Guide to Ireland s PR-STV Electoral System

Similar documents
How the Dáil is Elected

How Members of Local Authorities are Elected

European Parliament. How Ireland s MEP s are elected

STV-PR Weighted Inclusive Gregory Method Rules for Manual Counting

1. Representation in the European Parliament Constituencies Elections to the Parliament Who can become an MEP?

Elections and Electoral Systems

General Election. The Crean Award: The Activity: Objective: To run a mock election and explore the electoral system. SPICES Social Character

Response Form - Consultation paper 2008/02

Elections Procedures for Determination of Result of Ballot

SENATE (ELECTIONS) ACT, ACT No.7 of 2013

IRELAND. Date of Elections: June 16, 1977

Electoral Scheme for the Election of Architect Members to the Architects Registration Board

EUROPEISKA KONVENTET SEKRETARIATET. Bryssel den 27 februari 2003 (28.2) (OR. en) CONV 585/03 CONTRIB 261 FÖLJENOT

Number 25 of 1997 ELECTORAL ACT, 1997 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

2010 Municipal Elections in Lebanon

Has the time come to reform Ireland s PR-STV electoral system? John Kenny BSc Government III

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA HIGHER EDUCATION (P) DEPARTMENT N O T I F I C A T I O N. NO /P 2/73/H.Edn Dated, Trivandrum, 7th September 1973

James Cook University Student Association Election Guidelines

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT 1993

Titanic Exhibition Centre Count Information pack

Carnegie Mellon University Student Senate Bylaws

Number 38 of 2001 ELECTORAL (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

BY LAWS OF THE ALABAMA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Politics in the Republic of Ireland

BY LAWS OF THE ALABAMA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Last amended on February 25, 2012)

House Copy OLS Copy Public Copy For Official House Use BILL NO. Date of Intro. Ref.

LOCAL ELECTIONS (DISCLOSURE OF DONATIONS AND EXPENDITURE) ACT, 1999 CONSOLIDATED VERSION. Electoral (Amendment) Act 2001 (No.

ELECTION TO THE OFFICE OF VICE-PRESIDENT OF INDIA. FAQs

Barrington Heights Homeowners Association ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP MEETING AND VOTING RULES (Civil Code Section ) Effective October 16, 2008

Elections and referendums

Compare the vote Level 3

The Georgia Green Party Nominating Convention Rules & Regulations

Compare the vote Level 1

Elections in Nepal 2018 National Assembly Elections

Electoral Reform Brief

THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL (No. XXII of 2018) Explanatory Memorandum

BY LAWS OF THE ALABAMA REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

CONSTITUTION OF THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF BIOLA UNIVERSITY

Designing for Equality

Podgorica, april godine

Amended by the Green Party State Committee at its meeting held in Rensselaer, New York on May 18, 2013.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FEDERAL CODE OF ELECTORAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES OF MEXICO

CONSTITUTION OF THE BIOLA UNIVERSITY STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

PARTY VOTE LEAKAGE IN WARDS WITH THREE CANDIDATES OF THE SAME PARTY IN THE SCOTTISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS IN 2012

ASSESSMENT OF THE LAWS ON PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (FRY)

NEVADA STATE DELEGATE SELECTION PLAN

Electoral Reform National Dialogue INFORMATION BOOKLET

Electoral System Design Database Codebook

Electoral systems for the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales

Niamh Hyland SC. The Citizens Assembly

#1 RE: IN-PERSON MEETINGS OF THE PACIFICA NATIONAL BOARD

The source of authority in a referendum democracy

REGULATIONS ON REPRESENTATION OF THE STAFF OF THE UNITED NATIONS AT GENEVA*

A New Method of the Single Transferable Vote and its Axiomatic Justification

The Electoral Law of the PRC for the National People s Congress [NPC] and Local People s Congresses at All Levels

RANKED VOTING METHOD SAMPLE PLANNING CHECKLIST COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE 1700 BROADWAY, SUITE 270 DENVER, COLORADO PHONE:

BYLAWS OF THE LAVA RANCH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND THE LAVA RANCH BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY - HOW TO ACHIEVE IT

Green Party of California Bylaws Committee ADOPTED BYLAWS. (Amended August 1999)

GUIDE TO VOTING. An Easy to Read Guide

Green Party of California

SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM FOR THE 2004 INDONESIAN GENERAL ELECTION ANSWERED

Information from the. Essential Features of the System of Local Government Elections in Lower Saxony

SAMPLE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS for LOCAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONS IN TENNESSEE. (Amended September 2013)

The impact of different voting systems on the type of government, party representation and voter choice

Third Evaluation Round. Evaluation Report on Ireland Transparency of Party Funding

Constitution of the. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Students Union

Easy Read Creating a Parliament for Wales

PLAN OF ORGANIZATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, INC.

