Frank Vera III. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Similar documents
Freedom of Information Act Request: White House Website Removal of Climate Change

Freedom of Information Act Request: African Wildlife Consultative Forum

Freedom of Information Act Request: Greater Sage-Grouse Order and Memorandum

Freedom of Information Act Request: EPA Press Release on AP s Article

Freedom of Information Act Request: Interior s Political Appointees and Aurelia Skipwith s Nomination

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 8-1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Freedom of Information Act Request: Cadiz Water Project and Institutional Memoranda UPDATE

Accordingly, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), we request copies of the following records 1 in EPA s possession:

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Re: Request under the Freedom of Information Act. Dear Mr. Marquis,

Freedom of Information Act Request: Aminocyclopyrachlor and Oregon

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

February 9, 2017 By

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9

President Obama s FOIA Memorandum and Attorney General Holder s FOIA Guidelines. Creating a "New Era of Open Government"

S O U T H E R N ENVIRONM E N TA L LAW CENTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE FDA

WILLIAM J. OLSON, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Case 1:15-cv ARR-RLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNCLASSIFIED INSTRUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

City of Tacoma. Procedures for Public Disclosure Requests

Case 3:19-cv SK Document 1 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. No. 164 August 24, Part V

Case 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Citizen Advocacy Center Guide to Illinois Freedom of Information Act

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Federal and New York State Laws

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT APPEAL: EPA-HQ (Sue and Settle)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

April 12, Dear FOIA Officer:

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 11-7 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY Telephone:

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MISSISSIPPI MODEL PUBLIC RECORDS RULES with comment

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Freedom of Information Act Policy

Comments of EPIC 1 Department of Interior

Case 2:74-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 04/03/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

July 29, Via Certified Mail. Attn: Freedom of Information Law Request

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. EDWARD TUFFLY, AKA Bud Tuffly, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

~ 14 ~ 15 VOICE OF SAN DIEGO, Case No.

PUBLIC RECORDS ACT POLICY. Policy Number: REC Policy Effective Date: September 6, 2017

Case 1:10-cr RDB Document 113 Filed 05/10/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ILLINOIS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS...

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Amendments to the Commission s Freedom of Information Act Regulations

City of Midland. Freedom of Information Act. (P.A. 442 of 1976, as amended) Administrative Policy

Freedom of Information Act Procedures, Guidelines and Written Public Summary

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

No CONSOLIDATED WITH Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT H. RAY LAHR, Plaintiff-Appellee,

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

VILLAGE OF OVID VILLAGE. Michigan Freedom of Information Act Procedures and Guidelines

Knowledge, Skills & Abilities. FOIA Redaction Workshop Denver, Colorado. Instructors. Scott Hodes, Esq.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law

Case 2:18-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

New Paradigm Glazer-Loving Academy Freedom of Information Act Procedures, Guidelines and Written Public Summary

Also filed through FOIA Online Portal,

VILLAGE OF CASNOVIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES (THE PROCEDURES ) I. INTRODUCTION

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

DCAA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCESSING GUIDE

POLICY PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS OF THE ALBANY COUNTY LAND BANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHARLEVOIX-EMMET INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT ISD. Michigan Freedom of Information Act Procedures and Guidelines

ACCESS TO PORT PUBLIC RECORDS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITY OF GRAND LEDGE. Freedom of Information Act Procedures and Guidelines

Freedom of Information Act Request: Mobile Biometric Devices and Applications

Rights & Responsibilities: The Rights of Requesters and the Responsibilities of Richmond County under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act

Case 1:16-cv KBJ Document 15 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Transcription:

Frank Vera III www.georgeafb.info 30 May 2011 BY FAX TRANSMISSION TO 334-953-4096 Mrs. Lynn Gamma HQ AFHRA/RSA 600 Chennault Circle Maxwell AFB AL 36112 Phone: 334-953-2395 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST Dear Mrs. Gamma: I request a copy of the following documents IRISNUM# 01097429 (Please see pages 5 of 6 and 6 of 6). I request both a waiver of all fees and expedited processing on the basis that I am attempting to trace my potential toxic/radiological exposure(s) while stationed at the former George Air Force Base. The exposure(s) may be related to my medical conditions. I also request "surgical" bracketing to allow maximum release of unclassified information to help establish this possible connection. RECORD FORMAT I request that any documents or records produced in response to this request be provided in electronic (soft-copy) form wherever possible. Acceptable formats are.pdf,.doc,.jpg,.gif,.tif. Please provide soft-copy records by email or on a CD if email is not feasible. However, I do not agree to pay an additional fee to receive records on a CD, and in the instance that such a fee is required, I will accept a paper copy of responsive records. Page 1 of 6

