the Jurisdiction Rules of Brussels I Regulation... 48 bb) Special Rules on Collective Redress to Ensure Effective Enforcement of EU Law... 53 IV. Conclusion... 54 A. The Private International Law of Collective Redress Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Model of the Brussels I Regulation Burkhard Hess 1. Introduction... 59 2. Multiple Claimants... 61 3. Multiple Defendants... 63 4. Collective Settlements... 64 5. Conclusion: The Need for a Coherent Instrument on Cross-Border Collective Redress in the European Union... 67 xii

Table of Contents The Consolidation of Collective Claims Under Brussels I Arnaud Nuyts 1. Introduction... 69 2. Domicile of the Defendant... 71 3. Protective Jurisdiction... 73 4. Special Jurisdiction: Contracts... 74 5. Special Jurisdiction: Tort... 76 6. Parallel Collective Redress Proceedings... 79 Recognition, Enforcement and Collective Judgments Richard Fentiman 1. Preamble... 85 2. Four Issues and Some Deeper Questions... 88 3. The Enforcement of Collective Judgments... 89 4. The Preclusive Effect of Collective Judgments... 91 a) The Risk of Non-preclusion... 91 b) Non-parties and Procedural Justice... 92 c) Indefeasible Rights of Action... 93 d) Absentees and Due Process... 94 e) Contingent Difficulties... 95 f) Interim Conclusions... 96 5. The Status of Collective Settlements... 98 6. Preclusion and Collective Judgments in the EU regime... 100 a) Problems Stated... 100 b) Non-recognition and Public Policy... 101 c) Non-recognition and Due Notice... 101 d) Preclusion and Collective Settlements... 102 7. Conclusions... 105 xiii

Table of Contents a) The Recognition of Foreign Settlements... 105 b) Remission to National Law... 106 c) The Problem of Collective Justice... 107 European Class Actions and Applicable Law Ralf Michaels 1. Introduction... 111 a) Problem and Discussion in the EU... 111 b) The US Comparison... 114 c) Structure of the Analysis... 116 2. Class Action and Applicable Law: Foundations... 116 a) Three Functions of Class Actions... 117 b) The Class Action and multiple potentially applicable laws... 118 c) Existing Proposals... 120 d) The triple problem of private international law:... 122 aa) Consolidation of Claims... 123 bb) Regulation and Compensation... 123 3. Class Certification... 124 a) Legal Background... 124 b) Only nationwide collective redress?... 125 c) A New Choice-of-Law Rule?... 126 d) Certification Despite Potential Differences in Law... 126 4. Applicable Law... 128 a) Application of different laws... 129 b) Consolidation through Choice... 130 aa) Unanimous Choice... 130 bb) Unilateral Choice... 132 cc) Exercise of Choice... 133 c) Consolidation through a new Choice-of-Law Rule... 133 aa) Defendant s incorporation law... 134 bb) Market Most Affected... 134 cc) Average Law... 135 dd) Place of Conduct... 136 ee) General problems... 137 xiv

Table of Contents d) Consolidation through Application of Lex Fori... 138 aa) Lex Fori in Existing EU Private International Law... 138 bb) Lex Fori for Harmonized Law... 139 cc) Lex Fori for Unharmonized Law... 140 5. Policy Suggestions... 140 B. New Perspectives on Collective Redress Collective Redress and Competition Policy Lia Athanassiou 1. Introductory remarks... 145 a) Points of horizontal consensus... 145 b) Collective redress as a tool of competition policy... 147 2. Issues to be addressed in competition claims... 149 a) Identification of the victims... 149 aa) The problem of passing-on and the responses of national laws... 149 bb) Collective litigation and levels of chain... 152 b) Quantification of damages... 154 aa) Techniques of quantification... 154 bb) Quantification on a collective basis: the idea of an approximate compensation... 155 c) Multiplicity of enforcing agents... 157 aa) Decentralized application of competition rules... 157 bb) The role of competition authorities in collective redress... 159 3. Collective redress implications... 160 a) The various profiles of collective actions... 160 aa) One size does not fit all... 160 bb) Gate-keepers and Opt-out mechanisms... 162 b) The appropriate remedies... 165 aa) Compensation as one of the available remedies... 165 bb) Is there a need for distribution?... 166 cc) The Greek model as an example of good intentions... 167 c) Issues requiring a uniform European approach... 168 4. Conclusions... 170 xv

Table of Contents The Emerging EU Legal Regime for Collective Redress: Institutional Dimension and Its Main Features Lukasz Gorywoda 1. Introduction... 173 2. Institutional Dimension of the Emerging EU Regime of Collective Redress... 174 a) Collective Redress Policy Developed by DG SANCO... 175 b) Collective Redress Policy Developed by DG COMP... 177 c) The Joint Work of the European Commission: Towards a Horizontal EU Legal Framework... 179 d) National Models of Collective Redress... 181 e) Conclusion... 184 3. The Main Features of the Emerging EU Regime of Collective Redress... 184 a) Collective Redress is Expected to Improve Enforcement of the EU Law... 184 b) Collective Redress is Expected to Improve Access to Justice. 185 c) Collective Redress Should Not Incentivize Abusive Litigation Practices... 186 4. Conclusion... 187 The Class Action Experience in Israel and the Value of Having a Representative with a Personal Claim Michael M. Karayanni 1. Introduction... 189 2. The Main Requisites for Filing a Class Action under CAL, 2006... 192 a) Preconditions... 192 aa) The Claim... 192 bb) Standing... 192 cc) Procedure... 193 xvi

