IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:18-cv ECF No. 1 filed 06/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 4:18-cv RGE-SBJ Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Case 1:18-cv PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 09/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ROBERT S AMERICAN GOURMET FOOD, INC., a domestic corporation; & JURY DEMAND

Pacer Service Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. COMES NOW the plaintiff, Heather Tuttle, for a cause of action against defendant

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc, et al Doc. 8 Case 2:10-cv JLR Document 319 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CALHOUN. Plaintiff, Case No

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. The plaintiff, David Lutz, by and through his counsel of record, Brett Dressler, Esq.

Case 2:16-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN JOSE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

COME NOW the plaintiffs JO ANN and MICHAEL SMITH, a married couple, by and. through their attorneys of record, MARLER CLARK LLP and FRANK JENKINS LAW

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DODGE COUNTY BRANCH

Case 2:15-cv DN-BCW Document 111 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

THE PARK DOCTRINE AND PROSECUTION OF MISDEMEANOR VIOLATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT (OR FARMER BILL GOES TO JAIL)

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG. v. Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-33 (BAILEY)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Adelman et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al Doc. 66 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO: ORDER & REASONS. Before the Court is Defendant Florida Gas Transmission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv JRS Document 11 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 487 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Bank of America frames its actions demanding that one of its customers breach a four

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Case 4:18-cv KGB-DB-BSM Document 38 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv RSM Document 14 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 9

Case: LTS Doc#:111 Filed:05/25/17 Entered:05/25/17 13:40:50 Document Page 1 of 6

Case 3:02-cv JAH-MDD Document 290 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 10

Case: 4:13-cv ERW Doc. #: 28 Filed: 04/30/13 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 144

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 74 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

unconscionability and the unavailability of the forum, is not frivolous. In Inetianbor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CASE NO. COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, (Personal Injury) Defendants.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MAT Document 10 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiff.

Case: 4:18-cv RLW Doc. #: 1 Filed: 05/25/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2015 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:14-CV-60-FL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv JRH-BKE Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 12. United States District Court Southern District of Georgia Augusta Division

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION. Defendant.

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable Mary Alice Theiler

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. PAATALO APPELLANT

Case 2:14-cv MJP Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2016 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 10 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2011 Session

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case: 2:14-cv ART Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/14/14 Page: 1 of 13 - Page ID#: 1100

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv MJP Document 22 Filed 04/10/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Meunier et al v. Peanut Corporation of America Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION GABRIELLE and DARYL MEUNIER, Husband and wife, individually, and as Next Friends and Natural Guardians of CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MEUNIER, a minor, Plaintiffs, NO. 1:09-CV-12-WLS v. PEANUT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Georgia corporation; and KELLOGG COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Defendants. AMEND THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT STEWART PARNELL COME NOW the plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys of record, Flynn Peeler & Phillips, LLC and Marler Clark, LLP, PS, and hereby move the Court under FRCP 15(a for leave to amend their complaint to add Stewart Parnell (Parnell as a party defendant. The proposed Third Amended Complaint is attached as Exhibit A, and is incorporated by reference. INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BASIS FOR MOTION The plaintiffs bring this motion in response to events that have transpired since the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. On January 20, 2009, the plaintiffs commenced this action against the above-named defendant Peanut Corporation of America (PCA, for injuries the plaintiffs sustained arising out of a nationwide outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium that has been linked to peanut product produced at defendant PCA s peanut processing plant in Blakely, Georgia. The outbreak has to-date caused 642 culture-confirmed Salmonella infections and at AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 1 Dockets.Justia.com

least nine people have died. The subsequent recall of food items that were manufactured with the defendant PCA s peanut products involves thousands of peanut butter and peanut buttercontaining products. The plaintiffs filed this suit on behalf of the minor plaintiff, Christopher Meunier, who suffered a culture-confirmed Salmonella Typhimurium infection after consuming peanut buttercontaining crackers manufactured by defendant Kellogg and made with peanut product manufactured by defendant PCA. Shortly after the original Complaint was filed, the FDA uncovered twelve instances in 2007 and 2008 when private laboratories hired by defendant PCA tested products for defendant PCA that was positive for Salmonella, a potentially deadly pathogen. Despite these positive test results, defendant PCA, at the direction of its President, Chief Executive Officer (CEO, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO Stewart Parnell, shipped and released the contaminated products into interstate commerce. 1 On February 11, 2009, the Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing titled, "The Salmonella Outbreak: The Continued Failure to Protect the Food Supply." Mr. Parnell was subpoenaed to testify before the subcommittee regarding the Salmonella outbreak associated with peanut products manufactured by his company, PCA. Instead of testifying, Mr. Parnell refused to answer questions posed by members of Congress, citing his Fifth Amendment protection right under the US Constitution against self-incrimination. 1 Prior to the filing of an Answer by defendant PCA, on January 28, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint that added a claim for punitive damages against the defendant PCA. The plaintiffs subeqeuntly sought leave to once again amend their complaint, this time adding defendant Kellogg, the manufacturer of the peanut butter-containing crackers consumed by the plaintiff. The defendant PCA consented to this amendment and a Joint Motion to Amend was filed with this Court. On February 11, 2009, the Honorable W. Louis Sands signed the Consent Order granting the Joint Motion to Amend, and the plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint adding defendant Kellogg to the action. AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 2

