Case 1:14-cv JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 9513 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 2:14-cv Document 1166 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 38972

Case 2:11-cv WJM-MF Document 88-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 71 PageID: Exhibit A

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 3:12-cv DRH-SCW Document 942 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #40056

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 992 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65902

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 88 Filed: 07/06/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1135

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv BMC-GRB Document 317 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15114

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

[Proposedi Order Granting Motion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-md FAM Document Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2017 Page 192 of 347

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:08-cv BMC-PK Document Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-md SM Document 242 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL CASES)

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 2:14-md JWL-JPO Document 3532 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. MDL No.

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 1:16-cv JG Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2017 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 1:01-cv BLW Document 207 Filed 01/28/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

Case 7:12-cv VB Document 109 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 9513 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: CATERPILLAR, INC., C13 and C15 ENGINE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 14-3722 (JBS)(JS) MDL No. 2540 ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in this action entitled In re Caterpillar Inc., C13 an C15 Engine Products Liability Litigation, No., Master Docket No. 14-3722 (JBS)(JS) (the Litigation ) and Defendant Caterpillar Inc., have entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), filed April 11, 2016, after substantial motion practice, discovery and lengthy arms-length settlement discussions; AND, WHEREAS, the Court has received and considered the Agreement, including the accompanying exhibits, and the record in this Litigation; AND, WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs have made an unopposed application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Litigation, and for its dismissal with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement; AND, WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the Plaintiffs application and the supporting memorandum for such order, and has found good cause for same. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 2 of 11 PageID: 9514 The Class Is Preliminarily Certified 1. If not otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement. 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), the Court certifies for the sole purpose of consummating the settlement of the Litigation in accordance with the Agreement the following Class: all persons in the United States who are original purchasers or original lessees, subsequent purchasers or subsequent lessees, (including but not limited to those having purchased via a TRAC option or some rights to residual purchase of vehicles at lease end) of a vehicle powered by a Subject Engine. 1 Excluded from the Class are Defendant, all present or former affiliates and/or directors of Defendant, the Judge of this Court, the Judge's family and staff, and all persons who have already made a timely and valid exclusion to be excluded from the Class in accordance with the provisions of the Notice of Pendency, all persons who have already released claims against Defendant for the relief provided herein, and all persons who will make a timely and valid election to be excluded from the Class in accordance with the provisions of the Notice. Settlement Class does not include persons or entities that have previously executed settlement releases concerning the Subject Engines. Such persons or entities that have previously executed settlement releases are specifically excluded from the Class. 3. This certification of the Class is made for the sole purpose of consummating the settlement of the Litigation in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. If the Court s grant of final approval does not become final for any reason whatsoever, or if it is modified in any material respect, this class certification shall be deemed void ab initio, shall be of no force or 1 Subject Engine(s) or Engine(s) shall mean all EPA 2007 Compliant Caterpillar On Highway C13 and C15 engines (manufactured in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009) at issue in this Action, including the CRS components incorporated therewith. 2

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 3 of 11 PageID: 9515 effect whatsoever, and shall not be referred to or used for any purpose whatsoever, including in any later attempt by or on behalf of Class Representatives or anyone else to seek class certification in this or any other matter. 4. The Class meets all requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) for certification of the class claims alleged in the operative complaint, including: (a) numerosity; (b) commonality; (c) typicality; (d) adequacy of the Class Representatives and Class Counsel; (e) predominance of common questions of fact and law Class; and (f) superiority. 5. Class Counsel and the Class Representatives are found to be adequate representatives of the Class pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court appoints the following as representatives of the Class: Ronald Bagley, Bailey Coach Inc., Brian Brown, BK Trucking Co., Leroy Bolton Trucking Co., David Brewer, Bryant s Transport, Inc., C&F Movers, Inc., Columbia Petroleum Transportation, LLC, DeCamp Bus Lines, Eagle Valley South, Inc., Easton Coach Company, Eclipse Charters & Tours, LLC, First Priority Tours, Inc., d/b/a First Priority Trailways, G&G Specialized Carriers, LLC, Gentry Coach Company, d/b/a Gentry Trailways, Harmon Brothers Charter Services, Inc., John Lamanteer, K Double D, Inc., Kelton Tours Unlimited LLC, Edward Charles McLean, MNS Enterprises, Inc., NW Navigator Luxury Coaches LLC, Roadrunner Charters, Inc., Salud Services, Inc. d/b/a Endeavor Bus Lines, S&M Mercado, Inc., German Saravia, Scenic Boundaries Trans., Inc., Tri-City Charter of Bossier, Inc., U.S. Transport, Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc., Ricky A. Williams, and Windy City Limos). 6. The Court also designates Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC; Quantum Legal, LLC; Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & 3