Why do people vote? Instrumental Voting (1)

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA. Pat Mullins, Chairman Lee Goodman, General Counsel Dave Rexrode, Executive Director. Plan of Organization

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA. John H. Hager, Chairman John Padgett, General Counsel Charles E. Judd, Executive Director. Plan of Organization

Teacher s guide. Ngā Pōti ā-taiohi Youth Voting 2019 for the local government elections

SUPPLEMENTAL RULES 2016 STATE CONVENTION REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS

Laura Matjošaitytė Vice chairman of the Commission THE CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL: POSSIBLE CHANGES TO ITS ELECTORAL SYSTEM

Elections in Egypt May Presidential Election

NEVADA STATE DELEGATE SELECTION PLAN

Constitution of the Board for Sports Activities (as passed by the S.A.C. at its Meeting held on 13 th February, 2013, incorporating)

PROPOSED RULE CHANGES

BY-LAWS OF THE AUGUSTA COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

CONSTITUTION THE STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC. SEIU, LOCAL 1984 CTW, CLC

FACE - By-Laws SETON HALL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES

STATUTES (as of )

President National Assembly Republic of Slovenia France Cukjati, MD. LAW ON ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY official consolidated text (ZVDZ-UPB1)

MJC ACADEMIC SENATE BYLAWS

FACULTY STATUS COMMITTEE

BY-LAWS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF WISCONSIN

Rules for Counting Votes and Ascertaining the Results of an Election

- The Fast PR System is a proportional representation (PR) system. Every vote counts. But it offers significant differences from other PR systems.

Democratic Party of Oregon District and State Convention rules for the 2016 delegate selection process

The Constitution of the University Faculty. Bylaws of the University Faculty PREAMBLE... 15

South Windsor Swim & Tennis Club, Inc. Post Office Box 534 South Windsor, Connecticut 06074

Executive Summary. candidates.

Carnegie Mellon University Student Senate Bylaws

Bylaws of the National Education Association of the United States

Kenya Gazette Supplement No nd November, (Legislative Supplement No. 54)

MJC ACADEMIC SENATE BYLAWS

MINISTERIE VAN ONDERWIJS EN VOLKSONTWIKKELING. Afdeling Vertalingen vrt/ No. 73 OFFICIAL GAZETTE. of the REPUBLIC OF SURINAME

Transcription:

Guide to Ireland s PR-STV Electoral System 1. Overview Voting at Presidential, Dáil, Seanad, European and local elections is by secret ballot on the principle of proportional representation in multi-seat constituencies (Ireland is a single constituency at a Presidential election), each elector having a single transferable vote. 2. Voting is straightforward - You vote for candidates in order of preference. You mark the ballot paper by putting 1 opposite the name of your first choice candidate and, if you wish, 2 opposite the name of your second choice and so on. - What you are saying is: "I want to vote for candidate A. If the situation arises where A does not need my vote because he/she has been elected or excluded from the count, I want my vote to go to candidate B." And so on. - This system gives you a wide degree of choice. You can choose between candidates of different parties or non-party candidates and you can order your preferences, as you wish. - Only one of the preferences in your vote is active at a time. The vote stays with your first preference candidate unless and until he/she does not need it any more (either because he/she has been elected or excluded from the count). If your vote is transferred, it passes to your next highest preference for a candidate still in the running. Your vote could transfer a number of times at the same election to your lower preference candidates. 3. The count is more complex. It is divided into a number of stages. I. Opening the ballot boxes Each ballot box is opened separately and the ballot papers in each box are counted and compared with the total number of ballot papers issued for that box - this is done to check that ballot papers have not been put into or taken out of the box since the poll closed. The number of ballot papers in each box are added together to determine the total poll. Individual ballot papers are not examined at this stage but the "tallymen" note the first preference on each ballot paper as it is counted. [1]