At this hearing, numerous e-mails to and from Mr. Parnell were produced in which Salmonella positive test results for PCA s peanut products were discussed. In at least one instance, despite the positive test results, Mr. Parnell gave instructions to turn them loose and had the product shipped and released into interstate commerce. See Parnell e-mails as Exhibit B. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI is currently conducting an investigation regarding possible criminal charges against Mr. Parnell for his involvement in knowingly shipping and releasing Salmonella contaminated products into interstate commerce. Accordingly, the plaintiffs now seek leave to amend their Second Amended Complaint to add Stewart Parnell as an additional defendant in this action. LEGAL AUTHORITY FRCP 20(a provides for the permissive joinder of parties where there exist (1 a right to relief arising out of the same transaction [and] occurrence, and (2 common questions of fact or law. See Grayson v. K Mart Corp., 79 F.3d 1086, 1097 (11 th Cir. 1996. Further, leave to amend to add parties under FRCP 15(a shall be freely given when justice so requires. Id. at 1110. Thus, courts are constrained to allow a plaintiff leave to amend unless there is substantial countervailing reason. Id. The Court should grant the plaintiffs motion to amend to add Mr. Parnell as a party defendant to this suit because he is personally liable to the plaintiffs for conduct amounting to negligence and negligence per se, that was a direct and proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries. It is well established that one who is damaged as a result of a tort that is actually committed by a corporate agent may sue either the individual agent or the corporation or the injured party can sue both. See Smith v. Hawks, et al., 182 Ga. App. 379, 384, 355 S.E.2d 669 (1987. Here, the contaminated product identified as the cause of the outbreak, and the cause of AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 3

plaintiffs injuries, was manufactured by the defendants PCA and Kellogg. Accordingly, the plaintiffs may sue, and in fact have sued, the corporations PCA and Kellogg for their injuries. In addition to the liability of a corporation for torts it commits, an officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable therefor, but an officer of a corporation who takes no part in the commission of a tort committed by the corporation is not personally liable unless he specifically directed the particular act to be done or participated or co-operated therein. Id. at 384 (emphasis added. At all times relevant to this matter, Mr. Parnell was the President, CEO, and CFO of defendant PCA. As noted above, the FDA has identified twelve instances in 2007 and 2008 when private laboratories hired by defendant PCA tested products for defendant PCA and found Salmonella positives. Despite the positive test results, Mr. Parnell, as illustrated in numerous e- mails, demanded that PCA employees release the contaminated products to its customers, with knowledge that the contaminated products would be used in products intended for human consumption. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant them leave to file their Third Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A. AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 4

DATED: March 2, 2009. Attorneys for the plaintiffs FLYNN PEELER & PHILLIPS, LLC /s/patrick S. Flynn Patrick S. Flynn, GA State Bar #004765 Charles E. Peeler, GA State Bar #570399 Flynn Peeler & Phillips, LLC 517 W. Broad Avenue Post Office Box 7 (31702 Albany, Georgia 31701 Tel. (229 446-4886 Fax (229 446-4884 pflynn@fpplaw.com William D. Marler, WSBA #17233 bmarler@marlerclark.com MARLER CLARK, LLP PS 701 First Avenue, Suite 6600 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel. (206 346-1888 Fax (206 346-1898 Admitted pro hac vice AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION GABRIELLE and DARYL MEUNIER, Husband and wife, individually, and as Next Friends and Natural Guardians of CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MEUNIER, a minor, Plaintiffs, NO. 1:09-CV-12-WLS v. PEANUT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Georgia corporation; and KELLOGG COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 2, 2009, I electronically filed a true and correct copy of the foregoing AMEND THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT STEWART PARNELL through the Court s CM/ECF system which shall cause service to be electronically made upon the following: Mr. Alan M. Maxwell 950 East Paces Ferry Road Suite 3000 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Mr. Dean N. Panos Jenner & Block LLP 330 N. Wabash Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611-7603 AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 6

This 2 nd day of March, 2009. FLYNN PEELER & PHILLIPS, LLC /s/patrick S. Flynn Patrick S. Flynn, GA State Bar #004765 Flynn Peeler & Phillips, LLC 517 W. Broad Avenue Post Office Box 7 (31702 Albany, Georgia 31701 Tel. (229 446-4886 Fax (229 446-4884 pflynn@fpplaw.com AMEND COMPLAINT Page - 7