In Belgium, several national texts exist, including a Federal Act on conservation of

Similar documents
XVIII MODEL LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

The protection of cultural property in Romania is ensured through an extensive and complex normative system (Annex I).

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

PERIODIC REPORT BY ESTONIA

- 1 - Implementing the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols: legal and practical implications. Patrick J Boylan, City University London, UK

SLOVAKIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of Ratification of the Convention

PANEL 18 ILLEGALLY TRADED CULTURAL ARTIFACTS: WILL THE MUSEUMS SHOWING ANCIENT ARTIFACTS BE EMPTY SOON? Malcolm (Max) Howlett, Sciaroni & Associates.

Periodic Report by Canada on Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its Protocols

MACEDONIA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

Report on the national implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols

Contact Person Surname Solomidou-Ieronymidou First Name Marina Address 1 Museum Street Postal Code 1516

The National Council of the Slovak Republic has adopted the following act: Article I. 1 Scope of act. 2 Basic concepts

UNESCO Heritage Conventions

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

I. The 1954 Hague Convention

Directive for the Military Protection of Cultural Property and the Military Safeguarding of Cultural Heritage

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

REPUBLIC OF KOREA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

Emergency Safeguarding of the Syrian Cultural Heritage Project

REPORTING COUNTRY: The Republic of Lithuania REPORTING PERIOD:

Patrick Boylan, Professor Emeritus of Heritage Policy and Management, City University London

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/69/489)]

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 (with reference to its provisions)

Ac t on the Protection of Cultural Property

World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council Satellite meeting 31 July - 1 August 2003

FORMAT FOR NATIONAL REPORTS. Four-year cycle

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE ARCHEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, AND ARTISTIC HERITAGE OF THE AMERICAN NATIONS

PROPOSAL FOR A NON-BINDING STANDARD-SETTING INSTRUMENT ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE ROLE OF MUSEUMS AND COLLECTIONS

Concluding observations on the report submitted by Belgium under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention*

[No. 73 of 2016] Mar a tionscnaíodh. As initiated

MODEL LAW ON THE EMBLEMS

Model law 1 concerning the use and the protection of the emblem of the red cross, the red crescent and the red crystal 2

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

UNESCO CONCEPT PAPER

A. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 (with reference to its provisions)

SUMMARY. This agenda item has no financial and administrative implications. Action expected of the Executive Board: proposed decision in paragraph 3.

Prepared by : The Department of Antiquities of Jordan. (A) In Terms of Inventories of cultural property

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT

(Translation from the French version)

The Parliament has passed the following Act of the Czech Republic: PART ONE PROTECTION OF COLLECTIONS OF MUSEUM CHARACTER. Scope of application

COSTA RICA. I. Information on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention of 1970

KRAM DATED JANUARY 25, 1996 ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE

The Supreme National Council of Camhodia Decision of 10 February 1993 on THE NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AUTHORITY OF C~'\fBODIA

Last profile update: November 2017

Federal Act on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, Disaster or Emergency Situations*

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 11 OF 2010 CONCERNING CULTURAL CONSERVATION BY THE MERCY OF THE ONE SUPREME GOD

Report of France to the United Nations Secretary-General

Measures undertaken by the Government of Romania in order to disseminate and implement the international humanitarian law

DECREE LAW NB. 25 OF NOVEMBER 1937 (*)'

Hundred and sixty-seventh Session

13647/1/15 REV 1 MM/lv 1 DG E - 1C

29. Model treaty for the prevention of crimes that infringe on the cultural heritage of peoples in the form of movable property* 1

LAW ON MUSEUM ACTIVITY

OUTLINE. Source: 28 C/Resolution 3.11 and Article 16 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Trainers and facilitators:

On Protection of Cultural Monuments

1. This Act may be cited as the Cultural Property Act, No. 73 of 1988.

"Ensuring lasting protection against destruction and deterioration for the tangible and intangible cultural heritage of humanity "

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT SIXTH MEETING OF THE PARTIES

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. Destruction of cultural sites perpetrated by ISIS/Da'esh

1994 Agreement on the Protection of the River Scheldt. The Contracting Parties to the present Agreement on the Protection of the Scheldt,

Museums Act. Passed RT I, , 1 Entry into force

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

EU response to the illicit trade in cultural goods

Permanent Mission of Mexico

Prague, February 2017 Prague Model United Nations Conference. Model United Nations Prague z.s. Jaurisova 515/ Prague 4 The Czech Republic

CULTURAL HERITAGE LEGISLATION UNITY VS. DIVERSITY ADV. GIDEON KOREN

Federal Act on the Protection of the Swiss Coat of Arms and Other Public Signs

NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

CULTURAL PROPERTY Act No 73 of 1988

)CUMENT HIGHLIGHTS: A 4.

