Why We Need a Better Approach

Similar documents
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2016 ELECTION

1. A Republican edge in terms of self-described interest in the election. 2. Lower levels of self-described interest among younger and Latino

Polling and Politics. Josh Clinton Abby and Jon Winkelried Chair Vanderbilt University

Bias Correction by Sub-population Weighting for the 2016 United States Presidential Election

Who Really Voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012?

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

The Social Policy & Politics Program. August 13, 2012

Update on OFA Grassroots Organizing: Voter Registration and Early Voting

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Romney Leads in Confidence on Recovery But Obama Escapes Most Economic Blame

JEWISH VOTERS AND THE 2008 ELECTION CBS News Exit Poll Analysis June, 2008

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy

POLL RESULTS: Congressional Bipartisanship Nationwide and in Battleground States

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

An Election Year Like No Other:

Obama s Majority and Republican Marginalization

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

Paul M. Sommers Alyssa A. Chong Monica B. Ralston And Andrew C. Waxman. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO.

Trump, Clinton and the Future of the United States of America

The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?

Team 1 IBM UNH

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Volatility to Continue Jim Wiesemeyer Senior VP, Farm & Trade Policy Informa Economics

Keep it Clean? How Negative Campaigns Affect Voter Turnout

What is The Probability Your Vote will Make a Difference?

A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and

Introduction. 1 Freeman study is at: Cal-Tech/MIT study is at

President Donald Trump: how and what next?

Global Macro Strategy: Special Election Report

NextGen Climate ran the largest independent young

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

Political Report: September 2010

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

NABPAC 2016 Biennial Post Election Conference

2008 Democratic Nomination

American Dental Association

YouGov Results in 2010 U.S. Elections

The Path to 270 In 2016, Revisited

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Bayesian Combination of State Polls and Election Forecasts

THE COURSE OF U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. -An Update

National Public Radio The Campaign on the Eve of the Conventions

Background Information on Redistricting

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2014 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

OCTOBER. Presidential Election. Chartbook

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Forecasting the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Should we Have Known Obama Would Win All Along?

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

Ipsos Poll Conducted for Reuters State-Level Election Tracking:

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 20 AT 6 AM

Interpreting the Predictive Uncertainty of Presidential Elections

Redistricting in Michigan

Changes in Party Identification among U.S. Adult Catholics in CARA Polls, % 48% 39% 41% 38% 30% 37% 31%

GUIDING PRINCIPLES THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ELECTRICITY POLICY (NCEP)

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Big Data, information and political campaigns: an application to the 2016 US Presidential Election

A Political Junkie s Guide to the 2016 Elections: What it Means for Minnesota David Schultz, Professor Hamline University

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

National Public Radio The Final Weeks of the Campaign

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Oklahoma, Maine, Migration and Right to Work : A Confused and Misleading Analysis. By the Bureau of Labor Education, University of Maine (Spring 2012)

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

The Next Swing Region: Reapportionment and Redistricting in the Intermountain West

Note: The sum of percentages for each question may not add up to 100% as each response is rounded to the nearest percent.

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Smarter Choices Safer Communities

The US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success

Presidential Election 2016 and its Economic Consequences.

Conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center

State of Local and State Government Workers Engagement in the U.S.

THE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey

SELA Antenna in the United States SELA Permanent Secretary No th Quarter 2007

Voters and the Affordable Care Act in the 2014 Election

Louisiana Poll Results Romney 55%, Obama 34%, Third Party 4% (8% Undecided) Obama re-elect: 32-60% Healthcare reform support hurts 58-33%

In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

The Rising American Electorate

THE DEMOCRATS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE January 5-6, 2008

Hillary Clinton Leading the Democratic Race in California

Lab 3: Logistic regression models

Battleground Districts July 2018 Midterm Survey Immigration Policy Attitudes

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Transcription:

1

Why We Need a Better Approach 2

Why We Need a Better Approach will decide this weekend McCain by half a point Too close to call Obama- Biden Too close to call 3

