Basics of Internet Defamation. Defamation in the News

Similar documents
Free Speech on the Internet Jeremy D. Mishkin

Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, Allegheny County. Reunion Industries Inc. v. Doe 1. No. GD March 5, 2007

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

How to Keep Your Clients (and Yourself!) From Getting Sued for Defamation

Answer A to Question Statements of Opinion May Be Actionable in a Defamation Action

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. S. Ct. Case No.: SC15-1 District Court Case No.: 4D MEDYTOX SOLUTIONS, INC., SEAMUS LAGAN and WILLIAM G.

Case 2:15-cv ER Document 152 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA O R D E R

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

DEFAMATION INSTRUCTIONS Introduction

Understanding New Attacks on Section 230 Immunity

2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

DEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1

Nevada Right to Publicity Statute I. ISSUES PRESENTED. The client has requested research regarding Nevada s right to publicity statute

Case 1:15-cv PGG Document 9 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 5

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Case 7:06-cv TJM-GJD Document 15 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiff, Defendants. DECISION & ORDER

D R A F T : N O T F O R D I S T R I B U T I O N

Robert McClenaghan v. Melissa Turi

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2017 PA Super 292 OPINION BY MOULTON, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 08, Howard Rubin appeals the October 20, 2015 order entered in the

authorities noted in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, declaration of counsel,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 20 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 8. : Plaintiffs, : : : Defendants. :

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SUBPOENA QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION LONDON, UK

PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENT

Petitioner, Index No: /07

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SCRIPPS MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 3:08-cv HA Document 64 Filed 12/18/2008 Page 1 of 20

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

EXPERT ANALYSIS Understanding New Attacks On Section 230 Immunity

Fundamental First Amendment Issues in Relation to On-Line Liability

1. Consider standing 2. Consider the three elements to make out a prima facie case 3. Consider defences 4. Consider remedies

IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Defamation. Fordham Law Review. Jessica R. Friedman. Volume 64 Issue 3 Article 8. Recommended Citation

JOHN DOE, Petitioner,

JEFFREY W. THARPE, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. MCCLANAHAN FEBRUARY 28, 2013 J. HARMAN SAUNDERS, ET AL.

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv PGG Document 16 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS. Appellate Court Cause: 49A PL-00234

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION. v. Calendar 1

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT

AOL, INC., Appellant. DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellees No WDA 2012

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

in the United States Courthouse, 312 N. Spring St., Los Angeles, CA Pursuant to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Media Today 5th Edition Chapter Recaps & Study Guide. Chapter 5: Controls on Media Content: Government Regulation, Self-Regulation, and Ethics

Dodging the Communications Decency Act when Analyzing Libel Liability of On-line Services:

LUNNEY V. PRODIGY SERVICES CO.

New York Central Mutual Insura v. Margolis Edelstein

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/17/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/17/2013

Case3:09-mc SI Document20 Filed05/17/10 Page1 of 9

Case3:14-cv WHO Document64 Filed03/03/15 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division

This memorandum of law is submitted by Intervenor John Doe in support of

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 1 May Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 19 July 2011 by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ORDER

7.21 JONES ACT COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE (Approved pre-1985) If in accordance with the principles of law heretofore given you, you find that

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Case4:10-cv CW Document26 Filed08/13/10 Page1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

Case 2:16-cv JCZ-JVM Document 6 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1815 N. Fort Myer Dr., Suite 900 Arlington, Virginia (703)

IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

: : Plaintiff James Tagliaferri, acting pro se, sues Matthew J. Szulik and Kyle M. Szulik

IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CA

Case 6:14-cv RBD-TBS Document 47 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID 243 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Judge CASE. Civil Action PETITION FOR RELIEF IN DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Case 1:13-cv FDS Document 12 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) ) Civil No. v.

Topic 1: Freedom of Speech.

William E. Buelow III*

Media Today 6th Edition Chapter Recaps & Study Guide. Chapter 5: Controls on Media Content: Government Regulation, Self-Regulation, and Ethics

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

Case 1:12-cv UU Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 2:16-cv LDD Document 30 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Compelled Self-Publication in the Employment Context: A Consistent Exception to the Defamation Requirement of Publication

Defamation and John Does: Increased Protections and Relaxed Standing Requirements for Anonymous Internet Speech

Strict Liability Versus Negligence: An Economic Analysis of the Law of Libel

Case 3:10-cv N Document 2-2 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 29

Regis Insurance Co v. AM Best Co Inc

Chardno Chemrisk, LLC v Foytlin 2014 NY Slip Op 32548(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: Anil C.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Privacy & the media. Traditional and emerging protections in an online world.