Key aspects of the new Act on the Protection of Cultural Property in Germany

2 August Law of 2 August 2002 on the supervision of the financial sector and on financial services

International UNESCO-related listing systems, registries or networks in the field of heritage

TABLE OF CONTENTS...p.1

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

CONVENTION ON CULTURAL PROPERTY IMPLEMENTATION ACT

Fifth Expert Working Group on the Preservation of the Bamiyan Site. Aachen, Germany December 2006 RECOMMENDATIONS

Intangible Cultural Heritage Safeguarding System in Vietnam. Nguyen Kim Dung, Expert Ministry of Culture and Information. 1.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 8 July 1987*

UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970)

CONVENTION ON NOMENCLATURE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS IN CUSTOMS TARIFFS

THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS ACT (JERSEY) ORDER 2012

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE D' ASSOCIATIONS NATIONALES D'INGENIEURS Association Sans But Lucratif (en abrégé: FEANI)

1. Introduction. 3. Tentative List. 2. Inventories / lists / registers for cultural and natural heritage. Page 1

Concluding observations on the sixteenth to nineteenth periodic reports of Belgium*

Information concerning the construction of the Khudoni hydropower plant in the Enguri River gorge.

Practice sheet on RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

LAW OF MONGOLIA. 15 May 2014 Government Palace, Ulaanbaatar city LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE. (Amendment)

-1- Translated from Spanish. [Original: Spanish] Costa Rica

NATIONAL MONUMENTS ACT 28 OF 1969

Address by Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO on the occasion of the visit to the Flemish Parliament

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

SECOND PROTOCOL TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT

Federal Act on the International Transfer of Cultural Property

Transcription:

In Belgium, several national texts exist, including a Federal Act on conservation of monuments and sites (7 August 1931), an Act on the national cultural heritage (16 May 1960), and an Act on civil protection (31 December 1963). Some of these texts have been completely or partly abrogated following the transfer of competencies in cultural properties from the federal level to the community and regional levels, and the adoption by these authorities of new provisions. In Belgium, there are several layers of legislation: federal legislation, community legislation (the Flemish Community, the French community and the German-speaking community) and regional legislation (Brussels- Capital region, Flemish Region and Wallon Region). In addition, a program of restoration has been established, particularly concerning roofs, therm, and the update of all fire safety standards. The concerned authorities have their own plans to evacuate cultural properties to identified shelters in case of emergency and / or according to a national evacuation plan. Belgium has several shelters to store and protect its works of art. The Flemish and Wallon areas have each enacted several texts on the protection of monuments and heritage. In the Flemish Community, there are the Decree of 24 January 2003 on protection of movable cultural heritage of outstanding interest and the Order of the Flemish Government implementing the Decree of 24 January 2003 on protection of movable cultural heritage of outstanding interest. Pursuant to that Decree, the Flemish Government is drawing up a list of the movable cultural heritage of the Flemish Community (the list of masterworks ). This list describes all the movable property and collections which must be conserved in the Flemish Community by virtue of their particular archaeological, historic, historico-cultural, artistic or scientific interest for the Flemish Community. The list currently contains 204 individual items and 11 collections. It can be found on the website www.topstukken.be. An English version of this website is being prepared. Cultural property featuring on the list of masterworks may not be exported without prior authorization. The Flemish authorities subsidize any physical acts done to these items of cultural property, on condition that authorization is obtained in advance.

The 11 July 2002 Decree regarding the French Community s cultural heritage and cultural property provides a legal basis for the classification, protection, restoration, inventory and exportation of movable cultural properties within and outside of the European Union. It also specifies forms of pre-emption, and financial and penal sanctions, in the event that these measures are not applied. This Decree is not yet accompanied by an application text on movable cultural properties, but an advisory Commission for movable cultural heritage has been established. Important inventory programs also have been created, some of which are already finished and available online. The law of 7 August 1931 on conservation of monuments and sites (only regarding movable cultural properties), and the law of the 16 May 1960 on movable cultural heritage of the Nation, are still applicable. The Community is working on reforming legislation in the field of protection of movable cultural properties. The government regularly updates and publishes the Register of Protected Monuments and Sites in the Region of Bruxelles-Capitale. In addition, a transitional measure in the COBAT (Code bruxellois de l aménagement du territoire / The Code of Brussels for the Management of the District) permits automatic registration of all monuments built before 1932. Therefore, all of the licensing demands for these properties are submitted for a preliminary approval by the Commission of Local Cooperation for Urbanism, which can require the advice of the experts of the Royal Commission of Monuments and Sites. Other inventories are currently in progress, and museums and archives services have made their inventories available on-line and are working to regroup several collections virtually.

