The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

Similar documents
The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

Uniform protection and rights conferred: towards a limited unitary effect?

The Current Status of the European Patent Package

The Current Status of the Unitary Patent Package

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

The Unified Patent Court explained in detail. Managing Intellectual Property European Patent Reform Forum 19 September 2013 Munich

The Rules of Procedure for the opt-out

European Patent with Unitary Effect

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

Patent Protection: Europe

The German constitutional challenge

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court

Substantive patent law harmonization: focus on grace period

French case law on the consequences of the revocation of a patent on the payment of royalties by the licensee and of damages by the infringer

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

SFIR / AIPPI 31 August Amendment of patent claims in France. Partial revocation of a claim by Court (only possibility until January 1, 2009)

European Patent with Unitary Effect and

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014

The Unitary Patent and UPC is coming soon?

The EU Unitary Patent System in its current state. EU-Japan Policy Seminar 22 November 2016

Patent Infringement Damages in France

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

UNIFIED PATENT COURT (UPC) Einheitliches Patentgericht (EPG) Juridiction Unifiée du Brevet (JUB)

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OF REFORMS

Course of patent infringement proceedings before the Unified Patent Court

Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM: A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN EUROPE

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

European Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court

Olivier MANDEL, Partner, MANDEL & ASSOCIES Law firm

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court. Guide to Key Features & Perspectives

Understanding the Unified Patent Court: The Next Rocket-Docket for Patent Owners?

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

The Unitary Patent Package State of Play

The Unitary Patent Unified Patent Court. Taylor Wessing LLP

The European Patent and the UPC

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION (UPP) PACKAGE

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

European Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook

the UPC will have jurisdiction over certain European patents (see box The unitary patent and the UPC: a recap ).

Lessons learnt 6 February 2015

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions

CROSS-BORDER PATENT DISPUTES: UPC OR ARBITRATION

Rules of Procedure for UPC

17229/09 LK/mg 1 DG C I

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

PUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 1 December /11 LIMITE PI 170 COUR 72 NOTE

Unified Patent Court. Breakfast Seminar Taylor Wessing, London. James Marshall, Dietrich Kamlah and Chris Thornham 10 April 2013, Wednesday

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}

UPC Alert. March 2014 SPEED READ

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April /11 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0094 (CNS) PI 32 PROPOSAL

The Unitary Patent Plan Beta Update on National Case Law in Europe

The life of a patent application at the EPO

AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October Licenses in European Patent Litigation

Patent litigation in Europe Major changes to come. Anne-Charlotte Le Bihan, Partner, Bird & Bird ABPI, Rio de Janeiro August 20, 2013

epi-ceipi Basic Training in European Patent Law

President Ing Paolo MARKOVINA

20 YEARS OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION

Unified Patent Court & Rules of Procedure Where do we stand

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

Unitary Patent Protection, Unified Patent Court, Supplementary Protection Certificate and Brexit

European Patent Litigation: An overview

IS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF

Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

A Guide through Europe s New Unified Patent System

Judicial training in the framework of the Unified Patent Court as a prerequisite for the success of the Unitary Patent System

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents

Patents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy

Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO

European Patent Opposition Proceedings

The European Unitary Patent System

VIRK - Västsvenska Immaterialrättsklubben

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Strategies to protect a market entry against (provisional) injunctions

The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)

Strategies for successful Patent Enforcement in Germany. Michael Knospe, Partner, SJ Berwin LLP

Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court. Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs. I. Proposal for

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

Trademark Protection in Europe

The Opt-Out: Actions You Need to Take

Welcome to the. The. But. The. that in such handled by a team CASALONGA. constituted. Consequently, in. three. Now KPN).

No. prev. doc.: 15819/13 PI 159 European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court - Information by the Presidency

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS

Presumption Of Patent Validity In Patent Litigations The New Trends

Singapore Trade Marks (International Registration) Rules as amended by S 740 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 13, 2014

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

Transcription:

EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011 Pierre Véron Honorary President EPLAW (European Patent Lawyers Association) Paris Lyon What happened in 2010-2011? July 2010 CJEU Advocates General negative opinion December 2010 Enhanced Cooperation (Com Proposal) 2 March 2011 Enhanced Cooperation (Council decision) 8 March 2011 CJEU negative opinion 13 April 2011 Prop. Regulation translation arrangements 13 April 2011 Proposed regulation Enhanced Cooperation September 2011 Draft Agreement Unified Patent Court 23 September Warsaw conference October 2011 Venice Judges conference November 2011 Study Financing Unified Patent Court 2 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 1

What next? 5 December 2011 Competitiveness Council 22 December 2011 Initialling Agreement (Warsaw) 12 June 2012 Signing Agreement 1 January 2014 Entry into force 31 December 2018 End transitional period 3 A changing territory 25 UP (EPO + EU + UP) NON UP (EPO + EU) EPO (NON EU) COE (NON EPO NON EU) (Three different Europes: EU, EPO & UP) 4 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 2

