I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN

Similar documents
NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

State Consumer and Protection Laws Enforcement and Litigation Trends in Texas. September 20, 2011

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

FILED SAN MAteO COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

COMES NOW the State of Texas, by and through the Texas General Land Office, by and

D-1-GN PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Cause No. D-t-GV

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Case 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN DANIEL TRISTAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff. v. TRAVIS COUNTY

CAUSE NO. Mark S. Wolfe, in his Official Capacity as Texas State Historic Preservation

Case 2:13-cv DSF-MRW Document 14 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:150

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

NO. C A AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Superior Court of California

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Case 8:14-cv CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56

Courthouse News Service

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ORIGINAL PETITION FOR EXPEDITED DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

NO. EDMUNDS.COM, INC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 4:16-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Plaintiff, Defendant. JEFF W. REISIG, District Attorney of Yolo County, by LARRY BARLLY, Supervising

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION. STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rel. DUSTIN McDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. v. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

2016CI21911 CAUSE NO. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. COMES NOW GRUPO INTEGRADORA SOLAR, SAPI DE CV (hereinafter, GIS ),

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAUSE NO PC IN PROBATE COURT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff,

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 7:16-cv NSR Document 17 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv FAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATE OF WASIDNGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 4:17-cv Document 1-2 Filed in TXSD on 11/15/17 Page 2 of NO.

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ( PLAINTIFF or the ATTORNEY GENERAL ),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Transcription:

D-1-GN-14-004288 NO.~---~--~- 10115/2014 9:42:58 AM Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-14-004288 THE STA TE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS ROBERT UNDSEY DUNCAN, aka "DR. LINDSEY DUNCAN" Defendant. 53RD ----JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: PJaintiff, the ST A TE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott, complains of Robert Lindsey Duncan, aka "Dr. Lindsey Duncan," Defendant, and for cause of action would respectfully show: CIV.P.190.3. I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Discovery in this case should be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEx. R. 1.2 This case is not subject to the restrictions of expedited discovery under TRCP 169 because: a) The relief sought by the State includes non-monetary injunctive relief; and b) The State's claims for monetary relief including penalties, consumer redress and attorneys' fees and costs are in excess of $100,000 and could exceed $ 1,000,000.00.

II. AUTHORITY 2. This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, at the request of the Commissioner of Higher Education of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, in the name of the ST A TE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted him by TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.320. This action is also brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott through the Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the ST A TE OF TEXAS pursuant to the authority granted by 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. 17.41 et seq. ("DTPA"), upon the grounds that Defendant has engaged in false, misleading and deceptive acts and practices in the course of trade and commerce. Pursuant to 17.47 of the DTPA, the Attorney General is authorized to seek injunctive relief, penalties, and consumer redress for conduct declared unlawful under l 7.46(a) and (b) of the DTP A. Ill. DEFENDANT 3. Defendant Robert Lindsey Duncan, aka "Dr. Lindsey Duncan," ("Defendant" or "Mr. Duncan") is an individual doing business in Texas as a!leged specifically below, and may be served with process at 200 Congress Avenue, Suite 19DE; Austin, Texas 78701. IV. JURISDICTION 4. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under l 7.47(b) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code. v. VENUE 5. Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas for the following reasons: State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan, aka Page 2of10

a) Pursuant to 17.47(b) of the DTPA, venue is proper because Defendant resides in Travis County, Texas; and b) Under the 17.47(b) of the DTPA, venue is proper because Defendant has done business in Travis County, Texas, by promoting and marketing vitamins, herbs and related health products and items at local grocery stores and retail outlets. VI. PUBLIC INTEREST 6. Plaintiff, the State of Texas, has reason to believe Defendant is engaging in, has engaged in, or is about to engage in acts or practices declared to be unlawful under the DTP A; therefore, the Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Texas believes that these proceedings are in the public interest. VII. TRADE AND COMMERCE 7. Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45( 6) of the DTP A. Vlll. NOTICE BEFORE SUIT 8. The Consumer Protection Division informed Defendant in general of the alleged unlawful conduct described below, at least seven days before filing suit, as may be required by 17.47(a) of the DTPA. IX. ACTS OF AGENTS 9. Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that Defendant did any act, it is meant that a) Defendant performed or participated in the act, or Slale o/texf:js v. Undsey Dwncan, afca Page 3of10