CONTEXT OF THIS REQUEST FOIA S LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOIA requires an agency to disclose requested information unless the information falls within one of the nine narrowly construed exemptions from FOIA listed in 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Additionally, the FOIA imposes a twenty working-day deadline in which to issue a final determination of an information request. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i) (establishing deadline of twenty working days from receipt). Further, the FOIA mandates that an agency establish a system to assign an individualized tracking number for each request received that will take longer than ten days to process and provide to each person making a request the tracking number assigned to the request. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(7)(A). Similarly, the Agency must establish a telephone line or Internet service that provides information about the status of a request to the person making the request using the assigned tracking number, including (i) the date on which the agency originally received the request; and (ii) an estimated date on which the agency will complete action on the request. Id. at 552(a)(7)(B). The purpose of FOIA is to establish a general philosophy of full agency disclosure unless information is exempted under clearly delineated statutory language. S.Rep. No. 813, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 3 (1965). The Supreme Court has interpreted the disclosure provisions of FOIA broadly, noting that the act was animated by a philosophy of full agency disclosure. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146, 152 (1989). Accordingly, FOIA requires that federal agencies disclose records to any person upon request, unless the information falls within one of the nine exemptions from FOIA listed in 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Dep t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 352, 361 (1976) ( disclosure, not secrecy, is the dominant objective of the Act ); Dobronski FCC, 17 F.3d 275, 277 (9th Cir.1994). In contrast to FOIA s disclosure provisions, in furtherance of the Act s policy of governmental transparency, its disclosure exemptions are to be very narrowly construed by the agencies and reviewing courts. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. at 152; Multnomah County Medical Soc'y v. Scott, 825 F.2d 1410, 1413 (9th Cir. 1987); Church of Scientology of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't. of the Army, 611 F.2d 738, 741-42 (9th Cir.1979) ( The Freedom of Information Act... mandates a policy of broad disclosure of government documents when production is properly requested. ). The government bears the burden of showing that the withheld information is exempt from disclosure. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) ( the burden is on the agency to sustain its action ); see also Multnomah County Medical Soc'y v. Scott, 825 F.2d at 1413. As the Supreme Court has declared: FOIA is often explained as a means for citizens to know what their Government is up to. NARA v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 171 (2004) (quoting U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989). The Court elaborated that Page 2 of 6

[t]his phrase should not be dismissed as a convenient formalism. Id. at 171-72. Rather, [i]t defines a structural necessity in a real democracy. Id. at 172. EXEMPT RECORDS If you assert that any of the requested records are exempt from mandatory disclosure under FOIA, I request that you disclose them nevertheless, as such disclosure would serve the public interest of educating citizens regarding the operations and activities of the Agency regarding this matter. Should you decide to invoke a FOIA exemption, please include in your full or partial denial letter sufficient information for us to evaluate an appeal of the denial. To comport with legal requirements this information must include: 1. Basic factual material about each withheld item, including the originator, date, length, general subject matter, and location of each item; and 2. Explanations and justifications for denial, including the identification of the category within the governing statutory provision under which the document (or portion thereof) was withheld and a full explanation of how each exemption fits the withheld material. In addition, I ask that you certify that any records that are withheld were not shared with any person beyond the Agency, which would waive or destroy any claim of privilege that could be claimed to exempt such disclosed documents from production under FOIA. See, e.g., Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, 532 U.S. 1, 12 (2001). Finally, if you determine that any portion of the records requested are exempt from disclosure, please segregate the exempt portions and mail the remaining records to me within the statutory time limits after the exempted material has been redacted from the other records I am seeking. FEE WAIVER REQUEST Based on the nature and scope of this request, it is unlikely that the production of responsive data will exceed the Agency s de minimis threshold for the assessment of fees (2 hours of search time/100 pages of records, see 40 C.F.R. 2.107(d)(3). However, to the extent that any fees are properly incurred, I request that you waive all copy, clerical and other fees associated with providing information responsive to this request. The FOIA requires agencies to furnish documents to information requesters free of charge, or at a reduced rate, if disclosure of the information is in the public interest. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). Such disclosure is in the public interest if it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the Page 3 of 6

