FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE

Similar documents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

Executive Summary Case No 140 of 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH

2. Mr.M.Mohammed Amjad, S/o.Late.Dr.M.Mohammed Ghouse, Aged about 37 years,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO OF 2014 (GM-CPC)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012

Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100. Total number of questions : 8 Total number of printed pages : 5

SECTION 138 NI ACT OUTSIDE THE PURVIEW OF MORATORIUM UNDER SECTION 14 OF IBC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 419/2008 Date of Decision: 05th February, 2013.

Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate : Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Dubey, Sr. S.C. I

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos of 2005 Decided On: Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judg

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No. 581/2003. DATE OF DECISION : 13th March, 2012

State Bank of India. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, and others (and vice versa)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2/2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8398/2013

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus P.V. KANAKARAJ TRADING AS. Through None. % Date of Decision : 05 th December, 2017

Delhi Judicial Services Main Exam 2007 Civil Law II

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Present: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Ujjal Banerjee and Ms. Ankita Sinha, Advocates

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. CM(M) No. 932/2007 and CM(M) No. 938/2007 RESERVED ON: 4.12.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION RSA No. 80/2009 DATE OF DECISION : 20th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2016 (KLR CON)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. RFA Nos. 601/2007 and 606/2007. DATE OF DECISION 10th February, 2012.

GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on : % Date of decision : W.P. (C) No of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO of 2015

Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 7097/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/2113/2012 ========================================== ===============

THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Date of Reserve: Date of Order: CRP No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

CONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant. Versus. Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RSA No.64/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 31st January, 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO OF 2018] VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013

THE LAND ALIENATION ACT (1939)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

M.A. No. 70/Chd/2018 in Stay Application No. l8/chd/2017 (in ITA No. 1560/Chd/2017) Assessment Year:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

Versus. 1. M/s Skyhigh Infraland Pvt.Ltd., SCO No.5, First Floor, HUDA Shopping Complex, Sector 8, Karnal

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + OMP Nos. 495/2007, 496/2007 & 497/2007

A FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2003 NTN 22) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 297 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION PETITION NO.

(27 November 1998 to date) ALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + LPA No.313/2015, CMs 9472/2015, 9476/2015, /2015 SOUTHEND INFRASTRUCTURE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Civil Appeal No of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2018)

Case No. 99 of Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Chairperson Shri Vijay. L. Sonavane, Member Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member

Shri Sadashiv S/o. Sakharam Pol, Aged about 67 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Chinchali, Tal: Raibag, Dist: Belgavi... Respondent

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. W.P.Nos.50029/2013 & 51586/2013 (CS-RES)

ALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981 i * [ASSENTED TO 28 AUGUST 1981] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 19 OCTOBER 1982] (Except s. 26: 6 December 1983) (English

ALIENATION OF LAND ACT NO. 68 OF 1981

THE KARNATAKA COURT-FEE AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Statement of Objects and Reasons: Sections: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No.

ORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH ORDER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2004

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

Direct Tax (Article) Power of ITAT to stay the penalty proceedings where quantum proceeding is pending before it

MUNICIPAL CLAIM AND TAX LIEN LAW - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Aug. 14, 2003, P.L. 83, No. 20 Session of 2003 No

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % 21 st January, versus. Through: CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:

BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORIry MUMBAI COMPLAINT NO: CC Avinash Saraf, Neha Duggar Saraf... Complainant. Versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR... Defendants Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate. CS(OS) 1442/2004 & I.A.7528/2013 (of defendant u/o 7 R-11 CPC)

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crl. MC No.867/2012 & Crl.MAs /2012 Date of Decision:

Transcription:

1 FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE Against three mortgages of agricultural lands situated in villages Pal and Bhatha admeasuring 199 acrea and 1 Guntha, late Shri Sheryarji Burjorji Mody obtained loan of Rs. 18,000/- and 35,000/- respectively in the years 1929 and 1935. On his failure to repay the said loans on due dates, two separate awards and decrees for the recovery of Rs 29,209 and of Rs. 47,670/- were obtained by the Bank in the years 1936 and 1938 respectively from Court of Board of Nominees, Surat. During the recovery proceedings alongwith interest in the revenue court, the said Sheryarji Burjorji Mody offered to sell the said lands in liu of the said loan amount of Rs. 78,251/- alongwith interest. The Bank accepted the offer and purchased the said lands admeasuring 199 Acres and one Guntha through registered sale deed on 18/4/1941 vide registration No. 1035 dated 18/4/1941 in Surat Sub - Registry, Surat. On obtaining decrees from the Board of Nominees, Surat by the Bank for the recovery of the said loan, right of redemption available to the said Mortgager was extinguished in the year 1935 as stipulated in the proviso to section 60 of the T.P. Act, 1882. Consequently thereafter, the relationship between the Bank and Shri Sheryarji Burjorji Mody had ceased to be that of a mortgagee and a Mortgager. In the sale deed dated 18/4/1941, an option

2 was given to the seller Shri Sheryarji Burjorji Mody to purchase the said lands back at the same price by a registered purchased deed within five years (i.e. before 18/4/1946). Shri Sheryarji did not exercise such option. And thus from 18/4/1941, the said lands are in the name of the Bank as an owner in the revenue records till date. Out of the said total lands admeasuring 199 acres and 1 Guntha, the Bank had sold total 163 acres and 23 Guntha in the years 1943, 1947 and 1963 during the lifetime of Shri Sheryarji Burjorji Mody and the purchasers of the said lands are presently enjoying peaceful possession and enjoyment of such sold lands. Shri Sherayrji Mody died on 20/6/1981 and his son Rushi Mody died on 17/5/1986. After 1941, during their life time none of them claimed at any time any ownership right in the said lands. After seventy Years in the year 2011, Rutti Rushi Mody, widow of Sheryarji s son Rushi Mody of Mumbai through her power of attorney holder Shri Pankaj Nathwani of Junagadh, filed a suit No. 43/2011 for the redemption of alleged Mortgage of the said whole lands admeasuring 199 Acres and one Guntha claiming the deed of sale dated 18/4/1941 as a deed of anomalous mortgage and / or Mortgage by conditional sale. In the said suit, in Exhibit 5, status quo was prayed by the plaintiff. The Court of Board of Nominees on 8/8/2011 ordered status quo on Exhibit 5. Against the said order, by way of Revision application