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 4 of 11 PageID: 9516 Agnello, P.C., whom the Court finds is experienced and adequate counsel having considered the factors set forth in Rule 23(g)(1), as Lead Class Counsel. The Settlement Agreement Is Preliminarily Approved and Final Approval Schedule Set 7. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Agreement and the terms and conditions of settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Final Approval Hearing. 8. The Court has conducted a preliminary assessment of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Agreement, and hereby finds that the settlement falls within the range of reasonableness meriting possible final approval. The Court therefore preliminarily approves the proposed settlement as set forth in the Agreement. 9. Pursuant to of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) the Court will hold a final approval hearing on September 20, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in the Courtroom of the Honorable Jerome B. Simandle, Courtroom 4A, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 4 th and Cooper Streets, Camden, NJ 08101for the following purposes: a. determining whether the proposed settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in the Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved by the Court; b. considering the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses as provided for under the Settlement Agreement; c. considering the application for service awards to the Plaintiffs as provided for under the Agreement; d. considering whether the Court should enter the Final Order Approving Settlement; 4

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 5 of 11 PageID: 9517 e. considering whether the release by the Class Members of the Released Claims as set forth in the Agreement and the Final Order should be provided; and f. ruling upon such other matters as the Court may deem just and appropriate. 10. The Court may adjourn the Final Approval Hearing and later reconvene such hearing. 11. Any Class Member may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at his or her own expense, individually or through counsel. All Class Members who do not enter an appearance will be represented by Class Counsel. 12. The Parties may further modify the Agreement prior to the Final Approval Hearing so long as such modifications do not materially change the terms of the settlement provided therein. 13. The Court retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of connected with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the Agreement with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to Class Members. 14. Pursuant to Section 3.A.i. of the Agreement, the Court orders Defendant to fund the first payment into the Escrow Fund within twenty (20) calendar days of the entry of this Order. 15. Opening papers in support of final approval of the Settlement Agreement and any application for attorneys fees and expenses and/or Plaintiffs service awards must be filed with the Court and served at least 21 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. Reply papers, if any, must be filed and served at least 7 days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. 5

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 6 of 11 PageID: 9518 The Court Approves the Form and Method of Class Notice and Notice Plan 16. The Court approves, as to form and content, the proposed Long Form Notice and publication Notice (collectively the Class Notice ), which are Exhibits D and E, respectively, to the Agreement on file with this Court. 17. The Court finds that the distribution of Class Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order and the Agreement meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto. 18. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Administrator, on behalf of the Defendant, will notify the appropriate federal and state officials of this Settlement Agreement as required by the Class Action Fairness Act ( CAFA ), 28 U.S.C. 1715. 19. The Court approves the designation of Epiq Systems Class Action and Claims Solutions to serve as the Court-appointed Settlement Administrator for the settlement. The Settlement Administrator shall disseminate Class Notice and supervise and carry out the notice procedure, the processing of claims, and other administrative functions, and shall respond to Class Member inquiries, as set forth in the Agreement and this Order under the direction and supervision of the Court. 20. The Court directs the Settlement Administrator to establish a Settlement Website, making available copies of this Order, the Class Notice, Claim Forms that may be downloaded and submitted online or by mail, the Agreement and all exhibits thereto, and such other information as may be of assistance to Class Members or required under the Settlement Agreement. 6

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 7 of 11 PageID: 9519 21. The Settlement Administrator is ordered to institute the dissemination of the Class Notice as set forth in the Agreement, no later than 30 days after the Court enters this Preliminary Approval Order, including by direct mail, publication, internet publication and radio spots. 22. The costs of the Class Notice, processing of claims, creating and maintaining the Settlement Website, and all other Claims Administrator and Class Notice expenses shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Agreement. Procedure for Class Members to Participate In the Settlement 23. Class Members who wish to claim a settlement award must submit their Claim Form and supporting documentation no later than 180 days after the date first set by the Court for the Final Approval Hearing. Such deadline may be further extended without notice to the Class by Court order, by agreement between the Parties, or as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Procedure for Requesting Exclusion from the Class 24. Any Person falling within the definition of the Class may, upon his or her request, be excluded from the Class. Any such Person must submit a request for exclusion to the Settlement Administrator postmarked or delivered no later than 45 days before the date first set for the Final Approval Hearing (the Opt-Out Date ), as set forth in the Class Notice. 25. Any Class Member who does not send a signed request for exclusion postmarked or delivered on or before the Opt-Out Date will be deemed to be a Class Member for all purposes and will be bound by all further orders of the Court in this Litigation and by the terms of the settlement, if finally approved by the Court. The written request for exclusion must request exclusion from the Class, must be signed by the potential Class Member and include their email and mailing address, the Engine serial number, VIN of vehicle containing the Engine, and the 7