Why We Need a Better Approach 4

Why We Need a Better Approach 5

Why We Need a Better Approach 6

Why We Need a Better Approach

Why We Need a Better Approach

Why We Need a Better Approach

Why We Need a Better Approach Cherry-Picked Obama Polls Cherry-Picked Romney Polls Obama +5.0 Colorado Romney +3.0 Obama +2.3 Florida Romney +5.3 Obama +6.3 Iowa Romney +1.0 Obama +8.0 Michigan Obama +0.8 Obama +7.0 Nevada Obama +1.7 Obama +6.4 New Hampshire Romney +1.7 Obama +2.0 North Carolina Romney +6.7 Obama +5.3 Ohio Romney +1.0 Obama +7.7 Pennsylvania Obama +2.0 Obama +5.3 Virginia Romney +3.3 Obama +8.0 Wisconsin Obama +0.7

Why We Need a Better Approach Cherry-Picked Obama Polls Actual Results Cherry-Picked Romney Polls Obama +5.0 Colorado Obama +5.4 Colorado Romney +3.0 Obama +2.3 Florida Obama +0.9 Florida Romney +5.3 Obama +6.3 Iowa Obama +5.8 Iowa Romney +1.0 Obama +8.0 Michigan Obama +9.5 Michigan Obama +0.8 Obama +7.0 Nevada Obama +6.7 Nevada Obama +1.7 Obama +6.4 New Hampshire Obama +5.6 New Hampshire Romney +1.7 Obama +2.0 North Carolina Romney +2.0 North Carolina Romney +6.7 Obama +5.3 Ohio Obama +3.0 Ohio Romney +1.0 Obama +7.7 Pennsylvania Obama +5.4 Pennsylvania Obama +2.0 Obama +5.3 Virginia Obama +3.9 Virginia Romney +3.3 Obama +8.0 Wisconsin Obama +6.9 Wisconsin Obama +0.7

The FiveThirtyEight Philosophy Basic Philosophical Principles: 1. Look for consensus in the data 2. Update frequently Today is the first forecast of the rest of your life 3. Quantify and measure uncertainty 4. Combine theory and empiricism. Data-driven, but not reality-blind 12

The FiveThirtyEight Philosophy Look for Consensus Many polls are better than one. Many economic indicators are better than one. 13

The FiveThirtyEight Philosophy Update Frequently Forecasts are updated each day as new data comes in. However, more often than not, it doesn t change much. Laypeople tend to overrate new + near data points (availability heuristic) Professionals sometimes get dug in and make the opposite mistake. 14

The FiveThirtyEight Philosophy Quantify the Uncertainty This seems to be key to people who have achieved gains in forecast accuracy: Weather forecasters Gamblers Incentives for most experts discourage this. 15

Quantify the Uncertainty Flood Prediction: 49 Levee: 51 16

Quantify the Uncertainty Margin of Error: ±9 Flood Prediction: 49 Levee: 51 17

Quantify the Uncertainty 18

The FiveThirtyEight Method Major Steps in Model 1. Calculate polling average in each state 2. Adjust polling average 3. Combine polling model with economic conditions 4. Simulate Electoral College outcomes 19

The Economy and Elections Weight assigned to economic component declines as Election Day approaches. 20

The Economy and Elections 21

The Economy and Elections 22

The Economy and Elections 23

The Economy and Elections 24

The Economy and Elections We use a composite economic index from seven variables: 1. Jobs (payrolls) 2. Inflation (CPI) 3. Stock prices (S&P 500) 4. Industrial production 5. Consumption (PCEs) 6. Personal income 7. GDP (forecasted) 25

The Economy and Elections We use a composite economic index from seven variables: 1. Jobs (payrolls) 2. Inflation (CPI) 3. Stock prices (S&P 500) 4. Industrial production 5. Consumption (PCEs) 6. Personal income 7. GDP (forecasted) 26

The FiveThirtyEight Method Wide variance in pollster quality Only 10% of people respond to polls! Many pollsters miss cellphone voters Pollsters cheat/herd off one another Certain polling firms have persistent and predictable partisan biases. Polling is like golf: there s more you can do wrong than right. 27

The FiveThirtyEight Method When is there a real trend in the race? Textbook example of distinguishing signal from noise. Best way is to look at intra-poll movement, e.g. the Gallup poll moved 2 points toward Romney. 28

The FiveThirtyEight Method Lowess smoother Fitted values 5 10 15 20 25-400 -300-200 -100 0 polluntil bandwidth =.9 29

The FiveThirtyEight Method Lowess smoother Fitted values 5 10 15 20 25-400 -300-200 -100 0 polluntil bandwidth =.05 30

The FiveThirtyEight Method 31

The FiveThirtyEight Method 32

The FiveThirtyEight Method 33

The FiveThirtyEight Method 34