3 No. 134/2011, the Bank approached Gujarat State Co-op Tribunal, Ahmedabad which while allowing Revision application of the Bank, quashed and set aside the order dated 8/8/2011 of the Board of Nominees, Surat. Thus there is no stay thereafter against the bank for sale of the said land. Against the order of the Tribunal vacating the stay, the plaintiff filed Spl. C.A. No. 6144 of 2012 before the High Court of Gujarat Ahmedabad. By an order dated 11/6/2012 the Hon ble Gujarat High Court while confirming the order of the Tribunal, rejected the said petition. Since vacating of the stay by the Tribunal was confirmed by the Gujarat High Court on 11/6/2012, the Bank sold 38243 sq. Mts. from the remaining land on 12/6/2012 and the purchasers of the said land are enjoying peaceful possession and enjoyment. This sale made by the Bank is during the pendency of suit No. 43/2011 before the court of Board of Nominees, Surat. Against the said order dated 11/6/2012 of the Gujarat High Court in Spl. C.A. No. 6144 of 2012, the plaintiff filed LPA No. 872 of 2012 before the Division Bench of the High court of Gujarat. In this LPA, the plaintiff also challenged the sale made by the Bank on 12/6/2012. The Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in its order dated 22/8/2012 in LPA No. 872 of 2012 while making certain observations confirmed the order of the single judge in Spl. CA No. 6144 of 2012 and rejected the petition. Against the said order dated 22/8/2012 in LPA No. 872 of 2012 in Spl. CA

4 No. 6144 of 2012, the plaintiff filed petition for Special leave to appeal (Civil) No. 1812 of 2013 with a prayer for interim relief before the Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court vide its order dated 7/4/2014 dismissed also the said petition. Thus the plaintiff has failed upto the highest court for restoring the stay which was vacated by the co-operative Tribunal. Out of the frustration, resulting from her failure to restore the stay upto the Supreme Court, her POA in suit No. 43/2011 Mr. Pankaj Nathwani of Junagadh, in collusion with and through his two friends filed Spl. Civil Application No. 7681 of 2014 in the High Court of Gujarat challenging the sale from the said lands made by the Bank on 12/6/2012 during the pendency of suit No. 43/2011, on 9th May, 2014. The High Court of Gujarat by its order dated 12/8/2014 not only rejected the said petition but also awarded costs of Rs. 5 (Five) lac and directed the petitioners to deposit the same within four weeks in the Gujarat state legal services Authority failing which the petitioners are warned that necessary proceedings under the Bombay law Revenue code to recover such cost shall be initiated. However against the said order, the petitioners therein have filed LPA No. 1156 of 2014 in Spl. C.A. No. 7681 of 2014 which is admitted and stay qua the costs of Rs. 5 Lacs has been given. Final hearing of LPA No. 1156 of 2014 in Spl. C.A. No. 7681 is pending.

5 Thereafter, on 27-02-2015, overreaching the order dated 07-04-2014 of Supreme Court of India, the Court of Board of Nominees, Surat on an application by the Plaintiff in Lavad Suit No. 43/11 had again granted stay by ordering status quo. Against the said order dated 27-02-2015, the bank approached the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court by way of SPI C.A. No. 4275 of 2015 in which vide order dated 10-03-2015, the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat has stayed implementation, execution and operation of the order dated 27-02-2015 pending admission,/ hearing and final disposal of said petition. Thus there is no stay continuing against the sale of the land for which advertisement is published on 22-04-2016. The said agricultural land was purchased by the Bank as part of its recovery proceedings in the year 1941, i.e. before The Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act, 1948 came into force. The purchasers therefore need not have any worry in this regard. All those who have legal knowledge know that transfer during the pendency of the legal proceedings is not barred in law. However, the little of the purchasers of the said lands shall remain subservient to the rights of plaintiff in the suit No. 43/2011 in the court of Board of Nominees, Surat and subject to any direction which the court may eventually pass therein. The orders in this regard of the Gujarat State Co-op Tribunal in Revision application No. 134 of 2011, No. 98/2011 and No. 86/2013 in Arbitration case No. 43/2011 are available on the website www.spcbl.in.notices of the Bank and The

6 orders of the Gujarat High Court in Spl. C.A. No. 6144, LPA No. 872 IN Spl. CA No. 6144 and Spl. CA No. 7681 of 2014 are available on the websites of the Gujarat High Court and the order of the Supreme Court of India in petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 1812/2012 are available on the website of the Supreme Court of India. The above facts are sufficient for the intending purchasers of lands to appreciate that the propaganda made by anyone is baseless and false. It is further clarified that two orders dated 8/6/1998 and 23/7/2002 of Deputy Collector, Choryasi, Prant, Surat which had impacted the District land records, have been quashed by Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeal) vide his two separate orders dated 7/11/2015. Following the cancellations of the said orders, the Bank has applied to Deputy Mamlatdar, Choryasi and to the Superintendent, DLR, Surat for giving effect of the same in the relevant revenue records and on the map. That also will be carried out in due course of time. Thus, total agricultural land as per original land revenue records (without considering draft TP scheme No. 50) admeasuring 1,13,819 sq. meters shall be restored. GENERAL MANAGER