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 8 of 11 PageID: 9520 date of purchase and sale (if applicable), as well as a statement indicating that the Person desires to be excluded from the Class. All Persons who submit valid and timely requests for exclusion in the manner set forth in the Agreement shall have no rights under the Agreement and shall not be bound by the Agreement or the Final Judgment and Order. 26. A list reflecting all requests for exclusions shall be filed with the Court by Plaintiffs at or before the Final Approval Hearing. Procedure for Objecting to the Settlement 27. Any Class Member who desires to object to the proposed settlement, including the requested attorneys fees and expenses or service awards to the Plaintiffs must timely file with the Clerk of this Court a notice of the objection(s), together with all papers that the Class Member desires to submit to the Court no later than 30 days before the date first set for the Final Approval Hearing (the Objection Date ). The objection must also be served on Class Counsel and Defendant s counsel no later than the Objection Date. The Court will consider such objection(s) and papers only if such papers are received on or before the Objection Date provided in the Class Notice, by the Clerk of the Court and by Class Counsel and Defendant s counsel. In addition to the filing with this Court, such papers must be sent to each of the following persons: James C. Shah SHEPHED, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP 475 White Horse Pike Collingswood, NJ 08107 Theodore J. Leopold COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (561) 515-1400 Email: tleopold@cohenmilstein.com 8

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 9 of 11 PageID: 9521 Richard J. Burke QUANTUM LEGAL, LLC 513 Central Avenue, Suite 300 Highland Park, IL 60035 Telephone: (847) 433-4500 Email: rich@qulegal.com James E. Cecchi CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 5 Becker Farm Road Roseland, NJ 07068 Telephone: (973) 994-1700 Email: JCecchi@carellabyrne.com Counsel for Defendants James H. Keale SEDGWICK LLP One Newark Center 1085 Raymond Boulevard, 16th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 Telephone: (973) 242-0002 Email: james.keale@sedgwicklaw.com Robert G. Abrams BAKER HOSTETLER Washington Square 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20036-5304 Telephone: (202) 861-1500 Email: rabrams@bakerlaw.com The written objection must include: (a) a heading which refers to the Litigation; (b) the objector s name, address, telephone number and, if represented by counsel, of his/her counsel; (c) the approximate date(s) of his/her purchase, or lease (having purchased via a TRAC option or some rights to residual purchase of vehicles at lease end) of a vehicle powered by a Subject Engine and the serial number for the Subject Engine(s); (d) a statement whether the objector intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either in person or through counsel; (e) a statement of the objection and the grounds supporting the objection; (f) copies of any papers, 9

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 10 of 11 PageID: 9522 briefs, or other documents or evidence upon which the objection is based; (g) a statement of the number of class action settlements objected to by the Class member in the last three years and (h) the objector s signature. 28. Any Class Member who files and serves a written objection, as described in the preceding Section, may appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either in person or through counsel hired at the Class Member s expense, to object to any aspect of the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of this Agreement, including attorneys fees. Class Members or their attorneys who intend to make an appearance at the Final Hearing must serve a notice of intention to appear on the Class Counsel identified in the Class Notice and to Defendant s counsel. 29. Any Class Member who fails to comply with the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall waive and forfeit any and all rights he or she may have to appear separately and/or to object, and shall be bound by all the terms of the Agreement and by all proceedings, orders and judgments, including, but not limited to, the Release, in the Litigation. 30. Pending final determination of whether the settlement should be approved, neither the Class Representatives nor any Class Member, either directly, representatively, or in any other capacity, shall commence or prosecute against the Released Parties any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims. 31. All proceedings in this Litigation with respect to Defendant are hereby stayed and suspended, pending the Final Approval of the Class Settlement, except such proceedings as are provided for in the Agreement, or which may be necessary to implement the terms of the Agreement, the Class, or this Order. 10

Case 1:14-cv-03722-JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 11 of 11 PageID: 9523 32. Counsel for the Parties are hereby authorized to utilize all reasonable procedures in connection with the administration of the settlement which are not materially inconsistent with either this Order or the terms of the Settlement Agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 25, 2016 11