Scope of application Community patent SPC for a Community patent European patent Patent application 5 4 & 5 The Court Court of Appeal optional preliminary request binding decision European Court of Justice Registry Appeal (facts & law)??? optional preliminary request binding decision Local division Local division Central division Regional division Regional division 6 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 3

6 (2a) Panel: 1 st instance local division Member State with < 50 cases 7 6 (3) & (4) Panel: 1 st instance local division Member State with > 50 cases or regional division 8 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 4

6 (5) Panel: Additional technical judge 9 6(6) Panel: 1 st instance central division 10 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 5

7 Panel: Court of Appeal 11 Applicable law 14e(1) 14e(2) 14f-i 39-43 substantive law conflict of law definition of infringement sanctions and damages 12 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 6

15 Jurisdiction Infringement Declaration of non-infringement Revocation Miscellaneous 13 15a (1) Infringement: (a) place of infringement 14 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 7

15a (1) Infringement: (b) defendant s domicile 15 15a (6) Infringement: choice of the parties 16 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 8

15a (2) Concurrence of actions: infringement then revocation The local division has the discretion to: proceed with the infringement proceedings and counterclaim for revocation (with a technically qualified Judge); refer the counterclaim for decision to the central division and proceed with the infringement proceedings; or with agreement of parties, refer the case to the central division 17 15a (4) Concurrence of actions: revocation then infringement The local division may either Proceed with the infringement proceedings, or stay the infringement proceedings, or if parties agree, refer the infringement action for decision to the central division 18 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 9

15a (3) Revocation and non-infringement 19 15a (5) Concurrence of actions non-infringement then infringement The action for a declaration of noninfringement before the central division shall be stayed once an infringement action is initiated within three months before local division 20 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 10

16 Territorial effects of the decision European Patent All the countries where the patent is in force Unitary Patent All UP countries 21 27 Plaintiffs The patentee The exclusive licensee, provided that the proprietor is given prior notice, unless the licensing agreement provides otherwise The non-exclusive licensee cannot initiate proceedings but can join them 22 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 11

29 Language of proceedings: 1 st instance 23 30 Language of proceedings: appeal Language of 1 st instance Court of Appeal Language of the patent (upon the parties agreement) Appeal (facts & law)??? Language chosen by the court and approved by the parties 24 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 12

58 Transitional period 01/01/2014 Entry into operation Unified Patent Court Agreement 31/12/2018 End of Transitional Period 01/01/2014-31/12/2018 Transitional period: 5 years National courts still competent for EP European Patent holders may opt out from Unified Patent Court (withdrawal possible) 25 Rules of procedure (470 rules) Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the European and Community Patents Court 16 October 2009 unpublished (PSPRP) 26 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 13

Rule 8 PSPRP Stages of the proceedings (a) the written procedure; (b) the interim procedure, which may include an interim conference with the parties; (c) the oral procedure, which shall include an oral hearing of the parties; (d) the procedure for the award of damages; (e) the procedure for a cost order. 27 Front loading system? or drips and drabs system? 28 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 14

Interim conference with the JR? 29 Hearing of a witness in person? 30 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 15

Oral hearing Rule 114 Duration of the oral hearing 1. Without prejudice to the principle of proportionality, the presiding judge shall endeavour to complete the oral hearing within one day. The presiding judge may set time limits for parties' oral submissions in advance of the oral hearing, in accordance with the Practice Directions. 2. Oral testimony at the oral hearing shall be limited to issues identified by the judge-rapporteur or the presiding judge as having to be decided by oral evidence. 3. The presiding judge may, after consulting the panel, limit a party's oral submissions if the panel is sufficiently informed. 31 EPLAW concerns Quality and costs? 1. Inexperienced local divisions should be avoided 2. Inexperienced judges should be avoided 3. Rules of procedure should be made available 4. Court fees and reimbursement should be determined now 32 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 16

EPLAW concerns Choice should be available 5. Option for parallel national litigation for EP patents should be possible 6. Longer transitional period 7. Review and termination provisions to be added 33 EPLAW concerns Legal problems 8. Rules on infringement should not be EU law (art. 6 8) 9. Legal privilege to be better protected 10.SPC provisions to be added 34 EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 17

Where will it be located? Paris Munich Luxembourg 35 Pierre Véron Thank you 1, rue Volney 75002 Paris Tel. +33 (0)1 47 03 62 62 Fax +33 (0)1 47 03 62 69 53, avenue Maréchal Foch 69006 Lyon Tel. +33 (0)4 72 69 39 39 Fax +33 (0)4 72 69 39 49 pierre.veron@veron.com www.veron.com EPLAW Annual Meeting Brussels 18