The Parliament of the German speaking Community enacted the following laws: a Decree providing financial support to owners of classified immovable properties (18 March 2002), and the Decree concerning the protection of monuments, small heritage, sites, natural landscapes and archaeological excavations (23 June 2008). The Flemish Region enacted the following laws: - Decree of 3 March 1976, amended on several occasions (most recently on 10 March 2006), on protection of urban and rural monuments and sites, - Decree of 30 June 1993, amended on several occasions (most recently on 10 March 2006), on protection of the archaeological heritage, - Decree of 16 April 1996, amended on several occasions (most recently on 10 March 2006), on protection of rural sites, - Decree of 29 March 2002, amended by the Decree of 10 March 2006, on protection of the nautical heritage. The Walloon Region enacted the following laws: - Decree of 1 April 1999 on the conservation and protection of the heritage, amending and supplementing the Walloon Code on regional development, planning and heritage; - Order of the Walloon Government of 11 May 2006 establishing the list of outstanding immovable heritage of the Walloon Region. All these texts are available on the website http://wallex.wallonie.be or on the website of the Moniteur belge (www.moniteurbelge.be). Belgium has not yet set up any special unit to ensure respect for cultural property within its armed forces, but it appears that the legal counselors of the Armed Forces or civil affairs officers could handle this mission. In Belgium, the Communities and the Regions issued regulations regarding the affixing of the distinctive emblem on classified cultural properties within their jurisdiction: the Ministerial Order (Ministry of Dutch Culture and Flemish Affairs, during the era before the Flemish Government was established) of 1 April 1977 deciding on the design of the distinctive emblem to be affixed to monuments protected by Royal

order, the Order of the Flemish Government of 3 June 1997 deciding on a distinctive emblem for protected sites, the Order of the Flemish Government of 4 June 2004 implementing the Decree of 29 March 2002 for the protection of the nautical heritage (introducing a distinctive emblem for the nautical heritage), the Order of the Walloon Regional Executive of 7 June 1990, the Order of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region of 16 March 1995 and the Order of the Government of the German-speaking Community of 13 March 1995 (this latter exercising the powers of the Walloon Region over immovable heritage situated in the communes within its jurisdiction). In addition, the Commission for the Protection of the Natural Environment and Monuments in the Military Domain affixed distinctive red and green emblems on monuments and natural sites in the military domain. However, the use and value of this marking is limited to the armed forces. The majority of the sites and cultural properties located near Bruxelles and in Wallonie have been designated with a distinctive emblem. The protected properties are systematically indicated on the URBIS (Brussels Urban Information System) plan, which can be consulted the administration, and soon by all citizens, on internet. An educational leaflet on the protection of cultural property in Belgium, written in French and Dutch, has been edited and will be distributed to the authorities of the central government, concerned administrations, and to international institutions such as UNESCO, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International

Committee of the Blue Shield. It contains particular recommendations to improve the implementation of the Convention and its two Protocols. These texts (Protocol II as soon as Belgium will have ratified it) will also be diffused through an internal armed forces database. The protection of cultural property is a part of the military forces education on the law of armed conflict. In addition, following a decree adopted by the French Community Parliament on 12 January 2007, a manual entitled Being and becoming a citizen will be distributed to pupils in their final years of secondary school. This manual, written by a committee of experts designated by the Government of the French Community, will include information regarding the protection of cultural property. Finally, the Belgian Committee of the Blue Shield, a non-profit association set-up in 2000, develops concrete actions to disseminate information to and raise awareness of the general public, to educate and train, and to intervene and prevent disasters. A website is already available, and a survey among professional administrators of cultural property has been done to evaluate disasters suffered and risks identified, in order to elaborate a plan of action for safeguarding cultural property. The Belgian Act of 5 August 2003, criminalizing serious violations of international humanitarian law, as amended by Act of 1 April 2004 and Act of 7 July 2006 and which replaces the former Act of 16 June 1993, introduces an infraction of destruction and appropriation of property (including cultural property) not justified by military necessity as admitted by international law, and carried out on a large scale in an illicit and arbitrary

fashion. It also covers violations detailed in Articles 53 and 85 (4) (d) of Additional Protocol I to the four 1949 Geneva Conventions, which applies to international armed conflicts, and define as crimes a series of acts against cultural property, as well as those in Additional Protocol I, Article 16 of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions. In Belgium, apart from the Federal State, the Flemish and French Communities adopted two decrees (11 July 2002 and 24 January 2003) that established penal sanctions for the crime of the authorised export of protected cultural properties. In Belgium, Chapter III, Title IX, Book II of the Penal Code (Article 510 et. seq.) makes it an offence to destroy, defile or damage properties. These provisions do not, however, directly cover the prohibition in Article 53 of Additional Protocol I to the four 1949 Geneva Conventions.