requester. Id. While a FOIA requester bears the initial burden of making a prima facie showing of entitlement to a fee waiver, McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v. Carlucci, 835 F.2d 1282, 1284-85 (9th Cir.1987), once that threshold has been satisfied, the burden shifts back to the agency to substantiate denial of a waiver request. The prima facie test is not intended to be a difficult one to satisfy, as the Ninth Circuit has held a requester meets this burden in situations in which They identified why they wanted the [requested information], what they intended to do with it, to whom they planned on distributing it... Friends of the Coast Fork v. BLM, 110 F.3d 53, 55 (9th Cir.1997). As you consider my fee waiver request, please recall that in enacting FOIA, Congress was principally interested in opening administrative processes to the scrutiny of the press and public. Renegotiation Bd. v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 17 (1974). To further this policy, FOIA requires that documents must be provided without charge or at a reduced charge if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). CONCLUSION For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Agency promptly provide me with access to the requested information and waiver of any fees associated with your response. Please let me know if I can help you in your efforts to publicly disclose the important information contained in the requested document. Should you have any questions whatsoever, please do not hesitate to contact me. You may contact me at the address listed above, my phone number is address is:, my email Sincerely, Frank Vera III http://www.georgeafb.info/ Page 4 of 6

IRISNUM= 01097429 CLASS= SECRET BEG_DATE= 01-01-1989 END_DATE= 06-30-1989 MAIN= DIVISION/0831/AIR RECTYPE= HISTORY CALL= K-DIV-831-HI V.1 TITLE_XT= VOL 1 OF 4 REEL= 43072 FRAME= 909 FRAMELST= 1239 INDEXID= 48 REL_DATE= 08-08-1990 ABSTRACT= CONTAINS JOINT HISTORY OF 831 AIR DIVISION (AD) AND 35 TACTICAL TRAINING WING (TTW) BASED AT GEORGE AIR FORCE BASE (AFB) CA. HISTORY OF 831 AD SINCE ACTIVATION ON 26 SEP 57. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FRANK CARLUCCI ANNOUNCED GEORGE AFB WAS ON LIST OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS PROPOSED FOR CLOSURE AS BUDGET REDUCTION MEASURE. GEORGE AFB ENVIRONMENT ISSUES INCLUDE TRICHLORETHYLENE, WASTEWATER RECLAMATION, ASBESTOS ABATEMENT, AND WATER RIGHTS. REPORTS ON 831 AD DEPLOYMENT/REDEPLOYMENT PLANS; COMBAT READINESS RATINGS (C RATINGS); TACTICAL AIR COMMAND CONDUCTED OPERATIONAL READINESS INSPECTION OF 831 AD (CORONET WHITE 89-13). 831 AD PARTICIPATED IN EXERCISES CROWN FALCON 89-1, 89-2, AND 89-3. CHAPTER 2 SUMMARIZES ACTIVITIES OF 832 COMBAT SUPPORT GROUP. MEMBERS OF 831 SECURITY POLICE SQUADRON DEPLOYED TO HOWARD AFB, PANAMA TO AUGMENT SECURITY FORCES. OVERVIEW OF 35 TTW HISTORY CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 3; 35 TTW PREVIOUSLY 35 FIGHTER WING. MISSION OF 35 TTW TO TRAIN UNITED STATES AND GERMAN AIRCREWS IN F-4E AIRCRAFT. DISCUSSES MAINTENANCE, PERSONNEL, AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT. CHAPTER 4 DETAILS 35 TTW INVOLVEMENT IN OPERATIONS MAPLE FLAG XXII, RED FLAG 89-3, FALLING VANTAGE 89-2, AND LONG RIFLE V. 35 TTW CONSISTING OF 20 TACTICAL FIGHTER TRAINING SQUADRON (TFTS), 21 TFTS, 35 TACTICAL TRAINING SQUADRON (TTS), AND 4443 TTS PROVIDED F-4 AIRCRAFT TRAINING TO AMERICAN AND GERMAN AIRCREWS. CHAPTER 5 COVERS ACTIVITIES OF 35 TTW MAINTENANCE INCLUDING Page 5 of 6

MAINTENANCE CAPABILITY, QUALITY ASSURANCE, MAINTENANCE TRAINING, AND DEDICATED CREW CHIEFS. ADMIN= ORCON/OTHER PRIVILEGED DNOTES= APPENDICES INCLUDE ROSTER OF KEY PERSONNEL; 831 AIR DIVISION AND 35 TACTICAL TRAINING WING (TTW) ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS; AIRCRAFT INVENTORY; DROPPED OBJECTS TABLE; AIR WARRIOR EXERCISES. PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN DURING CROWN FALCON 89-1 AND 89-2; APPLE ORCHARD PERSONNEL; MOBILITY TRAINING KITCHEN; 831 SECURITY POLICE SQUADRON AFTER PANAMA DEPLOYMENT; F-4E AIRCRAFT; WEAPONS SPECIALIST LOADING AIM-7. Page 6 of 6