Defamation and Social Media An Update

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

RECEIVED by MCOA 5/12/2015 3:43:21 PM

Case 2:11-cv CJB-ALC Document 63 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NUMBER:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:12-cv JAG Document 22 Filed 06/13/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 240

Free Speech Issues in Technology Part 3 Threats, Hate Speech, Violence in Video Games, & Defamation

Transcription:

Internet Defamation 2018 Basics of Internet Defamation Michael Berry 215.988.9773 berrym@ballardspahr.com Elizabeth Seidlin-Bernstein 215.988.9774 seidline@ballardspahr.com Defamation in the News 2

Defamation in the News 3 What Is Defamation? def a ma tion /defəˈmāsh(ə)n/ noun The action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel. 4

Defamation Statute 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. 8343, 8344 Elements and Burdens Outmoded in Light of First Amendment Construed by Common Law 5 Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 6

Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 7 Defamatory Harmful to Reputation Grievously Fracture Standing in Community Not Mere Embarrassment Question of Law 8

Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 9 Statement of Fact Factual Statements Are Actionable Opinions Are Protected No Wholesale Defamation Exemption for Anything that Might be Labeled Opinion 10

Fact v. Opinion Fact: - Can Be Proven True or False Opinion: - Cannot Be Proven True or False - Rhetorical Hyperbole - Conclusion Based on Disclosed Facts 11 Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 12

Material Falsity Substantial Truth is Protected - Same Gist or Sting as Truth - Ascertained at Time of Publication Falsehood Must be Material - Different Impact on Mind of Reader 13 Reasonable Meaning Meaning Reasonable Reader Would Understand Publication Intended to Express Natural Meaning of Words In Context Entire Publication Reasonable Implications Question of Law 14

Twitter Example #1 Boulger v. Woods, 2018 WL 527009 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2018) 15 Twitter Example #2 Woods v. Doe (Cal. Super. 2016) 16

Twitter Example #3 Jacobus v. Trump, 156 A.D.3d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017) 17 Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 18

Of and Concerning Plaintiff Must Be About Plaintiff Does Not Have to Identify Plaintiff by Name Can People Familiar with Plaintiff Identify Her from the Context? Small Group Defamation 19 Of and Concerning Example #1 Cheney v. Daily News, 654 F. App x 578 (3d Cir. 2016) 20

Of and Concerning Example #2 Elias v. Rolling Stone, 872 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. 2017) 21 Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 22

Fault Plaintiff s Burden Fault Standards: - Private Figures: Negligence - Public Officials and Public Figures: Actual Malice 23 Who Is a Public Figure? All-Purpose Public Figures Limited-Purpose Public Figures - Individuals: Thrust Self into a Public Controversy - Companies: Overlap Between Promotional Message and Alleged Defamation 24

Actual Malice Knowing Falsehood Entertained Serious Doubts About Truth Acted with High Degree of Awareness that Statements Were Probably False 25 Actual Malice Example Palin v. New York Times, 264 F. Supp. 3d 527 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) 26

Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 27 Injury Joseph v. Scranton Times L.P., 129 A.3d 404 (Pa. 2015) Falsehood Must Cause Actual Injury Private Figure Must Show Reputational Harm - Emotional Distress/Economic Loss Presumed Damages Only if Actual Malice 28

Elements of Defamation Defamatory Statement of Fact Materially False (Not Substantially True) Of and Concerning Plaintiff Defendant at Fault Causing Injury to Plaintiff Published to Third Parties 29 Publication One-Year Statute of Limitations Single-Publication Rule: Only One Claim Per Publication Republication Rule: Liability for Republishing Defamatory Statement 30

Publication Linking is Not Republication In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 690 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2012) Liking is Not Republication Slozer v. Slattery, 2015 WL 7282971 (Pa. Super. Nov. 18, 2015) 31 Privileges Absolute Qualified Fair Report Privilege Fair and Substantially Accurate Summary of Government Proceedings or Documents 32

Fair Report Privilege Example Adelson v. Harris, 402 P.3d 665 (Nev. 2017), 876 F.3d 413 (2d Cir. 2017) 33 Publishing on the Internet General Rule: Rules of Defamation Apply on the Internet Exception: User-Generated Content (Communications Decency Act 230) 34

Before Section 230 Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Service Co., 1995 WL 323710 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995) 35 Section 230 No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. 36

Section 230 Information Content Provider = any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service 37 Anonymous Speech The First Amendment and The Philadelphia Lawyer 38

Unmasking Anonymous Posters Pilchesky v. Gatelli, 12 A.3d 430 (Pa. Super. 2011): Notice Sufficient Evidence for Prima Facie Case Affidavit of Good Faith and Necessity Balancing Test 39 Unmasking Anonymous Posters Javens v. Does (1) (6), 2017 WL 3314269 (Beaver Cty. C.C.P.): Four-Part Test Pennsylvania Reporter s Shield Law 40

Post-Judgment Unmasking Signature Management Team v. Doe, 876 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2017): Public Interest in Disclosure - Defamation or Copyright? Plaintiff s Need to Identify Defendant Will Disclosure Chill Protected Speech? 41