b) Defendant's officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. x. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 10.1 Defendant, Mr. Duncan, is in the business of marketing nutritional products, including vitamin and herbal-based supplements. Mr. Duncan promotes himself as a Naturopathic Doctor, referring to himself in speaking engagements, marketing videos, advertisements, articles, interviews and in personal settings by the honorific "Doctor,. or "Dr.,. and "ND." Mr. Duncan claims to have degrees in nutrition or naturopathy. "ND." 10.2 The State of Texas does not recognize the degree of Naturopathic Doctor or 10.3 Further, Mr. Duncan received his alleged degrees from the Clayton College of Natural Health, a non-accredited American distance-learning natural health college based in Birmingham, Alabama, specifically named on a list posted by The Higher Education Coordination Board of "Institutions Whose Degrees Are 11legal to Use in Texas." Clayton College of Natural Health was not accredited in any state during its existence and is now closed. I 0.4 Mr. Duncan uses his alleged degrees and honorific to promote nutritional products with which he has a financial connection. More than one dozen promotional videos and recordings of television appearances have appeared and remain available on the internet in which Mr. Duncan either referred to himself, or others have referred to him with his acquiescence as, "Dr. Lindsey Duncan,,. and/or in which he claims to have degrees in nutrition or naturopathy. 10.5 In addition to the use of the honorific "Dr.," Mr. Duncan presents the appearance of a health practitioner, which he has done in television show appearances, media interviews, speaking engagements, and video promotions, by donning Jab coats and making references to State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan, aka Page 4of10

clinical experience and practice. Mr. Duncan's acts and practices mislead the public into believing that he is disseminating health advice or knowledge, but such advice or knowledge is based on educational background and training which he does not have and when his underlying motivation is to sell products in which he has a financial interest. XI. VIOLATIONS OF TEXAS EDUCATION CODE I I.I Pursuant to its authority, as set forth in TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.027, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board maintains a list of "Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas," which can be viewed on the Board's web site at: http://www. thecb.state. tx. us/index.cfm?obj ectid=ef4c3c3b-eb44-43 81-6673F760B3946FBB 19 TEX. ADMIN. CODE, Chapter 7. The institution from which Mr. Duncan received his degree, Clayton College of Natural Health, is listed therein. 11.2 As determined by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Mr. Duncan's degree from the Clayton College of Natural Health is a "fraudulent or substandard degree," in accordance with TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.302. It is a violation of 19 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 7.5(a)(6) to knowingly use or claim to hold a degree that is fraudulent or substandard in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business or with intent to obtain employment, compensation or other benefit in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation. A violation of this provision is a violation of TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.304, 61.313. 11.3 Moreover, a person who violates subchapter 61 of the Texas Education Code commits a false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice within the meaning of 17.46 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices- Conswner Protection Act. TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. 17.41 et seq.; TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.320. Slate of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan. a/ca Page S of lo

XII. FALSE, MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE ACTS 12. Defendant, as alleged in paragraphs 10.1 to 10.3 above, which are incorporated herein by reference, has in the course of trade and commerce engaged in false, misleading and deceptive acts and practices declared unlawful in I 7.46(a) and (b) of the DTPA, by: a) using or claiming to hold a degree conferred by institution whose degrees are iijegal to use in Texas, in violation of 61.320 of the Texas Education Code; b) referring to himself with the honorifics "ND", "Dr.", or ''Doctor", in violation of TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 61.304 and 61.313 of the Texas Education Code; c) causing confusion or misunderstanding as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services, in violation of 17.46(b )(2) of the DTPA; d) causing confusion or misunderstanding as to affiliation, connection, or association with, or certification by, another, in violation of 17.46(b)(3) of the DTPA; e) representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities which they do not have or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection which he does not, in violation of 17.46(b)(5) of the DTPA; and f) failing to disclose infonnation concerning goods or services which was known at the time of the transaction if such failure to d.isclose such infonnation was intended to induce the consumer into a transaction into which the consumer would not have entered had the information been disclosed, in violation of 17.46(b)(24) of the DTPA. State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan, aka Page 6of10