II. First Count All the ballot papers are mixed and then sorted according to first preferences, setting aside the invalid papers. The quota is then calculated. This is the minimum number of valid votes each successful candidate must get to be elected. The quota is calculated as the minimum number of votes, which will fill the seats available and no more. For example, in a three-seat constituency, the quota is a quarter of the valid votes, plus one - only three candidates can get this number of votes. In a four-seater, the quota is a fifth of the valid votes, plus one, and so on. The formula for calculating the quota is: divide the valid votes by the number of seats plus one, ignore any fraction and add one. As an example, if there are 1,000 valid votes and 4 seats, the quota is calculated as follows: 1,000 + 1 = 201 4 + 1 This is the lowest number of votes which four candidates can obtain (804) but five cannot (1,005). Any candidate whose first preferences equal or exceed the quota is deemed elected. The first count is generally the only time the votes of all candidates are examined and sorted. The second and subsequent counts at a PR-STV election involve either the distribution of the surplus of an elected candidate or exclusion of the lowest candidate(s) and distribution of his/her/their votes. [2]

III. Surplus distributions A candidate's surplus is the number of votes he/she has over the quota. Generally surpluses are distributed before candidates are excluded. The rule is that a surplus must be distributed in the next count if it meets one or more of the following conditions: Can elect the highest continuing candidate, Can bring the lowest candidate level with or above the second lowest candidate If there is more than one surplus and the largest surplus on its own does not meet any of the above conditions, the largest surplus must be distributed on its own in the next count if the sum of the surpluses meets one or more of the conditions. The question of whether a surplus must be distributed is considered afresh after each count on the basis of the surplus(es) then available. After a surplus has been transferred, any candidate who reaches or exceeds the quota as a result is deemed elected. Following the distribution of the surplus, the elected candidate is left with an exact quota of votes that he/she retains for the duration of the count. See section VIII for further elaboration of the rules for distributing a surplus. IV. Overview of the surplus distribution procedure An elected candidate's surplus is distributed based on the next available preferences for continuing candidates (i.e. candidates not elected or excluded) contained in the last parcel of votes that brought the elected candidate over the quota. In the case of a surplus arising on the first count, this parcel is made up of all the elected candidate's first preferences. In any other case, only the last parcel of votes received by the elected candidate is involved. Where all the next preferences in the last parcel of votes received by the elected candidate cannot be distributed because they exceed the surplus, the surplus votes are distributed to candidates still in the running in proportion to each one s share of next preferences in that parcel of votes. The votes for inclusion in the surplus are taken from the top of each candidate's sub-parcel of next preferences made up from the last parcel of votes received by the elected candidate. [3]

V. Detailed surplus calculations All the votes in the last parcel of votes received by the elected candidate are sorted into sub-parcels according to the next available preferences, setting aside those that do not transfer to any candidate. The total number of transferable papers is calculated. The manner in which the surplus is then distributed depends on whether the number of transferable papers is greater than the surplus (this is usually the case in the early stages of a count); the number of transferable papers is equal to the surplus (this happens infrequently), and the number of transferable papers is less than the surplus (this is usually the case in the later stages of a count). Where the number of transferable papers is greater than the surplus, only a proportion of them can be included in the surplus distribution. This proportion is calculated by working out the ratio of the surplus to the total number of transferable papers and applying that ratio consecutively to the total number of next preferences for each candidate still in the running. This calculation gives the number of next preferences for each candidate that should be included in the surplus distribution. The resultant number of next preferences for each continuing candidate to be transferred as part of the surplus distribution is taken from the top of his/her sub-parcel of next preferences made up from the last parcel of votes received by the elected candidate. As an example, if candidate A was 6 votes short of the quota and then got 10 votes in a particular count, he/she would have a surplus of 4 votes. The 10 votes that got him/her elected are examined and 8 are found to be transferable, viz. 6 to candidate C and 2 to candidate D. The ratio of the surplus of 4 votes to the 8 transferable papers in A's last parcel of votes is 0.5. This ratio is applied to the sub-parcels of next preferences for candidates C and D. Thus, the votes transferred in the distribution of A s surplus of 4 votes are the top 3 votes in the sub-parcel of next preferences for candidate C, together with the top vote in the sub-parcel of next preferences for candidate D. In this situation, the quota of votes retained by the elected candidate following the surplus distribution comprises all the papers credited to him/her up to the count immediately before he/she was elected, and - from the last parcel of votes that brought him/her over the quota all the non-transferable papers and the transferable papers that were not actually transferred in the surplus distribution. The non-transferable papers retained by [4]