Table of Contents b) Administering the Class Action... 194 aa) Certification... 194 bb) Adjudication... 195 cc) Withdrawal and Settlement... 196 dd) State Institutions as Defendants in Class Actions... 198 dd) Judgment and Rewards... 199 3. Section Two: Who Should Represent the Class and Why it Matters?... 200 a) Historical Barriers... 201 b) The Value of the Personal Claim in Negative-Value Class Action... 203 c) Has the Israeli Legislature Realized These Objectives in CAL, 2006?... 206 4. Summary and Conclusions... 208 Class Arbitration in Europe? Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo 1. Introduction... 209 2. Class arbitration and multiparty arbitration... 211 3. The scope for class arbitration: what type of cases?... 212 4. The main issues posed by class arbitration... 214 a) Is the notion of a class action compatible with that of arbitration?... 214 b) Consent to class arbitration... 216 c) The waiver of class arbitration... 217 d) Other problems... 218 e) The specific issues of international arbitration... 218 5. Conclusions... 219 xvii

Table of Contents C. Case Studies on Cross-Border Collective Redress Private International Law and Collective Redress The case of Antitrust damage claims Michael Hellner 1. Private Antitrust Damages Claims... 223 2. Jurisdiction the Brussels I Regulation... 225 a) Choice of Court Agreements Article 23... 226 b) Defendant s domicile Article 2... 228 c) Actions in contract Article 5(1)...229 d) Actions in tort Article 5(3)...230 e) Consolidation of Actions Article 6(1)...234 3. Choice of Law... 236 a) Tort... 236 b) Contract... 237 4. Recognition and Enforcement... 238 Compensatory Consumer Collective Redress and the Brussels I Regulation (Recast) Cristina González Beilfuss and Beatriz Añoveros Terradas 1. Introduction... 241 2. Definition of collective redress: injunctive and compensatory actions... 243 3. Collective consumer redress and the Brussels I Recast Regulation 245 a) The domicile of the defendant... 246 b) Jurisdiction in consumer contracts... 246 aa) Applicability of Section 4 Chapter II to compensatory collective redress: representative and group actions... 248 c) Jurisdiction in consumer contracts in matters relating to a contract: art. 7(1) BIR... 252 aa) The application of the proper rules on jurisdiction: lurality of consumers domiciled in different Member States... 253 4. Concluding remarks... 257 xviii

Table of Contents Rethinking Collective Redress, Consumer Protection and Brussels I Regulation 259 Małgorzata Posnow-Wurm 1. The Henkel case connecting collective redress, consumer protection and Brussels I Regulation... 259 2. The material scope of Brussels I Regulation and collective redress: action brought by a person governed by private law v. action brought by a public body... 261 3. The scope of Section 4 of the Brussels I Regulation: collective interest of group of consumers v. the individual consumers interests... 268 4. The scope of points (1) and (2) of Article 7 of the Brussels I Regulation: the case of class (group) actions: consumers as both the party to the action and the party to the relationship concerned by the proceedings... 270 5. Is designing of the new rule on jurisdiction adapted to collective redress in the field of consumer protection possible?... 274 Transnational Securities Fraud Class Actions: Looking Towards Europe? Natalia A. Kapetanaki 1. Introduction... 277 2. The Pre-Morrison Era of Securities Fraud Class Actions Blossom in the United States... 280 3. The Post-Morrison Era of Securities Fraud Class Actions Decline in the United States... 282 4. Is it the Dawn of a European Era for Securities Class Actions?... 286 xix

Table of Contents Rome II and the Law of Financial Markets: The Case of Damage Caused by the Breach of Disclosure Sabine Corneloup 1. Introduction... 291 2. Application of the Rome II Regulation... 298 a) The law of contract (culpa in contrahendo)... 299 b) The law of the place of injury... 300 aa) Difficulty in locating the damage... 300 bb) Inadequacy of the place where the damage occurred... 302 c) The law of the common habitual residence of the parties... 303 d) The law that manifestly presents the closest links... 304 e) The law chosen by the parties... 304 3. Specialization of the rules of the Rome II Regulation... 306 a) Draft proposal... 306 b) The testing of the proposal... 308 Collective Redress and Global Governance (Concluding Remarks) Nikitas E. Hatzimihail 1. Introduction... 315 2. (Re)thinking Collective Redress... 315 (a) Typology of collective redress... 315 (b) Policy considerations... 317 (c) Procedure Mechanisms... 318 3. Problems under the existing framework... 319 (a) Jurisdiction... 320 (b) Parallel proceedings and lis pendens... 322 (c) Recognition and enforcement... 322 (d) Applicable law... 323 4. Conclusions... 325 xx