XIII. REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION 13. l Because the Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated the law as set forth herein. Unless restrained by this Honorable Court, Defendant may continue to violate the Jaws of the State of Texas and cause additional injury, Joss and damage to its Texas insureds and to prospective Texas customers. 13.2 Plaintiff, the State of Texas respectfully requests that this Court (1) set this matter for trial; (2) issue a temporary injunction after notice and hearing and (3) issue a pennanent injunction upon final hearing, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from engaging in the following acts or practices: a. using or claiming to hold a degree or certificate conferred by institution whose degrees are illegal to use in Texas, b. using, claiming the status of, or referring to himself with the title or honorific "Doctor," "Dr.," "N.D." "Doctor ofnaturopathy" or "Naturopathic Doctor," unless and until the State of Texas recognizes these designations and the institutions that confer this degree; c. causing confusion or misunderstanding as to affiliation, connection, or association with. or certification by, another, by using, claiming the status of, or referring to himself with the title or honorific "Doctor," ~ or.," ''N.D." "Doctor of Naturopathy" or "Naturopathic Doctor," unless and until Defendant has received a doctorate from a medical school or other lawful degree granting institution; d. representing that he has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection which he does not have by using the title or honorific "Doctor," "Dr.," ''N.D." "Doctor of Naturopathy" or "Naturopathic Doctor''; State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan. aka Page 7 of JO

e. representing that he has a sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection which he does not have by using the title or honorific, "Doctor," "Dr.," "N.D!' "Doctor of Naturopathy'' or "Naturopathic Doctor'' in the State of Texas; f. disseminating any false advertisements or causing the dissemination of false advertising related to use of the titles or honorifics "Doctor," "Dr.," "N.D." "Doctor of Naturopathy" or "Naturopathic Doctor"; g. failing to provide written notice to any agent, servant, employee, or representative of Defendant of the existence and tenns of any injunction entered in this case, and of their duty to comply with the tenns set forth herein; h. failing to provide written notice to any person or entity who promotes, advertises and/or sells Defendant's products, of the existence and terms of any injunction entered in this case, and of their duty to comply with the terms set forth herein; i. failing to remove signage, internet and website postings, and any other public promotional material that refers to Defendant as "Doctor," "Dr.," ''N.D." "Doctor of Naturopathy" or "Naturopathic Doctor" within seven (7) days of this Order; J. representing, directly or by implication, that this Court, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board or the Attorney General has approved. or does not object to, any good or service sold or offered for sale by Defendant, or has approved, or does not object to, any of Defendant's business practices, including those not addressed by the terms of any injunction or judgment entered in this cause of action; k. transferring, concealing, destroying, or removing from the jurisdiction of this Court any books, records, documents, invoices or other written materials relating to the business State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan. aka Plaintifrs Original Petition Page 8 of to

of Defendant currently or hereafter in Defendant's possession, custody or control except in response to further orders or subpoenas in this cause; and j. transferring, spending, hypothecating, concealing, encumbering or removing from the jurisdiction of this Court any money, stocks, bonds, assets, notes, equipment, funds, accounts receivable, policies of insurance, trust agreements, or other property, real, personal or mixed, wherever situated, belonging to or owned by, in possession of, or claimed by Defendant, insofar as such property relates to, arises out of or is derived from the business operation of Defendant within the State of Texas, save and except for reasonable and necessary expenditures in the ordinary course of business. XIV. REQUEST FOR CIVIL PENAL TIES AND RESTITUTION 14. Plaintiff, the State of Texas, respectfully requests that this Court: a. adjudge against the Defendant civil penalties in the amount of not more than $20,000 per violation of the DTP A, pursuant to TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. l 7.47(c); and b. enter additional orders and judgments against the Defendant as are necessary to compensate identifiable persons for restoration of money which may have been acquired by the Defendant by means of any act or practice restrained, as authorized by TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. 17.47(d). xv. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS OF COURT 15. Plaintiff, the State of Texas, respectfully requests that this Court award the State its costs of this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, as provided by TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. 402.006(c}. State o/texas v. Lindsey Duncan, aka Page 9of JO

XVI. PRAYER 16. Plaintiff, the State of Texas. respectfully prays that Defendant. Robert Lindsey Duncan, aka "Dr. Lindsey Duncan'', be served with citation as required by law and that this Court grant judgment to Plaintiff against Defendant for all relief requested herein and to all other relief to which Plaintiff may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, OREGABBOIT Attorney General of Texas DANIEL T. HODGE First Assistant Attorney General JOHN SCOTI Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation TOMMY PRUD,HOMME Chief, Consumer Protection Division State Bar o. 00794391 JACOB A. PETRY State Bar No. 24088219 Assistant Attorneys General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711~2548 ( S 12) 936-1705 Telephone (512) 463-1267 Facsimile ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS State of Texas v. Lindsey Duncan, a/ca Page!Oof 10