the elected candidate are regarded as effective because they form part of the quota of votes held by him/her. Where the total number of transferable papers is equal to the surplus, all the transferable papers are included in the surplus distribution. In this situation, the quota of votes retained by the elected candidate whose surplus is being distributed is made up entirely of non-transferable votes. Where the total number of transferable papers is less than the surplus, all the transferable papers are included in the surplus distribution. As the transfer of these papers leaves the elected candidate with more than a quota of votes, that number of nontransferable votes equal to the difference between the number of transferable papers and the surplus is removed from him/her. The papers concerned are designated as nontransferable papers not effective because they are no longer credited to any candidate. The quota of votes retained by the elected candidate for the duration of the count is made up entirely of effective non-transferable votes. VI. Exclusion of lowest candidate(s) If there is no surplus available or the distribution of a surplus is prohibited, the lowest candidate(s) is/are excluded and his/her/their votes distributed. The two or more lowest candidates must be excluded together where it is clear that they will be excluded in turn in any event, i.e. where the sum of their votes, plus any available surplus(es), is less than the number of votes credited to the next lowest candidate. Where this rule does not apply, the lowest candidate only is excluded. All transferable votes of the excluded candidate(s) are distributed to candidates still in the running in accordance with the next available preferences shown on them. All non-transferable papers of the excluded candidate(s) are set aside and designated as non-transferable papers not effective because they are no longer credited to any candidate. Any candidate reaching or exceeding the quota following this distribution of votes is deemed elected. See section VIII for further elaboration of the rules for excluding the two or more lowest candidates together. [5]

VII. Filling of last seat(s) The process of distributing surpluses or excluding the lowest candidate(s) and distributing his/her/their votes is continued until all seats in the election are filled. The count can be finished without distributing either an available surplus or the votes of excluded candidates where it is clear which candidate(s) is/are eventually going to fill the remaining seat(s) and which candidate(s) has/have no chance of being elected. When this happens, candidates are deemed elected without reaching the quota. A common example of this is where there are three continuing candidates, two unfilled seats and no available surplus. The lowest continuing candidate is excluded and the remaining two candidates are deemed elected to fill the last seats. Alternatively, if there was an available surplus in this situation that could not bring the lowest candidate level with or above the second lowest candidate, the two highest continuing candidates would be deemed elected to fill the last seats. VIII Recoupment of election expenses Candidates at most elections qualify for recoupment of their election expenses (up to a maximum of 6,348 at a Dáil election) provided the number of votes they receive at the count exceeds one-quarter of the quota. There are extra count rules to those outlined above designed to give candidates every chance of reaching this vote threshold. Thus, a surplus must be distributed if it could qualify the lowest candidate for recoupment of election expenses (see section III) and the lowest candidates must be excluded separately if this could possibly qualify any of them for recoupment of election expenses (see section IV). Also, any surplus(es) available after all seats have been filled must be distributed if it/they could possibly give any continuing candidate enough votes to qualify for recoupment of election expenses (see section VII). The election expenses threshold is calculated differently at a bye-election to ensure that it is broadly comparable to the threshold that applied at the general election in that constituency. IX. Recounts The returning officer can decide at any time to re-examine and recount all or any of the ballot papers and change results already announced. [6]

Candidates can request a re-examination and recount of any particular count after it is completed. A recount of this nature involves examining all papers relevant to that count and moving papers to correct any errors. Candidates can also, before the result is formally declared, request a total recount of all votes. This involves re-examining and recounting all parcels of ballot papers as they stand when the recount is called for. If a significant error is found (i.e. one which is likely to change who is elected), then all the ballot papers must be counted afresh from the point at which the error occurred. X. Declaring result When all seats have been filled and any recounts are concluded, the returning officer formally declares who has been elected. Once this is done, the only way a person can question the election result is by presenting an election petition to the High Court within 28 days of the result being declared. 4. Legislation The law relating to voting and vote counting is set out in the legislation governing the elections concerned viz. Presidential elections: Presidential Elections Act, 1993 (No. 28 of 1993). Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2006 (No. 33 of 2006) Dáil elections: Electoral Act, 1992 (No. 23 of 1992). Electoral Act 1997 (No. 25 of 1997) Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2001 (No. 38 of 2001). Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2002 (No. 4 of 2002) Seanad elections: Seanad Electoral (University Members) Act, 1937 (No. 30 of 1937). The counting rules here differ on points of procedure and detail from those outlined above. Seanad Electoral (Panel Members) Acts, 1947 (No. 42 of 1947) and 1954 (No. 1 of 1954). The counting rules here are adapted from those outlined above to take account of the relatively small electorate. [7]

European elections: European Parliament Elections Act, 1997 (No. 2 of 1997). Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2001 (No. 38 of 2001). Local elections: Local Elections Regulations, 1995 (S.I. No. 297 of 1995) made under the Local Government Act, 1994 (No. 8 of 1994). Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2001 (No. 38 of 2001). Franchise Section, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government January 2007. [8]